RESUMO
BACKGROUND: High quality sexual health services are needed to improve both individual and public health outcomes. This study set out to explore what is important to patients who visit a sexual health clinic, and examine their understanding of standard survey questions, in order to inform the collection and interpretation of patient experience data that are used to improve services. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, qualitative study. In the first part of the interview, we used "discovery interviews" to explore patients' experiences of attending a central London walk-in sexual health clinic. In the second part, we asked patients how they would respond to eight standard patient experience survey questions and to provide an explanation for each of their responses. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data. RESULTS: We interviewed seventeen participants (nine women, eight men) of different ethnicities and backgrounds. All interviewees were positive about their experience. They described how staff had made them feel "comfortable", and talked about how staff spent time, listened and did not rush them, despite being a very busy clinic. In response to the survey questions, fourteen patients rated their as care excellent or very good overall. However, survey questions were interpreted in different ways and were not always easily understood. CONCLUSIONS: The open-ended "discovery interviews" provided new insights into aspects of care that were most valued or could improve. Standard patient experience questions provide a rating but little elucidation of the experiences that lie behind patients' responses. They do not always measure aspects of care valued by patients or identify areas for improvement. They are not uniformly understood and necessarily collapse a wide range of experiences and views into categories that may seem inappropriate. Qualitative methods have a key role in measuring patient experience and involving patients in service improvement.
Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Conforto do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Saúde Sexual , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde , Emoções , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of brief advice for excessive alcohol consumption among people who attend sexual health clinics. METHODS: Two-arm, parallel group, assessor blind, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. 802 people aged 19 years or over who attended one of three sexual health clinics and were drinking excessively were randomised to either brief advice or control treatment. Brief advice consisted of feedback on alcohol and health, written information and an offer of an appointment with an Alcohol Health Worker. Control participants received a leaflet on health and lifestyle. The primary outcome was mean weekly alcohol consumption during the previous 90 days measured 6 months after randomisation. The main secondary outcome was unprotected sex during this period. RESULTS: Among the 402 randomised to brief advice, 397 (99%) received it. The adjusted mean difference in alcohol consumption at 6 months was -2.33 units per week (95% CI -4.69 to 0.03, p=0.053) among those in the active compared to the control arm of the trial. Unprotected sex was reported by 154 (53%) of those who received brief advice, and 178 (59%) controls (adjusted OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.25, p=0.496). There were no significant differences in costs between study groups at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of universal screening and brief advice for excessive alcohol use among people attending sexual health clinics does not result in clinically important reductions in alcohol consumption or provide a cost-effective use of resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 99963322.
Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/psicologia , Educação em Saúde/métodos , Comportamento Sexual/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/transmissão , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Educação em Saúde/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateteres de Demora/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Protocolos Clínicos , Administração Hospitalar , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement an objective, reliable approach to surveillance for ventilator-associated events in adult patients. DESIGN: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened a Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Surveillance Definition Working Group in September 2011. Working Group members included representatives of stakeholder societies and organizations and federal partners. MAIN RESULTS: The Working Group finalized a three-tier, adult surveillance definition algorithm for ventilator-associated events. The algorithm uses objective, readily available data elements and can identify a broad range of conditions and complications occurring in mechanically ventilated adult patients, including but not limited to VAP. The first tier definition, ventilator-associated condition (VAC), identifies patients with a period of sustained respiratory deterioration following a sustained period of stability or improvement on the ventilator, defined by changes in the daily minimum fraction of inspired oxygen or positive end-expiratory pressure. The second tier definition, infection-related ventilator-associated complication (IVAC), requires that patients with VAC also have an abnormal temperature or white blood cell count, and be started on a new antimicrobial agent. The third tier definitions, possible and probable VAP, require that patients with IVAC also have laboratory and/or microbiological evidence of respiratory infection. CONCLUSIONS: Ventilator-associated events surveillance was implemented in January 2013 in the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network. Modifications to improve surveillance may be made as additional data become available and users gain experience with the new definitions.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Vigilância da População/métodos , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Lesão Pulmonar Induzida por Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The purpose of this document is to highlight practical recommendations to assist acute care hospitals to prioritize and implement strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ventilator-associated events (VAE), and non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) in adults, children, and neonates. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Acute Care Hospitals published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology (SHEA), and is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the American Hospital Association, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Pneumonia , Adulto , Criança , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/prevenção & controle , Hospitais , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Controle de Infecções , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Ventiladores Mecânicos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Background: Traditional approaches for surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance have deficiencies that delay detection of SSI outbreaks and other clinically important increases in SSI rates. We investigated whether use of optimised statistical process control (SPC) methods and feedback for SSI surveillance would decrease rates of SSI in a network of US community hospitals. Methods: We conducted a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial of patients who underwent any of 13 types of common surgical procedures across 29 community hospitals in the Southeastern United States. We divided the 13 procedures into six clusters; a cluster of procedures at a single hospital was the unit of randomisation and analysis. In total, 105 clusters were randomised to 12 groups of 8-10 clusters. All participating clusters began the trial in a 12-month baseline period of control or "traditional" SSI surveillance, including prospective analysis of SSI rates and consultative support for SSI outbreaks and investigations. Thereafter, a group of clusters transitioned from control to intervention surveillance every three months until all clusters received the intervention. Electronic randomisation by the study statistician determined the sequence by which clusters crossed over from control to intervention surveillance. The intervention was the addition of weekly application of optimised SPC methods and feedback to existing traditional SSI surveillance methods. Epidemiologists were blinded to hospital identity and randomisation status while adjudicating SPC signals of increased SSI rates, but blinding was not possible during SSI investigations. The primary outcome was the overall SSI prevalence rate (PR=SSIs/100 procedures), evaluated via generalised estimating equations with a Poisson regression model. Secondary outcomes compared traditional and optimised SPC signals that identified SSI rate increases, including the number of formal SSI investigations generated and deficiencies identified in best practices for SSI prevention. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03075813. Findings: Between Mar 1, 2016, and Feb 29, 2020, 204,233 unique patients underwent 237,704 surgical procedures. 148,365 procedures received traditional SSI surveillance and feedback alone, and 89,339 procedures additionally received the intervention of optimised SPC surveillance. The primary outcome of SSI was assessed for all procedures performed within participating clusters. SSIs occurred after 1171 procedures assigned control surveillance (prevalence rate [PR] 0.79 per 100 procedures), compared to 781 procedures that received the intervention (PR 0·87 per 100 procedures; model-based PR ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.30, p=0.25). Traditional surveillance generated 24 formal SSI investigations that identified 120 SSIs with deficiencies in two or more perioperative best practices for SSI prevention. In comparison, optimised SPC surveillance generated 74 formal investigations that identified 458 SSIs with multiple best practice deficiencies. Interpretation: The addition of optimised SPC methods and feedback to traditional methods for SSI surveillance led to greater detection of important SSI rate increases and best practice deficiencies but did not decrease SSI rates. Additional research is needed to determine how to best utilise SPC methods and feedback to improve adherence to SSI quality measures and prevent SSIs. Funding: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
RESUMO
Infection control programs can generate a wealth of data, but many professionals become overwhelmed when trying to translate the data into actionable knowledge. Automated surveillance systems have the potential to greatly streamline these efforts, but many questions arise about how to evaluate these systems, their costs, benefits and more. Here are answers to some of the most important questions on this issue.
Assuntos
Automação , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Eficiência Organizacional , Vigilância da População/métodos , Automação/economia , Automação/métodos , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , HumanosRESUMO
This guide is intended for IPs, nurses, and others who are involved in infection prevention efforts across the continuum of care. It reviews current literature, suggested prevention strategies, and potential tools and techniques to guide surveillance, detection, and prevention efforts for NV-HAP.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Atenção à Saúde , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Literature suggests that cancer patients can become colonized or infected with a variety of opportunistic and health care-associated pathogens, putting them at higher risk for nonventilator health care-associated pneumonia. This section will review the epidemiology of nonventilator health care-associated pneumonia and the importance of prevention strategies in this vulnerable population. Prevention strategies for cancer patients across the continuum of care are highlighted.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Atenção à Saúde , Instalações de Saúde , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde/epidemiologia , Humanos , Oncologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controleRESUMO
This section highlights the necessary steps to implement a robust plan to connect surveillance and prevention strategies for nonventilator health care-associated pneumonia (NV-HAP) as described in previous sections. In addition to specific NV-HAP strategies, the importance of general infection prevention principles that are common to all settings for prevention of all health care-associated infections are reviewed. The section also provides an overview of a step-wise model to develop a comprehensive NV-HAP surveillance plan. A sample case review form is included.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Pneumonia , Antibacterianos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Lymphogranuloma venereum in the United Kingdom was detected in 2004, following the introduction of enhanced surveillance. This report describes a previously undiagnosed case, detected retrospectively in a sample obtained in 2003 from a male patient with high-risk behaviour, indicating that this previously rare disease in Europe, was present in the UK in 2003.
Assuntos
Linfogranuloma Venéreo/diagnóstico , Linfogranuloma Venéreo/epidemiologia , Adulto , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Linfogranuloma Venéreo/tratamento farmacológico , Linfogranuloma Venéreo/microbiologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Parceiros Sexuais , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
In the genitourinary medicine clinic setting, the most practical and widely used method of diagnosing Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is direct microscopy of a wet mount preparation (WMP) of a sample taken from the posterior vaginal fornix. We retrospectively reviewed the potential impact of further limiting WMP to women with a vaginal pH > or =4.5. In total, 5/100 women with TV diagnosed on WMP had a recorded vaginal pH <4.5. One case of TV was identified in 1000 consecutive WMPs performed in women with vaginal pH <4.5. Our review demonstrates that, in our two groups, TV as diagnosed by WMP is strongly associated with a vaginal pH > or =4.5.
Assuntos
Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Tricomoníase/parasitologia , Trichomonas vaginalis/isolamento & purificação , Vagina/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tricomoníase/metabolismo , Vagina/parasitologia , Esfregaço VaginalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016 Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) Progress Report documented no change in catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) between 2009 and 2014. There is a need for investment in additional efforts to reduce HAIs, specifically CAUTI. Quality improvement fellowships are 1 approach to expand the capacity of dedicated leaders and infection prevention champions. METHODS: The fellowship used a model that expanded collaboration among disciplines and focused on partnership by recruiting a diverse cohort of fellows and by providing 1-on-1 mentoring to enhance leadership development. The curriculum supported the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Prevention Competency Model in 2 domains: leadership and performance improvement and implementation science. RESULTS: The fellowship was successful. The fellows and mentors had self-reported high level of satisfaction, fellows' knowledge increased, and they demonstrated leadership, quality improvement, and implementation science competency within the completed capstone projects. CONCLUSIONS: A model encompassing diverse educational topics, discussions, workshops, and mentorship can serve as a template for developing infection prevention champions. Although this project focused on CAUTI, this template can be used in a variety of settings and applied to a range of other HAIs and performance improvement projects.
Assuntos
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organização & administração , Bolsas de Estudo , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Segurança do Paciente , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Aspirin resistance and its predictors were studied in community hospital patients who required antiplatelet therapy for thrombotic event prophylaxis. Demographic and antiplatelet medication data were collected and medication response followed. Aspirin resistance was assayed with the VerifyNow System with > or = 550 aspirin reaction units (ARUs) used as a dichotomous indicator of aspirin resistance. Patients (n = 123) were 21 to 95 years old; 49.6% were women, 77.2% were black, 95.1% were hypertensive, 85.4% had coronary disease, and 30.1% were smokers. ARU score for 325 versus 81 mg/day was 435.2 +/- 93.7 versus 401.9 +/- 83.9 ARU (p = 0.04), with a 12.1% (8 of 66 patients) nonresponse rate to 81 mg/day. Of the 8 patients who were unresponsive to 81 mg/day of aspirin, 7 responded to 325 mg/day. The 5.3% (3 of 57 patients) who were resistant to 325 mg/day received clopidogrel; 2 became responders. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant associations of aspirin resistance with smoking (risk ratio 11.47, 95% confidence interval 6.69 to 18.63, p < 0.0001), including a significant interaction between smoking and aspirin resistance. In conclusion, this study estimates aspirin resistance prevalence and shows a strong association of smoking with platelet hyperactivity in a diverse community hospital population. Nonresponders to 81 mg/day frequently responded to 325 mg/day or to the addition of clopidogrel.
Assuntos
Aspirina/farmacologia , Resistência a Medicamentos , Hospitais Comunitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/farmacologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombose/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Translate each new regulation into a process change that can be implemented and sustained economically, with reasonable effort.
Assuntos
Tecnologia Biomédica , Legislação Hospitalar , Cuidados de Enfermagem/normas , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Regular oral care with chlorhexidine gluconate is standard of care for patients receiving mechanical ventilation in most hospitals. This policy is predicated on meta-analyses suggesting decreased risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia, but these meta-analyses may be misleading because of lack of distinction between cardiac surgery and non-cardiac surgery studies, conflation of open-label vs double-blind investigations, and insufficient emphasis on patient-centered outcomes such as duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of routine oral care with chlorhexidine on patient-centered outcomes in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception until July 2013 without limits on date or language. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials comparing chlorhexidine vs placebo in adults receiving mechanical ventilation. Of 171 unique citations, 16 studies including 3630 patients met inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Eligible trials were independently identified, evaluated for risk of bias, and extracted by 2 investigators. Differences were resolved by consensus. We stratified studies into cardiac surgery vs non-cardiac surgery and open-label vs double-blind investigations. Eligible studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS: There were fewer lower respiratory tract infections in cardiac surgery patients randomized to chlorhexidine (relative risk [RR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.41-0.77]) but no significant difference in ventilator-associated pneumonia risk in double-blind studies of non-cardiac surgery patients (RR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.66-1.16]). There was no significant mortality difference between chlorhexidine and placebo in cardiac surgery studies (RR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.25-2.14]) and nonsignificantly increased mortality in non-cardiac surgery studies (RR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.99-1.29]). There were no significant differences in mean duration of mechanical ventilation or intensive care length of stay. Data on hospital length of stay and antibiotic prescribing were limited. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Routine oral care with chlorhexidine prevents nosocomial pneumonia in cardiac surgery patients but may not decrease ventilator-associated pneumonia risk in non-cardiac surgery patients. Chlorhexidine use does not affect patient-centered outcomes in either population. Policies encouraging routine oral care with chlorhexidine for non-cardiac surgery patients merit reevaluation.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Clorexidina/análogos & derivados , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Interdisciplinary Academy for Coaching and Teamwork (I-ACT) was an advanced course aimed at educating leaders of a quality improvement project on addressing clinical challenges associated with catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), overcoming socioadaptive issues among a multidisciplinary team, and effective coaching. METHODS: The I-ACT course provided substantial opportunities for interaction among participants and faculty experts through role playing. Participants were grouped so that each discipline of a potential CAUTI improvement team was represented during interactive components of the training. Precourse and postcourse surveys were used to assess participants' comfort in addressing various challenges associated with implementation of interventions. RESULTS: After the course, participants expressed improved comfort with using the tools provided to address challenging socioadaptive issues. Written comments indicated that the participants valued being able to learn from experts and meet in a face-to-face setting. CONCLUSIONS: The I-ACT course was successful in training faculty to serve as improvement experts for US hospitals working on CAUTI prevention. After completing the course, participants felt that their comfort and ability to address complex improvement problems had improved. This model may be effective for use in preparing improvement project leaders and participants to tackle other healthcare-associated infections and complex quality problems.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Educação em Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hospitais , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Urinários/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Central venous catheter use is common outside the intensive care units (ICUs), but prevention in this setting is not well studied. We initiated surveillance for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) outside the ICU setting and studied the impact of a multimodal intervention on the incidence of CLABSIs across multiple hospitals. METHODS: This project was constructed as a prospective preintervention-postintervention design. The project comprised 3 phases (preintervention [baseline], intervention, and postintervention) over a 4.5-year period (2008-2012) and was implemented through a collaborative of 37 adult non-ICU wards at 6 hospitals in the Rochester, NY area. The intervention focused on engagement of nursing staff and leadership, nursing education on line care maintenance, competence evaluation, audits of line care, and regular feedback on CLABSI rates. Quarterly rates were compared over time in relation to intervention implementation. RESULTS: The overall CLABSI rate for all participating units decreased from 2.6/1000 line-days preintervention to 2.1/1,000 line-days during the intervention and to 1.3/1,000 line-days postintervention, a 50% reduction (95% confidence interval, .40-.59) compared with the preintervention period (P .0179). CONCLUSION: A multipronged approach blending both the adaptive and technical aspects of care including front line engagement, education, execution of best practices, and evaluation of both process and outcome measures may provide an effective strategy for reducing CLABSI rates outside the ICU.