The impact of effective paediatric adherence promotion interventions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the impact of effective paediatric adherence promotion interventions on patients, families and the healthcare system is necessary to inform efforts to improve healthcare quality and control costs. Building on previous research suggesting that improving adherence may have far-reaching benefits, the objective of this study was to quantify the impact of effective adherence promotion interventions for children and adolescents with a chronic medical condition on patients, families and the healthcare system. METHODS: Authors systematically reviewed articles indexed in PubMed, PsycINFO and CINAHL to identify randomized controlled trials of paediatric adherence promotion interventions. Interventions that improved paediatric adherence and examined patient-level, family-level or healthcare system-level outcomes in children and adolescents (M age ≤ 18 years) with a chronic medical condition were included. Two authors independently extracted and classified outcome variables as patient-level (quality of life and disease-related activity restrictions), micro-level (family functioning, family conflict, caregiver quality of life, caregiver sleep interruption, caregiver days away from work and patient missed school days) or macro-level variables (emergency department visits, hospitalizations, outpatient visits and urgent care visits). Outcome variables detailed in previously published reviews (i.e. disease severity) were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty studies representing 19 unique samples met inclusion criteria. An additional eight articles representing trials that did not significantly improve adherence were included in post hoc analyses. Compared with control interventions, effective paediatric adherence promotion interventions improved patient quality of life and family-level outcomes and decreased healthcare utilization among children and adolescents with a chronic medical condition. CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary efforts to improve healthcare quality and reduce spending among children and adolescents with a chronic medical condition may be enhanced by incorporating effective paediatric adherence promotion interventions. As relatively few chronic medical conditions were represented in included studies, future research should examine the impact of paediatric adherence promotion interventions in other populations.

Nonconvulsive seizures are common in critically ill children.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies have reported the occurrence of nonconvulsive seizures in critically ill children. We aimed to prospectively determine the incidence and risk factors of nonconvulsive seizures in critically ill children using predetermined EEG monitoring indications and EEG interpretation terminology. METHODS: Critically ill children (non-neonates) with acute encephalopathy underwent continuous EEG monitoring if they met institutional clinical practice criteria. Study enrollment and data collection were prospective. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify risk factors for seizure occurrence. RESULTS: One hundred children were evaluated. Electrographic seizures occurred in 46 and electrographic status epilepticus occurred in 19. Seizures were exclusively nonconvulsive in 32. The only clinical risk factor for seizure occurrence was younger age (p=0.03). Of patients with seizures, only 52% had seizures detected in the first hour of monitoring, while 87% were detected within 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Seizures were common in critically ill children with acute encephalopathy. Most were nonconvulsive. Clinical features had little predictive value for seizure occurrence. Further study is needed to confirm these data in independent high-risk populations, to clarify which children are at highest risk for seizures so limited monitoring resources can be allocated optimally, and to determine whether seizure detection and management improves outcome.