Novel inhibitors of the trypanosome alternative oxidase inhibit Trypanosoma brucei brucei growth and respiration.

African trypanosomiasis is a deadly disease for which few chemotherapeutic options are available. The causative agents, Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense and T. b. gambiense, utilize a non-cytochrome, alternative oxidase (AOX) for their cellular respiration. The absence of this enzyme in mammalian cells makes it a logical target for therapeutic agents. We designed three novel compounds, ACB41, ACD15, and ACD16, and investigated their effects on trypanosome alternative oxidase (TAO) enzymatic activity, parasite respiration, and parasite growth in vitro. All three compounds contain a 2-hydroxybenzoic acid moiety, analogous to that present in SHAM, and a prenyl side chain similar to that found in ubiquinol. ACD15 and ACD16 are further differentiated by the presence of a solubility-enhancing carbohydrate moiety. Kinetic studies with purified TAO show that all three compounds competitively inhibit TAO, and two compounds, ACB41 and ACD15, have inhibition constants five- and three-fold more potent than SHAM, respectively. All three compounds inhibited the respiration and growth of continuously cultured T. b. brucei bloodstream cells in a dose-dependent manner. None of the compounds interfered with respiration of rat liver mitochondria, nor did they inhibit the growth of a continuously cultured mammalian cell line. Collectively, the results suggest we have identified a new class of compounds that are inhibitors of TAO, have trypanocidal properties in vitro, and warrant further investigation in vivo.

Cell surface glycoprotein PZR is a major mediator of concanavalin A-induced cell signaling.

PZR is an immunoglobulin superfamily cell surface protein containing a pair of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs. As a glycoprotein, PZR displays a strong association with concanavalin A (ConA), a member of the plant lectin family. Treatment of several cell lines with ConA caused tyrosine phosphorylation of a major cellular protein. Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation studies indicated that this protein corresponded to PZR. Tyrosine phosphorylation of PZR was accompanied by recruitment of SHP-2 and was inhibited by PP1, a selective inhibitor of the Src family tyrosine kinases. Furthermore, c-Src was constitutively associated with PZR and was activated upon treatment of cells with ConA. Moreover, tyrosine phosphorylation of PZR was markedly enhanced in v-Src-transformed NIH-3T3 cells and was predominant in Escherichia coli cells co-expressing c-Src. Expression of an intracellular domain-truncated form of PZR in HT-1080 cells affected cell morphology and had a dominant negative effect on ConA-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of PZR, activation of c-Src, and agglutination of the cells. Together, the data indicate that PZR is a major receptor of ConA and has an important role in cell signaling via c-Src. Considering the various biological activities of ConA, the study of PZR may have major therapeutic implications.

Tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2 are associated with distinct tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins.

SHP-1 and SHP-2 are two SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases. They share significant overall sequence identity but their functions are often opposite. The mechanism underlying this is not well understood. In this study, we have investigated the association of SHP-1 and SHP-2 with tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in mouse tissues and in cultured cells treated with a potent tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor, pervanadate. Pervanadate was introduced into mice by intravenous injection. It induced robust tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins in a variety of tissues. Both SHP-1 and SHP-2 were phosphorylated on tyrosyl residues upon pervanadate treatment, and they became associated with distinct tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in different tissues and cells. Among these proteins, PZR and PECAM were identified as major SHP-2-binding proteins while LAIR-1 was shown to be a major SHP-1-binding protein. A number of other proteins are to be identified. We believe that the different binding proteins may determine the distinct physiological functions of SHP-1 and SHP-2. The present study also provides a general method to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins and to study protein-protein interactions involving tyrosine phosphorylation in vivo and in vitro.