Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vaccine ; 27(11): 1741-9, 2009 Mar 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19186196

RESUMO

Classical brucellosis vaccines induce antibodies to the O-polysaccharide section of the lipopolysaccharide that interfere in serodiagnosis. Brucella rough (R) mutants lack the O-polysaccharide but their usefulness as vaccines is controversial. Here, Brucella melitensis R mutants in all main lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic pathways were evaluated in sheep in comparison with the reference B. melitensis Rev 1 vaccine. In a first experiment, these mutants were tested for ability to induce anti-O-polysaccharide antibodies, persistence and spread through target organs, and innocuousness. Using the data obtained and those of genetic studies, three candidates were selected and tested for efficacy as vaccines against a challenge infecting 100% of unvaccinated ewes. Protection by R vaccines was 54% or less whereas Rev 1 afforded 100% protection. One-third of R mutant vaccinated ewes became positive in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with smooth lipopolysaccharide due to the core epitopes remaining in the mutated lipopolysaccharide. We conclude that R vaccines interfere in lipopolysaccharide immunosorbent assays and are less effective than Rev 1 against B. melitensis infection of sheep.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/biossíntese , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Brucella melitensis/imunologia , Brucelose/imunologia , Brucelose/veterinária , Lipopolissacarídeos/biossíntese , Lipopolissacarídeos/genética , Doenças dos Ovinos/imunologia , Animais , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Liofilização , Macrófagos/microbiologia , Masculino , Camundongos , Mutação/imunologia , Gravidez , Ovinos , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA