Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Euro Surveill ; 28(44)2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37917030

RESUMO

Between August and September 2023, three distinct autochthonous dengue virus transmission events occurred in Lazio, Italy, with the main event in Rome. The events involved three different dengue serotypes. No link with previous imported cases was identified. Here we describe the epidemiological and phylogenetic analysis of the first autochthonous cases and the implemented control actions. The multiple transmission events call for a strengthening of the vector control strategies and future research to better characterise the risk in countries like Italy.


Assuntos
Dengue , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Filogenia , Itália/epidemiologia , Sorogrupo , Dengue/epidemiologia
2.
Euro Surveill ; 24(6)2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30755294

RESUMO

BackgroundPaediatrician recommendations are known to influence parental vaccine decisions.AimOur aim was to examine vaccination knowledge, attitudes and practices among paediatricians in Italy and identify factors associated with their confidence in addressing parental questions.MethodsAn electronic questionnaire survey was conducted from February to March 2016, among a sample of Italian paediatricians.ResultsThe survey was completed by 903 paediatricians (mean age: 56 years). Of 885 who responded to the specific question, 843 (95.3%) were completely favourable to vaccinations. Sixty-six per cent (570/862) felt sufficiently knowledgeable about vaccinations and vaccine-preventable diseases to confidently discuss them with parents. Paediatricians who were male, who were 55 years or older, who had participated in training courses in the last 5 years, who reported that taking courses and reading the scientific literature had contributed to their knowledge, or who had implemented vaccination promotion activities, felt more knowledgeable than other paediatricians. When asked to rate their level of agreement with statements about vaccine safety and effectiveness, only 8.9% (80/903) responded fully as expected. One third (294/878) did not systematically verify that their patients are up to date with the immunisation schedule. Only 5.4% (48/892) correctly identified all true and false contraindications.ConclusionsThe majority of paediatricians in Italy are favourable to vaccination but gaps were identified between their overall positive attitudes and their knowledge, beliefs and practices. Targeted interventions are needed aimed at increasing paediatricians' confidence in addressing parents' concerns, strengthening trust towards health authorities and improving systems barriers.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pais/psicologia , Pediatras , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Instituições Filantrópicas de Saúde
3.
Eur J Pediatr ; 176(7): 955-962, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28551878

RESUMO

In accordance with the goals of the World Health Organization Regional Committee for Europe, the Italian national Measles and Rubella Elimination Plan 2010-2015 aimed to reduce the incidence of congenital rubella cases to <1 case/100,000 live births by 2015. In Italy, a passive national surveillance system for congenital rubella and rubella in pregnancy is active since 2005. We estimated the degree of underreporting of congenital rubella, performing a capture-recapture analysis of cases detected through two independent sources: the national surveillance system and the national hospital discharge database, in the years 2010-2014. We found that 6 out of 11 cases tracked in the retrospective case-finding from hospital registries had not been notified to the surveillance system, and we estimated a degree of underreporting of 53% for the period 2010-2014. This approach showed to be simple to perform, repeatable, and effective. CONCLUSION: In order to reduce underreporting, some actions aimed at strengthening surveillance procedures are needed. The adoption on a routine basis of the review of hospital discharge registries for case-finding, monthly zero-reporting, and actions to train and sensitize all the specialists involved in the care of pregnant women and the newborns to notification procedures are recommended. What is Known • In Italy, the incidence of congenital rubella was below the WHO target of 1/100,000 live births in 2005-2015, except for two peaks in 2008 and 2012 (5 and 4/100,000, respectively). • Further efforts are required to improve congenital rubella surveillance so that it is more sensitive and specific. The WHO proposes retrospective case-finding from hospital records as an alternative approach to detect infants with congenital rubella. What is New • Underreporting of congenital rubella in Italy was 53% in 2010-2014. • Hospital discharge registries resulted to be an appropriate source to detect congenital rubella cases.


Assuntos
Notificação de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/congênito , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Itália/epidemiologia , Alta do Paciente , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/diagnóstico , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle
4.
Epidemiol Prev ; 39(4 Suppl 1): 134-8, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26499431

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the trend of invasive pneumococcal disease in the years 2008-2014; to verify the impact of the conjugate vaccine and monitor the occurrence of serotype replacement. DESIGN: Prospective observational study based on data from the national surveillance for invasive bacterial diseases coordinated by the Istituto superiore di sanità. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Seven Italian regions (A.P. Bolzano, A.P. Trento, Emilia-Romagna, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Lombardia, Piemonte, Veneto), accounting for 43% of the national population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of cases and incidence of invasive pneumococcal diseases: global, stratified by age groups and by serotypes included or not in the PCV13. RESULTS: In 2008-2014, in the 0-4 age group IPD incidence for all serotypes decreased from 7.1 to 2.9/100,000; incidence for vaccine serotypes (VT) decreased from 5.5 to 1.1/100,000, while incidence for non-vaccine serotypes (NVT) increased from 1.6 to 2.0/100,000 (2.5 in 2013). In the >64 age group, IPD incidence increased from 5.3 to 7.5/100,000; VT incidence decreased from 3.9 to 3.2 (4.9 in 2010 and 4.3 in 2013), whereas NVT incidence increased from 1.4 to 4.4/100,000. CONCLUSION: Use of the conjugate vaccine has reduced the number of cases of IPD by VT in children; the increase in IPD by NVT, above all in older age groups, suggests a serotype replacement.


Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade/tendências , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Estudos Prospectivos , Sorotipagem , Streptococcus pneumoniae/classificação , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Vacinas Conjugadas , Adulto Jovem
5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 14: 545, 2014 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25410754

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Italy, free-of-charge HPV vaccination is offered to 11-year-old girls since 2007. The National Immunization Plan established the target coverage at a minimum of 70%; it should increase to 95% within 3-year time frame. In 2012, four year after the introduction of HPV vaccination, coverage was stable at 69%. We conducted a national cross-sectional study to explore barriers to vaccination in Italy. METHODS: Vaccination services selected, through the immunization registries, a sample of unvaccinated girls born in 1997 or 1998 and posted to their families a 23-items questionnaire inquiring barriers to vaccination, HPV knowledge, source of information on HPV, perception of risk of contracting HPV, advice from consulted health professionals on HPV vaccination. RESULTS: We analysed 1,738 questionnaires. Main barriers were fear of adverse events (reported by 80% of families), lack of trust in a new vaccine (76%), discordant information received by health professionals (65%) and scarce information on HPV vaccination (54%). Overall, 54% of families replied correctly to more than half of 10 questions exploring knowledge on HPV vaccination. Families with a high knowledge score were more likely to live in Northern and Central Italy, be Italian, have a high educational level, include a mother who attended cervical screening regularly and consult more information sources. Although paediatricians/general practitioners and gynaecologists were considered the most trusted source of information by 79% and 61% of respondents, they were consulted only by 49% and 31%. Among parents who discussed vaccination with a physician, 28% received discordant advices and 31% received the recommendation of accepting vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of adverse events, discordance of information and advices from physicians, and scarce information were the more commonly reported barriers to HPV vaccination. Health professionals played a key role as information providers, thus they must be better trained to provide clear notions. Training needs to include the development of communication skills; transparent discussion about the pros and cons of vaccination may reduce fear of adverse events and increase trust in vaccination. The creation of a public health network around vaccination would allow sharing information and attitudes on vaccinations, so that homogeneous messages could reach the target population.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Vacinação , Adolescente , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Itália , Papillomaviridae/imunologia , Pais , Participação do Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
6.
Ig Sanita Pubbl ; 70(6): 635-46, 2014.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25715898

RESUMO

In the season 2013-2014, a campaign to promote influenza vaccination among health care workers (HCWs) was conducted in two Italian hospitals, based on an educational toolkit and attitude and compliance towards vaccination were investigated. Overall, 36% of the HCWs get vaccinated almost once, 2.3% in 2013-14 season for the first time, 57% never, 7% do not know or not remember. The main reason for vaccination was reportedly to avoid taking sick-leave (29.7%); while refusal was guided by the low risk-perception associated with influenza (38.5%). Interventions based only on education and communication seem not to be sufficient; an integrated approach with multiple components is needed to achieve higher coverage rates and to ensure a successful vaccination campaign.

7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 13: 74, 2013 Feb 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23390953

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pre-vaccination information on HPV type-specific prevalence in target populations is essential for designing and monitoring immunization strategies for cervical cancer (CC) prevention. Data on HPV prevalence in Italy are available for women over the age of 24 years, target of the population-based CC screening programmes; while data of HPV prevalence in younger ages are very limited. The present study enrolled Italian women aged 18-26 years in order to assess the prevalence and distribution of high-risk (HR) HPV types. Risk-factors correlated with HR-HPV positivity were also described. METHODS: A sample of 2,289 women was randomly selected from the resident population lists of ten Local Health Units (LHUs) located in six Italian Regions scattered across the country; both rural and urban LHUs were involved. Women aged between 18 and 26 years and living in the selected LHUs were included in the study; pregnant women and women who did not speak Italian were excluded. A total of 1,102 women met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. Participants were offered pap test and Hybrid-Capture 2 (HC2) test for HR-HPV types and genotyping was performed on positive smears. RESULTS: Out of 1,094 valid samples, 205 (18.7%) were HR-HPV positive. Women with 2-4 (ORadj = 4.15, 95%CI: 2.56-6.72) and ≥5 lifetime partners (ORadj = 10.63, 95%CI: 6.16-18.36) and women who have used any contraceptive in the last six months (ORadj = 1.67, 95%CI: 1.09-2.54) had a higher risk to be infected; women living with their partner had a lower risk (ORadj = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.34-0.92) to acquire infection than women living with parents/friends/alone. Among HC2 positive women, HPV16 was the most prevalent type (30.9%), followed by 31 (19.6%), 66 (12.9%), 51 (11.3%), 18 (8.8%), 56 (8.8%). Co-infections of HR-HC2 targeted types were found in 20.4% of positive samples. The HR-HPV prevalence in women with abnormal cytology (52.4%) was significantly higher than in women with normal cytology (14.6%); however 33.0% of HR-HPV infected women had an abnormal cytology. CONCLUSION: HR-HPV prevalence in Italian women aged 18-26 years was 19%, higher than what detected for older women, by other studies using the same molecular method and laboratory network; this result supports the choice of electing girls before the sexual debut as the primary target of HPV vaccination. The HPV type distribution found in this study may represent a baseline picture; an accurate post-vaccine surveillance is necessary to early detect a possible genotype replacement. The high prevalence of viral types other than vaccine-HPV types supports the necessity to guarantee the progression of CC screening programmes in vaccinated women.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus/isolamento & purificação , Alphapapillomavirus/patogenicidade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Alphapapillomavirus/classificação , Alphapapillomavirus/genética , Análise de Variância , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Teste de Papanicolaou , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco
8.
Recenti Prog Med ; 104(6): 262-6, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23801230

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We carried out an active surveillance of common adverse events occurring among women (9 to 26 years old) receiving human papillomavirus vaccine (Gardasil® and Cervarix®) in 9 Italian Regions. METHODS: Common adverse events occurring in the two weeks following each dose administration were collected using a structured diary. RESULTS: From August 2008 to September 2011, 12,066 immunised women (9,084 receiving Cervarix® and 2,982 Gardasil®) were included in the surveillance for a total of 29,494 administered doses. 53% of women concluded the vaccination cycle (74% with Gardasil® and 47% with Cervarix®). 61% of women experienced an adverse event after the administration of the first dose. The high proportion of adverse events reported is mainly due to the design of the study, since women were requested to report all events occurring after the vaccination; however the majority of events were mild and transient. DISCUSSION: As for all vaccines, and in particular for newly marketed ones, the surveillance of adverse events represents an essential step in the evaluation of a vaccination programme.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
10.
Vaccine ; 37(36): 5439-5451, 2019 08 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31296374

RESUMO

In recent years various EU/EEA countries have experienced an influx of migrants from low and middle-income countries. In 2018, the "Vaccine European New Integrated Collaboration Effort (VENICE)" survey group conducted a survey among 30 EU/EEA countries to investigate immunisation policies and practices targeting irregular migrants, refugees and asylum seekers (later called "migrants" in this report). Twenty-nine countries participated in the survey. Twenty-eight countries reported having national policies targeting children/adolescent and adult migrants, however vaccinations offered to adult migrants are limited to specific conditions in seven countries. All the vaccinations included in the National Immunisation Programme (NIP) are offered to children/adolescents in 27/28 countries and to adults in 13/28 countries. In the 15 countries offering only certain vaccinations to adults, priority is given to diphtheria-tetanus, measles-mumps-rubella and polio vaccinations. Information about the vaccines given to child/adolescent migrants is recorded in 22 countries and to adult migrants in 19 countries with a large variation in recording methods found across countries. Individual and aggregated data are reportedly not shared with other centres/institutions in 13 and 15 countries, respectively. Twenty countries reported not collecting data on vaccination uptake among migrants; only three countries have these data at the national level. Procedures to guarantee migrants' access to vaccinations at the community level are available in 13 countries. In conclusion, although diversified, strategies for migrant vaccination are in place in all countries except for one, and the strategies are generally in line with international recommendations. Efforts are needed to strengthen partnerships and implement initiatives across countries of origin, transit and destination to develop and better share documentation in order to guarantee a completion of vaccination series and to avoid unnecessary re-vaccination. Development of migrant-friendly strategies to facilitate migrants' access to vaccination and collection of vaccination uptake data among migrants is needed to meet existing gaps.


Assuntos
Migrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinação/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Imunização/métodos , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização/métodos
11.
Vaccine ; 37(32): 4610-4617, 2019 07 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29426661

RESUMO

Over the last three years an unprecedented flow of migrants arrived in Europe. There is evidence that vaccine preventable diseases have caused outbreaks in migrant holding centres. These outbreaks can be favored by a combination of factors including low immunization coverage, bad conditions that migrants face during their exhausting journey and overcrowding within holding facilities. In 2017, we conducted an online survey in Croatia, Greece, Italy, Malta, Portugal and Slovenia to explore the national immunization strategies targeting irregular migrants, refugees and asylum seekers. All countries stated that a national regulation supporting vaccination offer to migrants is available. Croatia, Italy, Portugal and Slovenia offer to migrant children and adolescents all vaccinations included in the National Immunization Plan; Greece and Malta offer only certain vaccinations, including those against diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, poliomyelitis and measles-mumps-rubella. Croatia, Italy, Malta and Portugal also extend the vaccination offer to adults. All countries deliver vaccinations in holding centres and/or community health services, no one delivers vaccinations at entry site. Operating procedures that guarantee the migrants' access to vaccination at the community level are available only in Portugal. Data on administered vaccines is available at the national level in four countries: individual data in Malta and Croatia, aggregated data in Greece and Portugal. Data on vaccination uptake among migrants is available at national level only in Malta. Concluding, although diversified, strategies for migrant vaccination are in place in all the surveyed countries and generally in line with WHO and ECDC indications. Development of procedures to keep track of migrants' immunization data across countries, development of strategies to facilitate and monitor migrants' access to vaccinations at the community level and collection of data on vaccination uptake among migrants should be promoted to meet existing gaps.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Migrantes , Doenças Preveníveis por Vacina/prevenção & controle , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários
12.
BMC Infect Dis ; 8: 100, 2008 Jul 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18662386

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2001, two hexavalent vaccines were licensed in Italy (Hexavac, Infanrix Hexa), and since 2002 were extensively used for primary immunization in the first year of life (at 3, 5, 11/12 months of age). In 2005, the market authorization of Hexavac was precautionary suspended by EMEA, because of doubts on long-term protection against hepatitis B virus. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the persistence of antibodies to anti-HBs, in children in the third year of life, and to investigate the response to a booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine. METHODS: Participant children were enrolled concomitantly with the offering of anti-polio booster dose, in the third year of life. Anti-HBs titers were determined on capillary blood samples. A booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine was administered to children with anti-HBs titers < 10 mIU/ml, with the monovalent precursor product of the previously received hexavalent vaccine. HBsAb titers were tested again one month after the booster. RESULTS: Sera from 113 children previously vaccinated with Hexavac, and from 124 vaccinated with Infanrix Hexa were tested for anti-HBs. Titers were > or = 10 mIU/ml in 69% and 96% (p < 0,0001) respectively. The proportion of children with titers > or = 100 mIU/ml did also significantly differ among groups (27% and 78%; p < 0,0001).Post-booster, 93% of children achieved titers > or = 10 mIU/ml, with no significant difference by vaccine group. DISCUSSION: Fifteen months after third dose administration, a significant difference in anti-HBs titers was noted in the two vaccine groups considered. Monovalent hepatitis B vaccine administration in 3-year old children induced a proper booster response, confirming that immunologic memory persists in children with anti-HBs titers < 10 mIU/ml. However, long-term persistence of HBV protection after hexavalent vaccines administration should be further evaluated over time.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/imunologia , Vírus da Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Memória Imunológica/imunologia , Vacinas Combinadas/imunologia , Pré-Escolar , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche , Feminino , Hepatite B/imunologia , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/imunologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Itália , Masculino , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado , Estudos Prospectivos , Vacinas Combinadas/administração & dosagem
13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29757209

RESUMO

The unprecedented flow of migrants over the last three years places Italy in front of new issues regarding medical care from the rescue phase up to the integration into the national health services, including preventive actions. We used online questionnaires to investigate the Italian national and regional policies for immunization offer targeting asylum seekers, refugees, irregular migrants and unaccompanied minors. Another questionnaire was used to assess how these policies are translated into practice in migrant reception centres and community health services. Questionnaires were filled out at the national level, in 14 out of 21 Regions/Autonomous Provinces, and in 36 community health services and 28 migrant reception centres. Almost all responders stated that all vaccinations included in the National Immunization Plan are offered to migrant children and adolescents. The situation concerning adults is fragmented, with most of the Regions and local centres offering more vaccines than the national offer-which include polio, tetanus and measles⁻mumps-rubella. Data on immunized immigrants is archived at the regional/local level with different methods and not available at the national level. Further efforts to ensure consistency in vaccine provision and adequate mechanisms of exchanging data are needed to guarantee a complete vaccination offer and avoid unnecessary health actions, including unnecessary re-vaccination.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Política de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Refugiados , Migrantes , Vacinação , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/normas , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Itália , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinação/normas , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29849000

RESUMO

Migrant centres, as other institutions hosting closed or semi-open communities, may face specific challenges in preventing and controlling communicable disease transmission, particularly during times of large sudden influx. However, there is dearth of evidence on how to prioritise investments in aspects such as human resources, medicines and vaccines, sanitation and disinfection, and physical infrastructures to prevent/control communicable disease outbreaks. We analysed frequent drivers of communicable disease transmission/issues for outbreak management in institutions hosting closed or semi-open communities, including migrant centres, and reviewed existing assessment tools to guide the development of a European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) checklist tool to strengthen preparedness against communicable disease outbreaks in migrant centres. Among articles/reports focusing specifically on migrant centres, outbreaks through multiple types of disease transmission were described as possible/occurred. Human resources and physical infrastructure were the dimensions most frequently identified as crucial for preventing and mitigating outbreaks. This review also recognised a lack of common agreed standards to guide and assess preparedness activities in migrant centres, thereby underscoring the need for a capacity-oriented ECDC preparedness checklist tool.


Assuntos
Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/métodos , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Emigração e Imigração , Instituições Residenciais , Imigrantes Indocumentados , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , União Europeia , Humanos
15.
Vaccine ; 36(6): 779-787, 2018 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29325822

RESUMO

In Italy, in 2016, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to estimate vaccine hesitancy and investigate its determinants among parents of children aged 16-36 months. Data on parental attitudes and beliefs about vaccinations were collected through a questionnaire administered online or self-administered at pediatricians' offices and nurseries. Parents were classified as pro-vaccine, vaccine-hesitant or anti-vaccine, according to self-reported tetanus and measles vaccination status of their child. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with hesitancy. A total of 3130 questionnaires were analysed: 83.7% of parents were pro-vaccine, 15.6% vaccine-hesitant and 0.7% anti-vaccine. Safety concerns are the main reported reason for refusing (38.1%) or interrupting (42.4%) vaccination. Anti-vaccine and hesitant parents are significantly more afraid than pro-vaccine parents of short-term (85.7 and 79.7% vs 60.4%) and long-term (95.2 and 72.3% vs 43.7%) vaccine adverse reactions. Most pro-vaccine and hesitant parents agree about the benefits of vaccinations. Family pediatricians are considered a reliable source of information by most pro-vaccine and hesitant parents (96.9 and 83.3% respectively), against 45% of anti-vaccine parents. The main factors associated with hesitancy were found to be: not having received from a paediatrician a recommendation to fully vaccinate their child [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 3.21, 95% CI: 2.14-4.79], having received discordant opinions on vaccinations (AOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.11-2.43), having met parents of children who experienced serious adverse reactions (AOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.03-2.15), and mainly using non-traditional medical treatments (AOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.31-3.19). Vaccine safety is perceived as a concern by all parents, although more so by hesitant and anti-vaccine parents. Similarly to pro-vaccine parents, hesitant parents consider vaccination an important prevention tool and trust their family pediatricians, suggesting that they could benefit from appropriate communication interventions. Training health professionals and providing homogenous information about vaccinations, in line with national recommendations, are crucial for responding to their concerns.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Vacinação , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Itália , Masculino , Pais/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28441361

RESUMO

Background: The World Health Organization recommends that host countries ensure appropriate vaccinations to refugees, asylum seekers and migrants. However, information on vaccination strategies targeting migrants in host countries is limited. Methods: In 2015-2016 we carried out a survey among national experts from governmental bodies of 15 non-EU countries of the Mediterranean and Black Sea in order to document and share national vaccination strategies targeting newly arrived migrants. Results: Four countries reported having regulations/procedures supporting the immunization of migrants at national level, one at sub-national level and three only targeting specific population groups. Eight countries offer migrant children all the vaccinations included in their national immunization schedule; three provide only selected vaccinations, mainly measles and polio vaccines. Ten and eight countries also offer selected vaccinations to adolescents and adults respectively. Eight countries provide vaccinations at the community level; seven give priority vaccines in holding centres or at entry sites. Data on administered vaccines are recorded in immunization registries in nine countries. Conclusions: Although differing among countries, indications for immunizing migrants are in place in most of them. However, we cannot infer from our findings whether those strategies are currently functioning and whether barriers to their implementation are being faced. Further studies focusing on these aspects are needed to develop concrete and targeted recommendations for action. Since migrants are moving across countries, development of on-line registries and cooperation between countries could allow keeping track of administered vaccines in order to appropriately plan immunization series and avoid unnecessary vaccinations.


Assuntos
Imunização/métodos , Refugiados , Migrantes , Adolescente , Adulto , África do Norte , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Europa Oriental , Humanos , Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oriente Médio , Refugiados/estatística & dados numéricos , Migrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinação/métodos , Adulto Jovem
17.
PLoS One ; 12(10): e0178122, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28968403

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: International migration rapidly increased in the last decade, raising a renewed attention to its impact on public health. We evaluated differences in rubella immunization rate (RIR) between immigrant and Italian women of childbearing age and tried to identify the driving factors causing them. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Italian behavioral surveillance system PASSI collected in 2011-2015 in a nationally representative sample of residents in Italy. The analysis was performed using log-binomial models to compare RIR between 41,094 Italian women and 3140 regular immigrant women of childbearing age (18-49 years), stratifying the latter by area of origin and length-of-stay in Italy (recent: ≤ 5-years; mid-term: 6-10-years; long-term: > 10-years). RESULTS: Immigrant women showed a RIR of 36.0% compared to 60.2% among Italian women (RIR-ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.63). Adjusting for demographic characteristics (i.e., sex, age and area of residence), socio-economic factors (i.e., education, occupation, family composition and economic status) and an indicator of the presence of at least one health-risk behavior (i.e., physical inactivity, current cigarette smoking, excessive alcohol consumption and excess weight) did not significantly change this difference (RIR-ratio = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53-0.59). Recent immigrants (RIR-ratio = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.42-0.53) and immigrants from high migratory pressure countries (HMPC) in sub-Saharan Africa (RIR-ratio = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.31-0.56) and Asia (RIR-ratio = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.33-0.53) showed the greatest differences in RIR compared with Italian women. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in RIR between immigrant and Italian women were not explained by different demographic, socioeconomic and health-risk behaviors characteristics. As entitlement to free-of-charge immunization in Italy is universal, regardless of migration status, other informal barriers (e.g., cultural and barriers to information access) might explain lower RIRs in immigrant women, especially recent immigrants and those from HMPC in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Further investigations are needed to identify obstacles and appropriate promotion and access-enabling strategies for rubella immunization.


Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Vigilância da População , Vacina contra Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assunção de Riscos , Classe Social , Adulto Jovem
19.
Vaccine ; 33(21): 2425-31, 2015 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25869895

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Italy, HPV vaccination is offered to 11-year-old girls since 2007. In 2012 coverage was 69%. Strategies for offering and promoting HPV vaccination and coverage rates (26-85%) vary among Regions and Local Health Authorities (LHAs). We conducted a national study to identify strategies to improve HPV vaccination uptake. METHODS: In 2011-2012 we invited the 178 LHAs to fill a web-questionnaire, inquiring implementation of HPV vaccination campaigns (immunization practices, logistics of vaccine delivery, training, activities to promote vaccination, barriers, local context). We described type of offer and vaccination promotion in each LHA and studied the association of these factors with vaccination coverage rates. RESULTS: We analyzed 133 questionnaires. The communication tools more frequently used to promote vaccination were: brochures/leaflets (92% of LHAs), fliers/posters (72%). Television (24%) and radio (15%) were less used. Using ≥3 communication channels was associated to a coverage ≥70% (ORadj=5.9, 95%CI 2.0-17.4). The probability to reach a coverage ≥70% was higher if the invitation letter indicated a pre-assigned date for HPV vaccination (ORadj=7.0, 95%CI 1.2-39.8) and >1 recall for non-respondents was planned (ORadj=4.1, 95%CI 1.8-9.3). Immunization services and paediatricians were involved in informative and training activities in most LHAs (80-90%), instead general practitioners, women and family's healthcare services and public gynaecologists in 60-70%, cervical cancer screening services and private gynaecologists in 20-40%. The main factors that negatively affected vaccination uptake were: poor participation to training events of professional profiles different from personnel of immunization services (reported by 58% LHAs), their mistrust towards HPV vaccination (55%) and insufficient resources (56%). CONCLUSION: The synergy of multiple interventions is necessary for a successful vaccination programme. Practices such as pre-assigning vaccination date and repeatedly recalling non-respondents could improve vaccination uptake. Efforts are required to strengthen the training of different professional profiles and services and encourage their collaboration. Economical resources are needed to promote vaccination.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Comportamental , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Inquéritos e Questionários
20.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 3(6): 965-74, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12943455

RESUMO

Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines have been available for more than a decade. Characteristics of the vaccines, comparative data among different formulations and the possibility of combination and association with other vaccines are reviewed in this article. Hepatitis A vaccines show high immunogenicity with different schedules and associations, induce long-term protection irrespective of timing of booster dose, and present an excellent safety profile. Pre-exposure efficacy has been demonstrated in large trials and postexposure protection has been described in family contacts of acute cases. The recommendations for the use of hepatitis A vaccines for immunisation campaigns and for targeted groups, such as travellers and people at risk for occupational and iatrogenic exposure or lifestyle behaviours, are discussed. Aspects related to economic analysis of vaccination strategies are also considered.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Hepatite A/uso terapêutico , Hepatite A/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Animais , Humanos , Imunização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA