A multicentre study of naevus-associated melanoma vs. de novo melanoma, tumour thickness and body site differences.

BACKGROUND: Whether melanoma in histological contiguity with a naevus [naevus-associated melanoma (NAM)] is distinctly different from melanoma arising de novo remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the characteristics of de novo melanoma differ from NAM and are not due to naevus obliteration in thicker tumours. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of de novo melanoma and NAM in seven referral centres in Europe, Australia and the USA between 2006 and 2015. RESULTS: In a total of 9474 localized melanomas, de novo melanoma was associated with thicker tumours and body site differences compared with NAM. In the subset of T1 melanomas (n = 5307), similar body site differences were found in multivariate analysis by body site. When compared with NAM, de novo melanoma was more likely to affect older individuals (≥ 70 years) when located on the head/neck [odds ratio (OR) 4·65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2·55-8·46], the trunk (OR 1·82, 95% CI 1·40-2·36) or the upper extremity (OR 1·69, 95% CI 1·14-2·50), was more likely to affect female patients when located on the lower extremities (OR 1·36, 95% CI 1·03-1·80), and was more likely to be of the nodular melanoma subtype (OR 2·23, 95% CI 1·14-4·35) when located on the trunk. De novo melanoma was less likely to have regression present compared with NAM. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicopathological and body site differences between de novo melanoma and NAM support the divergent pathway model of development. These differences were also found in thin melanomas, suggesting that de novo melanomas are different from NAM and their differences are not due to the obliteration of naevus remnants in thicker tumours.

Histopathological features of complete pathological response predict recurrence-free survival following neoadjuvant targeted therapy for metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib (DT) among patients with surgically resectable clinical stage III BRAFV600E/K mutant melanoma. Although patients achieving a complete pathological response (pCR) exhibited superior recurrence-free survival (RFS) versus those who did not, 30% of pCR patients relapsed. We sought to identify whether histopathological features of the pathological response further delineated risk of relapse. METHODS: Surgical resection specimens from DT-treated patients in two phase 2 clinical trials were reviewed. Histopathological features, including relative amounts of viable tumour, necrosis, melanosis, and fibrosis (hyalinized or immature/proliferative) were assessed for associations with patient outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients underwent surgical resection following neoadjuvant DT. Patients achieving pCR (49%) had longer RFS compared with patients who did not (P = 0.005). Patients whose treated tumour showed any hyalinized fibrosis had longer RFS versus those without (P = 0.014), whereas necrosis (P = 0.012) and/or immature/proliferative fibrosis (P = 0.026) correlated with shorter RFS. Multivariable analyses showed absence of pCR or presence of immature fibrosis independently predicted shorter RFS. Among pCR patients, mature/hyalinized-type fibrosis correlated with improved RFS (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The extent and composition of the pathological response following neoadjuvant DT in BRAFV600E/K mutant melanoma correlates with RFS, including pCR patients. These findings support the need for detailed histological analysis of specimens collected after neoadjuvant therapy.

Pathological assessment of resection specimens after neoadjuvant therapy for metastatic melanoma.

Background: Clinical trials have recently evaluated safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy among patients with surgically resectable regional melanoma metastases. To capture informative prognostic data connected to pathological response in such trials, it is critical to standardize pathologic assessment and reporting of tumor response after this treatment. Methods: The International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium meetings in 2016 and 2017 assembled pathologists from academic centers to develop consensus guidelines for pathologic examination and reporting of surgical specimens from AJCC (8th edition) stage IIIB/C/D or oligometastatic stage IV melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant-targeted or immune therapy. Patterns of pathologic response are provided context to inform these guidelines. Results: Based on our collective experience and guided by efforts in well-established neoadjuvant settings like breast cancer, procedures directing handling of pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy-treated melanoma specimens are provided to facilitate comparison of findings across different trials and centers. Definitions of pathologic response are provided together with guidelines for reporting and quantifying the extent of pathologic response. Finally, the spectrum of histopathologic responses observed following neoadjuvant-targeted and immune-checkpoint therapy is described and illustrated. Conclusions: Standardizing pathologic evaluation of resected melanoma metastases following neoadjuvant-targeted or immune-checkpoint therapy allows more robust stratification of patient outcomes. This includes recognizing the spectrum of histopathologic response patterns to neoadjuvant therapy and a standard approach to grading pathologic responses. Such an approach will facilitate comparison of results across clinical trials and inform ongoing correlative studies into the mechanisms of response and resistance to agents applied in the neoadjuvant setting.

Is surviving enough? Coping and impact on activities of daily living among melanoma patients with lymphoedema.

We assessed the impact of lymphoedema (defined as ≥ 10% limb volume change) on quality of life (QOL), ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and coping in 277 melanoma patients. Limb volume was measured prospectively, pre-operatively and every 3-6 months for 18 months post-operatively using a perometer. Three questionnaires were administered to measure QOL, coping and impact on ADLs. Statistical analyses were conducted using longitudinal logistic regression models. At 18 months, the cumulative incidence of lymphoedema was 31% in patients with upper extremity nodal basin treatment and 40% in lower extremity nodal basin treatment patients. Patients with lower extremity lymphoedema reported lower QOL scores than those with upper extremity lymphoedema. Over 18 months, both groups with mild and moderate lymphoedema showed improvement in coping [odds ratio (OR): 6.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.30-13.47] and performance of ADLs (OR: 7.46, CI: 3.38-16.47). Over the course of 18 months, men were found to have poorer coping scores than women (OR: 2.91, CI: 1.35-6.27). Lymphoedema was associated with improvement in coping over time (P = 0.08) and a higher reported interference with ADLs (OR: 2.53, CI: 1.29-4.97). Patient education about lymphoedema at the time of surgical consent may improve self-efficacy and coping ability. Effective management of lymphoedema may improve patient QOL and reduce interference with ADLs.

Multimethod imaging, staging, and spectrum of manifestations of metastatic melanoma.

The incidence of melanoma has been steadily increasing. Imaging plays an important role in tumour assessment as metastatic melanoma can involve multiple organs. Computed tomography (CT) is currently the most widely used technique for tumour staging, surveillance and assessment of therapeutic response, but ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron-emission tomography (PET)-CT also play important roles in the imaging of this tumour. In this article, we review the pathways of spread, staging according to the recently updated TNM classification, pathology, typical and atypical imaging features at common and uncommon sites, and treatment of metastatic melanoma.

A novel AKT3 mutation in melanoma tumours and cell lines.

Recently, a rare activating mutation of AKT1 (E17K) has been reported in breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancers. However, analogous activating mutations in AKT2 or AKT3 have not been identified in any cancer lineage. To determine the prevalence of AKT E17K mutations in melanoma, the most aggressive form of skin cancer, we analysed 137 human melanoma specimens and 65 human melanoma cell lines for the previously described activating mutation of AKT1, and for analogous mutations in AKT2 and AKT3. We identified a single AKT1 E17K mutation. Remarkably, a previously unidentified AKT3 E17K mutation was detected in two melanomas (from one patient) as well as two cell lines. The AKT3 E17K mutation results in activation of AKT when expressed in human melanoma cells. This represents the first report of AKT mutations in melanoma, and the initial identification of an AKT3 mutation in any human cancer lineage. We have also identified the first known human cell lines with naturally occurring AKT E17K mutations.

Phase II trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Metastatic melanoma cells express a number of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) that are considered to be targets for imatinib. We conducted a phase II trial of imatinib in patients with metastatic melanoma expressing at least one of these PTKs. Twenty-one patients whose tumours expressed at least one PTK (c-kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptors, c-abl, or abl-related gene) were treated with 400 mg of imatinib twice daily. One patient with metastatic acral lentiginous melanoma, containing the highest c-kit expression among all patients, had dramatic improvement on positron emission tomographic scan at 6 weeks and had a partial response lasting 12.8 months. The responder had a substantial increase in tumour and endothelial cell apoptosis at 2 weeks of treatment. Imatinib was fairly well tolerated: no patient required treatment discontinuation because of toxicity. Fatigue and oedema were the only grade 3 or 4 toxicities that occurred in more than 10% of the patients. Imatinib at the studied dose had minimal clinical efficacy as a single-agent therapy for metastatic melanoma. However, based on the characteristics of the responding tumour in our study, clinical activity of imatinib, specifically in patients with melanoma with certain c-kit aberrations, should be examined.

Dominant-negative transcription factor AP-2 augments SB-2 melanoma tumor growth in vivo.

We have previously demonstrated that the transition of melanoma to the metastatic phenotype is associated with a loss of expression of the transcription factor AP-2. To further investigate the role of AP-2 in the progression of human melanoma, we attempted to inactivate AP-2 in primary cutaneous SB-2 melanoma cells by using a dominant-negative AP-2, or AP-2B, gene. AP-2B is an alternatively spliced AP-2 variant capable of inhibiting AP-2 trans-activator function. Stable transfection of primary cutaneous melanoma SB-2 cells with the dominant-negative AP-2B gene was confirmed by RT--PCR and Northern blot analyses. Electromobility shift assay using nuclear extracts from these cell lines demonstrated decreased functional binding of AP-2B-transfected cells to the AP-2 consensus binding sequence compared with neo-transfected controls. In addition, CAT activity driven by a construct containing the AP-2 consensus binding sequence was downregulated in the AP-2B transfected cells, indicating AP-2 activity was quenched in the transfected cells. Orthotopic (subcutaneous) injection of the dominant-negative (AP-2B)-transfected cell lines into nude mice increased their tumorigenicity compared to control neo-transfected cells. The AP-2B-transfected cells displayed an increase in MMP-2 expression (by Northern blot) and MMP-2 activity (by zymography), which resulted in an increase in invasiveness through Matrigel-coated filters. The AP-2B-transfected tumors also displayed an increase in MMP-2 expression, microvessel density, and angiogenesis in vivo. These results demonstrate that inactivation of AP-2 contributes to the progression of melanoma, at least partially via deregulation of the MMP-2 gene.

Monoclonal antibodies to avian lipoprotein lipase. Purification of the enzyme by immunoaffinity chromatography.

Three monoclonal antibodies to avian lipoprotein lipase have been isolated by fusing spleen cells from immunized BALB/c mice with myeloma P3X-63 Ag 8. The antibodies were detected by their ability to bind immobilized lipoprotein lipase in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by immunoprecipitation of purified enzyme in the presence of second (rabbit anti-mouse) antibodies. Two of these antibodies, CAL1-7 and CAL1-11, inhibited catalytic activity, whereas with CAL1-2 interaction with lipoprotein lipase could be demonstrated only in ELISA and in Western blot assays following denaturation of the enzyme with sodium dodecyl sulfate. An immunoadsorbent column was prepared by coupling immunopurified CAL1-11 to Sepharose-4B. When acetone powder extracts of adipose tissue were applied on the column, 70% of the catalytic activity bound to the matrix. Effective elution was achieved with 1.8 M NaCl, 40% glycerol, 5% acetone, 20 mM Chaps (3[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]propanesulfonate), 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phosphate (pH 6.5). After concentration of the active fractions on a heparin-Sepharose 4B column, the purified enzyme was obtained with an overall recovery of 25%. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis demonstrates that the preparation is homogeneous with a major band at Mr 60900. Thus, avian adipose lipoprotein lipase has been purified by a one-step immunoaffinity followed by a concentrating step on heparin-Sepharose 4B.

Patterns of recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in 243 patients with stage I or II melanoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the patterns of recurrence and causes of regional nodal basin failure in stage I or II melanoma patients who had a histologically negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) and whose regional nodal basins were not dissected following lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 344 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy between 1991 and 1995 at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed. Of 322 patients who underwent successful lymphatic mapping procedures, 270 had histologically negative SLNs; mapped nodal basins were observed without further surgical intervention in 243 of these 270 patients. Recurrence patterns were analyzed from this cohort and a histologic reevaluation of all previously identified SLNs on which a biopsy had been taken was performed in patients who developed recurrent disease. RESULTS: Of 243 patients with a histologically negative SLN, 27 (11%) developed local, in-transit, regional nodal, and/or distant metastases after a median follow-up time of 35 months. Ten patients (4.1%) developed a nodal recurrence in the previously mapped basin, either solely or as a component of the first site of recurrence. Detailed analysis of the SLNs in these 10 patients demonstrated evidence of occult metastases in 80% by serial sectioning or immunohistochemical staining. CONCLUSION: Regional nodal failures in melanoma patients following a negative SLN biopsy are infrequent and to date have most commonly occurred because conventional histologic evaluation was unable to identify occult metastatic disease. These data provide further evidence that lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy accurately reflect the status of the regional nodal basin. Specialized pathologic techniques are necessary to reduce further the already low false-negative rates and to improve disease staging.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: controversy despite widespread agreement.

Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma has been adopted throughout the United States and abroad as a standard method of determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes, some controversy still exists regarding the validity and utility of this procedure. SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity. Numerous studies have documented the accuracy of this procedure for identifying nodal metastases. There are four major reasons to perform SLN biopsy. First, SLN biopsy improves the accuracy of staging and provides valuable prognostic information for patients and physicians to guide subsequent treatment decisions. Second, SLN biopsy facilitates early therapeutic lymph node dissection for those patients with nodal metastases. Third, SLN biopsy identifies patients who are candidates for adjuvant therapy with interferon alfa-2b. Fourth, SLN biopsy identifies homogeneous patient populations for entry onto clinical trials of novel adjuvant therapy agents. Overall, the benefit of accurate nodal staging obtained by SLN biopsy far outweighs the risks and has important implications for patient management.

Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of pathologic sentinel lymph node (SLN) status with that of other known prognostic factors on recurrence and survival in patients with stage I or II cutaneous melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 612 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy between January 1991 and May 1995 to determine the effects of tumor thickness, ulceration, Clark level, location, sex, and SLN pathologic status on disease-free and disease-specific survival. RESULTS: In the 580 patients in whom lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy were successful, the SLN was positive by conventional histology in 85 patients (15%) but negative in 495 patients (85%). SLN status was the most significant prognostic factor with respect to disease-free and disease-specific survival by univariate and multiple covariate analyses. Although tumor thickness and ulceration influenced survival in SLN-negative patients, they provided no additional prognostic information in SLN-positive patients. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy is highly accurate in staging nodal basins at risk for regional metastases in primary melanoma patients and identifies those who may benefit from earlier lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, pathologic status of the SLN in these patients with clinically negative nodes is the most important prognostic factor for recurrence. The information from SLN biopsy is particularly helpful in establishing stratification criteria for future adjuvant trials.

Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system.

PURPOSE: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recently proposed major revisions of the tumor-node-metastases (TNM) categories and stage groupings for cutaneous melanoma. Thirteen cancer centers and cancer cooperative groups contributed staging and survival data from a total of 30,450 melanoma patients from their databases in order to validate this staging proposal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were 17,600 melanoma patients with complete clinical, pathologic, and follow-up information. Factors predicting melanoma-specific survival rates were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Follow-up survival data for 5 years or longer were available for 73% of the patients. RESULTS: This analysis demonstrated that (1) in the T category, tumor thickness and ulceration were the most powerful predictors of survival, and the level of invasion had a significant impact only within the subgroup of thin (< or = 1 mm) melanomas; (2) in the N category, the following three independent factors were identified: the number of metastatic nodes, whether nodal metastases were clinically occult or clinically apparent, and the presence or absence of primary tumor ulceration; and (3) in the M category, nonvisceral metastases was associated with a better survival compared with visceral metastases. A marked diversity in the natural history of pathologic stage III melanoma was demonstrated by five-fold differences in 5-year survival rates for defined subgroups. This analysis also demonstrated that large and complex data sets could be used effectively to examine prognosis and survival outcome in melanoma patients. CONCLUSION: The results of this evidence-based methodology were incorporated into the AJCC melanoma staging as described in the companion publication.

Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

PURPOSE: To revise the staging system for cutaneous melanoma under the auspices of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prognostic factors analysis described in the companion publication (this issue), as well as evidence from the published literature, was used to assemble the tumor-node-metastasis criteria and stage grouping for the melanoma staging system. RESULTS: Major changes include (1) melanoma thickness and ulceration but not level of invasion to be used in the T category (except for T1 melanomas); (2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes rather than their gross dimensions and the delineation of clinically occult (ie, microscopic) versus clinically apparent (ie, macroscopic) nodal metastases to be used in the N category; (3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum lactic dehydrogenase to be used in the M category; (4) an upstaging of all patients with stage I, II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; (5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into stage III disease; and (6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathologic staging so as to take into account the staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy. CONCLUSION: This revision will become official with publication of the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual in the year 2002.

How many lymph nodes are enough during sentinel lymphadenectomy for primary melanoma?

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been shown to reliably identify nodal metastases and the subsequent need for further surgical and adjuvant therapy in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Although SLN identification rates have improved with the addition of radioactive colloid to the blue dye technique, it remains unclear how many lymph nodes should be removed to accurately determine the histologic status of the nodal basin. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal extent of SLN biopsy in these patients. METHODS: The records of 633 consecutive patients with melanoma (765 nodal basins) whose primary treatment included SLN biopsy with the use of a combination of blue dye and technetium Tc 99 labeled sulfur colloid were reviewed. SLN biopsy consisted of the removal of all of the blue-stained nodes and all nodes with radiotracer uptake activity of at least twice background. RESULTS: SLN biopsy was successful in 765 of 772 basins (99%). A mean of 1.9 SLNs (median, 2 SLNs) per basin were excised. At least 3 SLNs were removed in 176 basins (23%). The overall histologic status of a basin was always established by the first or second SLN harvested (ie, in no patient was the third or subsequent SLN positive when 1 of the first 2 was not). Of the 124 basins containing lymphatic metastases, the SLN that contained the maximal radiotracer uptake (hottest) and/or stained blue was pathologically positive in 118 basins (95%). In only 6 of the 124 positive basins (5%) was the sole evidence of occult nodal metastases identified in an SLN that was neither blue-stained nor the hottest. All but 1 of these SLNs had counts that were at least 66% of the hottest node in the basin. CONCLUSIONS: With a combined modality approach to SLN biopsy, removal of more than 2 SLNs did not provide information that upstaged any patient with primary melanoma. Removal of additional nonblue SLN(s) that contained radioactive counts of at least twice background but lower than two thirds of the SLNs with maximal radiotracer uptake affected patient management in less than 0.2% of all cases. These findings may be helpful in minimizing the extent of surgery and perhaps in reducing the costs and resource use associated with operating room time and pathologic examination.

Improved sentinel lymph node localization in patients with primary melanoma with the use of radiolabeled colloid.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the sentinel lymph node (SLN) localization technique, which uses blue dye and 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid, provides advantages over blue dye alone in the management of patients with stages I and II cutaneous melanoma. METHODS: The records of 626 consecutive patients with melanoma who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy between 1991 and 1997 at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed. Lymphatic mapping was performed with isosulfan blue dye alone (n = 252) or in combination with 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid accompanied by a hand-held gamma probe (n = 374). SLNs were defined as those that stained blue or demonstrated increased focal radiotracer uptake. RESULTS: SLN identification rates improved from 87% (dye alone) to 99% (dye and colloid) (P < .0001) with the combined technique in all anatomic sites examined. The mean number of SLNs harvested from each basin was significantly greater in the patients mapped with dye and colloid (1.74 vs 1.31; P < .0001). Occult metastatic disease was identified in 17.5% of all patients and did not significantly differ between groups. In 92% of patients who had at least one positive SLN and were mapped with both agents, lymphatic metastases were identified in the SLN that contained the greatest radiotracer uptake. CONCLUSIONS: SLN identification is enhanced by the addition of radiolabeled sulfur colloid and intraoperative use of the hand-held gamma probe and may identify SLNs missed by the blue dye alone. These data support the combined use of radiolabeled sulfur colloid and blue dye in lymphatic mapping procedures to improve the nodal staging of stages I and II melanoma.

Classification and staging of melanoma.

Although a standardized and uniformly accepted cancer staging system is an essential and fundamental requirement to enable meaningful comparisons across patient populations, the sometimes capricious biologic behavior of melanoma makes developing such a staging system particularly difficult. Since the earliest well-documented attempts at classifying patients with cutaneous melanoma were described more than 50 years ago, the identification of increasingly powerful prognostic factors has led to sequential modifications of the cutaneous melanoma staging system. The current AJCC staging system is based on relatively well-established prognostic factors; however, several recent reports have identified additional prognostic factors not included in the current system, and other studies support the re-evaluation of some of the currently employed staging criteria. Some of the more controversial areas include the relevance of level of invasion versus tumor thickness, optimal cutoffs for tumor thickness, importance of ulceration, the grouping of satellites with in-transit metastases, the inclusion of microsatellites and local recurrences as a separate staging criterion, the replacement of size of nodal mass with number of positive nodes, the importance of nodal metastases in more than one nodal basin, and the prognostic significance of distant metastases. Therefore, future modifications of the staging system are anticipated to better incorporate these observations. Stage-specific staging recommendations for the patient with melanoma provide the clinician with a framework to most efficiently assess extent of disease in an era of cost-conscious clinical practice. In the asymptomatic patient with primary melanoma (stage I or II), we recommend a chest roentgenogram and evaluation of alkaline phosphatase and LDH levels; extensive radiologic evaluations are not indicated, because the rate of detection in this population is extremely low. Additional staging information should also be obtained by the technique of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy. For patients with local-regional disease (stage III, satellites, and local recurrence), a selective approach to imaging studies is warranted. For this patient population, we recommend complete blood count, liver function tests including alkaline phosphatase and LDH, a chest roentgenogram, and a CT scan of the abdomen. Although the yield of these tests, particularly CT of the abdomen, in detecting distant metastases in asymptomatic patients is low, they may identify false-positive abnormalities and provide an important baseline for future studies in this high-risk population. For patients with disease below the waist or in the head and neck region, we recommend CT of the pelvis and CT of the neck, respectively. Additional studies should be done only if clinically indicated. Finally, patients with known systemic disease (stage IV) should be more comprehensively evaluated, because the likelihood of detecting asymptomatic metastases is higher. Accordingly, in addition to the work-up outlined previously for stage III patients, we also perform a CT scan of the chest and MR imaging of the brain; other studies (e.g., bone scan, gastrointestinal series) are performed on the basis of symptoms.

Epidermal hyperplasia overlying human melanoma correlates with tumour depth and angiogenesis.

The aim of this study was to determine whether epidermal hyperplasia overlying cutaneous human melanoma is associated with increased tumour angiogenesis, tumour growth and the potential for metastasis. Forty-two surgical specimens of cutaneous human melanoma of different depths, each containing epidermis present in the tumour-free margin, were analysed by immunohistochemistry for the expression of the pro-angiogenic molecules basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) and the anti-angiogenic molecule interferon-beta (IFN-beta). The epidermis overlying intermediate and thick (1.0-10.0 mm), but not thin (0.5-1.0 mm), melanoma specimens was hyperplastic. Although the expression level of bFGF, VEGF and IL-8 in the epidermis directly overlying the tumour was similar to that in the distant epidermis, the expression of IFN-beta was significantly decreased in keratinocytes overlying intermediate and thick, but not thin, melanomas. The microvessel density was also increased in intermediate and thick specimens. Human melanoma cells were injected subcutaneously into nude mice. The resulting tumours were used to determine the association between overlying epidermal hyperplasia and neoplastic angiogenesis. Similar to human autochthonous melanomas, epidermal hyperplasia was found only over lesions produced by metastatic cells. Although there was no change in the expression of the pro-angiogenic molecules, the expression of IFN-beta was significantly decreased in the hyperplastic epidermis. Conditioned medium collected from cultures of the metastatic cell line induced in vitro proliferation of mouse keratinocytes, whereas conditioned medium collected from cultures of the non-metastatic cell line did not. Collectively, the data demonstrate that metastatic melanoma cells induce keratinocyte proliferation, leading to decreased expression of the negative regulator of angiogenesis, IFN-beta, and hence to increased angiogenesis.

Classification and staging of melanoma.

Although a standardized and uniformly accepted cancer staging system is an essential and fundamental requirement to enable meaningful comparisons across patient populations, the sometimes capricious biologic behavior of melanoma makes developing such a staging system particularly difficult. Since the earliest well-documented attempts at classifying patients with cutaneous melanoma were described more than 50 years ago, the identification of increasingly powerful prognostic factors has led to sequential modifications of the cutaneous melanoma staging system. The current AJCC staging system is based on relatively well-established prognostic factors; however, several recent reports have identified additional prognostic factors not included in the current system, and other studies support the re-evaluation of some of the currently employed staging criteria. Some of the more controversial areas include the relevance of level of invasion versus tumor thickness, optimal cutoffs for tumor thickness, importance of ulceration, the grouping of satellites with in-transit metastases, the inclusion of microsatellites and local recurrences as a separate staging criterion, the replacement of size of nodal mass with number of positive nodes, the importance of nodal metastases in more than one nodal basin, and the prognostic significance of distant metastases. Future modifications of the staging system are anticipated to better incorporate these observations. Stage-specific staging recommendations for the patient with melanoma provide the clinician with a framework to most efficiently assess extent of disease in an era of cost-conscious clinical practice. In the asymptomatic patient with primary melanoma (stage I or II), we recommend a chest roentgenogram and evaluation of alkaline phosphatase and LDH levels; extensive radiologic evaluations are not indicated, because the rate of detection in this population is extremely low. Additional staging information should also be obtained by the technique of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy. For patients with local-regional disease (stage III, satellites, and local recurrence), a selective approach to imaging studies is warranted. For this patient population, we recommend complete blood count, liver function tests including alkaline phosphatase and LDH, a chest roentgenogram, and a CT scan of the abdomen. Although the yield of these tests, particularly CT of the abdomen, in detecting distant metastases in asymptomatic patients is low, they may identify false-positive abnormalities and provide an important baseline for future studies in this high-risk population. For patients with disease below the waist or in the head and neck region, we recommend CT of the pelvis and CT of the neck, respectively. Additional studies should be done only if clinically indicated. Finally, patients with known systemic disease (stage IV) should be more comprehensively evaluated, because the likelihood of detecting asymptomatic metastases is higher. Accordingly, in addition to the work-up outlined previously for stage III patients, we also perform a CT scan of the chest and MR imaging of the brain; other studies (e.g., bone scan, gastrointestinal series) are performed on the basis of symptoms.