A Patient-Centred Approach to Early Pregnancy Loss: The First 18 Months of a Canadian Outpatient Program for Early Pregnancy Loss (OPEL).

OBJECTIVE: Manual vacuum aspiration is a safe surgical option for the management of early pregnancy loss. To provide rapid, patient-centred access to MVA, an Outpatient Program for Early pregnancy Loss ("OPEL") was established at our institution. Objectives were to (1) assess complete uterine evacuation rates; (2) assess complication rates, and (3) assess patient satisfaction with the program. METHODS: With REB approval, a retrospective study was performed. Patient records from the first 18 months of OPEL (November 2015 to April 2017) were reviewed. Anonymous patient satisfaction questionnaires were completed immediately post-procedure. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients received treatment. Missed abortions accounted for 94 cases (58%). Median delay from referral to clinic appointment was 4.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-6.0) days. Average length of stay was 3.0 (IQR 2.5-3.0) hours. Efficacy of the procedure was 95.1%. Complication rate (immediate and delayed) was 14.2% and included intraoperative hemorrhage (3.1%; 5/162), Asherman's syndrome (1.9%; 3/162), retained products of conception requiring further treatment (4.9%; 8/162), and postoperative infection requiring antibiotic therapy (1.9%; 3/162). A total of 151 post-procedure satisfaction surveys were completed (93%); 100% agreed/strongly agreed that the nursing staff and physicians provided professional and compassionate care; 99.3% were satisfied with their care overall. Qualitative feedback was positive. CONCLUSION: Pregnant patients experiencing early pregnancy loss benefit from safe, timely, accessible, patient-centred care in the outpatient OPEL program. Similar models should be adopted nationally to ensure women experiencing this common pregnancy complication receive safe and compassionate care.

The role of background diet on the effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation in healthy pre-menopausal women: a randomized, cross-over, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The links between dietary fat intake, polyunsaturated fatty acid intake and breast cancer risk remain equivocal, with some studies pointing to improvements in risk upon omega-3 supplementation. However, the background diet is poorly controlled in most studies, potentially confounding this link. Therefore, this study examined the hypothesis that in order to see the benefits of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, the background diet must be low in fat. METHODS: Of the 56 healthy, pre-menopausal women randomized to one of two experimental arms, consisting of a two-treatment, randomized, cross-over design, 41 completed the 10 month intervention. The two diet phases (habitual and low-fat) were separated by a washout phase, each lasting 3 menstrual cycles. During each diet phase, women were supplemented with 1.2 g eicosapentaenoic acid + docosahexaenoic acid per day. RESULTS: Red blood cell fatty acid composition indicated that more eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid was incorporated in the low-fat diet than the habitual diet, though both diet phases resulted in significant increases in the omega-3 to omega-6 ratio. In the context of omega-3 supplementation in breast cancer risk reduction, we also measured fatty acid incorporation into nipple aspirate fluid. Similar changes to red blood cells were noted in nipple aspirate fluid, with higher incorporation of eicosapentaenoic acid in the low-fat diet phase. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the total level of dietary fat has some direct impact on fatty acid partitioning in addition to the recognized importance of fatty acid ratios, and supports the hypothesis that dietary fat intake must be considered a confounder in supplementation trials. Additionally, we demonstrate that n3 supplementation both reaches and imparts improvements in lipid content and n3:n6 at the target breast tissue. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial was been retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Reg NCT02816125 ).

Program impact and potential pitfalls of multi-purpose technologies (MPTs) for HIV prevention and contraception.

The overlapping epidemics of HIV and unplanned pregnancy disproportionately affect adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa. Prevailing dynamics driving benefits of any prevention method at the population level depend on: 1) population size, risk profile, and prevalence of method use, 2) method efficacy, and 3) method use-effectiveness. Adding a multi-purpose technology (MPT) to prevent HIV and pregnancy to this three-part equation results in scenarios that may enhance HIV population impact, even with methods that exhibit less than "perfect" method efficacy, by extending protection among existing users and attracting new users, resulting in greater population coverage. However, the interplay of epidemic drivers is complex and the greatest population benefit of such a MPT would be realized among those most at risk for HIV and pregnancy, and could be harmful if successful contraceptive users switch to a method with lower use-effectiveness. While MPTs are highly desired, and may offer considerable individual, population, and system-level public health benefits, there is no "magic bullet", nor single prevention method-MPT or otherwise-that will end the HIV epidemic nor fully resolve unmet need for family planning. All methods have inherent tradeoffs and women have varied reproductive and HIV prevention needs across their life course. Key programmatic features to maximize the potential of MPTs include offering them among a range of safe and effective methods with comprehensive information about their features allowing women to make a fully-informed method choice. Programmatic follow-up should support consistent and correct use to maximize use-effectiveness, and then monitor for potential untoward effects.