Rilzabrutinib, an Oral BTK Inhibitor, in Immune Thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Rilzabrutinib, an oral, reversible covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, may increase platelet counts in patients with immune thrombocytopenia by means of dual mechanisms of action: decreased macrophage (Fcγ receptor)-mediated platelet destruction and reduced production of pathogenic autoantibodies. METHODS: In an international, adaptive, open-label, dose-finding, phase 1-2 clinical trial, we evaluated rilzabrutinib therapy in previously treated patients with immune thrombocytopenia. We used intrapatient dose escalation of oral rilzabrutinib over a period of 24 weeks; the lowest starting dose was 200 mg once daily, with higher starting doses of 400 mg once daily, 300 mg twice daily, and 400 mg twice daily. The primary end points were safety and platelet response (defined as at least two consecutive platelet counts of ≥50×103 per cubic millimeter and an increase from baseline of ≥20×103 per cubic millimeter without the use of rescue medication). RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled. At baseline, the median platelet count was 15×103 per cubic millimeter, the median duration of disease was 6.3 years, and patients had received a median of four different immune thrombocytopenia therapies previously. All the treatment-related adverse events were of grade 1 or 2 and transient. There were no treatment-related bleeding or thrombotic events of grade 2 or higher. At a median of 167.5 days (range, 4 to 293) of treatment, 24 of 60 patients (40%) overall and 18 of the 45 patients (40%) who had started rilzabrutinib treatment at the highest dose met the primary end point of platelet response. The median time to the first platelet count of at least 50×103 per cubic millimeter was 11.5 days. Among patients with a primary platelet response, the mean percentage of weeks with a platelet count of at least 50×103 per cubic millimeter was 65%. CONCLUSIONS: Rilzabrutinib was active and associated with only low-level toxic effects at all dose levels. The dose of 400 mg twice daily was identified as the dose for further testing. Overall, rilzabrutinib showed a rapid and durable clinical activity that improved with length of treatment. (Funded by Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03395210; EudraCT number, 2017-004012-19.).

Prophylactic tranexamic acid in patients with hematologic malignancy: a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Evidence of the effectiveness of prophylactic use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in thrombocytopenia is lacking. To determine whether TXA safely reduces bleeding incidence in patients undergoing treatment for hematologic malignancies, a randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted from June 2016 through June 2020. Of 3120 screened adults, 356 patients were eligible and enrolled, and 337 patients (mean age, 53.9; 141 [41.8%] women), randomized to 1300 mg TXA orally or 1000 mg TXA through IV (n = 168) vs placebo (n = 169) thrice daily for maximum 30 days. Three hundred thirty patients were activated when their platelet counts fell below 30 000 per µL; 279 (83%) had complete outcome ascertainment. World Health Organization (WHO) grade ≥2 bleeding was observed in the 30 days following activation in 50.3% (73/145) and 54.2% (78/144) of patients in the TXA and placebo groups, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.34; P = .44). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of platelet transfusions (mean difference, 0.1; 95% CI, -1.9 to 2.0), mean days alive without grade ≥2 bleeding (mean difference, 0.8; 95% CI, -0.4 to 2.0), thrombotic events (6/163 [3.7%] TXA, 9/163 [5.5%] placebo), or deaths due to serious bleeding. Most common adverse events were: diarrhea (116/164 [70.7%] TXA and 114/163 [69.9%] placebo); febrile neutropenia (111/164 [67.7%] TXA, 105/163 [64.4%] placebo); fatigue (106/164 [64.6%] TXA, 109/163 [66.9%] placebo); and nausea (104/164 [63.4%] TXA, 97/163 [59.5%] placebo). Among patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, prophylactic treatment with TXA compared with placebo did not significantly reduce the risk of WHO grade ≥2 bleeding.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and ITP in patients with de novo or preexisting ITP.

Cases of de novo immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), including a fatality, following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in previously healthy recipients led to studying its impact in preexisting ITP. In this study, 4 data sources were analyzed: the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) for cases of de novo ITP; a 10-center retrospective study of adults with preexisting ITP receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; and surveys distributed by the Platelet Disorder Support Association (PDSA) and the United Kingdom (UK) ITP Support Association. Seventy-seven de novo ITP cases were identified in VAERS, presenting with median platelet count of 3 [1-9] ×109/L approximately 1 week postvaccination. Of 28 patients with available data, 26 responded to treatment with corticosteroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and/or platelet transfusions. Among 117 patients with preexisting ITP who received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, 19 experienced an ITP exacerbation (any of: ≥50% decline in platelet count, nadir platelet count <30 × 109/L with >20% decrease from baseline, and/or use of rescue therapy) following the first dose and 14 of 70 after a second dose. Splenectomized persons and those who received 5 or more prior lines of therapy were at highest risk of ITP exacerbation. Fifteen patients received and responded to rescue treatment. In surveys of both 57 PDSA and 43 UK patients with ITP, prior splenectomy was associated with worsened thrombocytopenia. ITP may worsen in preexisting ITP or be identified de novo post-SARS-CoV2 vaccination; both situations responded well to treatment. Proactive monitoring of patients with known ITP, especially those postsplenectomy and with more refractory disease, is indicated.

How I treat primary ITP in adult patients who are unresponsive to or dependent on corticosteroid treatment.

Approximately 80% of adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) have treatment failure with corticosteroids or become dependent on them and require second-line therapy. Several new and effective therapies have been introduced during the past decade and our understanding of disease burden and its effect on quality of life has expanded. It is now recommended that splenectomy, the standard second-line therapy for decades, be delayed for at least 12 to 24 months, allowing for more patients to achieve remission on medical therapies before considering surgery. It is highly recommended that medical therapies be used that have abundant clinical trial evidence, such as the thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) rituximab and fostamatinib. Unfortunately, there are no reliable biomarkers that help in treatment selection. These therapeutic medical options have variable efficacy, safety profiles, mechanisms of action, and modes of administration. This enables and mandates an individualized approach to treatment, where patient involvement, preferences and values have become central to the process of choosing the appropriate therapy. Both TPO-RAs and fostamatinib are maintenance therapies, whereas rituximab is given for a limited number of doses. Although the response is usually maintained while receiving a TPO-RA or fostamatinib therapy, half of rituximab responders will no longer respond 1 to 2 years after administration and require retreatment or other therapy.

Additional efficacy analysis of avatrombopag phase III data for the treatment of adults with immune thrombocytopenia.

Avatrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) that was approved in the US in 2019 for treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This post hoc analysis of the pivotal phase III study (NCT01438840) of avatrombopag in adult patients with ITP evaluated platelet count response to avatrombopag during the core study in different subgroups, and durability of response data in patients who responded to avatrombopag treatment both during the core phase (total population) and during the core and extension phase (total population and by subgroup). Loss of response (LOR [platelet count <30 × 109/L]) was defined as LOR over two consecutive scheduled visits. The response was generally similar between subgroups though a few differences were observed. The durability of response analysis showed that avatrombopag-treated patients maintained their response for 84.5% of time on treatment during the core phase and 83.3% during the core and extension phase; 55.2% of patients in the core phase and 52.3% in the core and extension phase never experienced LOR. We conclude that the initial response to avatrombopag is both stable and durable.

What is the context? Avatrombopag is a medicine that helps the body produce platelet cells, which are necessary for blood clotting.Avatrombopag is used to treat people with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP); these patients have low numbers of platelet cells in their blood, so their blood may not clot efficiently, putting them at risk of uncontrolled bleeding.A phase III clinical study in patients with chronic ITP showed that platelet counts increased for most patients who were treated with avatrombopag; patients who had a platelet count ≥50 × 10⁹/L were considered to have a response to avatrombopag treatment.The present study analyzes data from a phase III clinical study to determine whether there are any characteristics that make a patient more or less likely to have a loss of response (LOR) while taking avatrombopag, whether the initial response to avatrombopag is stable, and how long the response lasts.For this analysis, LOR is defined as platelet count <30 × 10⁹/L for either four consecutive weeks or for two consecutive office visits while taking avatrombopag.What is new? In general, patient characteristics did not influence the likelihood of LOR.Patients who responded maintained their response for most of the time they were taking avatrombopag.Most patients did not experience LOR.What is the impact? The initial response to avatrombopag is stable and long-lasting in patients with chronic ITP.These findings indicate that patients with a variety of background characteristics can experience a durable platelet response with avatrombopag treatment.

Adults with immune thrombocytopenia who switched to avatrombopag following prior treatment with eltrombopag or romiplostim: A multicentre US study.

Patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may respond to one thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) but not another. Limited data are available describing outcomes in patients who switched from romiplostim or eltrombopag to avatrombopag, a newer oral TPO-RA. We performed a retrospective observational study of adults with ITP who switched from eltrombopag or romiplostim to avatrombopag at four US tertiary ITP referral centres. Forty-four patients were included, with a mean ITP duration of 8.3 years and a median (range) of four prior ITP treatments. On avatrombopag, 41/44 patients (93%) achieved a platelet response (≥50 × 109 /l) and 38/44 patients (86%) achieved a complete response (≥100 × 109 /l). In all patients, the median platelet count on eltrombopag or romiplostim was 45 × 109 /l vs 114 × 109 /l on avatrombopag (p < 0.0001); in patients switched for ineffectiveness of romiplostim/eltrombopag, it was 28 × 109 /l on romiplostim/eltrombopag vs 88 × 109 /l on avatrombopag (p = 0.025). Fifty-seven percent of patients receiving concomitant ITP medications before switching discontinued them after switching, including 63% of patients receiving chronic corticosteroids. In a heavily pretreated chronic ITP population, avatrombopag was effective following therapy with romiplostim or eltrombopag, with high response rates even in patients with inadequate response to a prior TPO-RA.

Fecal blood loss: A quantitative method of evaluating hemostasis in patients with thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our studies was to determine if fecal blood loss can provide a quantitative measure of bleeding at platelet counts of 20 000/µL or less in patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia and to document the effects of different prophylactic platelet transfusion triggers on fecal blood loss. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients had an aliquot of their autologous red blood cells (RBCs) labeled with 51 Cr. Following reinjection of their radiolabeled RBCs, all feces and a daily blood sample were collected to determine fecal blood loss per day. Three different studies were performed in patients with thrombocytopenia: The first was in patients with thrombocytopenia with aplastic anemia who were not receiving platelet transfusions, and the other two trials involved thrombocytopenic patients with cancer who were receiving prophylactic platelet transfusions at platelet transfusion triggers of 5000/µL, 10 000/µL, or 20 000/µL. RESULTS: In patients with thrombocytopenia not receiving platelet transfusions, fecal blood loss does not increase substantially until platelet counts are 5000/µL or less. When platelet transfusions are given prophylactically to patients with cancer with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia at platelet counts of 5000/µL or less, fecal blood loss and red cell transfusion requirements are the same as those for patients transfused prophylactically at higher transfusion triggers of 10 000 platelets/µL or 20 000 platelets/µL. However, the total number of platelet transfusions needed increases significantly, and the duration of the patient's thrombocytopenia tends to be longer at the higher platelet transfusion thresholds. CONCLUSION: A prophylactic platelet transfusion threshold of 5000/µL or greater is sufficient to maintain hemostasis in patients with thrombocytopenia.

The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Interdisciplinary Consensus Statement on Neuraxial Procedures in Obstetric Patients With Thrombocytopenia.

Because up to 12% of obstetric patients meet criteria for the diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy, it is not infrequent that the anesthesiologist must decide whether to proceed with a neuraxial procedure in an affected patient. Given the potential morbidity associated with general anesthesia for cesarean delivery, thoughtful consideration of which patients with thrombocytopenia are likely to have an increased risk of spinal epidural hematoma with neuraxial procedures, and when these risks outweigh the relative benefits is important to consider and to inform shared decision making with patients. Because there are substantial risks associated with withholding a neuraxial analgesic/anesthetic procedure in obstetric patients, every effort should be made to perform a bleeding history assessment and determine the thrombocytopenia etiology before admission for delivery. Whereas multiple other professional societies (obstetric, interventional pain, and hematologic) have published guidelines addressing platelet thresholds for safe neuraxial procedures, the US anesthesia professional societies have been silent on this topic. Despite a paucity of high-quality data, there are now meta-analyses that provide better estimations of risks. An interdisciplinary taskforce was convened to unite the relevant professional societies, synthesize the data, and provide a practical decision algorithm to help inform risk-benefit discussions and shared decision making with patients. Through a systematic review and modified Delphi process, the taskforce concluded that the best available evidence indicates the risk of spinal epidural hematoma associated with a platelet count ≥70,000 × 106/L is likely to be very low in obstetric patients with thrombocytopenia secondary to gestational thrombocytopenia, immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the absence of other risk factors. Ultimately, the decision of whether to proceed with a neuraxial procedure in an obstetric patient with thrombocytopenia occurs within a clinical context. Potentially relevant factors include, but are not limited to, patient comorbidities, obstetric risk factors, airway examination, available airway equipment, risk of general anesthesia, and patient preference.

Blood use and transfusion needs at a large health care system in Washington state during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: This report evaluates hospital blood use trends during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, and identifies factors associated with the need for transfusion and risk of death in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: Overall hospital blood use and medical records of adult patients with COVID-19 were extracted for two institutions. Multivariate logistic regression models were conducted to estimate associations between the outcomes transfusion and mortality and patient factors. RESULTS: Daily blood use decreased compared to pre-COVID-19 levels; the effect was more significant for platelets (29% and 34%) compared to red blood cells (25% and 20%) at the two institutions, respectively. Surgical and oncologic services had a decrease in average daily use of platelets of 52% and 30%, and red blood cells of 39% and 25%, respectively. A total of 128 patients with COVID-19 were hospitalized, and 13 (10%) received at least one transfusion due to anemia secondary to chronic illness (n = 7), recent surgery (n = 3), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 3). Lower baseline platelet count and admission to the intensive care unit were associated with increased risk of transfusion. The blood group distribution in patients with COVID-19 was 37% group O, 40% group A, 18% group B, and 5% group AB. Non-type O was not associated with increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSION: The response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic included changes in routine hospital operations that allowed for the provision of a sufficient level of care for patients with and without COVID-19. Although blood type may play a role in COVID-19 susceptibility, it did not seem to be associated with patient mortality.

Prepare to adapt: blood supply and transfusion support during the first 2 weeks of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic affecting Washington State.

BACKGROUND: The first coronavirus (COVID-19) case was reported in United States in the state of Washington, approximately 3 months after the outbreak in Wuhan, China. Three weeks later, the US federal government declared the pandemic a national emergency. The number of confirmed COVID-19 positive cases increased rather rapidly and changed routine daily activities of the community. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This brief report describes the response from the hospital, the regional blood center, and the hospital-based transfusion services to the events that took place in the community during the initial phases of the pandemic. RESULTS: In Washington State, the first week of March started with four confirmed cases and ended with 150; by the end of the second week of March there were more than 700 cases of confirmed COVID-19. During the first week, blood donations dropped significantly. Blood units provided from blood centers of nonaffected areas of the country helped keep inventory stable and allow for routine hospital operations. The hospital-based transfusion service began prospective triaging of blood orders to monitor and prioritize blood usage. In the second week, blood donations recovered, and the hospital postponed elective procedures to ensure staff and personal protective equipment were appropriate for the care of critical patients. CONCLUSION: As community activities are disrupted and hospital activities switch from routine operations to pandemic focused and urgent care oriented, the blood supply and usage requires a number of transformations.

Mitigation strategies for anti-D alloimmunization by platelet transfusion in haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: a survey of NCCN® centres.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: D-negative patients are at risk of developing an alloantibody to D (anti-D) if exposed to D during transfusion. The presence of anti-D can lead to haemolytic transfusion reactions and haemolytic disease of the newborn. Anti-D alloimmunization can also complicate allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with haemolysis and increased transfusion requirements. The goal of this study was to determine whether cancer centres have transfusion practices intended to prevent anti-D alloimmunization with special attention in patients considered for HSCT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To understand transfusion practices regarding D-positive platelets in D-negative patients with large transfusion needs, we surveyed the 28 cancer centres that are members of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN® ). RESULTS: Nineteen centres responded (68%). Most centres (79%) avoid transfusing D-positive platelets to RhD-negative patients when possible. Four centres (21%) avoid D-positive platelets only in D-negative women of childbearing age. If a D-negative patient receives a D-positive platelet transfusion, 53% of centres would consider treating with Rh immune globulin (RhIg) to prevent alloimmunization in women of childbearing age. Only one centre also gives RhIg to all D-negative patients who are HSCT candidates including adult men and women of no childbearing age. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in platelet transfusion practices for supporting D-negative patients. The majority of centres do not have D-positive platelet transfusion policies focused on preventing anti-D alloimmunization specifically in patients undergoing HSCT. Multicentre, longitudinal studies are needed to understand the clinical implications of anti-D alloimmunization in HSCT patients.

Clinical updates in adult immune thrombocytopenia.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) occurs in 2 to 4/100 000 adults and results in variable bleeding symptoms and thrombocytopenia. In the last decade, changes in our understanding of the pathophysiology of the disorder have led to the publication of new guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ITP and standards for terminology. Current evidence supports alternatives to splenectomy for second-line management of patients with persistently low platelet counts and bleeding. Long-term follow-up data suggest both efficacy and safety, in particular, for the thrombopoietin receptor agonists and the occurrence of late remissions. Follow-up of patients who have undergone splenectomy for ITP reveals significant potential risks that should be discussed with patients and may influence clinician and patient choice of second-line therapy. Novel therapeutics are in development to address ongoing treatment gaps.

Laboratory predictors of bleeding and the effect of platelet and RBC transfusions on bleeding outcomes in the PLADO trial.

Bleeding remains a significant problem for many thrombocytopenic hematology/oncology patients in spite of platelet transfusions. Factors that might contribute to bleeding were analyzed for 16 320 patient-days on or after their first platelet transfusion in 1077 adult patients enrolled in the Platelet Dose (PLADO) trial. All patients had a greatly increased risk of bleeding at platelet counts of ≤5 × 109/L (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-4.8) compared with platelet counts ≥81 × 109/L. Platelet counts between 6 × 109/L and 80 × 109/L were also associated with a somewhat elevated bleeding risk in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCTs) or chemotherapy but not in those undergoing autologous SCTs. Other significant laboratory predictors of bleeding were hematocrit ≤25% (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11-1.49), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) 30 to ≤50 seconds (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.08-1.81; P = .01), aPTT >50 seconds (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.54-3.56), international normalized ratio (INR) 1.2 to 1.5 (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.17-1.83), and INR >1.5 (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.43-2.95). Transfusion of either platelets or red blood cells (RBCs) on days with bleeding was often not sufficient to change bleeding outcomes on the following day. Because bleeding occurred over a wide range of platelet counts among patients undergoing allogeneic SCT or chemotherapy and because platelet transfusions may not prevent bleeding, other risk factors may be involved. These may include low hematocrit and coagulation abnormalities. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00128713.

Response to random apheresis platelets versus HLA-selected platelets versus pooled platelets in HLA-sensitized patients.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown how pooled platelets (PPs) compare to random apheresis platelets (RAPs) when HLA-selected platelets (PLTs) are unavailable for HLA-sensitized patients. The aim of this study was to compare patient responses to RAPs, HLA-selected PLTs, and PPs in HLA-sensitized patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective study of patients from January 2014 to April 2017 with a class I calculated panel-reactive antibody of 60% or more. Response to transfusion was determined by a corrected count increment (CCI) up to 1 hour after completion of transfusion. A CCI of 5 or more was considered successful. RESULTS: Seventy-seven units of RAPs, 412 units of HLA-selected PLT, and 388 units PPs were transfused. Mean CCIs when transfusing RAPs, HLA-selected PLTs, and PPs were 2.82, 11.44, and 4.77, respectively (p < 0.0001). Posttest comparison between RAPs and PPs revealed no significant difference in mean CCI while there was a significant difference between HLA-selected PLTs versus RAPs and HLA-selected PLTs versus PPs. The success rates of RAPs, HLA-selected PLTs, and PPs were 31%, 80%, and 35% respectively. There was no significant association of type of PLT and success rate when comparing RAPs versus PPs (p = 0.51) while there was a significant association between success rate and type of PLT transfusion when comparing HLA-selected PLTs with RAPs and PPs. CONCLUSION: HLA-selected PLTs resulted in higher mean CCIs and more successful transfusions. There was no significant difference in mean CCI or success rate when transfusing RAPs versus PPs to HLA-sensitized patients. Future studies should assess clinical outcomes in HLA-sensitized patients receiving each type of PLT product.

Transfusion-related immunomodulation: gamma irradiation alters the effects of leukoreduction on alloimmunization.

BACKGROUND: Adverse events following blood transfusion include allosensitization and generalized immunosuppression, collectively referred to as transfusion-related immune modulation. We evaluated the immunological effects of red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusions on alloantibody responses and on immunoregulatory cells in nonimmunosuppressed patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive standard unmodified (STD), leukoreduced (LR), or leukoreduced and γ-irradiated (LRγ) RBCs. Patients received only apheresis platelets that were in-process LR and were γ-irradiated for the third arm. Nontransfused patients served as controls for the effects of surgery itself on immunologic changes. Antibodies to HLA were assessed with use of solid-phase assays. The effects of transfusion on adaptive and innate immunity were evaluated by assessing T regulatory cells (Tregs) and invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells. RESULTS: LR of blood products reduced the development of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alloantibodies, but only in patients without preexisting HLA antibodies. However, if LR blood products were γ-irradiated, HLA antibody production was not reduced. Compared to nontransfused patients, recipients of STD or LR transfusions showed a significant increase in CD4+CD25hi T cells expressing FoxP3 or CTLA4 and also of iNKT cells producing interleukin-4. In contrast, recipients of LRγ blood products showed markedly lower increases in all three cellular assays. CONCLUSION: LR decreased HLA alloantibody production in naïve recipients, but did not reduce the immunosuppressive effects of transfusion. LRγ reduced immunosuppression and was not associated with decreased HLA alloantibody production.

Evaluating safety and cost-effectiveness of platelets stored in additive solution (PAS-F) as a hemolysis risk mitigation strategy.

BACKGROUND: Platelet inventory constraints can result in minor ABO incompatibility and possible hemolysis. The aims of this study were to determine the reduction of isoagglutinin in titers of platelets stored in additive solution (PAS) and compare its safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness with full-volume and plasma-reduced platelets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Isoagglutinin titers were performed in paired whole blood donor samples and apheresis platelets collected in PAS (PAS-PLT) aliquot samples by the tube method. RESULTS: A total of 149 pairs of donor/platelet samples were tested: 75 group O, 59 group A, and 15 group B. For group O donor samples, the median anti-A IgG and IgM were 64 and 16, respectively, and the median anti-B IgG and IgM were 64 and 16, respectively. For group O PAS-PLT samples the mean anti-A IgG and IgM, and anti-B IgG and IgM were 32 and 8, and 16 and 8, respectively. For group A donor samples, the mean anti-B IgG and IgM was 8 in both cases; and both titers decreased to 2 in PAS-PLT. For group B donor samples, mean anti-A IgG and IgM was 16 in both cases; and both titers decreased to 4 in PAS-PLT. PAS-PLT demonstrated a net reduction in cost and improved efficiency when compared to plasma reduction. The use of PAS-PLT resulted in a 40% reduction of allergic transfusion reactions. CONCLUSION: The use of PAS decreases plasma isoagglutinin titers, transfusion reactions, and is cost-effective when compared to routine plasma reduction as a strategy to mitigate hemolysis risk from minor incompatible platelet transfusion.

Safety and efficacy of cryopreserved platelets in bleeding patients with thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: The short dating period of room temperature-stored platelets (PLTs; 5-7 days) limits their availability at far-forward combat facilities and at remote civilian sites in the United States. PLT cryopreservation in 6% DMSO and storage for up to 2 years may improve timely availability for bleeding patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A dose escalation trial of DMSO-cryopreserved PLTs (CPPs) compared to standard liquid-stored PLTs (LSPs) was performed in bleeding patients with thrombocytopenia. Within each of four cohorts, six patients received escalating doses of CPP (0.5 unit, 1 unit, and sequential transfusions of 2 and 3 units) and one received a LSP transfusion. Patients were monitored for adverse events (AEs), coagulation markers, PLT responses, and hemostatic efficacy. RESULTS: Patients with a World Health Organization bleeding score of 2 or more received from 0.5 to 3 units of CPP (n = 24) or 1 unit of LSP (n = 4). There were no related thrombotic or other serious AEs experienced. Mild transfusion-related AEs of chills and fever (n = 1), transient increased respiratory rate (n = 1), DMSO-related skin odor (n = 2), and headache (n = 1) were observed after CPP transfusion. Among CPP recipients 14 of 24 (58%) had improved bleeding scores, including three of seven (43%) patients who had intracerebral bleeding. CPP posttransfusion PLT increments were significantly less than those of LSPs; however, days to next transfusion were the same. After transfusion, the CPP recipients had improvements in some variables of thrombin generation tests and thromboelastography. CONCLUSION: Cryopreserved PLT transfusions appear to be safe and effective when given to bleeding patients with thrombocytopenia.

The use of antifibrinolytics in pediatric patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia.

Despite the use of evidence-based platelet transfusion therapy during periods of hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia, a large proportion of pediatric hematology/oncology patients continue to suffer from clinically significant bleeding. Antifibrinolytic (AF) drugs have been shown in certain surgical and trauma settings to decrease bleeding, blood transfusion, and improve survival. We conducted a retrospective assessment of the safety of using AF drugs in pediatric patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia at our center as well as the impact on bleeding occurrence and severity.

Response of Steroid-Refractory Acute GVHD to α1-Antitrypsin.

α1-Antitrypsin (AAT) is a serine protease inhibitor with anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic, and immunomodulatory properties. It has therapeutic efficacy in animal models of autoimmune diseases, inflammatory disorders, and transplantation. In a phase I/II open-label single-center study, we administered AAT (Glassia; Baxalta/Kamada, New Ziona, Israel) as salvage therapy to 12 patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). AAT was given i.v. at 2 dose levels over a 15-day course. All patients had grades III or IV GVHD with stage 4 gut involvement. After treatment, plasma AAT levels increased in both cohorts and remained within 2 to 4 mg/mL for the duration of treatment. No clinically relevant toxicities attributable to AAT were observed. GVHD manifestations improved in 8 of 12 patients, and 4 responses were complete. Six patients (50%) were alive at last follow-up (>104 to >820 days). These findings show that AAT is well tolerated and has efficacy in the treatment of steroid-refractory severe acute GVHD. Further studies are warranted.