The National Psoriasis Foundation psoriasis treatment targets in real-world patients: prevalence and association with patient-reported outcomes in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) published treat-to-target guidelines for psoriasis, yet their applicability in clinical practice remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of psoriasis patients meeting the NPF's body surface area (BSA) 'target' (≤1%) and 'acceptable' (≤3%) response criteria and the cross-sectional associations of these criteria with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry. METHODS: Separately for three independent cross-sectional cohorts of patients at the (i) enrolment, (ii) 6-month and (iii) 12-month visits, we calculated the proportion of patients with BSA ≤1% and ≤3%. Furthermore, we calculated odds ratios estimating the risk of PROs associated with not meeting criteria in the 6-month cohort. RESULTS: The enrolment, 6- and 12-month cohorts included 2794, 1310 and 629 patients, respectively. At enrolment, 24% of patients had a BSA ≤ 1% and 41% a BSA ≤ 3%. In the 6-month cohort, 43%/64% had a BSA ≤ 1%/BSA ≤ 3%. In the 12-month cohort, 46%/69% of patients had a BSA ≤ 1%/BSA ≤ 3%. Patients not at target/acceptable criteria had higher odds for worse quality of life compared with those who were. CONCLUSION: While most patients at 6- and 12-month visits were at the 'acceptable' response, less than half were at the 'target' response despite systemic therapy. There remain unmet needs to optimize psoriasis therapy and further validate current treat-to-target guidelines.

Utilization of the validated Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool to identify signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis among those with psoriasis: a cross-sectional analysis from the US-based Corrona Psoriasis Registry.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing awareness of the disease, rates of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are high in patients with psoriasis (PsO). The validated Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) is a five-item questionnaire developed to help identify PsA at an early stage. OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of possible undiagnosed PsA among patients with PsO and characterize patients based on PEST scores. METHODS: This study included all patients enrolled in the Corrona PsO Registry with data on all five PEST questions. Demographics, clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcomes were compared in Corrona PsO Registry patients with PEST scores ≥3 and <3 using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables; scores ≥3 may indicate PsA. RESULTS: Of 1516 patients with PsO, 904 did not have dermatologist-reported PsA; 112 of these 904 patients (12.4%) scored ≥3 and were significantly older, female, less likely to be working, and had higher BMI than patients with scores <3. They also had significantly longer PsO duration, were more likely to have nail PsO and had worse health status, pain, fatigue, Dermatology Life Quality Index and activity impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Improved PsA screening is needed in patients with PsO because the validated PEST identified over one-tenth of registry patients who were not noted to have PsA as having scores ≥3, who could have had undiagnosed PsA. Appropriate, earlier care is important because these patients were more likely to have nail PsO, worse health-related quality of life and worse activity impairment.

Plasma levels of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL1Ra) predict radiographic progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1ß and IL1Ra, are produced by joint tissues in osteoarthritis (OA), where they may contribute to pathogenesis. We examined whether inflammatory events occurring within joints are reflected in plasma of patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (SKOA). DESIGN: 111 SKOA subjects with medial disease completed a 24-month prospective study of clinical and radiographic progression, with clinical assessment and specimen collection at 6-month intervals. The plasma biochemical marker IL1Ra was assessed at baseline and 18 months; other plasma biochemical markers were assessed only at 18 months, including IL-1ß, TNFα, VEGF, IL-6, IL-6Rα, IL-17A, IL-17A/F, IL-17F, CRP, sTNF-RII, and MMP-2. RESULTS: In cross-sectional studies, WOMAC (total, pain, function) and plasma IL1Ra were modestly associated with radiographic severity after adjustment for age, gender and body mass index (BMI). In addition, elevation of plasma IL1Ra predicted joint space narrowing (JSN) at 24 months. BMI did associate with progression in some but not all analyses. Causal graph analysis indicated a positive association of IL1Ra with JSN; an interaction between IL1Ra and BMI suggested either that BMI influences IL1Ra or that a hidden confounder influences both BMI and IL1Ra. Other protein biomarkers examined in this study did not associate with radiographic progression or severity. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma levels of IL1Ra were modestly associated with the severity and progression of SKOA in a causal fashion, independent of other risk factors. The findings may be useful in the search for prognostic biomarkers and development of disease-modifying OA drugs.

Enhanced COMP catabolism detected in serum of patients with arthritis and animal disease models through a novel capture ELISA.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed determining whether assessment of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) degradation products could serve as a serological disease course and therapeutic response predictor in arthritis. METHODS: We generated a panel of monoclonal antibodies against COMP fragments and developed a novel capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting COMP fragments in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This test was also used to monitor COMP fragments in surgically-induced OA, collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) transgenic animal models. RESULTS: Compared with a commercial COMP ELISA kit that detected no significant difference in COMP levels between OA and control groups, a significant increase of the COMP fragments were noted in the serum of OA patients assayed by this newly established ELISA. In addition, serum COMP fragment levels were well correlated with severity in OA patients and the progression of surgically-induced OA in murine models. Furthermore, the serum levels of COMP fragments in RA patients, mice with CIA, and TNF transgenic mice were significantly higher when compared with their controls. Interestingly, treatment with TNFα inhibitors and methotrexate led to a significant decrease of serum COMP fragments in RA patients. Additionally, administration of Atsttrin [Tang, et al., Science 2011;332(6028):478] also resulted in a significant reduction in COMP fragments in arthritis mice models. CONCLUSION: A novel sandwich ELISA is capable of reproducibly measuring serum COMP fragments in both arthritic patients and rodent arthritis models. This test also provides a valuable means to utilize serum COMP fragments for monitoring the effects of interventions in arthritis.

Elevated liver enzyme tests among patients with rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis treated with methotrexate and/or leflunomide.

INTRODUCTION: Potential hepatotoxicity associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) requires laboratory monitoring. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the incidence of elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) enzymes associated with methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide (LEF) and MTX+LEF versus other DMARDs was examined. METHODS: Patients with RA and PsA enrolled in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (CORRONA) initiating DMARDs were identified. Abnormalities were identified when either was 1- or 2-fold times above the upper limits of normal (ULN). Odds ratios (OR) between MTX/LEF dose and elevated ALT/AST enzymes were estimated using generalised estimating equations. Interaction terms for use of MTX+LEF quantified the incremental risk of the combination compared with each individually. RESULTS: Elevated ALT/AST levels (>1x ULN) occurred in 22%, 17%, 31% and 14% of patients with RA receiving MTX, LEF, MTX+LEF or neither, respectively; elevations were 2.76-fold (95% CI 1.84 to 4.15) more likely in patients with PsA. Elevations >2x ULN occurred in 1-2% of patients on MTX or LEF monotherapy compared with 5% with the combination. After multivariable adjustment and compared with either monotherapy, the combination of MTX and LEF was associated with a greater risk according to MTX dose used as part of the combination: MTX 10-17.5 mg/week, OR 2.91 (95% CI 1.23 to 6.90); MTX > or =20 mg/week, OR 3.98 (95% CI 1.72 to 9.24). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal ALT/AST levels developed in 14-35% of patients with RA or PsA initiating DMARD therapy. The risks were incrementally greater in those with PsA and in those receiving MTX (> or =10 mg/day) + LEF. These findings should help inform monitoring for potential hepatotoxicity in these patient populations.

Association of methotrexate and tumour necrosis factor antagonists with risk of infectious outcomes including opportunistic infections in the CORRONA registry.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of methotrexate (MTX) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists with the risk of infectious outcomes including opportunistic infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with RA enrolled in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (CORRONA) registry prescribed MTX, TNF antagonists or other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were included. The primary outcomes were incident overall and opportunistic infections. Incident rate ratios were calculated using generalised estimating equation Poisson regression models adjusted for demographics, comorbidities and RA disease activity measures. RESULTS: A total of 7971 patients with RA were followed. The adjusted rate of infections per 100 person-years was increased among users of MTX (30.9, 95% CI 29.2 to 32.7), TNF antagonists (40.1, 95% CI 37.0 to 43.4) and a combination of MTX and TNF antagonists (37.1, 95% CI 34.9 to 39.3) compared with users of other non-biological DMARDs (24.5, 95% CI 21.8 to 27.5). The adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) was increased in patients treated with MTX (IRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.50) and TNF antagonists (IRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.78) compared with those treated with other DMARDs. TNF antagonist use was associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections (IRR 1.67, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.94). Prednisone use was associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections (IRR 1.63, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.21) and an increased risk of overall infection at doses >10 mg daily (IRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.53). CONCLUSIONS: MTX, TNF antagonists and prednisone at doses >10 mg daily were associated with increased risks of overall infections. Low-dose prednisone and TNF antagonists (but not MTX) increased the risk of opportunistic infections.

Prevalence of low hemoglobin levels and associations with other disease parameters in rheumatoid arthritis patients: evidence from the CORRONA registry.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of low hemoglobin (Hb) levels in a large US cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and examine the relationship between Hb levels and RA severity, associated comorbidities, and quality-of-life parameters by cross-sectional analysis of data from the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (CORRONA) registry. METHODS: The study population comprised patients with RA >18 years of age and clinical information recorded in the CORRONA registry between October 1, 2001 and February 1, 2007. Patients were separated into low (Hb <13 g/dl for men; <12 g/dl for women) and normal Hb groups (Hb >13 g/dl for men; >12 g/dl for women). Hb levels were calculated from recorded hematocrit values. RESULTS: Of the 10,397 study patients, 1734 (16.7%) had low Hb levels and 8663 (83.3%) had normal Hb levels. More patients in the low Hb group had a history of comorbid cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and gastrointestinal disease. The low Hb group exhibited greater disease severity and activity (p<0.05) as reported by patients and rheumatologists. In multivariate analyses, RA severity ([odds ratio] OR 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.44) and ESR (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03-1.05), and comorbid bleeding ulcers (OR 2.04; 95% CI: 1.01-4.12) were predictive of low Hb levels. CONCLUSION: Despite changes in treatment paradigms, low Hb levels remain prevalent in RA patients. This analysis suggests that low Hb levels may be associated with RA disease severity and the presence of certain comorbidities.

The COX-2 inhibitor market withdrawals and prescribing patterns by rheumatologists in patients with gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk.

OBJECTIVE: To examine effects of the COX-2 inhibitor market withdrawals on NSAID utilization among patients at increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) toxicities. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted using patients enrolled in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (CORRONA) Registry. The study population included rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients prescribed NSAIDs by rheumatologists from 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2005. Three cohorts were defined based on calendar year. The primary outcome assessed whether or not an NSAID gastroprotective strategy was prescribed. Secondary outcomes included rates of COX-2 inhibitor utilization and gastroprotective co-therapy utilization, stratified by the presence of cardiac and GI risk factors. RESULTS: NSAID gastroprotection utilization decreased from 65.1% in 2003 to 47.7% (p<0.001) in 2005. COX-2 inhibitor use decreased from 55.1% to 29.2% (p<0.001), whereas nonselective NSAIDs (nsNSAIDs) use increased from 50.2% to 73.9% (p=<0.01). Among patients with two or more risk factors for NSAID related GI bleeding, gastroprotection decreased from 74.4% in 2003 to 60.9% (p<0.01). For patients with two or more CV risk factors from 2003 to 2005, COX-2 inhibitor utilization decreased significantly, whereas nsNSAID utilization increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The COX-2 inhibitor withdrawals resulted in a rapid decline in NSAID gastroprotection prescribed by participating U.S. rheumatologists despite the availability of other gastroprotective options. Channeling toward nsNSAID use was widespread, including among patients at increased CV risk. Longer term follow-up is required to determine the clinical significance of these changes in NSAID prescribing, particularly for NSAID-related GI and CV-related toxicities.

Methotrexate combined with isoniazid treatment for latent tuberculosis is well tolerated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: experience from an urban arthritis clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Reactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) is a significant problem with all available tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists when used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and other inflammatory diseases. Concerns have been raised regarding the appropriate management of patients with latent TB (LTB) exposure (or active TB infection) before initiating TNF antagonists as the safety data of combined treatment with two potentially hepatotoxic medications, methotrexate (MTX) and isoniazid (INH), is lacking. The goal of this study was to investigate the toxicity of MTX and INH treatment in patients with RA before initiating TNF antagonists. METHODS: To investigate the toxicity of MTX and INH treatment in patients with RA we performed a retrospective chart review of patients seen at the Bellevue Hospital Arthritis Clinic in New York City between 2002 and 2006. Forty-four patients who were concomitantly treated with both drugs were included. The primary outcome investigated was increase in liver function tests (LFT). RESULTS: Transient increases in LFT were seen in 11% of patients, but in no case was this more than twice the upper limit of normal values. All abnormal LFT resolved spontaneously without intervention. In addition, no patient has developed signs or symptoms of TB reactivation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of INH for LTB was well tolerated in patients with RA on a background regimen of MTX. While the risks and benefits of all treatment must always be considered, in our experience the additive risk of INH to MTX in terms of hepatotoxicity was low. None the less it is prudent to follow LFT closely on patients taking this combination.

Disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of cardiovascular events.

OBJECTIVE: Use of several immunomodulatory agents has been associated with reduced numbers of cardiovascular (CV) events in epidemiologic studies of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, it is unknown whether time-averaged disease activity in RA correlates with CV events. METHODS: We studied patients with RA whose cases were followed in a longitudinal US-based registry. Time-averaged disease activity was assessed during followup using the area under the curve of the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), a validated measure of RA disease activity. Age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia, body mass index, family history of myocardial infarction (MI), use of aspirin or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), presence of CV disease, and baseline use of an immunomodulator were assessed at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression models were examined to determine the risk of a composite CV end point that included MI, stroke, and death from CV causes. RESULTS: A total of 24,989 patients who had been followed up for a median of 2.7 years were included in these analyses. During followup, we observed 534 confirmed CV end points, for an incidence rate of 7.8 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 6.7-8.9). In models adjusted for variables noted above, a 10-point reduction in the time-averaged CDAI was associated with a 21% reduction in CV risk (95% CI 13-29). These results were robust in subgroup analyses stratified by the presence of CV disease, use of corticosteroids, use of NSAIDs or selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, and change in RA treatment, as well as when restricted to events adjudicated as definite or probable. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that reduced time-averaged disease activity in RA is associated with fewer CV events.

Internal mammary artery perfusing the Leriche's syndrome.

Two cases of collateral perfusion of a lower extremity, by way of an internal mammary artery, in the presence of Leriche's syndrome are described. The importance of recognizing this condition prior to coronary artery bypass grafting is emphasized.

Cardiovascular outcomes in high risk patients with osteoarthritis treated with ibuprofen, naproxen or lumiracoxib.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that both selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increase the risk of cardiovascular events. However, evidence from prospective studies of currently available COX-2 inhibitors and non-selective NSAIDs is lacking in patients at high cardiovascular risk who are taking aspirin. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cardiovascular outcomes in high risk patients with osteoarthritis treated with ibuprofen, naproxen or lumiracoxib. METHODS: The Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET) of 18 325 patients with osteoarthritis comprised two parallel substudies, comparing lumiracoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) with either ibuprofen or naproxen. A post hoc analysis by baseline cardiovascular risk, treatment assignment, and low-dose aspirin use was performed. The primary composite end point was cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke at 1 year; a secondary end point was the development of congestive heart failure (CHF). RESULTS: In high risk patients among aspirin users, patients in the ibuprofen substudy had more primary events with ibuprofen than lumiracoxib (2.14% vs 0.25%, p = 0.038), whereas in the naproxen substudy rates were similar for naproxen and lumiracoxib (1.58% vs 1.48%, p = 0.899). High risk patients not taking aspirin had fewer primary events with naproxen than with lumiracoxib (0% vs 1.57%, p = 0.027), but not for ibuprofen versus lumiracoxib (0.92% vs 0.80%, p = 0.920). Overall, CHF developed more often with ibuprofen than lumiracoxib (1.28% vs 0.14%; p = 0.031), whereas no difference existed between naproxen and lumiracoxib. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that ibuprofen may confer an increased risk of thrombotic and CHF events relative to lumiracoxib among aspirin users at high cardiovascular risk. The study indicates that naproxen may be associated with lower risk relative to lumiracoxib among non-aspirin users. This study is subject to inherent limitations, and therefore should be interpreted as a hypothesis-generating study.