Validity and reliability of Arabic version of pediatric migraine disability assessment scale (Child Self-Report versus Parent Proxy-Report): a multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment (PedMIDAS) is one of the most frequently used questionnaires to assess disability from migraine in pediatric patients. This work aimed to evaluate the validity and test-retest reliability of the Arabic version of the child self-report versus the parent proxy report PedMIDAS. We also aimed to test the agreement between children's and parents' reports of the scale. METHODS: PedMIDAS was subjected to translation and back-translation, then applied to 112 pediatric patients fulfilling the migraine diagnostic criteria. This cross-sectional study was conducted on two visits, one week apart. At visit 1, the following data were obtained from the included pediatric patients: disease duration, migraine type, current treatment regimen, monthly migraine days (MMD) during the last month preceding the enrollment, and migraine intensity using the visual analogue scale. Then, each child and his parent were independently asked to fill out PedMIDAS and Child Self-Report of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ 4.0 (PedsQL™) to test the convergent validity of PedMIDAS. At visit 2, each child was requested to complete PedMIDAS again, and so was the parent to evaluate test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha was estimated to be 0.94 for each instrument. For the child-self report PedMIDAS, the average measure intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value was 0.992 (95%CI = 0.989-0.995), while it was estimated to be 0.990 for the parent-proxy report with 95%CI = 0.985-0.993, indicating excellent test-retest reliability for both instruments. The child-self report and the parent-proxy report PedMIDAS scores were significantly correlated with MMD, VAS, and all domains of the corresponding PedsQL, supporting convergent validity for both instruments. Agreement between parent and child on disability grading categories of PedMIDAS was substantial (κ = 0.644). CONCLUSION: The Arabic version of PedMIDAS was a valid and reliable instrument to assess disability from migraine in Arabic-speaking pediatric patients with migraine. Parent reports can be valuable as a complement to child reports for a comprehensive assessment of migraine.

Interleukins 17 and 10 in a sample of Egyptian relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Cytokines are major contributors in the immune disruption in multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: Evaluating the proinflammatory (IL-17A) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines in relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients at time of relapse and during remission. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: A case-control study including 30 RRMS patients and 15 controls. Patients were recruited from the Kasr Al-Ainy MS research unit (KAMSU), Cairo University, Egypt. Levels of IL-17A and IL-10 were assessed in patients' sera, during relapse and 30days after IV methylprednisolone, and in control subjects using enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). RESULTS: IL-17 was higher in patients during relapse and remission phases when compared with controls (P=0.001), whereas, IL-10 was higher in patients during remission but normal during relapse (P=0.01; 0.86 respectively). IL-17 increased during relapses (P=0.001) while IL-10 increased during remissions (P=0.028). No significant correlations were found between both interleukins and age at onset; disease duration, number of relapses; or EDSS. CONCLUSION: RRMS patients can have a regulatory imbalance between both pro-and antiinflammatory cytokines, which could be a target for treatment strategies rather than focusing on a single cytokine.