Considerations to Support Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Measures in Ambulatory Clinics.

OBJECTIVE: To identify challenges to the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric measures in the ambulatory pediatric setting and possible solutions to these challenges. STUDY DESIGN: Eighteen semistructured telephone interviews of health system leaders, measurement implementers, and ambulatory pediatric clinicians were conducted. Five coders used applied thematic analysis to iteratively identify and refine themes in interview data. RESULTS: Most interviewees had roles in leadership or the implementation of patient-centered outcomes; 39% were clinicians. Some had experience using PROMIS clinically (44%) and 6% were considering this use. Analyses yielded 6 themes: (1) selection of PROMIS measures, (2) method of administration, (3) use of PROMIS Parent Proxy measures, (4) privacy and confidentiality of PROMIS responses, (5) interpretation of PROMIS scores, and (6) using PROMIS scores clinically. Within the themes, interviewees illuminated specific unique considerations for using PROMIS with children, including care transitions and privacy. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world challenges continue to hamper PROMIS use. Ongoing efforts to disseminate information about the integration of PROMIS measures in clinical care is critical to impacting the health of children.

Systemwide Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Clinical Care at a Children's Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Despite a growing literature on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), little has been written to guide development of a standardized, systemwide PRO program across multiple clinics and conditions. A PRO implementation program, which was created at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, a large children's hospital, can serve as a standardized approach for the use of PROs in a clinical setting. METHODS: Recommended standardized PRO implementation components include identification of a committed clinical leader and team, selection of an instrument that addresses the identified outcome of interest, specifying threshold scores that indicate when an intervention is needed, identification of clinical interventions to be triggered by threshold scores, provision of training for providers and staff involved in the PRO implementation process, and the measurement and monitoring of PRO use. RESULTS: For each instrument, the completion goal is 80%, defined as the number of PRO measures that were actually completed divided by the number that should have been completed. The overall combined completion rate is 75% for the 68 unique instruments currently in use. Case studies of specific clinical team experiences demonstrate the value of using PROs and the implementation components and shows how PROs are used to promote patient-centered care. CONCLUSION: Data on PRO implementation are collected on an ongoing basis to confirm the value of the program, define ongoing improvement, and fuel collaborative research to further refine essential implementation components and successful spread. Next steps include measuring the influence of PRO use on coproduction of patient-centered clinical care and the impact PRO measurement has on patient outcomes.

Putting evidence-based clinical practice guidelines into practice: an academic pediatric center's experience.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines can provide a much-needed interface between research and practice, pointing the way to higher quality, evidence-based, and more cost-effective care. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center developed a formal process for the production of 29 evidence-based guidelines and companion tools. COMPONENTS OF DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION: Clinical practice guidelines and their companion documents are developed by interprofessional teams that are led by community physicians and that include hospital-based physicians, nurses, other allied health professionals, and patients or parents. An education coordinator develops an education plan that outlines specific clinical practice changes and expected outcomes to be monitored. Guideline evidence is embedded into companion documents and processes available at the point of care. Electronic order sets for treatments and medications have been developed using available guidelines as sources of evidence. All guideline-based order sets include an automatic order for use of the associated clinical pathway. It is important to create and maintain an evidence-based environment in an academic medical center. CONCLUSIONS: Keys to success include a rigorous methodology, tools that place the evidence in the hands of providers at the site of care, feedback on outcomes, and an environment that encourages evidence-based care.

Rapid adoption of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG for acute gastroenteritis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A 2007 meta-analysis showed probiotics, specifically Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), shorten diarrhea from acute gastroenteritis (AGE) by 24 hours and decrease risk of progression beyond 7 days. In 2005, our institution published a guideline recommending consideration of probiotics for patients with AGE, but only 1% of inpatients with AGE were prescribed LGG. The objective of this study was to increase inpatient prescribing of LGG at admission to >90%, for children hospitalized with AGE, within 120 days. METHODS: This quality improvement study included patients aged 2 months to 18 years admitted to general pediatrics with AGE with diarrhea. Diarrhea was defined as looser or ≥ 3 stools in the preceding 24 hours. Patients with complex medical conditions or with presumed bacterial gastroenteritis were excluded. Admitting and supervising clinicians were educated on the evidence. We ensured LGG was adequately stocked in our pharmacies and updated an AGE-specific computerized order set to include a default LGG order. Failure identification and mitigation were conducted via daily electronic chart review and e-mail communication. Primary outcome was the percentage of included patients prescribed LGG within 18 hours of admission. Intervention impact was assessed with run charts tracking our primary outcome over time. RESULTS: The prescribing rate increased to 100% within 6 weeks and has been sustained for 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Keys to success were pharmacy collaboration, use of an electronic medical record for a standardized order set, and rapid identification and mitigation of failures. Rapid implementation of evidence-based practices is possible using improvement science methods.

Decreasing overuse of therapies in the treatment of bronchiolitis by incorporating evidence at the point of care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of evidence-based point-of-care algorithms and rules, based on guideline recommendations, on the overuse of therapies for bronchiolitis. Study design Pre-postintervention for infants <1 year of age admitted with a first-time episode of bronchiolitis. Data collected for guideline-eligible patients discharged between January 15, 2002, and March 27, 2002, were compared with data collected for guideline-eligible patients discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis during the same time period in the first 5 years after the original guideline implementation (1997 to 2001). The primary outcome of interest was use of bronchodilator therapy. Secondary outcomes included use of guideline order sets, resource utilization, length of stay, and readmission. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients from 2002 were compared with 1272 historic patients. In 2002, the odds of receiving any bronchodilator, more than 1, more than 2, and more than 4 bronchodilators were all significantly less than predicted by the 1997 to 2001 year-to-year trend. The odds of receiving a nasopharyngeal wash for respiratory syncytial virus and a chest radiography (OR=0.680, CL=0.476, 0.973) were also significantly lower than what was predicted from use trends of previous years. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based point-of-care instruments can have a significant effect on unwarranted treatment variation.