RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Exponential increases in Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) program enrollment have come with a rapid rise in the number of capstone projects conducted in clinical environments. However, misaligned priorities between students, faculty, and clinician leaders have created significant challenges. PURPOSE: Identify opportunities to strengthen collaboration between academic and clinical stakeholders to better support DNP projects and education. METHODS: Experienced hospital-based nurse leaders engaged in scholarly discourse supplemented by policy and research in DNP education. FINDINGS: Facilitating a DNP project requires significant investment of time, resources, and funds from the healthcare institution. Discord has arisen due to unclear responsibilities or decision-making ability for clinical stakeholders, ethical dilemmas for students who are also employees of the clinical site, and mismatched priorities between clinical need and student/academic project desires. Clinical leaders have raised significant concerns about DNP project proposals that are research-focused, diverge from healthcare institution goals, and lack a sustainability plan. DISCUSSION: Fortification of academic-practice partnerships and clarification of roles in the DNP student project are necessary to ensure that the project is of educational value to the student, a demonstration of learning for faculty, and of sustained clinical value to the healthcare system.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe existing guidance for qualifications of principal investigator s (PI s) of human subjects research and explore how they are operationalized for pediatric nurse scientists and clinical nurses in children's hospitals. DESIGN AND METHODS: After reviewing federal regulations, accreditation guidelines, and the literature, a convenience sample of members of the National Pediatric Nurse Scientist Collaborative (NPNSC). Participants completed a 33-item survey that included questions about Institutional Review Board (IRB), guidelines, and policies for PI status at their affiliated children's hospitals. RESULTS: The survey was electronically disseminated to 179 members of NPNSC through the Collaborative's listserv. Of the 39 members who responded, 90% hold a PhD and 80% practice in a free-standing children's hospital, nearly all of which (93%) are recognized as Magnet® hospitals. While the majority of respondents indicated that nurse scientists and other nurses were allowed to be PIs of research studies, educational requirements for PI status varied, with 3% requiring a PhD, 15% a baccalaureate degree, and 10% a graduate degree. 54% of respondents reported there was no degree requirement for PI status; however15% reported that even doctorally prepared nurse scientists cannot serve as PIs of research studies at their affiliated children''s hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The survey identified substantial variability in requirements for PI status and potential barriers to pediatric nurses conducting independent research as PIs at children's hospitals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Operationalizing existing guidance will expand inclusion of nurse scientist expertise in human subjects research.
Assuntos
Enfermeiros Pediátricos , Pesquisadores , Criança , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Escolaridade , Enfermagem PediátricaRESUMO
This column shares the best evidence-based strategies and innovative ideas on how to facilitate the learning and implementation of EBP principles and processes by clinicians as well as nursing and interprofessional students. Guidelines for submission are available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1741-6787.
Assuntos
Transtorno Autístico/terapia , Enfermagem Baseada em Evidências/educação , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Humanos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/enfermagemAssuntos
Cuidadores/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Transferência da Responsabilidade pelo Paciente/normas , Sociedades/tendências , Cuidadores/psicologia , Cuidadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Sociedades/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Health care providers need to support families and provide resources when facing their child's death and potential organ donation. Aims of this retrospective chart review in a tertiary health care system were: (1) describe characteristics of pediatric organ donors compared to those who were not; (2) determine differences between services utilized by families who selected organ donation versus those who did not. From 2017 to 2023 of 288 pediatric deaths, 76 were organ donors and 212 did not donate. Organ donors' mean age at admission was 6.3 ± 5.8 years. Thirty-four (44.7%) participated in Honor Walks. Significant differences existed between organ donors and non-organ donors in patients who were diagnosed with SIDS (3.9% vs 13.2%; P = .025). This study provides additional data to help further our understanding of bereavement support services for families making difficult decisions regarding organ donation.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine differences in clinical characteristics and hospital length of stay (LOS) for adolescents with eating disorders (EDs) requiring medical stabilization during the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 time periods. METHODS: Medical record data were abstracted for patients with EDs hospitalized for medical stabilization between 1/1/2019-2/29/2020 (pre-COVID-19) and 3/1/2020-12/31/2021 (during COVID-19). Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and LOS were compared between COVID-19 eras. Patients were categorized as boarding if they remained hospitalized ≥ 1 day after medical stabilization. Multivariate negative binomial linear regression models were performed to determine incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for factors related to increased LOS. RESULTS: Of the 467 admissions during this study, 120 were pre-COVID-19 and 347 were during COVID-19. Monthly admissions for EDs were higher during COVID-19 versus pre-COVID-19 (15.8 vs. 8.6, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with increased LOS included admission during COVID-19 (IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.15-1.40), p = 0.001), boarding (IRR 1.77, 95% CI 1.63-1.93, p = 0.001), public insurance (IRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.23, p = 0.032), nasogastric tube usage (IRR 1.62, 95% CI 1.48-1.76, p = 0.001), heart rate < 40 beats per minute (IRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11-1.33, p = 0.001) and abnormal electrocardiogram (IRR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.37, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In addition to clinical factors, we found that admission during COVID-19, boarding, and public insurance were associated with increased LOS among patients with EDs. There is a need for greater availability of ED treatment centers to care for patients with EDs after medical stabilization.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound effect on the mental health of young people worldwide. This public health crisis has led to a significant increase in individuals seeking care for an eating disorder. In the United States, hospital admissions for adolescents with eating disorders requiring medical stabilization increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines differences in the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with an eating disorder hospitalized pre-COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic in one pediatric hospital in the United States. We found a significant increase in hospital admissions during the pandemic as well as longer hospital stays. Factors associated with prolonged hospitalizations include those patients with public insurance (Medicaid), nasogastric tube for delivery of nutrition, and low heart rate. We found no difference in demographic factors such as age, gender, and insurance as well as degree of malnutrition and medical severity between the two time periods. The shortage of appropriate eating disorder treatment options upon hospital discharge were especially challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Music is often used as a nonpharmacological pain management strategy, but little evidence is available about its role in pediatric critical care patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a live music intervention versus a recorded music intervention on heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate in pediatric critical care patients receiving mechanical ventilation and sedation. METHODS: An exploratory randomized controlled trial was performed in a pediatric intensive care unit. Participants were randomly allocated to receive a live music intervention with standard care or a recorded music intervention with standard care. Each intervention was delivered by a board-certified music therapist for 15 minutes. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure were measured at baseline and at 15-minute intervals for 60 minutes after the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients aged 0 to 2 years completed the study: 17 were assigned to the live music group and 16 to the recorded music group. In the live music group, a significant reduction in heart rate was observed immediately after the intervention and was sustained at 60 minutes after the intervention. Although the live music group also exhibited a downward trend in blood pressure, those differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that live music interventions may be more effective than recorded music interventions in reducing pain and anxiety in pediatric critical care patients. The advantage of live music may be due to the adaptability of the music delivery by a trained music therapist.