Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 44(10): 1379-1383, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36178524

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The oculomotor nerve (OMN) innervates the pupil, ciliary body, upper eyelid, and extraocular muscles through two divisions: a superior division that innervates the levator palpebrae superioris (LPS) and superior rectus (SR), and an inferior division that supplies the medial rectus (MR), inferior rectus (IR), inferior oblique (IO), and parasympathetic fibers to the pupil and ciliary body. We present a case of complete splitting of the cisternal segment of bilateral OMNs that was discovered incidentally on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a patient who had no ocular complaints. CASE REPORT: A 69-year-old patient was found to have bilateral splitting of the cisternal segments of OMNs during an MRI for trigeminal neuralgia workup. Both nerves sprang from the midbrain as distinct roots. They were symmetric on the right and minimally asymmetric on the left. On both sides, the medial root was slightly inferiorly situated. The patient had no visual problems and continued to function normally. A review of the literature for similar cases identified no such variants; however, it did identify eight examples of OMN fenestrations produced by aneurysms (AN), six of which had no OMN palsy symptoms. CONCLUSION: An anatomic variant of split bilateral OMN cisternal segments is described. The superior and inferior divisions may have different brainstem origins. Although this variant is an anatomic curiosity, it may have clinical significance and explain the various presentation of compressive OMN palsies.


Assuntos
Doenças do Nervo Oculomotor , Nervo Oculomotor , Humanos , Idoso , Nervo Oculomotor/diagnóstico por imagem , Achados Incidentais , Doenças do Nervo Oculomotor/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças do Nervo Oculomotor/etiologia , Músculos Oculomotores/diagnóstico por imagem , Músculos Oculomotores/inervação , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos
2.
Vision Res ; 188: 162-173, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34333201

RESUMO

Blast-induced traumatic brain injury is the signature injury of modern military conflicts. To more fully understand the effects of blast exposure, we placed rats in different holder configurations, exposed them to blast overpressure, and assessed the degree of eye and brain injury. Anesthetized Long-Evans rats received blast exposures directed at the head (63 kPa, 195 dB-SPL) in either an "open holder" (head and neck exposed; n = 7), or an "enclosed holder" (window for blast exposure to eye; n = 15) and were compared to non-blast exposed (control) rats (n = 22). Outcomes included optomotor response (OMR), electroretinography (ERG), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at 2, 4, and 6 months post-blast, and cognitive function (Y-maze) at 3 months. Spatial frequency and contrast sensitivity were reduced in ipsilateral blast-exposed eyes in both holders (p < 0.01), while contralateral eyes showed greater deficits with the enclosed holder (p < 0.05). Thinner retinas (p < 0.001) and reduced ERG a- and b- wave amplitudes (p < 0.05) were observed for both ipsilateral and contralateral eyes with the enclosed, but not the open, holder. Rats in the open holder showed cognitive deficits compared to rats in the enclosed holder (p < 0.05). Overall, the animal holder configuration used in blast exposure studies can significantly affect outcomes. Enclosed holders may cause secondary damage to the contralateral eye by concussive injury or blast wave reflection off the holder wall. Open holders may damage the brain via rapid head movement (contrecoup injury). These results highlight additional factors to be considered when evaluating patients with blast exposure or developing models of blast injury.


Assuntos
Explosões , Roedores , Animais , Cognição , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Humanos , Ratos , Ratos Long-Evans , Retina
3.
J Vis Exp ; (164)2020 10 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33165321

RESUMO

The optomotor response and the Y-maze are behavioral tests useful for assessing visual and cognitive function, respectively. The optomotor response is a valuable tool to track changes in spatial frequency (SF) and contrast sensitivity (CS) thresholds over time in a number of retinal disease models, including diabetic retinopathy. Similarly, the Y-maze can be used to monitor spatial cognition (as measured by spontaneous alternation) and exploratory behavior (as measured by a number of entries) in a number of disease models that affect the central nervous system. Advantages of the optomotor response and the Y-maze include sensitivity, speed of testing, the use of innate responses (training is not needed), and the ability to be performed on awake (non-anesthetized) animals. Here, protocols are described for both the optomotor response and the Y-maze and examples of their use shown in models of Type I and Type II diabetes. Methods include preparation of rodents and equipment, performance of the optomotor response and the Y-maze, and post-test data analysis.


Assuntos
Cognição , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/fisiopatologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/fisiopatologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Aprendizagem em Labirinto/fisiologia , Visão Ocular/fisiologia , Animais , Comportamento Animal , Masculino , Ratos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA