Comparative Analysis of Safety and Efficacy Between Anterior and Posterior Calyceal Entry in Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Introduction: One advantage of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPCNL) is the ability to access anterior as well as posterior calyces, but the safety and efficacy of anterior calyceal entry has never been investigated to our knowledge. We prospectively evaluated patients scheduled for sPCNL comparing anterior and posterior calyceal access. Materials and Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, we prospectively enrolled 100 consecutive patients undergoing sPCNL from February to September 2023. Primary outcomes included intraoperative complications, blood transfusions, 30-day complication rates, and emergency department (ED) visits or readmissions. Secondary outcomes included stone-free rates (SFR). Results: Seventy-six patients had anterior calyceal entry and 24 had posterior. No significant differences were found in terms of baseline demographics (age, body mass index), stone characteristics (location, density, complexity), or intraoperative features (operative time, location of access). Safety outcomes, including intraoperative complications (1% vs 4%), blood transfusions (3% vs 8%), 30-day complication rates (17% vs 21%), and ED visits (1% vs 0) or readmissions (11% vs 21%) were comparable between groups. Overall SFRs were equivalent (86% vs 90%). Conclusion: We found that anterior and posterior accesses in sPCNL offer similar safety and efficacy, with no significant differences in complications or SFRs. Surgeons can select either approach based on patient anatomy and surgical needs without concern for increased complications. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings and guide best practices for calyx selection in sPCNL.

Microbiota and the landscape of the prostate tumor microenvironment.

Prostate cancer remains one of the most common causes of cancer-related death in men globally. Progression of prostate cancer to lethal metastatic disease is mediated by multiple contributors. The role of prostate microbiota and their metabolites in metastasis, therapeutic resistance to castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and tumor relapse has yet to be fully investigated. Characterization of microflora can provide new mechanistic insights into the functional significance in the emergence of therapeutic resistance, identification of novel effective targeted therapies, and development of biomarkers during prostate cancer progression. The tumor microenvironment (TME) and its components work concurrently with the prostate microbiota in promoting prostate cancer development and progression to metastasis. In this article, we discuss the growing evidence on the functional contribution of microbiota to the phenotypic landscape of the TME and its effect on prostate cancer therapeutic targeting and recurrent disease.

Mini-Incision Direct Festoon Access, Cauterization, and Excision (MIDFACE): A 12-Year Analysis of a Novel Festoon Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical festoon management often entails aggressive dissection, flaps, unsightly scars, prolonged recovery, and high recurrence rates. The authors present outcomes with subjective and objective evaluation of an office-based, novel, minimally invasive (1-cm incision) festoon repair: mini-incision direct festoon access, cauterization, and excision (MIDFACE). METHODS: Charts of 75 consecutive patients from 2007 to 2019 were evaluated. Photographs of 39 patients who met inclusionary criteria were evaluated by three expert physician graders for festoon and incision visibility (339 randomly scrambled preoperative and postoperative photographs taken with and without flash and from four different views: close-up, profile, full-frontal, and worm's eye) using paired t tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests for statistical evaluation. Surveys returned by 37 of 75 patients were evaluated for patient satisfaction and possible contributing factors to festoon formation or exacerbation. RESULTS: There were no major complications in the 75 patients who underwent MIDFACE. Physician grading of photographs of 39 patients (78 eyes, 35 women; four men; mean age, 58 ± 7.7 years) demonstrated statistically significant sustained improvement in festoon score postoperatively up to 12 years regardless of view or flash. Incision scores were the same preoperatively and postoperatively, indicating incisions could not be detected by photography. Average patient satisfaction score was 9.5 on a Likert scale of 0 to 10. Possible factors for festoon formation or exacerbation included genetics (51%), pets (51%), prior hyaluronic acid fillers (54%), neurotoxin (62%), facial surgery (40%), alcohol (49%), allergies (46%), and sun exposure (59%). CONCLUSION: MIDFACE repair results in sustained improvement of festoons with an office-based, minimally invasive procedure with high patient satisfaction, rapid recovery, and low recurrence. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Simple Solution to a Difficult Problem: Removal of Large Bladder Calculi Using a Laparoscopic Entrapment Sac.

Introduction and Objectives: Percutaneous management of large bladder calculi with the use of a laparoscopic entrapment sac is a minimally invasive procedure that may have advantages over open cystolithotomy and transurethral cystolithotripsy, as well as standard percutaneous cystolithotomy. We first performed this procedure in 2008, and refined it after our initial publication in 2013 by changing the position from lithotomy to supine by using a urethral catheter postoperatively instead of a suprapubic (SP) catheter, by using ultrasound guidance for access, and by changing the procedure from being inpatient to outpatient. Our objective is to assess the continued feasibility of percutaneous entrapment sac cystolithotomy (PESC) and describe modifications that simplify the technique (mPESC), comparing outcomes and complications. Methods: Forty seven male patients underwent PESC from 2008 to 2019, 16 who had PESC and 31 who had mPESC. After extraction of calculi, either an SP catheter was placed, or the wound was closed and a urethral catheter was placed. Operative and follow-up parameters were compared between the two cohorts. Results: All patients were rendered stone free. Procedure time and length of stay were both significantly shorter in the mPESC cohort. Stone burden and estimated blood loss were equivalent between cohorts. There were no complications of urethral trauma in either cohort. The PESC cohort had higher rates of leakage from the SP site (25% vs 0%), increased need for catheter over 5 days (18.8% vs 0%), and greater likelihood of recurrent retention (12.5% vs 6%). Conclusions: Modifications of PESC, mPESC, leads to fewer complications and reduced length of stay compared with the original PESC procedure. This safe and efficacious technique can reduce morbidity during the management of large bladder calculi and is well suited for an outpatient procedure.