Imaging-based screening: maximizing benefits and minimizing harms.

Advanced imaging technologies play a central role in screening asymptomatic patients. However, the balance between imaging-based screening's potential benefits versus risks is sometimes unclear. Radiologists will have to address ongoing concerns, including high false-positive rates, incidental findings outside the organ of interest, overdiagnosis, and potential risks from radiation exposure. In this article, we provide a brief overview of these recurring controversies and suggest the following as areas that radiologists should focus on in order to tip the balance toward more benefits and less harms for patients undergoing imaging-based screening: interpretive variability, abnormal finding thresholds, and personalized, risk-based screening.

Availability of Advanced Breast Imaging at Screening Facilities Serving Vulnerable Populations.

OBJECTIVE: Among vulnerable women, unequal access to advanced breast imaging modalities beyond screening mammography may lead to delays in cancer diagnosis and unfavourable outcomes. We aimed to compare on-site availability of advanced breast imaging services (ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and image-guided biopsy) between imaging facilities serving vulnerable patient populations and those serving non-vulnerable populations. SETTING: 73 imaging facilities across five Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium regional registries in the United States during 2011 and 2012. METHODS: We examined facility and patient characteristics across a large, national sample of imaging facilities and patients served. We characterized facilities as serving vulnerable populations based on the proportion of mammograms performed on women with lower educational attainment, lower median income, racial/ethnic minority status, and rural residence.We performed multivariable logistic regression to determine relative risks of on-site availability of advanced imaging at facilities serving vulnerable women versus facilities serving non-vulnerable women. RESULTS: Facilities serving vulnerable populations were as likely (Relative risk [RR] for MRI = 0.71, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.42, 1.19; RR for MRI-guided biopsy = 1.07 [0.61, 1.90]; RR for stereotactic biopsy = 1.18 [0.75, 1.85]) or more likely (RR for ultrasound = 1.38 [95% CI 1.09, 1.74]; RR for ultrasound-guided biopsy = 1.67 [1.30, 2.14]) to offer advanced breast imaging services as those serving non-vulnerable populations. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced breast imaging services are physically available on-site for vulnerable women in the United States, but it is unknown whether factors such as insurance coverage or out-of-pocket costs might limit their use.

Craniocervical hyperpneumatization with concurrent pneumorrhachis, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema in a weightlifter.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Acquired hyperpneumatization of the skull base and upper cervical vertebrae is extremely rare and is thought to occur in patients who habitually perform the Valsalva maneuver or engage in repetitive positive pressure activities such as scuba diving or free diving. Craniocervical hyperpneumatization has been reported to cause intracranial and extracranial pneumatoceles but is not generally considered as a cause of pneumorrhachis (air in the spinal canal). Pneumorrhachis is relatively rare, and usually occurs in a localized form, either in the cervical spine secondary to skull base fractures or in the thoracic spine secondary to pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax. Here, we report a case of extensive pneumorrhachis extending from the skull base to the thoracolumbar junction in association with marked axio-atlanto-occipital hyperpneumatization and pneumomediastinum. This unique constellation of findings likely resulted from complications of the Valsalva maneuver during strenuous exercise. PURPOSE: To present a unique case of axio-atlanto-occipital hyperpneumatization with concurrent marked cervicothoracic pneumorrhachis, subcutaneous emphysema, and pneumomediastinum and to provide a review of the relevant literature, pathophysiology, and treatment strategies related to hyperpneumatization and pneumorrhachis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A unique case report from an urban medical center. PATIENT SAMPLE: A single case. OUTCOME MEASURES: Imaging findings and clinical history. METHODS: Imaging data from a picture archiving and communication system and clinical data from an electronic medical record system were analyzed. RESULTS: A 58-year-old previously healthy man presented with 3 to 4 weeks of neck pain, shoulder pain, and intermittent hand and finger numbness that developed after weightlifting. On physical examination, he had mild hyperreflexia and decreased pinprick sensation within the T5-T8 dermatomes. Initial radiographic and computed tomography (CT) studies demonstrated extensive craniocervical hyperpneumatization involving the occipital bone, clivus, and C1 and C2 vertebral bodies. There was also pneumorrhachis extending throughout the entire cervical and thoracic spine, which caused moderate dural compression. Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema were present. Maxillofacial CT showed dehiscent bone involving the dens, atlas, and occipital bone, with adjacent soft-tissue gas and pneumorrhachis. He was managed conservatively and advised to stop performing the Valsalva maneuver during weightlifting. His symptoms resolved, and follow-up imaging showed complete resolution of pneumorrhachis and partial reversal of hyperpneumatization. CONCLUSIONS: Craniocervical hyperpneumatization is a rare complication of the Valsalva maneuver. Most reported cases have involved only the skull base, or the skull base and C1, and many have been further complicated by microfractures leading to pneumocephalus or extracranial pneumatoceles. We present a unique case of extensive craniocervical hyperpneumatization that extended to the level of C2 and was complicated by microfractures causing severe pneumorrhachis. Concurrent pneumomediastinum in this case may have been an independent complication of the Valsalva maneuver, which could have contributed to pneumorrhachis. Alternatively, pneumomediastinum may have been caused by migration of gas through the neural foramen from the epidural space, driven by positive pressure generated by the one-way valve effect of the Eustachian tube during periods of exertion.