Differential Gene Expression in Circulating CD14+ Monocytes Indicates the Prognosis of Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis.

Critical illness and sepsis are characterized by drastic changes in the systemic innate immune response, particularly involving monocytes. The exact monocyte activation profile during sepsis, however, has remained obscure. Therefore, we prospectively analyzed the gene expression profile of circulating CD14+ monocytes from healthy volunteers (n = 54) and intensive care unit (ICU) patients (n = 76), of which n = 36 had sepsis. RNA sequencing of selected samples revealed that monocytes from septic ICU patients display a peculiar activation pattern, which resembles characteristic functional stages of monocyte-derived macrophages and is distinct from controls or non-sepsis ICU patients. Focusing on 55 highly variable genes selected for further investigation, arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (ALOX5AP) was highly upregulated in monocytes of ICU patients and only normalized during 7 days in the ICU in non-sepsis patients. Strikingly, low monocytic guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10-like protein (ARHGEF10L) mRNA expression was associated with the disease severity and mortality of ICU patients. Collectively, our comprehensive analysis of circulating monocytes in critically ill patients revealed a distinct activation pattern, particularly in ICU patients with sepsis. The association with disease severity, the longitudinal recovery or lack thereof during the ICU stay, and the association with prognosis indicate the clinical relevance of monocytic gene expression profiles during sepsis.

Correction to: Neutrophils are a main source of circulating suPAR predicting outcome in critical illness.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s40560-019-0381-5.].

Neutrophils are a main source of circulating suPAR predicting outcome in critical illness.

BACKGROUND: Circulating levels of soluble urokinase plasminogen activation receptor (suPAR) have been proposed as a prognostic biomarker in patients with critical illness and sepsis. However, the origin of suPAR in sepsis has remained obscure. We investigated the potential cellular sources of suPAR by analyzing membrane-bound urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR, CD87) and evaluated its clinical relevance in critically ill patients. METHODS: We studied 87 critically ill patients (44 with sepsis, 43 without sepsis) from the medical intensive care unit (ICU) in comparison to 48 standard care patients with infections and 27 healthy controls in a prospective single-center non-interventional cohort study. Cellular uPAR expression of different immune cell subsets (by flow cytometry from peripheral blood) and corresponding serum suPAR concentrations were determined upon ICU admission and at day 3. Furthermore, we analyzed the effects of serum from sepsis patients on the activation and uPAR cleavage of primary human neutrophils and macrophages in vitro. RESULTS: In healthy controls, uPAR (CD87) expression was detected on nearly all blood neutrophils and monocytes, but only scarcely on lymphocytes. While uPAR expression on monocytes was maintained in ICU patients, only 58% of neutrophils from critically ill patients expressed uPAR, which was significantly lower than in healthy controls or standard care patients. Concomitantly, serum suPAR levels were significantly increased in ICU patients. We noted a clear inverse correlation between low neutrophilic uPAR and high serum suPAR in standard care and ICU patients, indicating that shedding of uPAR from activated neutrophils represents a main source of suPAR in systemic inflammation. Both low uPAR and high suPAR were closely associated with mortality in critically ill patients. Furthermore, serum from sepsis patients induced uPAR protein expression and subsequent receptor shedding on isolated primary neutrophils, but not on macrophages, in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: The inverse correlation between low uPAR surface expression on neutrophils and high serum suPAR in critically ill patients supports that neutrophils are a main source of shed suPAR proteins in systemic inflammation. Furthermore, high suPAR levels and low neutrophilic uPAR expression predict mortality in ICU patients.

Erratum: Hohlstein, P. et al. Prognostic Relevance of Altered Lymphocyte Subpopulations in Critical Illness and Sepsis. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2019, 8, 353.

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [...].

Prognostic Relevance of Altered Lymphocyte Subpopulations in Critical Illness and Sepsis.

Lymphopenia and functional defects in lymphocytes may impact the prognosis in patients with critical illness or sepsis. Therefore, we prospectively analyzed peripheral blood leukocytes from 63 healthy volunteers, 50 non-critically ill standard care (SC) patients with infections, and 105 intensive care unit (ICU) patients (52 with sepsis, 53 without sepsis) using flow cytometry. Compared to healthy volunteers, SC and ICU patients showed significant leukocytosis, especially in sepsis, while lymphocyte numbers were significantly decreased. All major lymphocyte populations (B, T, and natural killer (NK) cells) decreased in ICU patients. However, we observed a relative reduction of T cells, alongside decreased CD8+ T cells, in critically ill patients, independent of sepsis. High absolute T cell counts (>0.36/nL) at ICU admission were associated with a significantly reduced mortality, independent of patient's age. Moreover, patients that survived ICU treatment showed dynamic changes within 48 h towards restoration of lymphopenia and T cell depletion, while non-surviving patients failed to restore lymphocyte counts. In conclusion, the flow-cytometric analysis of peripheral blood revealed striking changes in circulating lymphocyte subsets in critically ill patients, independent of sepsis. Lymphopenia and T cell depletion at ICU admission were associated with increased mortality, supporting their relevance as predictive biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in intensive care medicine.