Effects of vedolizumab, adalimumab and infliximab on biliary inflammation in individuals with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, progressive cholestatic biliary disease associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with no known cure. AIM: To evaluate the effect of biological therapies on PSC progression in IBD patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 88 cases (75 unique patients with 12 patients treated >1 biologics) of IBD (48 ulcerative colitis, 24 Crohn's disease and 3 indeterminate colitis) with concomitant PSC who received biological therapy (42 infliximab, 19 adalimumab, 27 vedolizumab) between June 2002 and October 2017. Hepatic biochemistries were compared using the paired t-test (patients served as their own controls) ≤3 months before and 6-8 and 12-14 months after biological initiation. Radiographic information of biliary stenosis and liver fibrosis were obtained via abdominal ultrasound, abdominal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance elastography. RESULTS: Use of adalimumab was associated with a significant decrease in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) after 6-8 months (P = 0.03; mean change -70 U/L, standard deviation [SD] 88 U/L) compared to vedolizumab (mean change +50 U/L, SD 142 U/L) or infliximab (mean change +37 U/L, SD 183 U/L) but the change was not significant after 12-14 months (P = 0.24). No significant decreases were observed with AST, ALT, total or direct bilirubin, elastography score or radiographic imaging of biliary tree dilation/strictures with any biological therapy after 6-8 or 12-14 months. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that biological therapies used for the treatment of IBD are not effective treatments for PSC. Further study is needed to elucidate any potential beneficial effect of adalimumab on PSC.

Medical management of chronic cholestatic liver diseases.

The purpose of the present review is to discuss the diagnosis and management of cholestatic liver diseases. Differential diagnoses to consider are described, including causes of extrahepatic biliary obstruction such as gallstones, strictures, extrabiliary malignancies and pancreatitis. In addition, diseases that cause intrahepatic cholestasis such as primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, hepatocellular diseases and a variety of miscellaneous causes including drugs that may cause cholestasis are discussed. Primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis are reviewed in detail, and management options are identified. The prognosis of patients with these diseases is discussed, and the Mayo Mathematical Models in Cholestatic Liver Disease for both primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis are provided. Finally, management options for the complications of cholestasis are provided.

Current therapies for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease in adults and children in many regions of the world. Although a relatively benign condition in some, for others the disease will progress to cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease with associated complications including hepatocellular cancer. Pharmaceutical therapies have had mixed results and none are accepted as standard therapy. Depending on the metric used to assess response (biochemical or histological), there are some therapies which may afford benefit. Others, however, have caused less than desirable adverse effects. Unfortunately, no particular treatment has emerged as safe and highly effective. The cornerstones of management of this problematic condition should include exercise and efforts at weight reduction through dietary changes and increased physical activity. Weight reduction does indeed seem to be beneficial in this setting, as evidenced by studies including those evaluating the effect of bariatric surgery. Less is known, however, about the effort of exercise in and of itself as a treatment strategy, even in the absence of a reduction in body weight. In this paper, we review the literature pertaining to the current state of NAFLD management with an emphasis on pharmacotherapy.

High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid increases risk of adverse outcomes in patients with early stage primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in a dose of 28-30 mg/kg/day increases the likelihood of clinical deterioration of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients. AIM: To compare the risk of adverse clinical endpoints in patients with varying disease status. METHODS: We reviewed records from patients previously enrolled in a study evaluating the effects of high dose (28-30 mg/kg/day) UDCA in PSC. Patients were grouped according to treatment (UDCA vs. placebo) and baseline disease status (histological stage of PSC, total serum bilirubin). Development of clinical endpoints including death, liver transplantation, cirrhosis, oesophageal varices and cholangiocarcinoma was sought. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included of whom 49 patients developed endpoints. There was an increased development of endpoints among patients using UDCA vs. placebo (14 vs. 4, P=0.0151) with early histological disease (stage 1-2, n=88) but not with late stage (stage 3-4, n=62) disease (17 vs. 14, P=0.2031). Occurrence of clinical endpoints was also higher in patients receiving UDCA vs. placebo (16 vs. 2, P=0.0008) with normal bilirubin levels (total bilirubin ≤1.0 mg/dL) but not in patients with elevated bilirubin levels (15 vs. 16, P=0.6018). Among patients not reaching endpoints 31.7% had normalisation of their alkaline phosphatase levels when compared to 14.3% in patients who reached endpoints (P=0.073). CONCLUSION: The increased risk of adverse events with UDCA treatment when compared with placebo is only apparent in patients with early histological stage disease or normal total bilirubin.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with interferon with or without ursodeoxycholic acid: a randomized prospective trial.

The only effective and approved therapy for chronic hepatitis C is interferon-alpha. Because sustained response rates with interferon alone are disappointingly low, multidrug treatment regimens are currently being investigated. Ursodeoxycholic acid has been used in other chronic liver diseases and can limit hepatocyte injury. To evaluate the potential benefit of ursodeoxycholic acid in combination with interferon-alpha for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, we conducted a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing the combination therapy of interferon-alpha 2b and ursodeoxycholic acid with interferon alone. Thirty-one patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomized to receive 3 million units of interferon-alpha 2b subcutaneously three times per week and either 13 to 15 mg/kg/day ursodeoxycholic acid or placebo orally for 6 months. The 6-month treatment period was followed by 6 months of observation. Biochemical normalization at the end of treatment occurred in 5 of 14 (36%) patients receiving monotherapy versus 8 of 15 (53%) patients (p = 0.34) receiving combination therapy. No patient treated with interferon alone had a sustained biochemical response 6 months after therapy; however, 3 of 12 patients (25%) treated with combination interferon and ursodeoxycholic acid maintained biochemical normalization at 6 months after therapy (p = 0.08). No difference in liver histology or clearance of hepatitis C viral RNA was noted 6 months after treatment. We conclude that combination therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid and interferon-alpha 2b was no more effective than interferon monotherapy in inducing a biochemical response in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C. Ursodeoxycholic acid, however, may be useful in prolonging the biochemical response to interferon therapy.

Increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients infected with hepatitis C genotype 1b.

UNLABELLED: Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b has been reported to be associated with more severe liver disease and an unfavorable outcome. Liver transplantation allows for a complete examination of the explanted liver for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of HCC in patients with liver cirrhosis secondary to chronic infection with HCV genotype 1b compared with those infected with other genotypes. METHODS: Sera were collected from 48 consecutive patients undergoing liver transplantation for end stage liver disease secondary to HCV infection. RNA was extracted from serum using chaotropic lysis and isopropanol precipitation. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction of the NS5 region was performed, followed by automated sequencing on desalted amplification products. Genotype assignment followed Simmonds's classification. All explanted livers were examined for the presence of HCC. RESULTS: HCV genotypes in our patients were as follows: subtype 1a, 20 patients (42%); 1b, 18 patients (37.5%); 2a, one patient (2%); 2b, six patients (12.5%); 3a, one patient (2%); and 4a, two patients (4%). Although five of 18 patients infected with HCV genotype 1b (28%) had HCC, only one of 30 patients (3%) infected with all other genotypes (1a, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 4a) had HCC (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Infection with HCV genotype 1b may carry a higher risk for the development of HCC than infection with other HCV genotypes.

The clinical significance of simultaneous infection with hepatitis G virus in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is a recently discovered member of the flavivirus family that has been associated with acute and chronic hepatitis. HGV infection has been reported to coexist in 10-20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The significance of simultaneous infection with HGV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains to be clarified, as do the effects on HGV of therapeutic interventions such as interferon treatment or liver transplantation. THE AIMS OF OUR STUDY WERE: 1) to examine the frequency of HGV infection in the settings of liver transplantation and interferon therapy for hepatitis C; and 2) to compare HGV RNA levels before and after liver transplantation or interferon treatment. METHODS: Pre-treatment sera were available in 65 patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon; pretransplant sera were available in 49 patients transplanted for end stage liver disease associated with chronic hepatitis C. Information collected included age, sex, risk factors for hepatitis, concurrent liver disease, patient and allograft survival, biochemical response to interferon, histological activity index, and degree of fibrosis/cirrhosis. HCV genotyping was performed by sequencing the NS-5 region. HGV quantitation was performed using a research-based branched DNA (bDNA) assay with a set of probes directed at the 5' untranslated region. RESULTS: HGV was detected in 10 of 49 patients (20%) before transplant and in 13 of 65 patients (20%) treated with interferon. There was a female predominance among HGV-positive compared with HGV-negative transplant patients (80% vs 20%; p < 0.01), but such a difference was not observed in the interferon-treated group. Hepatic iron concentration was lower in hepatic explants from patients who were HGV-positive than in those who were HGV-negative (318 +/- 145 microg/g dry weight vs 1497 +/- 2202 microg/g dry weight; p = 0.02). HCV exposure after 1980 was more common in the HGV-positive patients than in those who were HGV-negative for the entire study population (10 of 20 [50%] vs 16 of 66 [24%]; p = 0.03), as well as for the nontransplant subgroup (8 of 12 [67%] vs 12 of 39 [31%]; p = 0.03). HGV RNA levels declined at 1 yr after transplant in seven of eight patients. Among nine patients tested during or after interferon treatment, HGV RNA levels declined from pretreatment levels in all and disappeared in three. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with either interferon or liver transplantation, the frequency of coinfection with HGV is about 20%. HGV may be a more recent virus in the US than HCV. Coinfection with HGV does not appear to affect the likelihood of response to interferon in patients with hepatitis C. Finally, HGV RNA levels appear to decline after both liver transplantation and interferon therapy, suggesting possible suppression by increased HCV replication in the former case, and a possible drug treatment effect in the latter.