3-Dimensional Printed Alternative to the Standard Synthetic Flocked Nasopharyngeal Swabs Used for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Testing.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can be detected in respiratory samples by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or other molecular methods. Accessibility of diagnostic testing for COVID-19 has been limited by intermittent shortages of supplies required for testing, including flocked nasopharyngeal (FLNP) swabs. METHODS: We developed a 3-dimensional printed nasopharyngeal (3DP) swab as a replacement of the FLNP swab. The performance of 3DP and FLNP swabs were compared in a clinical trial of symptomatic patients at 3 clinical sites (n = 291) using 3 SARS-CoV-2 emergency use authorization tests: a modified version of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel and 2 commercial automated formats, Roche Cobas and NeuMoDx. RESULTS: The cycle threshold-C(t)-values from the gene targets and the RNase P gene control in the CDC assay showed no significant differences between swabs for both gene targets (P = .152 and P = .092), with the RNase P target performing significantly better in the 3DP swabs (P < .001). The C(t) values showed no significant differences between swabs for both viral gene targets in the Roche cobas assay (P = .05 and P = .05) as well as the NeuMoDx assay (P = .401 and P = .484). The overall clinical correlation of COVID-19 diagnosis between all methods was 95.88% (Kappa 0.901). CONCLUSIONS: The 3DP swabs were equivalent to standard FLNP in 3 testing platforms for SARS-CoV-2. Given the need for widespread testing, 3DP swabs printed onsite are an alternate to FLNP that can rapidly scale in response to acute needs when supply chain disruptions affect availability of collection kits.

Impact of the AACC Global Laboratory Quality Initiative in Partnership with Professional Societies and Universities in Latin America and the Caribbean.

The Global Lab Quality Initiative (GLQI), formerly known as the Emerging Countries program, was funded through a generous endowment from the Wallace H. Coulter Foundation. The aims of GLQI are to develop and implement innovative programs to promote education and training in laboratory medicine for low- or lower middle-income countries worldwide. From its inception in 2010, the GLQI was focused solely on the Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) region under the purview of AACC's Latin American Working Group (LAWG), the members of which have strong ties to the region thereby facilitating the partnerships with national societies. The LAWG has provided in-person workshops in the LAC countries, at the AACC Annual Scientific Meeting, and on-demand webinars. The LAWG aims to implement the GLQI aims in the LAC region. In-person workshops are based on best-practice recommendations and sources such as Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines and supplemented with professional experiences of the LAWG's lecturers and local experts of the countries visited. In 2015, the GLQI expanded to other regions of the world. Here we report the experience of the LAWG workshops, results of participant surveys, in-person visits to laboratories post-workshop, and the lessons learned throughout the years across different geographic areas. We are hopeful this report provides insights into the challenges and successes of the LAWG in LAC to help support the expansion of the GLQI.

Non-linearity within the primary measurement range of a lipase assay as the cause of a gap in the interpatient lipase results distribution.

OBJECTIVES: Interpatient distribution data for lipase (Roche Cobas® assay) showed an unexpected data gap, where no results were reported. This gap occurred beginning at a point just above the assay's primary measurement range (i.e., above the cutoff (300U/L) for automated repeat-on-dilution). Calculation or other errors within the automated dilution process were ruled out. Linearity of assay results was investigated. DESIGN AND METHODS: Linearity of experimental sample dilution series data was assessed by correlation coefficient, intercept, and constancy of slope. RESULTS: Dilution experiment data demonstrated a discontinuity of results between 300 and 400U/L consistent with the observed gap in patient data. Although data within the presumed linear range of the assay had a high linear correlation coefficient (r2>0.99), a non-zero intercept and progressively variable slope were inconsistent with linearity. Although the assay was assessed as linear by the College of American Pathology linearity survey, survey data also demonstrated non-linearity for this assay when analyzed for slopes and intercept. CONCLUSIONS: Non-linearity in the presumed linear range of an assay can produce gaps in patient data above a repeat-on-dilution cutoff. As in this instance, CAP linearity surveys may not identify certain forms of non-linearity.