Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 26(2): 211-217, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34211771

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The skin-sparing effect of megavoltage-photon beams in radiotherapy (RT) reduces the target coverage of superficial tumours. Consequently, a bolus is widely used to enhance the target coverage for superficial targets. This study evaluates a three-dimensional (3D)-printed customized bolus for a very irregular surface, the outer ear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We fabricated a bolus using a computed tomography (CT) scanner and evaluated its efficacy. The head of an Alderson Rando phantom was scanned with a CT scanner. Two 3D boluses of 5- and 10-mm thickness were designed to fit on the surface of the ear. They were printed by the Stratasys Objet260 Connex3 using the malleable "rubber-like" photopolymer Agilus. CT simulations of the Rando phantom with and without the 3D and commercial high density boluses were performed to evaluate the dosimetric properties of the 3D bolus. The prescription dose to the outer ear was 50 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction. RESULTS: We observed that the target coverage was slightly better with the 3D bolus of 10mm compared with the commercial one (D98% 98.2% vs. 97.6%).The maximum dose was reduced by 6.6% with the 3D bolus and the minimum dose increased by 5.2% when comparing with the commercial bolus. In addition, the homogeneity index was better for the 3D bolus (0.041 vs. 0.073). CONCLUSION: We successfully fabricated a customized 3D bolus for a very irregular surface. The target coverage and dosimetric parameters were at least comparable with a commercial bolus. Thus, the use of malleable materials can be considered for the fabrication of customized boluses in cases with complex anatomy.

2.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 26(6): 839-848, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34992855

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A clinical decision support system (CDSS ) has been designed to predict the outcome (overall survival) by extracting and analyzing information from routine clinical activity as a complement to clinical guidelines in lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective multicenter data from 543 consecutive (2013-2017) lung cancer patients with 1167 variables were used for development of the CDSS. Data Mining analyses were based on the XGBoost and Generalized Linear Models algorithms. The predictions from guidelines and the CDSS proposed were compared. RESULTS: Overall, the highest (> 0.90) areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curve AUCs for predicting survival were obtained for small cell lung cancer patients. The AUCs for predicting survival using basic items included in the guidelines were mostly below 0.70 while those obtained using the CDSS were mostly above 0.70. The vast majority of comparisons between the guideline and CDSS AUCs were statistically significant (p < 0.05). For instance, using the guidelines, the AUC for predicting survival was 0.60 while the predictive power of the CDSS enhanced the AUC up to 0.84 (p = 0.0009). In terms of histology, there was only a statistically significant difference when comparing the AUCs of small cell lung cancer patients (0.96) and all lung cancer patients with longer (≥ 18 months) follow up (0.80; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CDSS successfully showed potential for enhancing prediction of survival. The CDSS could assist physicians in formulating evidence-based management advice in patients with lung cancer, guiding an individualized discussion according to prognosis.

3.
World J Clin Oncol ; 12(3): 115-143, 2021 Mar 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33767969

RESUMO

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancers. The main treatment is chemotherapy (Ch). However, the addition of radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic SCLC and in those with metastatic SCLC who respond to Ch. Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the risk of brain metastases and improves OS in both metastatic and non-metastatic patients. The 5-year OS rate in patients with limited-stage disease (non-metastatic) is slightly higher than 30%, but less than 5% in patients with extensive-stage disease (metastatic). The present clinical guidelines were developed by Spanish radiation oncologists on behalf of the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer/Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology to provide a current review of the diagnosis, planning, and treatment of SCLC. These guidelines emphasise treatment fields, radiation techniques, fractionation, concomitant treatment, and the optimal timing of Ch and radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main indications for reirradiation in local recurrence.

4.
Radiother Oncol ; 105(3): 299-304, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23022171

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We investigated the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the transforming growth factor ß1 (TGFß1) gene and the risk of radiation-induced esophageal toxicity (RE) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-seven NSCLC patients with available genomic DNA samples and mostly treated with intensity modulated radio(chemo)therapy from 2003 to 2006 were used as a test dataset and 101 NSCLC patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal radio(chemo)therapy from 1998 to 2002 were used as a validation set. We genotyped three SNPs of the TGFß1 gene (rs1800469:C-509T, rs1800471:G915C, and rs1982073:T869C) by the polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism method. RESULTS: In the test dataset, the CT/TT genotypes of TGFß1 rs1800469:C-509T were associated with a statistically significant higher risk of RE grade⩾3 in univariate (P=0.026) and multivariate analysis (P=0.045) when compared with the CC genotype. These results were again observed in both univariate (P=0.045) and multivariate (P=0.023) analysis in the validation dataset. CONCLUSION: We found and validated that the TGFß1 rs1800469:C-509T genotype is associated with severe RE. This response marker may be used for guiding therapy intensity in an individual patient, which would further the goal of individualized therapy.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Esofagite/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Radioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta1/genética , Análise de Variância , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Esofagite/diagnóstico , Esofagite/etiologia , Feminino , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Genótipo , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA