FRBM Mini REVIEW: Chemogenetic approaches to probe redox dysregulation in heart failure.

Chemogenetics refers to experimental methods that use novel recombinant proteins that can be dynamically and uniquely regulated by specific biochemicals. Chemogenetic approaches allow the precise manipulation of cellular signaling to delineate the molecular pathways involved in both physiological and pathological disease states. Approaches utilizing yeast d-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) enable manipulation of intracellular redox metabolism through generation of hydrogen peroxide in the presence of d-amino acids and have led to the development of new and informative animal models to characterize the impact of oxidative stress in heart failure and neurodegeneration. These chemogenetic models, in which DAAO expression is regulated by different tissue-specific promoters, have led to a range of cardiac phenotypes. This review discusses chemogenetic approaches to manipulate oxidative stress in models of heart failure. These approaches provide new insights into the relationships between redox metabolism and normal and pathologic states in the heart, as well as in other diseases characterized by oxidative stress.

An essential role for EROS in redox-dependent endothelial signal transduction.

The chaperone protein EROS ("Essential for Reactive Oxygen Species") was recently discovered in phagocytes. EROS was shown to regulate the abundance of the ROS-producing enzyme NADPH oxidase isoform 2 (NOX2) and to control ROS-mediated cell killing. Reactive oxygen species are important not only in immune surveillance, but also modulate physiological signaling responses in multiple tissues. The roles of EROS have not been previously explored in the context of oxidant-modulated cell signaling. Here we show that EROS plays a key role in ROS-dependent signal transduction in vascular endothelial cells. We used siRNA-mediated knockdown and developed CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of EROS in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), both of which cause a significant decrease in the abundance of NOX2 protein, associated with a marked decrease in RAC1, a small G protein that activates NOX2. Loss of EROS also attenuates receptor-mediated hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and Ca2+ signaling, disrupts cytoskeleton organization, decreases cell migration, and promotes cellular senescence. EROS knockdown blocks agonist-modulated eNOS phosphorylation and nitric oxide (NO●) generation. These effects of EROS knockdown are strikingly similar to the alterations in endothelial cell responses that we previously observed following RAC1 knockdown. Proteomic analyses following EROS or RAC1 knockdown in endothelial cells showed that reduced abundance of these two distinct proteins led to largely overlapping effects on endothelial biological processes, including oxidoreductase, protein phosphorylation, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) pathways. These studies demonstrate that EROS plays a central role in oxidant-modulated endothelial cell signaling by modulating NOX2 and RAC1.

18F-FDG Dedicated Breast PET Complementary to Breast MRI for Evaluating Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Purpose To compare quantitative measures of tumor metabolism and perfusion using fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dedicated breast PET (dbPET) and breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI during early treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials and Methods Prospectively collected DCE MRI and 18F-FDG dbPET examinations were analyzed at baseline (T0) and after 3 weeks (T1) of NAC in 20 participants with 22 invasive breast cancers. FDG dbPET-derived standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and MRI-derived percent enhancement (PE), signal enhancement ratio (SER), and functional tumor volume (FTV) were calculated at both time points. Differences between FDG dbPET and MRI parameters were evaluated after stratifying by receptor status, Ki-67 index, and residual cancer burden. Parameters were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results High Ki-67 tumors had higher baseline SUVmean (difference, 5.1; P = .01) and SUVpeak (difference, 5.5; P = .04). At T1, decreases were observed in FDG dbPET measures (pseudo-median difference T0 minus T1 value [95% CI]) of SUVmax (-6.2 [-10.2, -2.6]; P < .001), SUVmean (-2.6 [-4.9, -1.3]; P < .001), SUVpeak (-4.2 [-6.9, -2.3]; P < .001), and TLG (-29.1 mL3 [-71.4, -6.8]; P = .005) and MRI measures of SERpeak (-1.0 [-1.3, -0.2]; P = .02) and FTV (-11.6 mL3 [-22.2, -1.7]; P = .009). Relative to nonresponsive tumors, responsive tumors showed a difference (95% CI) in percent change in SUVmax of -34.3% (-55.9%, 1.5%; P = .06) and in PEpeak of -42.4% (95% CI: -110.5%, 8.5%; P = .08). Conclusion 18F-FDG dbPET was sensitive to early changes during NAC and provided complementary information to DCE MRI that may be useful for treatment response evaluation. Keywords: Breast, PET, Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Clinical trial registration no. NCT01042379 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors for Managing Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: JACC: Heart Failure State-of-the-Art Review.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is frequently caused by pathogenic variants in genes encoding sarcomere proteins and is characterized by left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, hypercontractility, and-in many cases-left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. Despite standard management, obstructive HCM (oHCM) can still cause substantial morbidity, highlighting the critical need for more effective disease-specific therapeutic approaches. Over the past decade, improved understanding of the molecular pathobiology of HCM has culminated in development of cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs), a novel drug class that in recent randomized clinical trials has been shown to decrease LVOT obstruction, improve exercise capacity, and ameliorate symptom burden in patients with oHCM. Although promising, areas of uncertainty remain, including the long-term safety and efficacy of CMIs and whether they have the potential to modify progression of disease. Herein, we review key milestones in the clinical development of CMIs, contextualize CMIs with established oHCM therapies, and discuss future challenges and opportunities for the use of CMIs across the HCM spectrum.

Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly in routine clinical care and inform policies, reimbursements, and quality improvement. Less is known regarding PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify studies of PRO implementation in diverse and underrepresented patient populations, elucidate representation of clinical specialties, assess implementation outcomes, and synthesize patient needs, concerns, and preferences. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched September 2021 for studies aiming to study PRO implementation in diverse and underrepresented patient populations within the United States. Studies were screened and data extracted by three independent reviewers. Implementation outcomes were assessed according to Proctor et al. taxonomy. A descriptive analysis of data was conducted. RESULTS: The search yielded 8,687 records, and 28 studies met inclusion criteria. The majority were observational cohort studies (n = 21, 75%) and conducted in primary care (n = 10, 36%). Most studies included majority female (n = 19, 68%) and non-White populations (n = 15, 54%), while fewer reported socioeconomic (n = 11, 39%) or insurance status (n = 9, 32.1%). Most studies assessed implementation outcomes of feasibility (n = 27, 96%) and acceptability (n = 19, 68%); costs (n = 3, 11%), penetration (n = 1, 4%), and sustainability (n = 1, 4%) were infrequently assessed. CONCLUSION: PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations is generally feasible and acceptable. Research is lacking in key clinical specialties. Further work is needed to understand how health disparities drive PRO implementation outcomes.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) allow doctors and researchers to understand the patient perspective, such as how they are doing physically, mentally, or socially. When used, PROs can improve health and increase satisfaction of patients. Many clinics and hospitals are interested in using PROs in everyday care. Doctors, hospitals, and insurance companies are also using information from PROs to decide if the care they give is good quality. Unfortunately, certain groups of patients, such as racial and ethnic minorities and patients with low income, report worse PROs. Because of these differences, it will be important to make sure that PROs are being collected from all people, but not much is known regarding how this has been done. This study demonstrates what is known so far with regard to using PROs in everyday clinical care for these diverse patient groups. Findings from this study show that PROs can be successfully collected, but more work is needed in certain medical fields, and some types of patients have specific needs, concerns, or preferences with regard to PRO collection.

Accuracy of breast MRI in evaluating nodal status after neoadjuvant therapy in invasive lobular carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer can downstage axillary lymph nodes and reduce extent of axillary surgery. As such, accurate determination of nodal status after neoadjuvant therapy and before surgery impacts surgical management. There are scarce data on the diagnostic accuracy of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for nodal evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), a diffusely growing tumor type. We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage 1-3 ILC who underwent pre-operative breast MRI after either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy at our institution between 2006 and 2019. Two breast radiologists reviewed MRIs and evaluated axillary nodes for suspicious features. All patients underwent either sentinel node biopsy or axillary dissection. We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and overall accuracy of the post-treatment breast MRI in predicting pathologic nodal status. Of 79 patients, 58.2% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 41.8% neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of MRI were significantly higher in the neoadjuvant endocrine therapy cohort than in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy cohort (66.7 vs. 37.9%, p = 0.012 and 70.6 vs. 40%, p = 0.007, respectively), while overall accuracy was similar. Upstaging from clinically node negative to pathologically node positive occurred in 28.0 and 41.7%, respectively. In clinically node positive patients, those with an abnormal post-treatment MRI had a significantly higher proportion of patients with ≥4 positive nodes on pathology compared to those with a normal MRI (61.1 versus 16.7%, p = 0.034). Overall, accuracy of breast MRI for predicting nodal status after neoadjuvant therapy in ILC was low in both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy cohorts. However, post-treatment breast MRI may help identify patients with a high burden of nodal disease (≥4 positive nodes), which could impact pre-operative systemic therapy decisions. Further studies are needed to assess other imaging modalities to evaluate for nodal disease following neoadjuvant therapy and to improve clinical staging in patients with ILC.

Breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy in the surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma measuring 4 cm or greater.

BACKGROUND: The safety of breast conservation therapy (BCT) has not been demonstrated in large ILC tumors, potentially contributing to the higher mastectomy rates seen in ILC. METHODS: We queried a prospectively maintained database to identify patients with ILC measuring ≥4 cm and evaluated difference in recurrence free survival (RFS) between those treated with BCT versus mastectomy using a multivariate model. RESULTS: Of 180 patients, 30 (16.7%) underwent BCT and 150 (83.3%) underwent mastectomy. Patients undergoing mastectomy were younger (56.6 vs. 64.3 years, p = 0.003) and had larger tumors (7.2 vs. 5.4 cm, p < 0.001). While tumor size, nodal stage, receptor subtype, and margin status were significantly associated with RFS, there was no difference in RFS at 5 (p = 0.88) or 10 (p = 0.65) years for individuals undergoing BCT versus mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ILC ≥4 cm, BCT provides similar tumor control as mastectomy, provided that negative margins are achieved.