Minimal impacts of invasive Scaevola taccada on Scaevola plumieri via pollinator competition in Puerto Rico.

Introduction: Scaevola taccada and Scaevola plumieri co-occur on shorelines of the Caribbean. Scaevola taccada is introduced in this habitat and directly competes with native dune vegetation, including S. plumieri, a species listed as locally endangered and threatened in Caribbean locations. This study addresses whether the invasive S. taccada also impacts the native S. plumieri indirectly by competing for pollinators and represents the first comparative study of insect visitation between these species. Methods: Insect visitation rates were measured at sites where species co-occur and where only the native occurs. Where species cooccur, insect visitors were captured, identified and analyzed for the pollen they carry. Pollen found on open-pollinated flowers was analyzed to assess pollen movement between the two species. We also compared floral nectar from each species by measuring volume, sugar content, and presence and proportions of amine group containing constituents (AGCCs). Results: Our results demonstrate that both species share insect visitors providing the context for possible pollinator competition, yet significant differences in visitation frequency were not found. We found evidence of asymmetrical heterospecific pollen deposition in the native species, suggesting a possible reproductive impact. Insect visitation rates for the native were not significantly different between invaded and uninvaded sites, suggesting that the invasive S. taccada does not limit pollinator visits to S. plumieri. Comparisons of nectar rewards from the invasive and the native reveal similar volumes and sugar concentrations, but significant differences in some amine group containing constituents that may enhance pollinator attraction. Conclusion: Our analysis finds no evidence for pollination competition and therefore S. taccada's main impacts on S. plumieri are through competitive displacement and possibly through reproductive impacts as a consequence of heterospecific pollen deposition.

Serum Phosphorylated Neurofilament Heavy Subunit Levels and its Association with the Risk for Catastrophic Injury in Thoroughbred Racehorses.

Neurofilaments are structural proteins that are concentrated in the body and axons of neurons. Damage to the neurons or axons as a result of trauma or infectious diseases leads to the release of neurofilaments into blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This case-control study was carried out to compare serum levels of phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (pNF-H) between clinically healthy Thoroughbred (TB) horses and TB horses that suffered catastrophic musculoskeletal injuries (cMSI), and to investigate the correlation between putative risk factors and serum concentrations of pNF-H in injured horses. Blood samples were collected from clinically healthy horses and from horses that suffered cMSI. The concentration of pNF-H in serum samples was determined using the Phosphorylated Neurofilament H Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. A total of 343 horses were enrolled in the study (148 cases and 195 controls). The median serum concentration of pNF-H for controls was 0.0 ng/ml and for cases was 0.07 ng/ml. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in racing. The number of lifetime starts was correlated with serum pNF-H concentration in case horses. The serum concentration of pNF-H was higher in case horses that experienced cMSI while training than while racing. The number of lifetime starts is a proxy measure for several risk factors related to cumulative exercise load during the career of racehorses. Measurement of serum concentrations of pNF-H in TB racehorses does not support the hypothesis that subclinical neurologic injury or conditions are associated with catastrophic injury of TB racehorses.

Levels of Serum Phosphorylated Neurofilament Heavy Subunit in Clinically Healthy Standardbred Horses.

Neurofilaments heavy chain proteins (pNF-H) have been identified as useful serum biomarkers for humans and animals with neurologic conditions, some of which can lead to poor performance, and athletic injuries. However, there are no published reports that describe a reference range for serum pNF-H levels in healthy racehorses. This cross-sectional study was carried out to determine the serum concentration of pNF-H in 1,349 samples collected from 1,291 clinically healthy standardbred (SB) racehorses. Data on age, time of sampling (pre-race or post-race), and finishing position during a race were collected. The concentration of pNF-H in serum samples was determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The appropriate statistical techniques were used to determine the median serum concentration of pNF-H in these horses, if the serum concentration of pNF-H changed with age, if there were changes in the serum concentration of pNF-H during a race, and if there was an association between serum concentration of pNF-H, and the finishing position for the horse. The median serum concentration of pNF-H in this group of clinically healthy SB horses was 0.0 ng/mL. The concentration of pNF-H in serum was not associated with the age of the horses in this study as was determined by regression analysis. There was no significant change in the serum concentration of pNF-H before and after a race in paired samples. There was no association of serum concentration of pNF-H and the finishing position of the horses after the race. The data from this study supports use of <0.412 ng/mL as a reference interval for measurement of serum levels of pNF-H in SB racehorses as 95% of the collected samples fell into the range 0.0-0.412 ng/mL.

Rapid Adaptation and Remote Delivery of Undergraduate Research Training during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

When COVID-19 caused worldwide cancellations of summer research immersion programs in 2020, Mayo Clinic rallied to create an alternate virtual experience called Summer Foundations in Research (SFIR). SFIR was designed not only to ensure the continuance of science pathways training for undergraduate scientists but also to support undergraduate mental wellbeing, given the known pandemic stressors. A total of 170 participants took part in the program and were surveyed pre-post for outcomes in biomedical research career knowledge, biomedical research career interest, research skills confidence, and three dimensions of mental wellbeing. Knowledge of and interest in careers involving biomedical research rose significantly following participation in SFIR. The participants' mean research skills confidence also rose between 0.08 and 1.32 points on a 7-point scale across 12 items from the Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory. Success in science pathways support was accompanied by positive shifts in participant mental wellbeing. Measurable decreases in stress (Perceived Stress Scale, p < 0.0001) accompanied gains in resilience (Brief Resilience Scale, p < 0.0001) and life satisfaction (Satisfaction with Life Scale, p = 0.0005). Collectively, the data suggest that core objectives of traditional in-person summer research programming can be accomplished virtually and that these programs can simultaneously impact student wellbeing. This theoretical framework is particularly salient during COVID-19, but the increased accessibility of virtual programs such as SFIR can continue to bolster science education pathways long after the pandemic is gone.

Rapid adaptation and remote delivery of undergraduate research training during the COVID 19 Pandemic.

COVID-19 continues to alter daily life around the globe. Education is particularly affected by shifts to distance learning. This change has poignant effects on all aspects of academic life, including the consequence of increased mental stress reported specifically for students. COVID-19 cancellations of many summer fellowships and internships for undergraduates across the country increased students' uncertainty about their educational opportunities and careers. When the pandemic necessitated elimination of on-campus programming at Mayo Clinic, a new program was developed for remote delivery. Summer Foundations in Research (SFIR) was drafted around 4 aims: 1) support the academic trajectory gap in research science created by COVID-19; 2) build sustainable scientific relationships with mentors, peers, and the community; 3) create opportunities for participants to share and address concerns with their own experiences in the pandemic; and 4) provide support for individual wellbeing. SFIR included research training, but also training in communication through generative Dialogue and resilience through Amit Sood's SMART program. 170 participants were followed for outcomes in these spaces. Knowledge of and interest in careers involving biomedical research rose significantly following SFIR. Participants' mean confidence levels in 12 Key areas of research rose between 0.08 to 1.32 points on a 7-point scale. The strongest gains in mean confidence levels were seen in designing a study and collaborating with others. SFIR participants demonstrated gains in perceived happiness, and measured resilience and a reduction in stress. Participants' qualitative responses indicated exceptionally positive mentor relationships and specific benefit of both the SMART program and Dialogue.