ED patient falls and resulting injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Patient falls are the most common adverse events reported in hospitals. There is a growing body of literature on inpatient falls but a lack of data on ED falls. We applied the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model to patients who fell during their ED stays and provided a description of the patients and their injuries. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who fell in the emergency department during a 2-year period. We collected the 8 assessment parameters for high-risk fall identification in the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model. We also collected subject characteristics, circumstances surrounding the falls, fall-related injuries, and ED disposition. RESULTS: Fifty-seven falls were recorded, representing a rate of 0.288 falls per 1000 patient visits. The average age was 50 years, and a median of 48. 67% were men. Twenty-one subjects had a Hendrich II Model score of 5 of greater, which represents a sensitivity of 37.5%. Eleven subjects (19.6%) were intoxicated with alcohol. Eleven subjects (19.6%) received a potentially sedating medication prior to the fall. Thirty-six subjects (64.3%) fell in their ED rooms. Six subjects (10.7%) fell in the restroom. Three falls (5.4%) resulted in lacerations and 2 falls (3.6%) resulted in hematomas. DISCUSSION: The Hendrich II Fall Risk Model may not reliably identify patients at high risk of falling in the ED setting. It may be necessary to develop an emergency department-specific fall model considering additional factors, such as intoxication and receipt of potentially sedating medications.

An evaluation of emergency medicine resident interaction time with faculty in different teaching venues.

OBJECTIVES: To measure actual emergency medicine (EM) resident interaction time with faculty and to investigate the potential to use direct observation as an assessment tool for the core competencies. By 2006 all EM residencies must implement resident assessment techniques of the six Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies. Emergency medicine educators recommend direct observation as the optimal evaluation tool for patient care, systems-based practice, interpersonal and communication skills, and professionalism. Continuous faculty presence in the emergency department (ED) is widely believed to facilitate direct observation as an assessment technique. METHODS: Observational study of EM resident-faculty interaction time during two-hour periods. Study venues included two EDs, two trauma services, inpatient medicine, adult and pediatric intensive care units (ICUs), and a pediatric outpatient clinic. Using a priori definitions, the authors categorized faculty-EM resident interaction time as direct observation of patient care, indirect patient care, or non-patient care activities, and calculated total faculty interaction time. Subjects were blinded to the nature of the study, and data gathering was encrypted. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy observation periods of two hours each were conducted, sampling 32 EMR1, 33 EMR2-3, 41 EM, and 38 non-EM faculty. The mean total faculty interaction time ranged from a high of 30% (95% CI = 20% to 41%) in the pediatric ICU to a low of 10% (95% CI = 3% to 16%) on internal medicine wards. Overall, EM faculty interaction time was 20% (95% CI = 18% to 22%). Direct observation by faculty ranged from a high of 6% for EMR2-3s in the critical care areas of the ED (95% CI = 3% to 9%) to a low of 1% (95% CI = 0% to 2%) on internal medicine wards. Overall ED direct observation time was 3.6% (95% CI = 2.6% to 4.7%). Emergency department direct observation did not vary within EM resident training level or by ED site. Direct observation varied by treatment area within the EDs, with the critical care areas being substantially higher (6%) than the noncritical care areas (1%). CONCLUSIONS: Faculty direct observation time of EM residents was low in all training venues studied. Direct observation was the highest in ED critical care areas and lowest on medicine ward rotations. Emergency medicine faculty involved simultaneously in routine ED teaching, supervision, and patient care rarely performed direct observation, despite their continuous physical presence. This finding suggests that alternative strategies may be required to assess core competencies through direct observation in the ED.

Droperidol vs prochlorperazine for the treatment of acute headache.

To determine if droperidol i.v. is as effective as prochlorperazine i.v. in the emergency department (ED) treatment of uncomplicated headache, a randomized, controlled, blinded study was conducted in the Emergency Departments of two urban teaching hospitals. Patients >or= 18 years old with crescendo-onset headache were eligible for inclusion. Ninety-six patients (48 in each group) were randomized to receive droperidol 2.5 mg i.v. or prochlorperazine 10 mg i.v. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two study groups. For the main study outcome, 83.3% in the droperidol group and 72.3% in the prochlorperazine group reported 50% pain reduction at 30 min (p <.01; one-sided test of equivalence). The mean decrease in headache intensity was 79.1% (SD 28.5%) in the droperidol group and 72.1% (SD 28.0%) in the prochlorperazine group (p =.23). It is concluded that droperidol i.v. provided a similar reduction of headache as achieved with prochlorperazine i.v. with a similar incidence of akathisia.

An extended care facility-to-emergency department transfer form improves communication.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have established that essential information is inconsistently provided during the transfer of extended care facility (ECF) patients to the emergency department (ED). The authors tested the hypothesis that a one-page, standard ECF-to-ED transfer form would change the rate of successful documentation of ECF patient information. METHODS: The design was a pre- and postintervention investigation. The setting was the Methodist Hospital ED, an urban teaching facility in Indianapolis, Indiana. The population included consecutive patients transferred from ECFs to the ED. The intervention consisted of the introduction of a one-page, standard ECF-to-ED transfer form that listed 11 data elements that are critical for patient care. The completed form was to be sent with patients transferred to the ED. Successful documentation was defined as the recording of at least nine of 11 data elements. RESULTS: In the preintervention period, the ED received 130 transfers from 41 ECFs. Sixty-five of 130 transfers were from ten ECFs, which were the targets of the intervention. In the postintervention period, 72 consecutive transfers from ten ECFs were studied. Postintervention, the proportion of transfers with successful documentation was 77.8% (56 of 72), an increase of 19.3% (95% CI = 4.0% to 34.7%) over the preintervention period. In 31.9% (23 of 72) of postintervention ED transfers, the transfer form was transported with the patient. Successful documentation was achieved in 22 (95.6%) of these 23 transfers. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a one-page, standard ECF-to-ED transfer form increased the amount of essential data provided to the ED.

The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care.

Although there is a widely held belief that pain is the number 1 complaint in emergency medical care, few studies have actually assessed the prevalence of pain in the emergency department (ED). We conducted an analysis of secondary data by using explicit data abstraction rules to determine the prevalence of pain in the ED and to classify the location, origin, and duration of the pain. This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at an urban teaching hospital in Indianapolis, IN. Charts from 1,665 consecutive ED visits during a 7-day period were reviewed. Pain was defined as the word pain or a pain equivalent word (including aching, burning, and discomfort) recorded on the chart. Of the 1,665 visits, 61.2% had pain documented anywhere on the chart, 34.1% did not have pain, and 4.7% were procedures. Pain was a chief complaint for 52.2% of the visits. This high prevalence of pain has important implications for the allocation of resources as well as educational and research efforts in emergency medical care.