The efficacy and safety of duodenal stenting: a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Duodenal stenting has become a popular treatment in cases of malignant stenosis. However, a prospective evaluation of the efficacy and morbidity of this procedure has not been performed. A prospective multicenter study of duodenal stenting was conducted by the Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive (SFED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients were selected (mean age 72), the majority (69%) having pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Palliative treatment was chosen because of irresectability (61.2%), inoperability (18.4%), or both (20.4 %). Enteral Wallstent prostheses were used, and the patients were followed up on day 3, after 1 month, and then every month, with weight measurement, and symptomatic and laboratory evaluation. RESULTS: One prosthesis was sufficient in 46 patients. Stent positioning and deployment were correct in 50/51 patients (98%). Twenty patients also underwent biliary stenting in addition to the duodenal stenting. On day 3, 43 patients (84%) were able to tolerate soft solids or a full diet. Six complications were attributed to stenting: three intestinal hemorrhages, two cases of peritonitis due to bowel perforation, and one case of septicemia, and these led to five deaths (mortality 9.8%). Stent dysfunction was observed in 12 cases (23.5%) after a mean delay of 75 days, comprising 11-malignant obstructions and one migration: a new stent was inserted inside the first one and was effective in eight cases; and no treatment was given in the other four patients because of their clinical state. The median survival was 71.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative endoscopic treatment of malignant duodenal stenosis using metallic prostheses is highly feasible, even with associated biliary stenting. Symptomatic improvement is fast. However, the mortality and the obstruction rate are high, suggesting that a prospective trial comparing this treatment with surgery is still required.

Faecal bacterial mass and energetic losses in healthy humans and patients with a short bowel syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: In addition to non-digested nutrients, human stools contain endogenous substrates, among which bacteria are a major component, whose growth may be stimulated when more dietary nutrients are available for bacterial fermentation, as in patients with malabsorption syndrome. We assessed the energy content and composition of both stools and faecal bacteria in healthy volunteers and patients with a short bowel and colon in continuity (SBC). Our goal was to clarify the magnitude of error introduced by the faecal bacteria in the measurement of the digestibility of ingested energy and nutrients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied six healthy volunteers and six patients with a SBC under free oral intake. The bacterial mass of stools was isolated. In the bacterial fractions and fresh stools, calorie, fat, nitrogen and short-chain fatty acid contents were determined. The Wilcoxon signed rank or the Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparison. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers and patients with SBC, faecal bacterial mass accounted for 44 and 35% of faecal dry weight, and contained 50 and 34% of total faecal energy. In healthy volunteers, the apparent digestibilities when corrected by bacterial constituents (88-97% according to nutrients) were significantly higher than the apparent non-corrected digestibilities (84-94%). In patients with SBC, the corrected apparent digestibilities (69-89% according to nutrients) were significantly higher than the apparent non-corrected digestibilities (54-83%). CONCLUSION: The error introduced by the faecal bacterial fraction when assessing the extent of nutrient digestibility is small in healthy volunteers; it is more pronounced in patients with SBC, reaching 18% for the digestibility of ingested fat.

Urinary neopterin is a valuable tool in monitoring Crohn's disease activity.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the relation between urinary neopterin and the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and to compare its ability to discriminate active versus inactive CD with serum C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: In all, 217 urinary samples for neopterin measurement were obtained in a cohort of 93 consecutive patients with CD and 66 samples in 33 healthy volunteers. Clinical parameters were recorded and blood samples for CRP were collected as well. RESULTS: Whereas patients with inactive CD showed similar levels of urinary neopterin excretion than healthy volunteers (163 +/- 8 versus 142 +/- 7 nmol/mol of creatinine, respectively; P = 0.1), urinary neopterin excretion from mild to severe active CD was significantly higher (302 +/- 15 nmol/mol of creatinine; P < 0.001). Serum CRP levels were higher in active CD (14.8 +/- 2.1 mg/L) compared with inactive CD (5.6 +/- 0.8 mg/L; P < 0.001). Urinary neopterin excretion, and to a lesser degree CRP, were positively and significantly correlated with CDAI (r = 0.64 and 0.43, respectively, P < 0.001). Based on the cutoff of 183 nmol/mol of creatinine for urinary neopterin, the sensitivity and specificity of urinary neopterin to discriminate between active and inactive CD were 73% and 82%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 80% and 78%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary neopterin excretion is an objective, valuable, simple, and noninvasive biomarker to detect and follow fluctuations of CD activity. Further work is warranted to study its clinical value and relation to mucosal healing.

[Subjective and objective evaluation of the outcome of rhinoplasty. A retrospective study]. / Subjektive und objektive Bewertung des Ergebnisses nach Rhinoplastik. Eine retrospektive Studie.

Between 1983 and 1988, 206 patients underwent a septorhinoplasty in the ENT Department of the University Hospital Benjamin Franklin in Berlin. The results of the operation were analysed by an "objective" evaluation form including measurements of cephalometric angles and a "subjective" questionnaire reflecting the patient's view. Ninety-nine patients responded to our questionnaire. About one third of our patients were foreigners (mostly Turks). Seventy-five percent of the results were good in objective as well as subjective terms. Comparison of results between the two sexes did not show a significant difference. A relevant discrepancy between the objective and the subjective results was seen in the foreign patients. The low average age and therefore unrealistically high expectations are a possible explanation for this phenomenon. Patients with small preoperative deformities also turned out to be less satisfied with the outcome even though the objective result was better. While obtaining the objective results, we also realized that the nasofrontal angle seems to be of minor importance for the facial profile. The nasofacial and the nasolabial angle actually seem to be more important for the rhinoplasty and reflect the aesthetic correction of the nose better than the nasofrontal angle. It was much more often possible to correct the nasofacial and the nasolabial angle, while the nasofrontal angle remained uncorrected in many cases. Our retrospective study was able to answer the question whether the aesthetic outcome after rhinoplasty can be rated objectively.