Flexible versus rigid endoscopy for treatment of foreign body impaction in the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The use of either flexible endoscopy (FE) or rigid endoscopy (RE) for removal of ingested foreign bodies (FBs) impacted in the esophagus is still discussed controversially. METHODS: We report a consecutive series of 139 patients with FB impaction in the esophagus. During a 6-year period, 69 men and 70 women (median age, 64 [0.7-97] years) requiring removal of an impacted FB underwent either RE (n = 63) in the Otolaryngology Department of our hospital or FE (n = 76) in the Surgical Endoscopy Unit. RESULTS: Foreign body removal was equally effective with FE (success rate 93.4%) and RE (95.2%, p = n.s.). The cases in which foreign body removal failed (5 FE cases [6.6%] and 3 RE cases [4.8%]) were all subsequently successfully managed with "conversion" and use of the other technique. No severe complications occurred when FB removal was attempted with FE (0 of 76 cases; 0.0%), whereas RE was associated with esophageal rupture requiring immediate surgical intervention in 2 of 63 cases (3.2%; p < 0.002). Patient comfort differed significantly between the two procedures (p < 0.0001); RE was always performed under general anesthesia (100.0%), whereas only a minority of patients undergoing FE required general anesthesia (13.0%; p < 0.0001) or mild analgosedation (20.0%). The better patient comfort with FE was also reflected in a significantly lower rate of dysphagia (15%) compared to RE (48%; p < 0.0001). Rigid endoscopy was more frequently used in removal of FBs of the upper esophagus (p < 0.0001), whereas FE was the predominate approach to FBs in the lower esophagus (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A tailored approach to treatment of FB impaction is recommended. Because of the lower rate of severe complications, better patient comfort with a lower rate of dysphagia, and lack of requirement for general anesthesia, FE should be the "first line" approach to FBs, although RE has its place as the "second line" therapy.

Detecting the sentinel lymph node in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

The aim of this study was to evaluate sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Nine patients with suspected thyroid carcinoma who were scheduled to undergo thyroidectomy underwent scintigraphic localization of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). On the day of surgery we injected 37 MBq technetium-99m nanocolloid intratumourally. Dynamic data up to 10 min followed by planar anterior and lateral oblique images up to 1 h after tracer administration were recorded. At surgery the primary tumour was excised first, then the SLNs were removed using a gamma probe. Four patients had papillary carcinoma, two follicular carcinoma, one an oncocytic tumour and two benign tumours. An SLN was identified in all four patients with papillary carcinoma. In the two patients with follicular carcinoma, SLN detection failed. Five patients had one radioactive node, one had three and one had four. In one patient, no SLN was visible with scintigraphic imaging but at surgery three SLNs could be clearly identified using the gamma probe after removal of the primary tumour. There were no false-negative findings. This initial study indicates that in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma detection of the SLN is possible, whereas the technique failed in two patients with follicular carcinoma. A study on a larger patient sample is now warranted.

[Selective regional lymphadenectomy in malignant melanoma using a gamma probe]. / Selektive regionale Lymphadenektomie beim malignen Melanom mit Hilfe einer Gammasonde.

The accurate excision of the first tumour draining lymph node (sentinel lymph node SLN) can prevent extended surgery intervention in many patients with malignant melanoma. The aim of our study was to test the practicability of the SLN dissection using a gamma probe. In a total of 52 patients, mostly with high-risk melanoma, a selective lymph node dissection was performed. We injected intracutuneously about 50 MBq Tc-99m colloid around the tumour or scar followed by dynamic and late static imaging. The site of SLN was localized with a gamma probe and marked on the skin. This was followed by the dissection of the SLN using the gamma probe. In 51 of 52 patients the SLN could be found intraoperatively using the gamma probe. The SLN contained microscopic metastases in 13 patients (24%). The rate of positive SLN was 40% in patients with high-risk melanoma (Breslow thickness more than 1.5 mm). In case of positive SLN a second surgical intervention with radical lymph node dissection was followed. We conclude that dynamic lymphscintigraphy and the selective lymph node dissection using the gamma probe is a simple and minimally invasive method which can improve the survival probability in patients with micrometastases.

Antiinflammatory effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated primary human monocytes.

There is evidence from both human and animal research that 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)3 receptor antagonists, particularly tropisetron, exert analgesic and antiinflammatory effects. However, the underlying mechanisms of these effects have not yet been investigated in detail. Therefore, the antiinflammatory effects of tropisetron and ondansetron were investigated in human monocytes. In human monocytes, both lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-1beta secretion were dose-dependently inhibited by tropisetron starting at a concentration of 5 microg/mL and reaching maximal levels at 25 microg/mL (IC50: 32 microg/mL and 12 microg/mL, respectively). LPS-induced IL-6 and PGE2 release was only slightly inhibited at high doses, whereas LPS-induced release of IL-8 and matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-9 was not affected. In conclusion, our data show that the binding of tropisetron to 5-HT3 receptors results in antiinflammatory effects through inhibition of TNF-alpha/IL-1beta, which might explain the antiphlogistic effects of 5-HT3 antagonists.