Clinical and inflammatory features of asthma with dissociation between fractional exhaled nitric oxide and eosinophils in induced sputum.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of the fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and eosinophils in induced sputum are noninvasive markers for assessing airway inflammation in asthma. The clinical usefulness of the correlation between raised FeNO and sputum eosinophilia is controversial. We aimed to examine dissociation between FeNO and sputum eosinophils in a clinical series of asthma patients and to determine whether dissociation between these noninvasive markers was associated with clinical and inflammatory differences in these patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A total of 110 patients with asthma were included in a cross-sectional study. All of them were on maintenance treatment for asthma. All patients underwent the following on the same day: FeNO, induced sputum, spirometry, serum total IgE levels and skin prick test. The level of asthma control was determined by the Asthma control Test Questionnaire. In 46 (41.8%) patients, a discrepancy between FeNO and sputum eosinophil count was observed, of those, 34 (73.9%) had a FeNO <50 ppb and high eosinophil count, and were characterized by having a predominance of nonallergic asthma with bronchial eosinophilic inflammatory phenotype. Also, 12 (26.1%) patients had FeNO ≥50 ppb and sputum eosinophilia within the normal reference values, and were characterized by having a predominance of atopy with a paucigranulocytic inflammatory phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients with dissociation between results of FeNO and sputum eosinophils was observed. These patients showed differential clinical and inflammatory features.

Bronchial plasma exudation after adenosine monophosphate or methacholine challenge.

Nonspecific hyperresponsiveness to adenosine monophosphate is better related to airway inflammation than methacholine. Adenosine induces mast cells and other cells to release inflammatory mediators that produce bronchoconstriction and perhaps other inflammatory effects, such as plasma exudation, which have not been well studied. We compared the plasma exudation effect, as measured in induced sputum, between adenosine and methacholine challenge in healthy and asthmatic subjects. In a cross-over design, 42 subjects were randomly challenged with adenosine or methacholine. After recovery, induced sputum was collected on 2 separate days, 48 to 72 hours apart. In the control group, an additional challenge with saline was performed. Differential cell counts and albumin and alpha2-macroglobulin levels were determined. The sputum volume obtained was sufficient to measure proteins in only 34 subjects: 10 healthy individuals and 24 mild asthmatics. There was a significant difference between adenosine and methacholine in sputum albumin (mean differences: 68[73.4] microg/L in controls, p = 0.039 and 48.0[162.9] microg/L in asthmatics) and cell counts, but only a tendency in alpha2-macroglobulin. PC20 adenosine was better related to eosinophil counts than methacholine (r = -0.44, p = 0.014). Albumin or alpha2-macroglubulin levels were not significantly correlated with baseline FEV1, PC20, or eosinophil counts. Adenosine, but not methacholine challenge, produces a mild airway plasma exudation that does not seem to be relevant to bronchoconstriction. However, this could be relevant, to some supernatant measurements after adenosine challenge.