Linac-based versus MR-guided SBRT for localized prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation of acute tolerability.

AIM: This study aims to compare acute toxicity of prostate cancer (PCa) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered by MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) with 1.5-T MR-linac or by volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) with conventional linac. METHODS: Patients with low-to-favorable intermediate risk class PCa were treated with exclusive SBRT (35 Gy in five fractions). Patients treated with MRgRT were enrolled in an Ethical Committee (EC) approved trial (Prot. n° 23,748), while patients treated with conventional linac were enrolled in an EC approved phase II trial (n° SBRT PROG112CESC). The primary end-point was the acute toxicity. Patients were included in the analysis if they had at least 6 months of follow-up for the primary end-point evaluation. Toxicity assessment was performed according to CTCAE v5.0 scale. International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were included in the analysis. Seventy-two (53.3%) were treated with MR-linac and 63 (46.7%) with conventional linac. The median initial PSA before RT was 6.1 ng/ml (range 0.49-19). Globally, acute G1, G2, and G3 toxicity occurred in 39 (28.8%), 20 (14.5%), and 5 (3.7%) patients. At the univariate analysis, acute G1 toxicity did not differ between MR-linac and conventional linac (26.4% versus 31.8%), as well as G2 toxicity (12.5% versus 17.5%; p = 0.52). Acute G2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred in 7% and 12.5% of cases in MR-linac and conventional linac group, respectively (p = 0.06), while acute G2 genitourinary toxicity occurred in 11% and 12.8% in MR-linac and conventional linac, respectively (p = 0.82). The median IPSS before and after SBRT was 3 (1-16) and 5 (1-18). Acute G3 toxicity occurred in two cases in the MR-linac and three cases in the conventional linac group (p = n.s.). CONCLUSION: Prostate SBRT with 1.5-T MR-linac is feasible and safe. Compared to conventional linac, MRgRT might to potentially reduce the overall G1 acute toxicity at 6 months, and seems to show a trend toward a lower incidence of grade 2 GI toxicity. A longer follow-up is necessary to assess the late efficacy and toxicity.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases: a monoinstitutional analysis of clinical outcomes and potential prognostic factors.

PURPOSE: We report the retrospective data of a cohort of patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases, aiming to assess the clinical factors potentially affecting clinical outcomes. METHODS: The present series reports the outcomes of a cohort of 71 patients with pulmonary oligometastases with no extrapulmonary disease. All patients were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) performed with volumetric modulated arc therapy-image guided radiotherapy (VMAT-IGRT) to up to five secondary lesions. Survival estimates were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 98 lesions in 71 patients were treated from February 2014 to August 2020. The most frequent histologies were colorectal in 37.7%, lung cancer in 44.8%, head and neck cancer in 8.1%, and other in 9.4%. Median age was 71 years (range 32-93 years). Concurrent systemic therapy was administered in 32.3%. SBRT was delivered to a median total dose of 60 Gy (range 55-70 Gy) in 3-10 fractions for a median BED10 = 105 Gy (range 96-180 Gy). Median follow-up was 29.5 months (range 6-81), with no acute or late G > 2 adverse event. Our LC rates at 2 and 4 years were 92.4 and 89.8%, respectively. DPFS rates at 2 and 4 years were 45.3 and 27.2%, respectively. A second SBRT course was proposed in 21 patients (29.5%) who developed an oligoprogression, resulting in median time to second progression of 9 months (range 2-44) and 2­year PFS2 rate of 42.4%. At univariate analysis, patients with sequential oligometastases reported better OS rates (p = 0.002), which was also confirmed at multivariate analysis, where distant progression was also related to worse OS (p = 0.022). Higher local control rates relate to better PFS (p = 0.04). The 2­ and 4­year OS rates were 61 and 39.7% CONCLUSION: SBRT is feasible for pulmonary oligometastases with favorable outcomes and toxicity. At multivariate analysis, patients with sequential oligometastatic progression maintain a survival advantage. Also, local control was found to be related to improved PFS rates.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an innovative therapeutic approach in patients (pts) with a diagnosis of refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) after the use of drugs, radiofrequency catheter ablation, and/or defibrillator (ICD) implant. The current efficacy data of SABR are limited and several prospective clinical studies are ongoing to support the use of ablative radiation dose to control VT. The aim of the current prospective pilot study is to report the efficacy and tolerability of SABR in ICD implanted pts with refractory VT in our centre. Non-invasive electroanatomical mapping (EAM), cardiac computed tomography (CT), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission (FDG-PET)-CT scan were used and combined with a radiation CT scan. A dose prescription of 25 Gy in a single dose was delivered by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) Linac-based. The primary endpoint was efficacy, defined as a reduction in ICD shocks after SABR treatment, while the secondary endpoint was safety. Six consecutive pts (five males and one female) implanted with an ICD and with three or more VT were enrolled. One pts died after 1 month, due to end-stage heart failure. Two pts experienced ICD shocks in VT 2 and 5 months after treatment. Three pts experienced no more ICD shocks on VT after therapy. Our data suggest the efficacy and safety of SABR treatment in pts with VT. Larger dataset of pts and longer follow-up are otherwise required to validate the impact of SABR as a standardized treatment in these pts.

Postoperative moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a mono-institutional propensity-score-matching analysis between adjuvant and early-salvage radiotherapy.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of moderately hypofractionated postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 304 surgically resected PCa patients were analyzed. One hundred and five patients underwent adjuvant RT (aRT), 77 early-savage RT (esRT), and 123 salvage RT (sRT). Biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for potential confounders between aRT and esRT groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 33 months. Three-year BRFS and PFS were 82 and 85.2%, respectively, in the overall population. At the multivariate analysis, Gleason score and hormone therapy were factors independently correlated with BRFS and PFS. After PSM, there was no difference in BRFS and PFS between aRT and esRT patients. Severe toxicity was represented by grade 3 urinary incontinence (3.5%) and urgency (1%), and aRT correlated with increased any-grade acute toxicity. Severe grade 3 gastrointestinal late toxicity occurred in 1.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: Postoperative moderately hypofractionated RT achieved acceptable disease control rate and demonstrated no increased or unexpected toxicity. Future prospective studies should evaluate the role of postoperative RT in patients with unfavorable disease characteristics.

Daily dosimetric variation between image-guided volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy and MR-guided daily adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.

AIM: To evaluate differences between MR-guided daily-adaptive RT (MRgRT) and image-guided RT (IGRT) with or without fiducial markers in prostate cancer (PCa) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in terms of dose distribution on critical structures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred treatment sessions in 40 patients affected by low and intermediate PCa were evaluated. The prescribed dose was 35 Gy in 5 fractions delivered on alternate days. MRgRT patients (10) were daily recontoured, re-planned, and treated with IMRT technique. IGRT patients without (20) and with (10) fiducials were matched on soft tissues or fiducials and treated with VMAT technique. Respective CBCTs were retrospectively delineated and the prescribed plan was overlaid for dosimetric analysis. The daily dose for rectum, bladder, and prostate was registered. RESULTS: MRgRT resulted in a significantly lower rate of constraints violation as compared to IGRT without fiducials, especially for rectum V28Gy, rectum V32Gy, rectum V35Gy, rectum Dmax, and bladder Dmax. IGRT with fiducials reported high accuracy levels, comparable to MRgRT. MRgRT and IGRT with fiducials reported no significant prostate CTV underdosage, while IGRT without fiducials was associated with occasional cases of prostate CTV under dosage. CONCLUSION: MR-guided daily-adaptive SBRT seems a feasible and accurate strategy for treating prostate cancer with ablative doses. IGRT with the use of fiducials provides a comparable level of accuracy and acceptable real-dose distribution over treatment fractions. Future study will provide additional data regarding the tolerability and the clinical outcome of this new technological approach.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer using 1.5 T MRI-Linac: preliminary data on feasibility and acute patient-reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To report preliminary data on feasibility and patient-reported outcomes following PSMA-PET/CT guided SBRT by means of 1.5 T MRI-Linac. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between October 2019 and April 2020, twenty consecutive castration sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer patients were enrolled in an ethical committee approved prospective observational study (Protocol n. XXXX) and treated with PSMA-PET/CT guided SBRT by means of 1.5 T MRI-Linac (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). The mean delivered dose was 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Clinicians reported toxicity was prospectively collected according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Quality of life (QoL) assessment was performed using EORTC-QLQ C30 questionnaires administered at baseline, end of treatment and at first follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-five lesions in 20 castration sensitive oligorecurrent patients were treated: the most commonly treated anatomic sites were nodal (n = 16) and pelvic bone (n = 9). Median PSA-value preMRI guided SBRT was 1.16 ng/mL (range, 0.27-8.9), whereas median PSA value at first follow-up after SBRT was 0.44 ng/mL (range, 0.06-8.15). At first follow-up, for 16 patients showing detectable PSA, PSMA-PET/CT was performed detecting, respectively, in 6 cases partial response and in 10 cases complete response. In the remaining cases, PSA-value was undetectable after SBRT. Radiotherapy treatment was safe and well tolerated according to the PROMs. No acute G2 or higher toxicities were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The current series represent the largest one exploring the feasibility and patient-reported outcomes following PSMA-PET/CT guided SBRT by means of 1.5 T MRI-Linac. The preliminary findings here reported are encouraging in terms of effectiveness and tolerability.

Disease course of lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been shown to increase survival rates in oligometastatic disease (OMD), but local control of colorectal metastases remains poor. We aimed to explore the natural course of oligometastatic colorectal cancer and to investigate how SBRT of lung metastases can delay the progression to polymetastatic disease (PMD). METHODS: 107 lung oligometastases in 38 patients were treated with SBRT at a single institution. The median number of treated lesions was 2 (range 1-5). Time to PMD (ttPMD) was defined as the time from SBRT to the occurrence of >5 new metastases. Genetic biomarkers such as EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability were investigated as predictive factors for response rates. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 28 months. At median follow-up, 7 patients were free from disease and 31 had progression: 18 patients had sequential oligometastatic disease (SOMD) and 13 polymetastatic progression. All SOMD cases received a second SBRT course. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (range 4-9 months); median ttPMD was 25.8 months (range 12-39 months) with 1­ and 2­year PFS rates of 62.5% and 53.4%, respectively. 1­ and 2­year local PFS (LPFS) rates were 91.5% and 80%, respectively. At univariate analysis, BRAF wildtype correlated with better LPFS (p = 0.003), SOMD after primary SBRT was associated with longer cancer-specific survival (p = 0.031). Median overall survival (OS) was 39.5 months (range 26-64 months) and 2­year OS was 71.1%. CONCLUSION: The present results support local ablative treatment of lung metastases using SBRT in oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients, as it can delay the transition to PMD. Patients who progressed as SOMD maintained a survival advantage compared to those who developed PMD.

Linac-based SBRT as a feasible salvage option for local recurrences in previously irradiated prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The optimal management of prostate cancer (PC) recurrences after definitive or postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is still controversial. The aim of the present retrospective study was to report the preliminary clinical results and toxicity of a mono-institutional series of patients re-irradiated with linac-based SBRT in recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were previous definitive or adjuvant/salvage RT, evidence of biochemical recurrence and radiological detection of local relapse (Magnetic Resonance Imaging or PSMA/choline-Positron Emission Tomography), and IPSS <10. Toxicity was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. RESULTS: Between 12/2014 and 12/2019, 24 patients with median age 75 years (65-89) underwent re-RT for PC recurrence. Median follow-up was 21 months (2-68). The recurrences occurred in 13 cases within the prostate and in 11 cases within the prostate bed. All patients were treated with SBRT to a median total dose of 30 Gy (25-36 Gy) in 5-6 fractions, and simultaneous androgen deprivation therapy was administered in 4 patients. Acute toxicity was G1 in 8.3% and G2 in 12.5% for genitourinary (GU), no acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred. Concerning late side effects, 19.7% of patients were found to have ≥G2 GU toxicity, including one G3 urethral stenosis. Only one case of G1 late GI toxicity occurred and no ≥G2. The 2­year overall survival was 95%. The 1­ and 2­year biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 80 and 54.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite of the heterogeneity of the sample, linac-based SBRT as a salvage treatment in previously irradiated locally recurrent PC patients seems to be a safe and feasible treatment option. Long-term data are pending.

Post-HIFU locally relapsed prostate cancer: high-dose salvage radiotherapy guided by molecular imaging.

PURPOSE: To evaluate tolerance and biochemical control rates of salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in patients with local relapse from prostate cancer (PC) after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as primary treatment. METHODS: Twenty-four patients presented biochemical failure of PC. Salvage EBRT to the residual prostate was performed with moderate hypofractionation schedule (MHRT) in 28 fractions (n = 16) or with extreme hypofractionation schedule (SBRT) in 5 fractions (n = 8) by means of image-guided volumetric modulation arc therapy. In case of MHRT, the median dose was 71.4 Gy, whereas in case of SBRT it was 32.5 Gy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 28 months. The median PSA nadir was 0.26 ng/mL. In case of MHRT, the median PSA nadir was 0.15 ng/mL and occurred within a median time of 19 months. In case of SBRT, the median PSA nadir was 0.64 ng/mL and occurred within a median time of 8 months. No G3 higher acute or late toxicity after EBRT was observed. Only three patients presented with G2 acute GI toxicity (actinic proctitis). Twelve patients experienced acute G1 GU toxicity: 8/16 of men treated with MHRT and 4/8 of men treated with SBRT. Complete local control of disease was achieved in 23/24 patients (96%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the feasibility and the low toxicity of salvage EBRT with both schedules of treatment after HIFU failure. The findings of low acute toxicity and good biochemical control rates are encouraging, but a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.

Is multidisciplinary management possible in the treatment of lung cancer? A report from three Italian meetings.

PURPOSE: To report criticisms and barriers to the "real-life" application of international guidelines and recent developments in the management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Italy. METHODS: Three 2-day courses were organized. During the first day, experts in different fields of thoracic oncology gave their lecture on diagnosis and therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. During the second day, all participants were divided into four groups to discuss on a clinical case as a multidisciplinary team (MDT). The aim was to stimulate the discussion on practical issues in the management of NSCLC patients in the real-life practice. RESULTS: A total of 196 physicians were involved in the courses as learners. Invasive diagnosis of nodal disease for staging purposes, a priori definition of "surgical resectability" and a regular MDT with all crucial participants available were the three main key points identified for a good management of these patients. The main barriers to the clinical application of a good diagnostic and therapeutic approach to the patient were the absence of a regular and complete MDT in the South and Centre of Italy, while in the North of Italy, time for discussion of clinical cases in the MDT and waiting lists for staging and therapeutic interventions were deemed as the major concerns. CONCLUSION: The meetings showed that diagnosis and treatment of locally advanced NSCLC are still extremely variable between different Italian regions. Logistic issues, waiting lists, paucity of well-trained staff and expertise seem to be the main barriers to international guidelines application.