Raltegravir in HIV-1-Infected Pregnant Women: Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy.

BACKGROUND: The use of raltegravir in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women is important in the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission, especially in circumstances when a rapid decline of HIV RNA load is warranted or when preferred antiretroviral agents cannot be used. Physiological changes during pregnancy can reduce antiretroviral drug exposure. We studied the effect of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir and its safety and efficacy in HIV-infected pregnant women. METHODS: An open-label, multicenter, phase 4 study in HIV-infected pregnant women receiving raltegravir 400 mg twice daily was performed (Pharmacokinetics of Newly Developed Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Pregnant Women Network). Steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained in the third trimester and postpartum along with cord and maternal delivery concentrations. Safety and virologic efficacy were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included, of which 68% started raltegravir during pregnancy. Approaching delivery, 86% of the patients had an undetectable viral load (<50 copies/mL). None of the children were HIV-infected. Exposure to raltegravir was highly variable. Overall area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and plasma concentration at 12 hours after intake (C12h) plasma concentrations in the third trimester were on average 29% and 36% lower, respectively, compared with postpartum: Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) were 0.71 (.53-.96) for AUC0-12h and 0.64 (.34-1.22) for C12h. The median ratio of raltegravir cord to maternal blood was 1.21 (interquartile range, 1.02-2.17; n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: Raltegravir was well tolerated during pregnancy. The pharmacokinetics of raltegravir showed extensive variability. The observed mean decrease in exposure to raltegravir during third trimester compared to postpartum is not considered to be of clinical importance. Raltegravir can be used in standard dosages in HIV-infected pregnant women. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00825929.

Risk factors for IRIS in HIV-associated Pneumocystis-pneumonia following ART initiation.

BACKGROUND: HIV-infected patients with Pneumocystis-pneumonia (PCP) may develop paradoxical immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), when combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is started early during the course of PCP-treatment (PCPT). The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and predictors for PCP-IRIS and to improve individualized patient care. METHODS: An ICD-10 code hospital database query identified all Frankfurt HIV Cohort patients being diagnosed with PCP from January 2010 - June 2016. Patient charts were evaluated retrospectively for demographic, clinical and therapeutic (cART/PCPT) characteristics and incidence of paradoxical IRIS according to French's case definitions. RESULTS: IRIS occurred in 12/97 patients that started cART while on PCPT (12.4%). They had a higher rate of re-hospitalization (41.7vs. 4.7%; odds ratio (OR) 14.46; p = 0.009), intensive care treatment (66.7vs. 30.6%; OR = 4.54; p = 0.018), and longer median hospitalization (48 days vs. 23; p < 0.001). A high HIV-RNA level (> 6Log10/ml) before cART initiation was associated with IRIS development (41.6vs. 15.0%; OR 4.05; p = 0.042). Serum immunoglobulin G-levels (IgG) [mg/dl] were lower (894.0 vs. 1446.5; p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Higher hospitalization rate and morbidity parameters underscore the clinical importance of PCP-related paradoxical IRIS. A baseline viral load of > 6Log10/ml and serum IgG may help to assess individual risks for PCP-IRIS.

Reasons for Choice of Antiretroviral Regimens in HIV Patients Presenting Late for Initial Treatment in Europe.

The choice of an optimal antiretroviral therapy (ART) in naive patients presenting late for initial therapy with advanced HIV infection, that is, with a CD4 cell count <200/µL and/or an AIDS-defining disease (late presenters, LPs), is still a challenge, even for HIV specialists. At present, there is little information on the decision process and selection criteria that physicians must take into account when choosing the presumably optimal initial ART for LPs. This study analyzes reasons for the individual choice of first-line ART in HIV LPs. We conducted a prospective multi-center study to analyze the decision-making process of physicians treating naive HIV patients presenting with a CD4 cell count <200/µL and/or an AIDS-defining condition. Two European HIV treatment centers based in Frankfurt (Germany) and A Coruna (Spain) participated in the study. Physicians documented the reasons that led to their decision for a specific first-line ART regimen. A questionnaire was designed for the study. Decisions of the participating physicians were evaluated. A total of 52 treatment decisions were analyzed. Evaluation of the choice of antiretroviral treatment demonstrated that for the overall group of physicians, simplicity of the regimen was the most important selection criterion in 34.6% of cases. The presence of comorbidities was given as the decisive selection criterion in 26.9%, followed by experience with the chosen drugs in 21.2% of cases. In the group of physicians choosing an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimen for first-line ART, the same selection criteria were identified as in the overall group; 33.3% of clinicians selected an INSTI-based regimen because of its simplicity. The presence of comorbidities was the second most frequent decisive criterion (31.0%), followed by personal experience with the prescribed ART (23.8%). In the protease inhibitor group, simplicity was also the most common selection criterion with 40%. Results of clinical trials were stated as the most important criterion for the selection of ART in 38% of all cases, followed by the expected adherence of the patient (22%). Among the physicians who used a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen, patients' desire to have children was the most frequent criterion for selection of ART (60%). An ongoing pregnancy was the second most frequent selection criterion, followed by ART's simplicity (8%). For patients treated with a single-tablet regimen, simplicity of ART was comprehensibly the most important decisive criterion (54.5%). Experience with the chosen drugs was the decisive selection criterion in 24.2%, followed by comorbidities in 18.2% of cases. Physicians' selection of individual ART in patients presenting late for first-line treatment seems to be predominantly dependent on patient-centered factors such as adherence issues as well as the clinical experience of physicians with the prescribed drugs.

Myocardial Fibrosis and Inflammation by CMR Predict Cardiovascular Outcome in People Living With HIV.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine prognostic relationships between cardiac imaging measures and cardiovascular outcome in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH) on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). BACKGROUND: PLWH have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease and heart failure (HF) compared with the noninfected population. The pathophysiological drivers of myocardial dysfunction and worse cardiovascular outcome in HIV remain poorly understood. METHODS: This prospective observational longitudinal study included consecutive PLWH on long-term HAART undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination for assessment of myocardial volumes and function, T1 and T2 mapping, perfusion, and scar. Time-to-event analysis was performed from the index CMR examination to the first single event per patient. The primary endpoint was an adjudicated adverse cardiovascular event (cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal acute coronary syndrome, an appropriate device discharge, or a documented HF hospitalization). RESULTS: A total of 156 participants (62% male; age [median, interquartile range]: 50 years [42 to 57 years]) were included. During a median follow-up of 13 months (9 to 19 months), 24 events were observed (4 HF deaths, 1 sudden cardiac death, 2 nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, 1 appropriate device discharge, and 16 HF hospitalizations). Patients with events had higher native T1 (median [interquartile range]: 1,149 ms [1,115 to 1,163 ms] vs. 1,110 ms [1,075 to 1,138 ms]); native T2 (40 ms [38 to 41 ms] vs. 37 ms [36 to 39 ms]); left ventricular (LV) mass index (65 g/m2 [49 to 77 g/m2] vs. 57 g/m2 [49 to 64 g/m2]), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (109 pg/l [25 to 337 pg/l] vs. 48 pg/l [23 to 82 pg/l]) (all p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, native T1 was independently predictive of adverse events (chi-square test, 15.9; p < 0.001; native T1 [10 ms] hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.20 [1.08 to 1.33]; p = 0.001), followed by a model that also included LV mass (chi-square test, 17.1; p < 0.001). Traditional cardiovascular risk scores were not predictive of the adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal important prognostic associations of diffuse myocardial fibrosis and LV remodeling in PLWH. These results may support development of personalized approaches to screening and early intervention to reduce the burden of HF in PLWH (International T1 Multicenter Outcome Study; NCT03749343).