Can a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass be safely performed by surgical residents in a bariatric center-of-excellence? The learning curve of surgical residents in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: A learning curve (LC) is a graphic display of the number of consecutive procedures performed necessary to reach competence and is defined by complications and duration of surgery (DOS). There is little evidence on the LC of surgical residents in bariatric surgery. Aim of the study is to evaluate whether the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) can be safely performed by surgical residents, to evaluate the LC of surgical residents for LRYGB and to assess whether surgical residents fit in the LC of the bariatric center which has been established by their proctors. METHODS: Records of all 3389 consecutive primary LRYGB patients, operated between December 2007 and January 2016 in a bariatric center-of-excellence in Amsterdam, were reviewed. Differences in DOS were assessed by means of a linear regression model. Differences in complications (classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥ 2) were evaluated with the χ 2 or the Fisher exact test. Cases were clustered in groups of 70 for comparison and reported for residents with ≥70 cases as primary surgeon. RESULTS: Four surgeons (S1-4) and three residents (R1-3) performed 2690 (88.2%) and 361 (11.8%) of 3051 LRYGBs, respectively. Median (IQR) DOS was 52.0 (42.0-65.0) min for S1-4 versus 53.0 (46.0-63.0) min for R1-3 (p = 0.52). The LC of R1-3 in their first 70 cases (n = 210) differs significantly from the individual (n = 70) LCs of surgeon 1, 2, and 3, with remarkably shorter DOS for the residents (adjusted p < 0.0001; p < 0.001 and p = 0.0002, respectively) and the same amount of surgical complications 5.1% (137/2690) for S1-4 versus 3.0% (11/361) for R1-3 (p = 0.089). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be safely performed by surgical residents under supervision of experienced bariatric surgeons. Surgical residents benefit from the experience of their proctors and they fit faultlessly in the LC of the surgical team, as set out by their proctors in a large bariatric center-of-excellence.

Bridging the gap between gastric pouch and jejunum: a bariatric nightmare.

BACKGROUND: Even in a large volume bariatric centre, bariatric surgeons are sometimes confronted with intraoperative anatomical challenges which force even the most experienced surgeon into a pioneering position. In this video we present how a large gap of approximately 8 cm is bridged by applying several techniques that are not part of our standardized surgical procedure. CASE PRESENTATION: After creation of a 20 mL gastric pouch we discovered that the alimentary limb could not be advanced further cranially due to a very short a thick jejunal mesentery in a 49 year old male patient during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery. By dissecting the gastro-oesophageal junction form the crus, stretching the gastric pouch, transecting the jejunal mesentery, using a retrocolic/retrogastric route, and creating a fully hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy we were able to safely complete the LRYGB. Drains were left near the gastrojejunostomy and the patient was kept nil by mouth for 5 days. On the 5th postoperative day radiographic swallow series were obtained which revealed no sign of leakage. The patient was discharged in good clinical condition on the 6th postoperative day. To date, no complications have occurred. Weight loss results are -31.5 % of the preoperative total body weight. CONCLUSIONS: When confronted with a large distance between the gastric pouch and the alimentary limb, several techniques presented in this video may be of aid to the bariatric surgeon. We stress that only experienced bariatric surgeon should embark on these techniques. Inspecting the alimentary limb before the creation of the gastric pouch may prevent the need for such complex techniques.

Outcome expectation and risk tolerance in patients seeking bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Average long-term outcome after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 25% total weight loss. The risk of short-term complications (leakage and bleeding), acute internal herniation, and mortality are 4.0%, 2.5%, and .2%, respectively. There is a paucity of evidence on what patients expect in terms of weight loss and to what extent surgical risks are tolerated. OBJECTIVE: To examine the patient's weight loss expectations and acceptance of the morbidity and mortality risk after primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS: Two-hundred patients participated in a standardized survey after completion of an extensive multidisciplinary screening, before surgery. Weight loss expectations, naive assessment, and acceptation of risks of morbidity and mortality were addressed with standard gamble methods. RESULTS: The 200 participants (156 female, 78%) had a mean age of 45.1 years and a mean body mass index of 42.3 kg/m2. Weight loss was overestimated by 151 patients (75.5%), and 79 participants (39.5%) were disappointed with the predicted weight loss. Median accepted risks on short-term complications, acute internal herniation, and mortality were 35.8% (interquartile range, 21.0%-58.0%), 25.1% (interquartile range, 15.9%-50.8%), and 4.5% (interquartile range, 1.0%-10.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients seeking bariatric surgery seem to have unrealistic weight loss objectives and are willing to accept substantial risks to achieve these goals.

Internal Herniation After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery: Pitfalls in Diagnosing and the Introduction of the AMSTERDAM Classification.

INTRODUCTION: Internal herniation (IH) probably is the most elusive complication of laparoscopic Roux- en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery. This study provides a definition for IH, a diagnosing algorithm, and information on several factors influencing IH formation. METHOD: Baseline characteristics, laboratory findings, imaging studies, operative findings, and follow up data of 1583 patients that underwent LRYGB at our bariatric facility between 2007 and 2013 were recorded. Follow up varied between 3 and 76 months, and 85 % of the data was available for analysis at 12 months. Our surgical technique was standardized. Intermesenteric spaces were not closed until July 2012, where after they were closed. To facilitate comparison, IH cases were matched with controls. RESULTS: Forty patients (2.5 %) had an IH during re-laparoscopy. The modal clinical presentation is acute onset epigastric discomfort, often crampy/colicky in nature. Additional examinations included laboratory testing, abdominal X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, and abdominal CT scanning. Patients who developed an IH lost a significantly higher percentage of their total body weight than their matched controls at every time point. IH incidence was higher in the non-closure group than the closure group. CONCLUSION: The large variation in reported IH incidence is due to the large variation in IH definition. To gain more uniformity in reporting IH prevalence, we propose the use of the AMSTERDAM classification. Post-LRYGB patients with acute onset crampy/colicky epigastric pain should undergo abdominal ultrasound to rule out gallbladder pathology and offered re-laparoscopy with a low threshold. IH incidence is highest among patients with rapid weight loss and non-closure of intermesenteric defects.

Risk Stratification Models: How Well do They Predict Adverse Outcomes in a Large Dutch Bariatric Cohort?

BACKGROUND: Risk prediction models are useful tools for informing patients undergoing bariatric surgery about their risk for complications and correcting outcome reports. The aim of this study is to externally validate risk models assessing complications after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery. METHODS: All 740 patients who underwent a primary LRYGB between December 2007 and July 2012 were included in the validation cohort. PubMed was systematically searched for risk prediction models. Eight risk models were selected for validation. We classified our complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Predefined criteria of a good model were a non-significant Hosmer and Lemeshow test, Nagelkerke R (2) ≥ 0.10, and c-statistic ≥0.7. RESULTS: There were 85 (7.8 %) grade 1, 54 (7.3 %) grade 2, 5 (0.7 %) grade 3a, 14 (1.9 %) grade 3b, and 14 (1.9 %) grade 4a complications in our validation cohort. Only one model predicted adverse events satisfactorily. This model consisted of one patient-related factor (age) and four surgeon- or center related factors (conversion to open surgery, intraoperative events, the need for additional procedures during LRYGB and the learning curve of the center). CONCLUSIONS: The overall majority of the included risk models are unsuitable for risk prediction. Only one model with an emphasis on surgeon- and center-related factors instead of patient-related factors predicted adverse outcome correctly in our external validation cohort. These findings support the establishment of specialty centers and warn benchmark data institutions not to correct bariatric outcome data by any other patient-related factor than age.

The Preceding Surgeon Factor in Bariatric Surgery: a Positive Influence on the Learning Curve of Subsequent Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery has been well investigated. The learning curve is defined by complications and/or by duration of surgery (DOS). Previous studies report an inverse relationship between patient outcome and patient volume. In this study, we investigate whether the learning curve of preceding bariatric surgeons is of additional influence for surgeons who start to perform LRYGB in the same centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the records of all 713 consecutive primary LRYGB patients operated in our centre from December 2007 until July 2012. Surgeon 1 and 3 had previous laparoscopic bariatric experience whilst Surgeon 2 and 4 had not. We stratified the data between the four surgeons with different levels of experience and in a chronology of 50 cases. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (9.4 %) complications occurred in the study period. Surgeon 1 had more complications occurring within the first 50 cases than Surgeon 4 (10 versus 1, p < 0.05). There was no difference in complication rate between groups of 50 consecutive cases. None of the patients died. DOS decreased for every consecutive surgeon, irrespective of their experience. The learning curve defined by DOS was steepest for Surgeon 1, followed by Surgeon 2, 3 and 4. CONCLUSION: In this study, we show that the learning curve of the preceding surgeon positively influences the learning curve of latter surgeons, irrespective of their experience. Therefore, the 'preceding surgeon factor' should be taken in account in addition to volume requirements when starting new bariatric facilities.

Fast track care for gastric bypass patients decreases length of stay without increasing complications in an unselected patient cohort.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies investigating fast track care involve selected patients. This study evaluates the implementation of fast track care in unselected bariatric patients in a high volume teaching hospital in the Netherlands. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic gastric bypass in our center were reviewed in the years before (n = 104) and after implementation of fast track care (n = 360). Fast track involved the banning of tubes/catheters, anesthetic management and early ambulation. Primary outcome was the length of stay. Perioperative times, complications (<30 days), readmissions and prolonged length of stay were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The median length decreased after implementation of fast track (3 days versus 1 day, p < 0.001). Overall complication rate remained stable after implementation of fast track care (17.3 % versus 18.3 %, not significant). Readmission rate did not differ between groups (4.8 % conventional care versus 8.1 % fast track, not significant). More grades I-IVa complications occurred outside the hospital after the implementation of fast track care (24.8 % versus 51.5 %). Lower age (b = 0.118, 95 % CI: 0.002-0.049, p < 0.05) and the implementation of fast track (b = -0.270, 95 % CI: -1.969 to -0.832, p < 0.001) were the only factors that significantly shortened the length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients that received fast track care had a decreased length of stay. Although more complications occurred after discharge in the fast track care group, this did not lead to adverse outcomes. Fast track does enhance recovery and is suitable for unselected patients. Care providers should select their patients for early discharge and pursue a low threshold for readmission.

[EndoBarrier for counteracting obesity and metabolic syndrome]. / EndoBarrier tegen obesitas en het metabool syndroom.

The prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide. Its primary treatment consists of lifestyle changes. In severely obese (BMI > 40 kg/m2 or ≥ 35 kg/m2 with comorbidity) patients though, bariatric surgery has been found to be the only way to achieve permanent weight loss. Operations such as the placement of a gastric band or a gastric bypass can, however, lead to complications and necessitate secondary interventions. In search of less invasive treatments, placement of the EndoBarrier duodenal jejunal bypass liner appears to be a promising, safe and effective method for facilitating weight loss. The EndoBarrier is a plastic flexible tube which is gastroscopically placed in the duodenal bulb, directly behind the pylorus. It extends from the duodenum to the proximal jejunum. Recent studies have demonstrated significant weight reduction in comparison to control-diet patients. Concomitant positive effects on cardiovascular risk factors including diabetes type 2 were observed. A multicentre trial is currently being executed in order to unravel the mechanism behind these effects.