Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of carcinoid tumours. Part 1: the gastrointestinal tract. A statement from a Canadian National Carcinoid Expert Group.

Carcinoid tumours are relatively rare and, in general, slow growing. They can be "non-functioning" tumours, presenting as a tumour mass, or "functioning" tumours secondary to the production of several biopeptides leading to the carcinoid syndrome. Though these tumours represent 0.25% of an oncology practice, a proper understanding of the clinical course of the disease and of the importance of appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic measures is very important. Proper patient management can lead to cure, particularly if the tumour can be fully resected, or to long-term palliation with medical treatment or cytoreductive surgery, or both, with significant prolongation of survival. A good understanding of the use of somatostatin analogues to achieve effective symptomatic control and of the importance of adequate follow-up and cardiac monitoring to prevent or effectively treat cardiac complications can contribute significantly to optimal control of this complex disease, ultimately improving the quality of life of affected patients. This article, developed by a group of Canadian experts, provides a framework that will assist clinicians in taking an optimal approach to managing their patients with carcinoid tumour.

Optimal timing for collections of blood progenitor cells following induction chemotherapy and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for autologous transplantation in advanced breast cancer.

Circulating progenitor cells collected during periods of rapid hematopoietic reconstitution can be used successfully as hematopoietic support for super-dose chemotherapy. A major problem for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells has been determination of optimal time to start leukapheresis and of the adequate amount of progenitor cells. This study has demonstrated that an induction chemotherapy with augmented dosage of CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil) in conjunction with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CM-CSF) successfully mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells in 15 patients with metastatic breast cancer. By monitoring the granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM), erythrocyte burst-forming units (BFU-E), and CD34+ cells in peripheral blood daily after leukocyte nadir, we have identified an optimal 'window' in which concentrations of blood progenitor cells reached a maximum range. Although the time interval between chemotherapy and the time for maximum stimulation could vary from between 13 days to 19 days, maximum mobilization started consistently 2 days after the white blood cells (WBC) recovered to > 2.0 x 10(9)/l after nadir, and remained elevated for 4 to 5 days. A significant reduction of progenitor cells in peripheral blood and in the corresponding leukapheresis products was observed, however, from cycle 1 versus subsequent cycles (p < 0.0001), but there was no significant difference between cycles 2 and 3. When used as the sole source of hematopoietic support for super-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and carboplatin, these progenitor cells induce rapid and sustained reconstitution in all patients. The median time from reinfusion to recovery of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) to > 0.5 x 10(9)/l was 13 days (range 9-18 days) and to an unmaintained platelet count of > 50 x 10(9)/l, 12 days (range 10-35 days). Autologous transplantation with stimulated blood progenitor cells can be an efficient alternative to bone marrow transplantation. With optimal timing for collections, as few as two leukapheresis procedures are required to obtain an adequate progenitor cell dose.

A phase I trial of high-dose paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone with autologous blood stem cell support for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

The aim of this phase I study was to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and efficacy of a new combination of cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), mitoxantrone (70 mg/m2), with dose escalation of paclitaxel (TaxolR) at a starting dose of 250 mg/m2 given intravenously over 3 h in a transplantation setting. Patients with metastatic breast cancer and chemosensitive disease were eligible. The autologous blood stem cell re-infusion and subsequent recovery occurred in an out-patient setting. 50 patients were enrolled, but 10 withdrew. 40 completed the entire protocol. At 400 mg/m2 paclitaxel administered over 3 h, 3 of 6 patients experienced serious adverse events: approximately 20-40 min after completion of infusion, diaphoresis, bradycardia mild hypotension and diarrhoea occurred; 2 patients lost consciousness for a few minutes. An extended infusion schedule delivering 400 mg/m2 paclitaxel over 6 h rather than 3 h was initiated at this level without patients experiencing this DLT. At the next dose of 450 mg/m2 paclitaxel over 6 h, the same DLT was seen as at 400 mg/m2 paclitaxel over 3 h and, therefore, MTD was reached. Time to recovery for the absolute neutrophil count > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/l was 10-19 days (median 12 days); and for platelets > or = 20 x 10(9)/l was 18-20 days (median 11.5 days). 21 patients developed neutropenic fever that required intravenous antibiotics and re-admission; the transfusion frequency for packed red blood cell was 0-5 units (median 2 units) and for platelets, 1-5 encounters (median 2). 13 complete responses, 1 patient with no evidence of disease and 19 partial remissions were documented. The dose of 400 mg/m2 at an infusion rate of 6 h will be used for the ongoing phase II study to evaluate efficacy and toxicity further.

Teniposide (VM-26) and carboplatin as initial therapy for small cell lung cancer.

Forty-four patients with previously untreated histologically proven small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with a combination of teniposide 60 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1 through 5 and carboplatin 400 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 28 days for six courses. Patients with limited disease (LD) subsequently received prophylactic cranial and thoracic radiotherapy. Of the 44 patients, 40 were evaluable for response: 31 (78%) achieved an objective response; 9 of 18 patients (50%) with LD had a complete response (CR), with a partial response (PR) plus CR rate of 78%. Two of 22 patients (9%) with extensive disease achieved a CR, with a combined PR and CR rate of 77%. Median duration of response for all evaluable patients was 253 days (36 weeks). Median duration of survival for LD patients was 368 days (52 weeks). Survival of LD patients was 86% at 6 months, 52% at 12 months, and 26% at 18 months. Median duration of survival for all patients in the study was 275 days, with a survival of 79% at 6 months, 36% at 1 year, and 12% at 18 months. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4 infection occurring in 38% of patients. However, no patient died of sepsis or hemorrhage. Treatment was otherwise well tolerated, with no neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity documented. The high activity of this drug combination justifies its use as first-line treatment of previously untreated SCLC.

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous blood cell transplantation: a safe and effective outpatient approach.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous blood cell (ABC) transplantation has been used widely for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It has been shown by our group and others to be an effective means of achieving very high response rates including complete remission. Therefore, further reduction in toxicity and increased patient satisfaction is necessary. Fifty-three patients with MBC were enrolled in a feasibility study at our cancer centre with a three-step approach to outpatient observation after HDCT and ABC transplantation discharging our patients from hospital 6 days after reinfusion of ABC, 1 day after reinfusion of ABC and 1 day prior to reinfusion of ABC. The supportive care consisted of the use of 5-HT3 antagonists for nausea and vomiting, DMSO depletion, through body hygiene, prophylactic antibiotic, antifungal and virustatic drugs. In the event of febrile neutropenia, a standard evaluation and treatment was used. Only 22 patients were admitted for febrile neutropenia and two for haemorrhage. The median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-7). The time to engraftment, need for transfusion and other toxicities were not different in patients who stayed entirely as outpatients. No toxic deaths occurred. In conclusion, HDCT followed by ABC transplantation can be safely administered to patients in the clinic with outpatient post-transplant observation.

Bi-weekly vincristine, epirubicin and methylprednisolone in alkylator-refractory multiple myeloma.

Nine patients with poor-prognosis, alkylator-refractory stage III multiple myeloma (MM) were treated with a 23-h continuous infusion (CI) of a compatible mixture of vincristine (VCR) and epirubicin (EPI) daily for 4 days along with a daily 1-h infusion of high-dose methyl prednisolone (MP) to total of 5 days (VEMP); cycles were repeated every 2 weeks when possible, usually on an outpatient basis. WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and infection were the predominant toxicities encountered, necessitating some treatment delays and dose reductions. Two patients died during treatment. Peripheral neuropathy necessitated discontinuation of the VCR in six patients without obvious loss of efficacy of the regimen. Skeletal muscle dysfunction and cardiomyopathy did not occur; trivial ECG abnormalities occurred during a minority of infusions but were of indeterminate relationship to the chemotherapy. Confusion occurred in two patients; alopecia was frequent but reversible, and mild/moderate dyspepsia and stomatitis were common but easily managed. Eight patients achieved a partial response (PR); another patient experienced early death during his second cycle before response assessment. The median survival from the first VEMP administration was 9 months (range, 1-64 + months), the median response duration was 7 months (range, 1-64 + months). Two patients experienced responses too short to be clinically relevant (< or = 2 months). An analysis of weekly paraprotein estimations suggests that the intended bi-weekly cycle length may be optimal. Six of these nine patients derived major benefit from this bi-weekly regimen, which deserves further exploration.

Combination chemotherapy with teniposide (VM26) and carboplatin in small cell lung cancer.

Seventy patients with previously untreated histologically proven small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with a combination of teniposide 60 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 through 5 and carboplatin 400 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 every 28 days for six courses. Patients with limited stage disease, (LD) who achieved a response, subsequently received 2,000 cGy prophylactic cranial and 3,000 cGy involved field thoracic radiotherapy. Of the 70 patients, 62 were evaluable for response: 47 patients (76%) achieved an objective response; 14 of 29 patients (48%) with LD had a complete response (CR), with a partial response (PR) plus CR rate of 76%. Seven of 33 patients (21%) with extensive disease (ED) achieved a CR, with a combined PR and CR rate of 76%. Median time to progression (TTP) for all responders was 292 days (42 weeks). Median duration of survival for all LD patients was 415 days (59 weeks). Survival for LD patients was 88% at 6 months, 61% at 12 months, and 29% at 18 months. Median survival duration for all patients in the study was 311 days (44 weeks), with a survival of 79% at 6 months, 44% at 1 year, and 16% at 18 months. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4 infection occurring in 33% of patients. Two patients died of pneumonia, one complicated by renal failure, and another suffered cardiac arrest related to treatment. The high activity of this drug combination justifies its use as a first-line treatment of previously untreated SCLC.

Phase I-II study of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and long-term oral etoposide (FLAME) in unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer.

The objective of this phase I-II study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and oral etoposide (FLAME) in patients with measurable unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer. Starting doses on the phase I study were as follows: methotrexate 50 mg/m2 intravenous bolus day 1; leucovorin 20 mg/m2 intravenous bolus days 2 through 4, starting 24 hours after the methotrexate dose; 5-fluorouracil 325 mg/m2 intravenous bolus 15 minutes after leucovorin days 2 through 4; doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 intravenous bolus day 8; and oral etoposide 50 mg/day for 14 days, starting on day 8. A new cycle started on day 28. A total of 42 patients were treated--10 patients in the phase I study and 32 patients in the phase II study. Dose-limiting toxicity was encountered in the phase I study on the second escalation step, when doxorubicin was escalated to 30 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil was escalated to 350 mg/m2. In the phase II study 28 patients (109 courses) were evaluable for toxicity. Neutropenia grade 3 or more was dose limiting and was documented in 12 patients (43%) during 22 treatment courses (20%). Neutropenia was associated with febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization in four patients during five courses of therapy. Grade 3 stomatitis and grade 3 diarrhea was infrequent, documented in two patients (two courses) and three patients (four courses), respectively. All other toxicity was grade 1 and grade 2. The combined objective response rate in 38 evaluable patients entered in both studies was 23.3% (six partial responses and one complete response). Stable disease was documented in 15 patients (39.5%). The median survival for the 42 patients entered in both trials was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9-8.5 months). The objective response rate and median survival for the combined group is comparable with that reported for the etoposide, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (ELF), and 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate (FMTX) regimens in a recently reported, multicenter, phase III study.

The mode of action of taxol: apoptosis at low concentration and necrosis at high concentration.

The cytotoxicity of Taxol represents both inhibition of cell proliferation and cell death. The drug blocked cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. It has also been reported that Taxol induced cell apoptosis; however, the mode of action of Taxol is far from clear. In this communication, the cytotoxicity of Taxol in various breast cancer cell lines was carefully examined. We showed that Taxol treatment induced a biphasic decrease of viable cells. While the first phase of decrease occurred over concentrations ranging from 0.005 to 0.05 microM and the second phase of decrease occurred at concentrations ranging from 5 to 50 microM, there was a plateau between these ranges. We determined that the biphasic response was due to two different mechanisms. In the lower concentration range (0.005-0.05 microM), Taxol stabilized the spindle during mitosis, thereby blocking mitosis. This mitotic block led to the inhibition of cell proliferation and the induction of apoptosis. In the higher concentration range (5-50 microM), Taxol mainly increased the polymerization of microtubule and stimulated the formation of microtubule bundles, which blocked entry into S phase. This inhibition of S phase entry led to the inhibition of cell proliferation and the induction of necrosis. These findings may have profound clinical implications.

Survival following massive overdose of adrenergic blocking agents (acebutolol and labetalol).

Massive overdosage of adrenergic blocking drugs is associated with severe morbidity and a high mortality rate. We report the case of a 24-year-old medical intern who ingested 9.6 g acebutolol, 7.2 g labetalol and 0.625 g trimipramine in an attempted suicide. Blood samples drawn on admission were shown to contain markedly elevated plasma levels of acebutolol and its major metabolite and of labetalol. The patient was deeply comatose on admission. The heart rate was 60 min-1 (sinus rhythm) and the blood pressure was clinically unrecordable. Atropine, isoproterenol and dopamine initially had no effect on either heart rate or blood pressure. Only following the administration of inordinately large doses of isoproterenol and dopamine, together with glucagon was a clinical response obtained. The patient remained haemodynamically dependent on dopamine for 12 h and isoproterenol for 65 h. The total dose of isoproterenol administered was 260 mg, two thirds of this during the first 12 h. The patient left hospital well after 7 days but was readmitted after 26 days because of intestinal obstruction due to ischemic bowel necrosis.

Adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer after complete resection. Provincial Gastrointestinal Disease Site Group.

GUIDELINE QUESTION: Should patients with resected stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy? OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations regarding the use of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of resected stage II colon cancer. OUTCOMES: Overall survival is the primary outcome of interest. Secondary outcomes are disease-free survival and adverse effects of the treatment regimens. PERSPECTIVE (VALUES): Evidence was selected and reviewed by 2 members of the Provincial Gastrointestinal Disease Site Group (GI DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The recommendations resulting from this review have been approved by the GI DSG, which comprise medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons and epidemiologists. Community representatives did not participate in the development of this practice guideline but will do so in future guidelines development. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: There are 25 published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 meta-analysis. The GI DSG pooled data from 11 of the 25 RCTs that provided adequate data. BENEFITS: The 25 RCTs are grouped according to the type of therapy and whether the control patients received no treatment (observation) or other adjuvant therapy after resection. Because the trials usually included patients with stage II and III cancer, the complete trial results and those for a subset of patients with stage II disease were analysed. Although the overall trial results showed a survival benefit for adjuvant treatments, the benefit was not significant for stage II patients. A meta-analysis of 11 trials comparing adjuvant treatment with observation in patients with stage II cancer indicated no significant reduction in the odds ratio (OR) for death (OR 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 1.10). The OR for death among patients receiving chemotherapy by portal vein infusion (PVI) was 0.62 (95% CI 0.35 to 1.11). HARMS: The toxic effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with either levamisole or leucovorin, or both, were mild to moderate and consisted mostly of stomatitis, diarrhea and myelosuppression; 5% of patients required hospital admission. 5-FU plus levamisole was associated with transient neurotoxic effects in 18% of patients. Toxic effects associated with PVI were mild, rare and mostly consisted of leukopenia and diarrhea; 1% of patients experienced bowel perforation. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: Adjuvant therapy is not recommended at this time for the routine management of patients with resected stage II colon cancer. Patients with stage II disease and high-risk factors (bowel obstruction, tumour adhesion, invasion, perforation or aneuploidy) have a poorer prognosis, similar to that of patients with stage III colon cancer. For individual management, these patients should be made aware of their prognosis; treatment can be considered after the uncertainty of the value of adjuvant therapy has been explained to the patient. The enrolment of patients with high-risk stage II disease in clinical trials is encouraged. Trials comparing adjuvant therapy with observation are needed and are ethically acceptable in stage II colon cancer.

Levamisole and 5-fluorouracil therapy for resected colon cancer: a new indication.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and risks of postoperative treatment with levamisole plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with colon cancer. DESIGN: Computerized searches of MEDLINE and CANCERLIT were performed, and the reference list of each retrieved article was checked. Only randomized trials of therapy with levamisole alone or combined with 5-FU for colon cancer without distant metastases were included. The studies were then evaluated with the use of four criteria. RESULTS: We reviewed six randomized trials, of which three satisfied our criteria. Two studies demonstrated a significant improvement in the survival rate with levamisole plus 5-FU among patients with colon cancer and pathologically confirmed metastases to adjacent lymph nodes (Dukes' stage C). A subgroup analysis in another study demonstrated a similar benefit. The toxic effects of the drugs were generally mild. The three other studies showed no difference in survival rates between the treatment groups; however, the samples were too small to detect a clinically or statistically important difference. CONCLUSIONS: Because many patients with colon cancer will suffer a relapse we recommend that they be offered the opportunity to participate in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy. For those with stage C disease not entering a clinical trial levamisole plus 5-FU is appropriate adjuvant therapy.

Mitoxantrone, prednimustine, and vincristine for elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Elderly patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma have a worse outcome than those who are younger than 60 years. It has been shown that aggressive combination chemotherapy is poorly tolerated in older patients resulting in a subsequent decrease in dose intensity. A phase II trial was conducted with mitoxantrone, prednimustine, and vincristine (NSO) in this group of patients. NSO consists of mitoxantrone 12 mg/M2 intravenously on day one, vincristine 1.4 mg/M2 intravenously on day 1 (maximum dose of two mg), and prednimustine 100 mg/M2 orally once a day for four days. NSO was repeated every 21 days. Thirty-six patients were able to be evaluated. There were 18 males and 18 females with the median age of 71 (range 60-85). NSO was well tolerated and nonhematological toxicities were uncommon. More than 80% of the patients received 90% or greater of the intended dose. The complete response rate was 60.6% and partial response was 21.8%. At 60 months the Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival was 47.9% (standard error 8.6%) and actual survival was 40.6% (standard error 8.8%). There were no differences in outcome between those with performance status (PS) of zero or one and those with PS > 1. NSO is well tolerated by elderly patients including those with PS > 1. These results compare favorably with other combinations in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.