Health-related Quality of Life after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy following Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol or a Conventional Recovery Protocol.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychologic distress after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) following enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and conventional recovery protocols. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of a single-center randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Women assigned to LH were randomly divided into 2 groups: intervention (ERAS protocol) group (IG) (n = 60) and control (conventional protocol) group (CG) (n = 60). INTERVENTIONS: Women in the intervention group (IG) were treated according to the ERAS protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was a change in HRQoL assessed by the 15D questionnaire and a change in psychologic distress assessed by the General Health Questionnaire-12 at baseline before surgery and 1 month later. One month after surgery, the HRQoL was clinically and statistically better compared with baseline but with no difference between the groups. When following the ERAS protocol, the improvement in HRQoL was clinically greater, the difference in the dimension of sleeping was statistically better (p <.05), and the dimensions of discomfort and symptoms (+0.028), depression (+0.282), distress (+0.018), and vitality (+0.040) were clinically better than when following the conventional recovery protocol. No differences were found in the psychologic distress scores either preoperatively or 1 month after surgery (24 in IG vs 25 in CG [p = .85] and 9 in IG vs 12 in CG [p = .47], respectively). CONCLUSION: The HRQoL improved after LH with no significant difference between the ERAS and conventional recovery protocols. However, clinically, the change in HRQoL was greater, and the dimensions of sleeping, discomfort and symptoms, depression, distress, and vitality were better when following ERAS. Psychologic distress was equal in both groups. ERAS seems to have a positive impact on recovery after LH.

Recovery after enhanced versus conventional care laparoscopic hysterectomy performed in the afternoon: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and conventional care (CC) protocols on outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) performed in the afternoon. METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted on 120 women undergoing LH who were randomly divided into the intervention group (IG; n=60) and control group (CG; n=60). Women in the IG were treated according to the ERAS protocol and those in the CG according to the CC protocol. The primary outcome was the length of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid use, postoperative pain and emesis, complications, operative bleeding, and time. RESULTS: More women discharged during 24 hours in the IG than in the CG (88% vs 55%, P<0.001). The time to actual discharge (19 vs 22 hours, P<0.001) and ready-to-discharge time (15 vs 21 hours, P<0.001) were shorter and the use of oxycodone was lower (0 mg [0-0 vs 2.5 mg [0-10], P<0.001) in the IG than in the CG, respectively. Otherwise, no other significant differences between the groups were observed. The follow-up time was one month. CONCLUSION: The ERAS protocol reduces hospital stay and decreases the use of opioids with no impairment in surgical outcome of LH. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03828981.

National learning curve for laparoscopic hysterectomy and trends in hysterectomy in Finland 2000-2005.

BACKGROUND: Complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) have been evaluated with particular focus on quantities of urinary tract injuries. An earlier survey in the 1990s on LH in Finland indicated a decreasing trend in complications; our aim was to evaluate the current complications and hysterectomy trends. METHODS: All hysterectomies in Finland performed for benign indication from 2000 to 2005 (n = 56 130) were included, data were obtained from the Finnish hospital care register. All major complications reported on LH were analysed; the data were collected retrospectively from the Patient Insurance Centre. RESULTS: In 2000, the proportion of abdominal hysterectomy (AH) was 38%, vaginal hysterectomy (VH) 37% and LH 25%, whereas in 2005, the proportions were 26%, 45% and 29%, respectively. The overall incidence of major complications in LHs from 1992 to 1999 (LH n = 13 885) was 1.8% and from 2000 to 2005 (LH n = 13 942) it decreased to 1.0%. During the same time, urinary tract injuries decreased from 1.4% to 0.7%; in detail ureteral injuries decreased from 0.9% to 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic and VHs have become more common in Finland than AH. Continuous instruction and training of the Finnish gynaecological surgeons has helped to diminish major complication rates and it seems that in LH, a plateau on the learning curve has been reached.

Transumbilical versus lateral transabdominal removal of benign adnexal masses in laparoscopic surgery-A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: In laparoscopic adnexal surgery the conventional method of removing a mass from the abdominal cavity in Finland is through a 10-mm-wide lateral abdominal port. The larger the lateral trocar, the greater the risk of pain, complications and delayed recovery. Here, we assumed that adnexal mass removal through a 10-mm umbilical port together with 5-mm side trocars would decrease the postoperative need of analgesics when compared with removal through a 10-mm lateral abdominal port. STUDY DESIGN: Women scheduled for laparoscopic surgery of a benign adnexal mass were invited to participate. The participants were randomized into two groups: removal via the transumbilical (TU) (n=21) or lateral transabdominal (TA) (n=21) route. General anesthesia and use of local anesthetics were standardized. The amount of postoperative opioid (oxycodone) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures were nausea/vomiting (VAS evaluation), time to discharge, peri- and postoperative complications, surgeons' opinions of the alternative methods and patients' satisfaction, evaluated via a questionnaire sent six months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the use of opioids or median pain-VAS scores between the groups during the first 24h postoperatively. However, in the TU group the amount of women with very low pain-VAS scores (0-1) during the whole 12-h follow-up time was significantly greater than in the TA group (4 vs. 0 women p=0.04). The amounts of nausea and vomiting, and median times to discharge were similar in both groups. There were no major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both transumbilical and transabdominal routes of abdominal mass removal during laparoscopy were feasible and safe. However, the transumbilical route resulted in more women with very low pain-VAS scores.