Impact of age on the efficacy of oxaliplatin in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy of rectal cancer: a post hoc analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial.

Background: The German rectal cancer trial CAO/ARO/AIO-04 has shown a significant benefit in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of adding oxaliplatin to a standard preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The use of oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment in elderly patients with colon cancer is controversial. We therefore investigated the impact of age on clinical outcome in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial. Patients and methods: We carried out a post hoc analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial evaluating primary and secondary end points according to age. Patient and tumor characteristics, NCI CTC adverse events grades 3-4 (version 3.0), dose intensities as well as survival and recurrence data were analyzed in three specified age groups (<60, 60-70, and ≥70 years). The influence of age as a continuous variable on DFS was modeled using a subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) analysis. Results: A total of 1232 patients were assessable. With the exception of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (P < 0.001), no differences in patient and tumor characteristics were noticed between age groups. Likewise, toxicity pattern, dose intensities of CRT and surgical results were similar in all age groups. After a median follow-up of 50 months, in patients aged <60 years a significant benefit of adding oxaliplatin to 5-FU-based CRT and adjuvant chemotherapy was observed for local (P = 0.013) and systemic recurrences (P = 0.023), DFS (P = 0.011), and even overall survival (OS; P = 0.044). The STEPP analysis revealed improved hazard ratios for DFS in patients aged 40-70 years compared with elderly patients treated with oxaliplatin. Conclusion: The addition of oxaliplatin significantly improved DFS and OS in younger patients aged <60 years with advanced rectal cancer. Patients aged ≥70 years had no benefit. Clinical Trials Number: NCT00349076.

Neoadjuvant rectal score as individual-level surrogate for disease-free survival in rectal cancer in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase III trial.

Background: Surrogate end points in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation are lacking as their statistical validation poses major challenges, including confirmation based on large phase III trials. We examined the prognostic role and individual-level surrogacy of neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score that incorporates weighted cT, ypT and ypN categories for disease-free survival (DFS) in 1191 patients with rectal carcinoma treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial. Patients and methods: Cox regression models adjusted for treatment arm, resection status, and NAR score were used in multivariable analysis. The four Prentice criteria (PC1-4) were used to assess individual-level surrogacy of NAR for DFS. Results: After a median follow-up of 50 months, the addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly improved 3-year DFS [75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.30% to 79.50%) versus 71.3% (95% CI 67.60% to 74.90%); P = 0.034; PC 1) and resulted in a shift toward lower NAR groups (P = 0.034, PC 2) compared with fluorouracil-only CRT. The 3-year DFS was 91.7% (95% CI 88.2% to 95.2%), 81.8% (95% CI 78.4% to 85.1%), and 58.1% (95% CI 52.4% to 63.9%) for low, intermediate, and high NAR score, respectively (P < 0.001; PC 3). NAR score remained an independent prognostic factor for DFS [low versus high NAR: hazard ratio (HR) 4.670; 95% CI 3.106-7.020; P < 0.001; low versus intermediate NAR: HR 1.971; 95% CI 1.303-2.98; P = 0.001] in multivariable analysis. Notwithstanding the inherent methodological difficulty in interpretation of PC 4 to establish surrogacy, the treatment effect on DFS was captured by NAR, supporting satisfaction of individual-level PC 4. Conclusion: Our study validates the prognostic role and individual-level surrogacy of NAR score for DFS within a large randomized phase III trial. NAR score could help oncologists to speed up response-adapted therapeutic decision, and further large phase III trial data sets should aim to confirm trial-level surrogacy.

Outcome according to KRAS-, NRAS- and BRAF-mutation as well as KRAS mutation variants: pooled analysis of five randomized trials in metastatic colorectal cancer by the AIO colorectal cancer study group.

BACKGROUND: To explore the impact of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations as well as KRAS mutation variants in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving first-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1239 patients from five randomized trials (FIRE-1, FIRE-3, AIOKRK0207, AIOKRK0604, RO91) were included into the analysis. Outcome was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests and Cox models. RESULTS: In 664 tumors, no mutation was detected, 462 tumors were diagnosed with KRAS-, 39 patients with NRAS- and 74 patients with BRAF-mutation. Mutations in KRAS were associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [multivariate hazard ratio (HR) for PFS: 1.20 (1.02-1.42), P = 0.03; multivariate HR for OS: 1.41 (1.17-1.70), P < 0.001]. BRAF mutation was also associated with inferior PFS [multivariate HR: 2.19 (1.59-3.02), P < 0.001] and OS [multivariate HR: 2.99 (2.10-4.25), P < 0.001]. Among specific KRAS mutation variants, the KRAS G12C-variant (n = 28) correlated with inferior OS compared with unmutated tumors [multivariate HR 2.26 (1.25-4.1), P = 0.001]. A similar trend for OS was seen in the KRAS G13D-variant [n = 71, multivariate HR 1.46 (0.96-2.22), P = 0.10]. More frequent KRAS exon 2 variants like G12D [n = 152, multivariate HR 1.17 (0.86-1.6), P = 0.81] and G12V [n = 92, multivariate HR 1.27 (0.87-1.86), P = 0.57] did not have significant impact on OS. CONCLUSION: Mutations in KRAS and BRAF were associated with inferior PFS and OS of mCRC patients compared with patients with non-mutated tumors. KRAS exon 2 mutation variants were associated with heterogeneous outcome compared with unmutated tumors with KRAS G12C and G13D (trend) being associated with rather poor survival.

Quality of life assessment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving maintenance therapy after first-line induction treatment: a preplanned analysis of the phase III AIO KRK 0207 trial.

BACKGROUND: First-line maintenance strategies are a current matter of debate in the management of mCRC. Their impact on patient's health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has not yet been evaluated. The objective of this study was to assess whether differences in HRQOL during any active maintenance treatment compared with no maintenance treatment exist. PATIENT AND METHODS: Eight hundred and thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the AIO KRK 0207 trial. Four hundred and seventy-two underwent randomization (after 24 weeks of induction treatment) into one of the maintenance arms: FP plus Bev (arm A), Bev alone (arm B), or no active treatment (arm C). HRQOL were assessed every 6 weeks during induction and maintenance treatment independent from treatment stop, delay, or modification, and also continued after progression, using the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29. The mean value of the global quality of life dimension (GHS/QoL) of the EORTC QLQ-C30, calculated as the average of all available time points after randomization was considered as pre-specified main endpoint. Additionally, EORTC QLQ-C30 response scores were analyzed. RESULTS: For HRQOL analysis, 413 patients were eligible (arm A: 136; arm B: 142, arm C: 135). Compliance rate with the HRQOL questionnaires was 95% at time of randomization and remained high during maintenance (98%, 99%, 97% and 97% at week 6, 12, 18 and 24). No significant differences between treatment arms in the mean GHS/QoL scores were observed at any time point. Also, rates of GHS/QoL score deterioration were similar (20.5%; 17.2% and 20.7% of patients), whereas a score improvement occurred in 36.1%; 43.8% and 42.1% (arms A, B and C). CONCLUSION: Continuation of an active maintenance treatment with FP/Bev after induction treatment was neither associated with a detrimental effect on GHS/QoL scores when compared with both, less active treatment with Bev alone or no active treatment. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT00973609 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Prognostic value of microsatellite instability and p53 expression in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of MSI-H and p53 overexpression in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine-based first line chemotherapy. METHODS: Tumour samples were retrospectively obtained from 229 patients from a prospective randomised phase III trial of the AIO colorectal study group, comparing CAPOX and FUFOX in mCRC. Immunohistochemistry of p53 and MMR proteins as well as microsatellite analysis were performed. RESULTS: The incidence of MSI-H and p53 overexpression was 7.9 % and 65.4 %, respectively. MSI-H status was not correlated with ORR, PFS and OS. We observed a trend to lower DCR for MSI-H tumours (65 % vs. 85 %, p = 0.055). p53 overexpression was not correlated with DCR, ORR and PFS. The median OS of patients with tumors with p53 overexpression was significantly longer compared to tumors withhout p53 overexpression (19.6 vs. 15.8 months; p = 0.05). The post-progression survival (PPS) of p53-positive patients undergoing 2nd and/or 3rd line chemotherapy with irinotecan and/or cetuximab was significantly longer compared to p53-negative patients. CONCLUSION: MSI-H tumours tend to have lower disease control rates when treated with an oxaliplatin/fluoropyrmidin combination. mCRC patients with p53 overexpression undergoing an irinotecan containing second- or third-line chemotherapy after oxaliplatin failure have a significantly longer post-progression survival compared to patients without p53 overexpression. To validate the clinical impact of p53 in patients with mCRC treated with irinotecan- and/or cetuximab further studies are needed.

Evaluation of the inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a post hoc analysis of the randomized phase III XELAVIRI trial (AIO KRK0110).

BACKGROUND: The inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) combines serum levels of C-reactive protein and albumin and was shown to predict survival in advanced cancer. We aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of mGPS on survival as well as its predictive value when combined with gender in unselected metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving first-line chemotherapy in the randomized phase III XELAVIRI trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In XELAVIRI, mCRC patients were treated with either fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab followed by additional irinotecan at first progression (sequential treatment arm; Arm A) or upfront combination of fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab/irinotecan (intensive treatment arm; Arm B). In the present post hoc analysis, survival was evaluated with respect to the assorted mGPS categories 0, 1 or 2. Interaction between mGPS and gender was analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 421 mCRC patients treated in XELAVIRI, 362 [119 women (32.9%) and 243 men (67.1%)] were assessable. For the entire study population a significant association between mGPS and overall survival (OS) was observed [mGPS = 0: median 28.9 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 25.9-33.6 months; mGPS = 1: median 21.4 months, 95% CI 17.6-26.1 months; mGPS = 2: median 16.8 months, 95% CI 14.3-21.2 months; P < 0.00001]. Similar results were found when comparing progression-free survival between groups. The effect of mGPS on survival did not depend on the applied treatment regimen (P = 0.21). In female patients, a trend towards longer OS was observed in Arm A versus Arm B, with this effect being clearly more pronounced in the mGPS cohort 0 (41.6 versus 25.5 months; P = 0.056). By contrast, median OS was longer in male patients with an mGPS of 1-2 treated in Arm B versus Arm A (20.8 versus 17.4 months; P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the role of mGPS as an independent predictor of OS regardless of the treatment regimen in mCRC patients receiving first-line treatment. mGPS may help identify gender-specific subgroups that benefit more or less from upfront intensive therapy.

Capecitabine/irinotecan or capecitabine/oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab is effective and safe as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II study of the AIO colorectal study group.

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx) plus bevacizumab and dose-modified capecitabine/irinotecan (mCapIri) plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2)/day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) bid/days 1-14 or with irinotecan 200 mg/m(2)/day 1 plus capecitabine 800 mg/m(2) bid/days 1-14 both every 21 days. The primary end point was 6 months progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 255 patients were enrolled. The intent-to-treat population comprised 247 patients (CapOx-bevacizumab: n = 127; mCapIri-bevacizumab: n = 120). The six-month PFS rates were 76% (95% CI, 69%-84%) and 84% (95% CI, 77%-90%). Median PFS and OS were 10.4 months (95% CI, 9.0-12.0) and 24.4 months (95% CI, 19.3-30.7) with CapOx-bevacizumab, and 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.8-13.2) and 25.5 months (95% CI, 21.0-31.0) with mCapIri-bevacizumab. Grade 3/4 diarrhea as predominant toxic effect occurred in 22% of patients with CapOx-bevacizumab and in 16% with mCapIri-bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Both, CapOx-bevacizumab and mCapIri-bevacizumab, show promising activity and an excellent toxic effect profile. Efficacy is in the range of other bevacizumab-containing combination regimen although lower doses of irinotecan and capecitabine were selected for mCapIri.

Prognostic factors for 60-day mortality in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): individual patient analysis of four randomised, controlled trials by the AIO colorectal cancer study group.

BACKGROUND: The 60 day mortality is an established parameter for chemotherapy-related safety in randomised trials for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Prognostic factors associated with 60-day mortality would be helpful to identify high-risk patients in advance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual baseline patient data from four randomised, controlled trials from the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO) study group were retrospectively analysed. Chemotherapy consisted of fluoropyrimidine (5-FU/capecitabine), irinotecan, oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab. Prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression models in two cohorts: one limited to ECOG PS 0 and 1 and one including ECOG PS 2 patients. RESULTS: A total of 1377 patients were evaluated. The analysis of ECOG PS 0, 1 and 2 patients consisted of 898 patients where a total of 33 deaths within the first 60 days of treatment (3.7%) occurred. In multivariate analysis, 60-day mortality was significantly associated with ECOG PS 2 and high leucocyte count (white blood cell, WBC). Odds ratio was 6.28 for WBC and 12.92 for ECOG PS 2. Exclusion of ECOG PS 2 patients but inclusion of one trial limited to ECOG PS 0 and 1 patients resulted in 1302 assessable patients and 44 early deaths (3.4%). In both cohorts, around 50% of deaths were disease related. WBC was confirmed as a significant risk factor for early death (OR 7.60). A combined score using ECOG PS 2 and WBC ≥8.000/µl is able to identify high-risk patients with a sensitivity of 18% and specificity of 98%. CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective analysis of individual patient data, around 50% of early deaths were disease related. Elevated WBC was found strongly associated with increased 60-day mortality in first-line treatment of mCRC. The proposed AIO-60-Day-Mortality score serves as an additional trial exclusion criterion.

Impact of sex on the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus fluorouracil and folinic acid versus fluorouracil and folinic acid alone as maintenance therapy in RAS WT metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Subgroup analysis of the PanaMa-study (AIO-KRK-0212).

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are usually conducted irrespective of sex. Sex-associated differences relating to safety and efficacy in the treatment of mCRC, however, are gaining interest. METHODS: PanaMa investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) plus fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) versus FU/FA alone after induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. In this post hoc analysis, the study population was stratified for sex. Evaluated efficacy endpoints during maintenance treatment were progression-free survival (PFS, primary endpoint of the trial), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate during maintenance therapy. Safety endpoints were rates of any grade and grade 3/4 adverse events during maintenance therapy. RESULTS: In total, 165 male and 83 female patients were randomized and treated. Male and female patients showed numerically better objective response rates with Pmab, without reaching statistical significance. Male patients derived a significant benefit from the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment with regard to PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.88; P = 0.006] that was not observed in female patients (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.53-1.35; P = 0.491). The better PFS for male patients treated with Pmab did not translate into improved OS (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.55-1.30; P = 0.452). Female patients showed numerically improved OS when treated with Pmab. There was no difference in the total of grade ≥3 adverse events during maintenance regarding sex (P = 0.791). Female patients, however, had a higher rate of any grade nausea, diarrhea and stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS: In the PanaMa trial, the addition of Pmab to maintenance treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC with FU/FA improved the outcome in terms of the primary endpoint (PFS) particularly in male patients. Female patients did not show the same benefit while experiencing higher rates of adverse events. Our results support the development of sex-specific protocols.

Biomarkers of anti-angiogenic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): original data and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Tumour angiogenesis via vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is essential for promoting tumour progression and is overexpressed in colorectal cancer. The humanised monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (Avastin®, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA) has shown activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) combined with conventional chemotherapy. The search for biomarkers to predict response to anti-angiogenic therapy in mCRC is of great interest. We investigated several potential predictive anti-angiogenic markers including circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in patients with mCRC receiving bevacizumab containing treatment within a randomised multicenter phase 2 study of the German AIO GI tumour study group. METHODS: We collected sequential blood samples and tumour tissues from patients participating in a clinical trial for patients with mCRC. We performed flow cytometry of mononuclear cells isolated from peripheral blood to assess CD 133 + or CD 34 + /KDR + EPC before the first bevacizumab containing chemotherapy and after 21 days. Circulating VEGF blood levels before a bevacizumab containing chemotherapy regimen and after 21 days and VEGF expression in tumour tissue were examined. RESULTS: Patients with mCRC and a partial remission after six months of immuno-chemotherapy containing bevacizumab showed a reduction of CD 34 negative KDR positive cells as early as 3 weeks after start of therapy. In contrast, no remarkable change in the number of CD 34 /KDR positive or CD 34 /CD133 positive cells was seen. Furthermore, there was no correlation between treatment response and VEGF expression within the tumour tissue. The mAb bevacizumab reduced serum-VEGF levels in patients independent of their treatment response to bevacizumab. DISCUSSION: We examined circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), serum-VEGF levels and the tumour tissue VEGF expression of patients with mCRC under a bevacizumab containing chemotherapy. The patients with a partial remission after six months of immuno-chemotherapy showed a reduction of CD 34 negative KDR positive cells as early as 3 weeks after start of therapy. Neither serum nor tissue markers were of significant predictive value in our pilot study. Furthermore, we review the current data on biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapy of mCRC.

Dose-escalated CHOEP for the treatment of young patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: I. A randomized dose escalation and feasibility study with bi- and tri-weekly regimens.

BACKGROUND: To determine the maximum tolerated dose of a bi- and tri-weekly combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone plus etoposide (CHOEP) regimen without stem-cell support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomized phase I/II multicenter four-level (cyclophosphamide: 1000-1200-1400-1600 mg/m2; doxorubicin: 55-60-65-70 mg/m2; etoposide: 375-450-525-600 mg/m2) dose escalation study with CHOEP-14 and CHOEP-21 in young patients (18-60 years) with newly diagnosed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as thrombocytopenia <80,000/mm3 and leukocytopenia <2500/mm3 on days 16 (CHOEP-14) and 23 (CHOEP-21) or prolonged (>4 days) leukocytopenia (<1000/mm3) or thrombocytopenia (<20,000/mm3). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients (high-CHOEP-14: 47, high-CHOEP-21: 92) were randomly allocated to the study. Maximal tolerated dose was level 2 for CHOEP-14 and level 4 for CHOEP-21. With a less favorable profile of patients in CHOEP-14, 4-year event-free survival was 47.9% after high-CHOEP-14 and 66.2% after high-CHOEP-21, 4-year overall survival 62.1% after high-CHOEP-14 and 73.4% after high-CHOEP-21, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant dose escalations of CHOEP are possible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, with different chemotherapy models favoring the maximally escalated bi- or tri-weekly regimen, respectively. Because a higher total dose can be achieved with six cycles of the tri-weekly compared with the biweekly regimen, CHOEP-21 at dose escalation level 3 was chosen for a nationwide randomized comparison with baseline CHOEP-21 in a subsequent phase III trial.

[Systemic therapy of colorectal carcinoma]. / Onkologen setzen auf neue Kombinationen. Systemische Therapie des kolorektalen Karzinoms.

The therapeutic strategy for colorectal carcinoma is based upon the UICC stage. For stages 0 and I, endoscopic and operative methods are available. For stage II colon cancer, the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy has not been verified. On the other hand, beginning with stage III, the benefit of this therapy for lymph node metastases is undisputed. Although neoaduvant therapy is not indicated for colon cancer, it is standard procedure for rectal carcinoma in this stage. The objective of palliative chemotherapy in UICC stage IV is to extend the quality of life.

Modulation of angiogenesis and tumorigenicity of human melanocytic cells by vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor.

Human melanoma cells express two prominent angiogenic factors, e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF/fibroblast growth factor-2). In this study, we report on the relative contribution of these two factors to in vitro and in vivo growth of a tumorigenic melanoma cell line (WM164) and nontumorigenic, immortalized melanocytes (FM516SV). Overexpression of either cytokine significantly boosted tumorigenicity of WM164 cells in immunodeficient SCID mice. Attempting to overexpress bFGF antisense sequences produced no viable clones confirming earlier reports that autocrine bFGF is obligatory to melanoma cell survival and growth. By contrast, down-regulation of endogenous VEGF production did not affect growth of WM164 cells in vitro. In vivo expansion of WM164 cells expressing VEGF antisense was delayed but not abrogated. Forced expression of either bFGF or VEGF in immortalized but nontumorigenic melanocytes did not induce sustained tumor growth in vivo highlighting that neither of the two factors is sufficient for induction of tumorigenicity in this model system. Overexpression of either cytokine in WM164 cells led to the development of atypical large vessels but not to an increase in microvessel density. Taken together our results confirm an essential autocrine role of bFGF in human melanoma and indicate a beneficial but nonessential role of VEGF in the tumorigenic phenotype of human melanoma cells.

Transforming growth factor beta production and responsiveness in normal human melanocytes and melanoma cells.

Previous studies have shown that some human melanoma cells express transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) mRNA and are growth inhibited by exogenous TGF-beta, suggesting a possible negative autocrine role for this melanoma-derived growth factor. To better understand the role of endogenous TGF-beta in the development of melanoma, we investigated patterns of TGF-beta protein production and responsiveness of human melanoma cells as compared to normal melanocytes. Both cultured melanoma cells and normal melanocytes secreted biologically inactive, latent TGF-beta protein which, upon acid treatment, became biologically active. In melanoma cells, TGF-beta production occurred constitutively, i.e., in the absence of exogenous polypeptide growth factors. By contrast, in melanocytes, TGF-beta production depended on stimulation by exogenous growth factors such as insulin-like growth factor I. Exogenous, bioactive TGF-beta 1 at picomolar concentrations inhibited tritiated thymidine uptake of normal melanocytes, whereas melanoma cells demonstrated various degrees of resistance to TGF-beta-induced inhibition of DNA synthesis. Five of six cell lines were less sensitive than any of the melanocyte lines tested, and one cell line was completely resistant to inhibitory effects of TGF-beta on DNA synthesis. In vivo selection of melanoma cells for metastatic ability in athymic mice produced a variant cell line that was resistant to TGF-beta 1-induced inhibition of DNA synthesis and proliferation. Development of TGF-beta resistance in the variant cell line was not associated with changes in TGF-beta cell surface binding. Stable transfection of melanocytes with a plasmid expressing the Simian Virus 40 large T-antigen rendered these cells resistant to growth inhibition by TGF-beta, suggesting that TGF-beta inhibits melanoma/melanocyte growth via interaction with Simian Virus 40 large T-antigen-responsive transcription elements.

Characterization of tenascin secreted by human melanoma cells.

Tenascin is a large glycoprotein of the extracellular matrix. It shows a site-restricted expression during embryogenesis and can be found in adult tissues during wound healing and tumorigenesis. Because of the potential involvement of tenascin in adhesion and invasion during metastasis, the study of the interactions of tumor cells with tenascin is of considerable interest. Using five anti-melanoma monoclonal antibodies to four different epitopes of human tenascin, we found that most melanoma cells secrete tenascin in vitro constitutively. Transforming growth factor beta 1 in the medium increased secretion in tenascin-producing cells. Tenascin was present in sera of melanoma patients, with significantly elevated levels in patients with advanced melanomas as compared to patients with low tumor burden or to normal donors. Normal and malignant melanocytes did not attach to tenascin as substrate within 1 to 2 h and tenascin could also inhibit fibronectin-dependent adhesion. These results indicate that tenascin may play a critical role in cell-substrate interactions of melanoma cells.

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine and vinorelbine versus gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: from the German and Swiss Lung Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether cisplatin-based chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and cisplatin [GVP]) prolongs overall survival in comparison to cisplatin-free chemotherapy (gemcitabine and vinorelbine [GV]) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1999 and June 2001, 300 patients with NSCLC stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or stage IV disease were randomly assigned to receive GV (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) + vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or GVP (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) + vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 + cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 2 every 3 weeks). Primary end point of the study was overall survival. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven patients (GV, 143 patients; GVP, 144 patients) were eligible for analysis. At the time of analysis, April 15, 2002, 209 patients (GV, 103 patients; GVP, 106 patients) of 287 patients had died (73%). No statistically significant difference was observed for overall survival (P =.73; median survival, 35.9 versus 32.4 weeks; 1-year survival rate, 33.6% versus 27.5%) as well as for event-free survival (P =.35; median time-to-event, 19.3 versus 22.3 weeks) between GV and GVP. Two hundred fourteen patients were assessable for best response. The overall response rates were 13.0% for GV versus 28.3% for GVP (P =.004; complete responders, 0% versus 3.8%; partial responders, 13.0% versus 24.5%). Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the GV treatment arm compared with GVP. No statistically significant difference in quality of life was observed. CONCLUSION: In this phase III study, the cisplatin-based GVP regimen showed no survival benefit as first-line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC when compared with the cisplatin-free GV regimen, which was substantially better tolerated.

Expression of FLT4 and its ligand VEGF-C in acute myeloid leukemia.

FLT4 represents a recently cloned member of class III receptor tyrosine kinases which include receptors for the angiogenic growth factor VEGF, namely FLT1 and KDR. The ligand of FLT4 has been identified as VEGF-C which shares sequence homology with VEGF and P1GF. In the adult FLT4 shows a restricted expression pattern that is limited to lymphatic endothelia and endothelia of some high endothelial venules (HEV). FLT4 has also been detected in some tumor cell lines including the hematopoietic line HEL. We therefore investigated expression of FLT4 and its ligand VEGF-C in fresh samples from patients with AML. Using a sensitive PCR method we detected FLT4 m-RNA in 15 of 41 patients with de novo AML at diagnosis or relapse and in three of 12 patients with secondary AML. FLT4 expression was confirmed by immunocytochemistry in a subgroup of the studied patient population. FLT4 was also found in leukemic cell line U937, but not TF-1 and KG1a. VEGF-C expression was found in leukemic samples of four of seven FLT4-positive and four of six FLT4-negative patients. U937 cells also produced VEGF-C m-RNA. Interestingly, FLT4 expression was not detected in bone marrow samples of 15 normal volunteer donors or in CD34-positive cells from three additional donors. Possible autocrine and paracrine growth stimulation of leukemic blasts by VEGF-C is currently being investigated in our laboratory.