Pro-Con Debate: Anesthesiologist- Versus Hospitalist- Run Preoperative Clinics and Perioperative Care.

In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss the models, value propositions, and opportunities of preoperative clinics run by anesthesiologists versus hospitalists and their role in perioperative care. The medical and anesthesia evaluation before surgery has pivoted from the model of "clearance" to the model of risk assessment, preparation, and optimization of medical and psychosocial risk factors. Assessment of these risk factors, optimization, and care coordination in the preoperative period has expanded the roles of anesthesiologists and hospitalists as members of the perioperative care team. There is ongoing debate regarding which model of preoperative assessment provides the most optimal preparation for the patient undergoing surgery. This article hopes to shed light on this debate with the data and perspectives on these care models.

Pain Trajectories After Valve Surgeries Performed via Midline Sternotomy Versus Mini-Thoracotomy.

OBJECTIVES: Controlling moderate-to-severe pain remains a major challenge after cardiothoracic surgery. Several outcomes have been compared extensively after valve surgery performed via midline sternotomy versus mini-thoracotomy, but postoperative pain (POP) was not adequately examined. Therefore, the authors tested the hypothesis that there is no difference in POP trajectories in patients undergoing valve surgery via midline sternotomy versus mini-thoracotomy. DESIGN: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study. SETTING: At a single, large academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent mitral or aortic valve surgeries over a 5-year period. INTERVENTIONS: The authors compared the characteristics of pain between valve surgery patients receiving either midline sternotomy or mini-thoracotomy. To identify pain score trajectories, the authors employed latent class linear mixed models and then used multinomial regression models to study the association between incision type and pain trajectory class. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors' cohort consisted of 1,660 surgical patients-544 (33%) received a midline sternotomy, and 1,116 (66%) received a mini-thoracotomy. The authors identified the following 4 pain trajectory classes: stationary, rapidly improving, slowly improving, and acute worsening pain. Compared to the rapidly improving class, the odds of belonging to the stationary (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] 1.45 [1.01- 2.08]; p = 0.04) or the acute worsening class (aOR [95% CI] 1.71 [1.10-2.67] p = 0.02) were significantly higher for sternotomy patients compared to mini-thoracotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Midline sternotomies are associated with higher odds of having an acute worsening or stationary versus a rapidly improving pain trajectory compared to mini-thoracotomies. Therefore, the choice of incision may play an important role in determining POP trajectory after valve surgery.

Geospatial Variations and Neighborhood Deprivation in Drug-Related Admissions and Overdoses.

Drug overdoses are a national and global epidemic. However, while overdoses are inextricably linked to social, demographic, and geographical determinants, geospatial patterns of drug-related admissions and overdoses at the neighborhood level remain poorly studied. The objective of this paper is to investigate spatial distributions of patients admitted for drug-related admissions and overdoses from a large, urban, tertiary care center using electronic health record data. Additionally, these spatial distributions were adjusted for a validated socioeconomic index called the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). We showed spatial heterogeneity in patients admitted for opioid, amphetamine, and psychostimulant-related diagnoses and overdoses. While ADI was associated with drug-related admissions, it did not correct for spatial variations and could not account alone for this spatial heterogeneity.

The Opioid-Tolerant Patient: Opioid Optimization.

Chronic opioid use and abuse continue to plague our country despite efforts to curtail their use. Patients on chronic opioids (opioids tolerant) who undergo total joint arthroplasty have been clearly shown to have higher rates of complications, infection, and early revision compared to the opioid-naïve patients. The ability to successfully wean patients off of narcotics before surgery remains challenging and fragmented at best. The utilization of a multidisciplinary team that assists with not only preoperative opioids reduction but also postoperative opioids management is critical to the successful management of these patients. This symposium focuses on the opioid-tolerant patients and a comprehensive approach to opioids optimization.

American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Perioperative Management of Patients on Preoperative Opioid Therapy.

Enhanced recovery pathways have quickly become part of the standard of care for patients undergoing elective surgery, especially in North America and Europe. One of the central tenets of this multidisciplinary approach is the use of multimodal analgesia with opioid-sparing and even opioid-free anesthesia and analgesia. However, the current state is a historically high use of opioids for both appropriate and inappropriate reasons, and patients with chronic opioid use before their surgery represent a common, often difficult-to-manage population for the enhanced recovery providers and health care team at large. Furthermore, limited evidence and few proven successful protocols exist to guide providers caring for these at-risk patients throughout their elective surgical experience. Therefore, the fourth Perioperative Quality Initiative brought together an international team of multidisciplinary experts, including anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, surgeons, pain specialists, neurologists, nurses, and other experts with the objective of providing consensus recommendations. Specifically, the goal of this consensus document is to minimize opioid-related complications by providing expert-based consensus recommendations that reflect the strength of the medical evidence regarding: (1) the definition, categorization, and risk stratification of patients receiving opioids before surgery; (2) optimal perioperative treatment strategies for patients receiving preoperative opioids; and (3) optimal discharge and continuity of care management practices for patients receiving opioids preoperatively. The overarching theme of this document is to provide health care providers with guidance to reduce potentially avoidable opioid-related complications including opioid dependence (both physical and behavioral), disability, and death. Enhanced recovery programs attempt to incorporate best practices into pathways of care. By presenting the available evidence for perioperative management of patients on opioids, this consensus panel hopes to encourage further development of pathways specific to this high-risk group to mitigate the often unintentional iatrogenic and untoward effects of opioids and to improve perioperative outcomes.

Persistent postoperative pain: mechanisms and modulators.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Persistent postoperative pain (PPP) is a significant source of morbidity in our population. An excellent opportunity to understand the transition from acute to chronic pain states. Understanding the mechanisms that drive this and modulators that influence this transition is essential to both prevent and manage this condition. RECENT FINDINGS: Although the exact mechanism for the development of PPP is still poorly understood, hypotheses abound. Basic science research with animal models implicates nociceptive and neuropathic pain signals leading to pain sensitization due to persistent noxious signaling. Effects on the inhibitory modulation of noxious signaling in medullary-spinal pathways and descending modulation have also been implicated. SUMMARY: Persistent maladaptive neuroplastic changes secondary to neurotrophic factors and interactions between neurons and microglia may well explain the phenomenon. This article reviews the current thought processes on mechanisms and modulators from a basic science and epidemiological perspective.

A Perioperative Medicine Model for Population Health: An Integrated Approach for an Evolving Clinical Science.

Health care delivery in the United States continues to balance on the tight rope that connects its transition from volume to value. Value in economic terms can be defined as the amount something exceeds its commodity price and is determined by extraordinary reputation, quality, and/or service, whereas its destruction can be a consequence of poor management, unfavorable policy, decreased demand, and/or increased competition. Going forward, payment for health care delivery will increasingly be based on services that contribute to improvements in individual and/or population health value, and funds to pay for health care delivery will become increasingly vulnerable to competitive market forces. Therefore, a sustainable population health strategy needs to be comprehensive and thus include perioperative medicine as an essential component of the complete cycle of patient-centered care. We describe a multidisciplinary integrated program to support perioperative medicine services that are integral to a comprehensive population health strategy.

Postoperative Pain Management in Children of Hispanic Origin: A Descriptive Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: It has been established that pain is frequently undertreated in children following outpatient surgery. Very few studies, however, have investigated this phenomenon in ethnically diverse populations. METHODS: This study included 105 families of children aged 2 to 15 years of Hispanic origin and low income undergoing outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery. Participating parents completed baseline and demographic packets. Recorded postoperative pain ratings and administration of analgesics at home for 1 week were collected during home visits. RESULTS: Despite the high (70%; 99% confidence interval [CI], 57%-82%) incidence of significant pain in the first 24 hours home, 32% (95% CI, 20%-45%) of the children received 0 to 1 dose of analgesia. Overall, 21% children (99% CI, 11%-35%) received 4 or less total doses of pain medication over the entire week after surgery. Of the total analgesic doses administered to children in the week after surgery, only 44% (99% CI, 40%-47%) were in accepted ranges. CONCLUSIONS: Despite experiencing significant postoperative pain, Hispanic children assessed in this study received suboptimal analgesic therapy at home.

The use of an intrathecal pump to manage intractable cancer pain in a pediatric patient: a case report.

A 15-year-old girl with combined immune deficiency syndrome, diagnosed with metastatic squamous cell cancer of the anus, had significant pain secondary to vulvar-perianal condyloma. Conventional treatment with oral and intravenous analgesics was limited by significant side effects of mental status changes and urinary retention leading to clinical deterioration that precluded attempts at chemotherapy. An intrathecal pump was implanted in the challenging setting of neutropenia. There was a drastic improvement in her quality of life and the ability to tolerate further chemotherapy. The option of an intrathecal pump for pain control extended our patient's ability to enjoy important quality time with family by several months.

Epidurals in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin three times a day: the value of activated partial thromboplastin time testing.

BACKGROUND: Dosing subcutaneous (SC) unfractionated heparin (UFH) 3 times a day (TID) for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis is used for patients in the United States undergoing nonorthopedic surgery. There is a lack of data on the risks of neuraxial techniques in patients receiving TID SC UFH; however, concerns have been raised about higher bleeding risks. In this prospective study, we evaluated the value of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) testing at the time of removal of epidural catheters as a risk-reduction strategy for this population. METHODS: We collected data from our electronic hospital databases for all patients receiving epidural analgesia in conjunction with 5000 units TID or twice daily dosing (BID) SC UFH from December 2011 to December 2013. Our cohort received aPTT testing before removal of the catheter in all patients receiving TID SC UFH. An aPTT was ordered for patients receiving BID SC UFH only if risk factors for abnormal coagulation variables were identified. Chart reviews were performed on all patients with abnormal aPTT values to evaluate contributing risk factors. RESULTS: Over a 2-year period, 3523 epidurals were placed at our institution, including 714 (20.3%) for patients receiving TID SC UFH, and 1594 (45.2%) for patients receiving BID SC UFH. Of those patients receiving BID SC UFH, 186 (11.7%) had aPTT values drawn on the basis of risk factors. Ten (5.4 %, 95% CI: 2.6%-9.7%) of those patients had an aPTT value of greater than 35 seconds on the date of epidural removal. Of those patients receiving TID SC UFH, 20 (2.8%, 95% CI: 1.7%-4.3%) had an initial aPTT value of more than 35 seconds on the date of epidural removal. All patients who had abnormal aPTT values on TID heparin dosing were identified as having obvious concomitant risk factors for coagulation parameter abnormalities. There were no epidural hematomas in patients receiving either BID or TID dosing (95% CI: 0%-0.001%). CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of aPTT testing on patients receiving TID SC UFH at the time of removal of epidural catheters as a risk-reduction strategy is not supported by our results, where only 2.8% (95% CI: 1.7%-4.3%) of these patients had abnormal aPTT values. Our study adds to the limited data currently available on the safety of epidural analgesia in patients receiving TID SC UFH. Given the rare incidence of neuraxial hematoma (95% CI: 0%-0.001%), definitive conclusions on the risks of TID SC UFH administration in patients receiving epidural analgesia cannot be drawn based on our sample size.

Elevated lidocaine serum concentration after subcutaneous lidocaine administration using a needle-free device in pediatric patients.

We report several cases in which pediatric patients at our institution have elevated lidocaine levels in toxicology screens after subcutaneous injection of lidocaine using a needle-free device. The purpose of this article is to report 4 cases in which pediatric patients have elevated lidocaine levels in toxicology screens after J-Tip administration. In particular, the article highlights 2 cases in which children younger than 3 years had lidocaine levels in the toxic range. Although the literature has reported the device to be effective with no significant untoward effects in children as young as 3 years, it seems that no information is available for children younger than 3 years. From a quality assurance/safety perspective, a summary is provided as our institutional response to concerns raised over what is typically thought to be a benign and beneficial intervention in children.

Elevated lidocaine serum levels following the use of a needle free device in healthy adult volunteers.

There is increased concern regarding circulating levels of lidocaine immediately after the use of a needle-free device with buffered lidocaine. As a result, we conducted a prospective study to assess lidocaine circulation after the use of a needle-free device for the delivery of a local anesthetic in 10 healthy adult subjects. After informed consent, 2 peripheral intravenous catheters were placed in the antecubital fossa of each arm. Two milligrams of 1% buffered lidocaine was administered by the study physician via the needle-free device on the dorsum of the subject's hand. Within 2 minutes, a third intravenous catheter was placed in the location of the lidocaine administration and 5 mL of blood was collected from all 3 sites. If blood samples returned positive for lidocaine, they were also collected 1 hour and 2 hours after administration. Toxic levels of lidocaine were found in blood drawn from 2 subjects immediately after lidocaine administration. Results also showed that certain subjects had increasing levels of lidocaine over time. Other subjects also had increasing lidocaine serum levels from blood drawn on the arm opposite the administration site. We concluded that there may be systemic lidocaine levels with the administration of the needle-free device and that these levels may reach the toxic range in adults. Further investigation will be required to determine whether this finding has clinical significance, especially considering the smaller body mass of children.

Percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion results in less perioperative opioid usage compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single institution, multi-surgeon retrospective study.

Background: Ultra-minimally invasive percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion (percLIF) has been demonstrated to further minimize tissue trauma and has been associated with improved clinical outcomes including decreased blood loss, post-operative pain and length of stay when compared to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery. A single-institution retrospective study was conducted to investigate whether 1-level percLIF is associated with decreased narcotic consumption compared to 1-level MIS-TLIF in the first 24-hour following surgery. Methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing either single-level percLIF or MIS-TLIF from January 2018 to December 2021. Opioid consumption in the 24-hour following surgery was converted into total morphine milligram equivalents (MME). The primary outcome used univariate and multivariate regression analysis to compare MME consumption between the MIS-TLIF and percLIF groups. Secondary outcome variables included, estimated blood loss, total intraoperative MME, MME at discharge, MME at 30 days post-op, exiting nerve root injury, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) visual analogue scale (VAS) score at handoff, time to first ambulation, distance ambulated post-operative day one and hospital length of stay. Results: A total of 51 patients (21 percLIF vs. 30 MIS-TLIF) were included in the study. Univariate regression analysis revealed that on average patients who underwent percLIF had a 24-hour postoperative MME -50.8 mg (95% CI: -91.6, -10) lower than those who had MIS-TLIF (P=0.02). On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for sex and age, 24-hour postoperative MME closely failed to meet statistical significance (P=0.06) with an average of -40.8 mg (95% CI: -83.2, 1.6) MME in percLIF patients compared to MIS-TLIF. There was no statistically significant difference in MME between MIS-TLIF and percLIF at the time of discharge and at 30 days post-op. Conclusions: In the setting of the current opioid epidemic in the United States and increased numbers of patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion, spine surgeons must continue to do their part helping reduce the need for opioid prescriptions for postoperative pain management. New "ultra-MIS" techniques such as percLIF allow surgeons to further decrease tissue trauma, which should lead to reduced need for post-operative narcotic requirements.

Intracranial hypotension caused by anterior cervical CSF leak alleviated by an epidural blood patch [corrected].

We present a case in which a thoracocervical epidural blood patch was used to treat an anteriorly situated cerebrospinal fluid leak following 2 failed blood patches in the lumbar region. The challenge in identifying the source of the leak, deteriorating health of the patient, and risks from the procedure, contributes to the uniqueness of this case.

Green Light-Based Analgesia - Novel Nonpharmacological Approach to Fibromyalgia Pain: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: There continues to be significant reliance on pharmacological modalities for the management of chronic pain, with a particular focus on opioid analgesics as a singular option for pain management. Fibromyalgia is a prototypical central pain disorder, which is often used as a model to study chronic pain disorders. It has an estimated prevalence of approximately 1.1% to 5.4% in the general population. The widespread use of opioids in patients with fibromyalgia has been well demonstrated in several health claims database studies, with rates of use ranging from 11.3% to 69%. Minimizing opioid exposures reduces misuse risk, but requires adequate opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic strategies, particularly nonopioid analgesic adjuncts, to ensure effective treatment of pain, particularly high-impact pain. We chose fibromyalgia as our study population. Given that it is a disordered sensory processing condition, it may be particularly amenable to the beneficial effects of green-light therapy. OBJECTIVES: Most studies have evaluated exposure to light-emitting diode lights as a mode of green-light delivery; our study used green-light filtering eyeglasses, which would allow the wearer to move about with minimal interference. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility of green-light filtering eyeglasses in the treatment of chronic pain. SETTING: This study was conducted at Duke University Health System. METHODS: We recruited and randomized adult patients with a known diagnosis of fibromyalgia patients and excluded patients who were unable to wear eyeglasses for at least 4 hours per day or were colorblind according to the Ishihara Colorblindness Test. Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 arms: clear eyeglasses (control), green eyeglasses, or blue eyeglasses. We initially recruited 45 patients and randomly assigned 15 patients per group. RESULTS: To evaluate clinical significance, we determined the rate of >= 10% decline in oral morphine equivalents and found that 33%, 11%, and 8% of the green, blue, and clear eyeglass groups, respectively, achieved this clinically meaningful outcome. LIMITATIONS: This study was powered to detect feasibility of the intervention, rather than conclusive analgesic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated the feasibility of this treatment approach and study design and supports a future study to determine the efficacy of green light-based analgesia on opioid use, pain, and anxiety. While the reduction of opioid use was not of statistical significance, we believe it to be of clinical significance as there was no increase of patient-reported pain. This warrants further investigation in a large-scale trial of the use of green-light filtration of ambient light to mitigate opioid use and possible mediation of psychological impacts of pain with the use of green-lensed eyeglasses.

Opioids after a cesarean section: Prescribing, patient use, storage, and disposal practices.

Cesarean sections (C-sections) are commonly performed procedures, accounting for approximately one-third of births in the United States. This is often one of the first medical encounters for women which require prescription medications to manage post-operative pain. Our observational study looked at opioids prescribed and consumed for post-surgical C-section pain. We interviewed patients to examine handling practices of those who had excess opioids, including storage and disposal. Patients underwent a C-section at Duke University Health System from January 2017 through July 2018 and were pre-scribed opioids post-operatively. In this study, we observed 154 women who met inclusion criteria. Sixty women declined participation, and 15 could not recall the details of their opioid use. Of the 77 women who participated, most (97 percent) received oxycodone 5 mg tablets. About one-third of the women did not use any opioids, about one-third used all of their opioids, and the remainder used only a fraction of the pills prescribed. After sharing preliminary results with providers, they began prescribing fewer pills. Even then, only a fraction or none of the pills were used, and patients rarely required a renewal of pain prescriptions. We found only 1 percent of women stored their opioids in a secure location. These findings suggest an individualized approach to opioid prescribing along with nonopioid analgesics use may mitigate the consequences of excess opioid prescribing, which include lack of proper disposal and excess opioids in the community.

Multiorganizational consensus to define guiding principles for perioperative pain management in patients with chronic pain, preoperative opioid tolerance, or substance use disorder.

Significant knowledge gaps exist in the perioperative pain management of patients with a history of chronic pain, substance use disorder, and/or opioid tolerance as highlighted in the US Health and Human Services Pain Management Best Practices Inter-Agency Task Force 2019 report. The report emphasized the challenges of caring for these populations and the need for multidisciplinary care and a comprehensive approach. Such care requires stakeholder alignment across multiple specialties and care settings. With the intention of codifying this alignment into a reliable and efficient processes, a consortium of 15 professional healthcare societies was convened in a year-long modified Delphi consensus process and summit. This process produced seven guiding principles for the perioperative care of patients with chronic pain, substance use disorder, and/or preoperative opioid tolerance. These principles provide a framework and direction for future improvement in the optimization and care of 'complex' patients as they undergo surgical procedures.

A multisociety organizational consensus process to define guiding principles for acute perioperative pain management.

The US Health and Human Services Pain Management Best Practices Inter-Agency Task Force initiated a public-private partnership which led to the publication of its report in 2019. The report emphasized the need for individualized, multimodal, and multidisciplinary approaches to pain management that decrease the over-reliance on opioids, increase access to care, and promote widespread education on pain and substance use disorders. The Task Force specifically called on specialty organizations to work together to develop evidence-based guidelines. In response to this report's recommendations, a consortium of 14 professional healthcare societies committed to a 2-year project to advance pain management for the surgical patient and improve opioid safety. The modified Delphi process included two rounds of electronic voting and culminated in a live virtual event in February 2021, during which seven common guiding principles were established for acute perioperative pain management. These principles should help to inform local action and future development of clinical practice recommendations.

Reliability of a preliminary 3-D pain mapping program.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this preliminary investigation was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a new pain assessment method referred to as 3-D pain mapping. METHODS: In Study 1, 101 chronic noncancer pain patients from four sites reported their pain using the method on two occasions (separated by approximately 10 days). The patients marked intensity, surface location, and depth of pain on a 3-D computer display of a male or female body. The model body could be rotated in order to mark multiple pain locations. In Study 2, 25 patients from a single site were tested with a revised version of the mapping program used in Study 1. Each patient gave ratings on two occasions separated by approximately 1 week. RESULTS: In Study 1, the intra-class correlations of the 3-D pain mapping measures were moderate to high for maximum pain intensity (0.73), vertical location of the point of maximum pain (0.94), and the number of pain marks (0.84). Correlations were low for the horizontal location of the point of maximum pain (0.56) and for the depth of pain (0.50). In Study 2, using the revised program, intra-class correlations were moderate for pain intensity (0.76), and high for the vertical (0.99) and horizontal (0.98) locations of the point of maximum pain, number of pain marks (0.89), and the depth of pain (0.84). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional pain mapping enables patients to report the location and intensity of their pain on all parts of the body, and such ratings are highly reliable. Future studies are needed to determine whether the clinical value of this method can improve the accuracy of pain diagnoses and the quality of pain management.