Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients and prediction model: a multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 infection are commonly reported to have an increased risk of venous thrombosis. The choice of anti-thrombotic agents and doses are currently being studied in randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies. There exists a need for individualized risk stratification of venous thromboembolism (VTE) to assist clinicians in decision-making on anticoagulation. We sought to identify the risk factors of VTE in COVID-19 patients, which could help physicians in the prevention, early identification, and management of VTE in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and improve clinical outcomes in these patients. METHOD: This is a multicenter, retrospective database of four main health systems in Southeast Michigan, United States. We compiled comprehensive data for adult COVID-19 patients who were admitted between 1st March 2020 and 31st December 2020. Four models, including the random forest, multiple logistic regression, multilinear regression, and decision trees, were built on the primary outcome of in-hospital acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and tested for performance. The study also reported hospital length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS in the VTE and the non-VTE patients. Four models were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and confusion matrix. RESULTS: The cohort included 3531 admissions, 3526 had discharge diagnoses, and 6.68% of patients developed acute VTE (N = 236). VTE group had a longer hospital and ICU LOS than the non-VTE group (hospital LOS 12.2 days vs. 8.8 days, p < 0.001; ICU LOS 3.8 days vs. 1.9 days, p < 0.001). 9.8% of patients in the VTE group required more advanced oxygen support, compared to 2.7% of patients in the non-VTE group (p < 0.001). Among all four models, the random forest model had the best performance. The model suggested that blood pressure, electrolytes, renal function, hepatic enzymes, and inflammatory markers were predictors for in-hospital VTE in COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COVID-19 have a high risk for VTE, and patients who developed VTE had a prolonged hospital and ICU stay. This random forest prediction model for VTE in COVID-19 patients identifies predictors which could aid physicians in making a clinical judgment on empirical dosages of anticoagulation.

Periprocedural and long-term outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in cardiology practice.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has recently been made a class I indication in the treatment of AAA. In comparison to the conventional open surgical treatment, endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with equivalent long-term morbidity and mortality rates. Vascular surgeons perform majority of EVAR. There are no reports for the long-term results of this intervention performed by interventional cardiologists. We present one of the first reports of periprocedural and long-term outcomes of EVAR performed by interventional cardiologists. METHODS: Retrospective chart review on patients with attempted EVAR between September 2005 and January 2011 was performed. Included cases were all consecutive patients who had attempted EVAR by interventional cardiologists. RESULTS: During the study period EVAR was attempted in 170 patients, with 27% being women. The mean age was 74 years (range 52-93). The endovascular graft placement was successful in 96% (163/170) of patients. Procedure failures were more common in women (6 of 46 vs 1 of 124, P = 0.003). The 30-day mortality was 1.8 % (3 of 170). In patients with successful EVAR the mean follow-up was 30 months and mean length of hospital stay was 3.5 ± 3.2 days. Major periprocedural complications were noted in 9% patients (15 of 167). During follow-up, six patients (3.5%) required re-intervention and additional 16 patients died with no aneurysm related deaths. CONCLUSION: EVAR primarily performed by interventional cardiologists demonstrates high periprocedural and long-term success rates. A higher EVAR failure rate has been observed in women.

Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Treat Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis After Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is an uncommon complication after heart valve replacement surgery that can result in increased morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines for management of PVE recommend antibiotic therapy followed by surgical valve replacement. The number of aortic valve replacements is expected to rise in the coming years with the expanded indications for use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with low, intermediate, and high surgical risk, as well as in patients with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve. Current guidelines do not address the use of valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR for management of PVE in patients who are at high risk for surgical intervention. The authors present a case of a patient with aortic valve PVE after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR); he was treated with valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR due to the high surgical risk. The patient was discharged, but he returned to the hospital with PVE and valve dehiscence 14 months after ViV TAVR, after which he successfully underwent re-operative SAVR.

Data of atrial arrhythmias in hospitalized COVID-19 and influenza patients.

Atrial arrhythmias (AA) are common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with limited data on their association with COVID-19 infection, clinical and imaging outcomes. In the related research article using retrospective research data from one quaternary care and five community hospitals, patients aged 18 years and above with positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test were included. 6927 patients met the inclusion criteria. The data in this article provides demographics, home medications, in-hospital events and COVID-19 treatments, multivariable generalized linear regression regression models using a log link with a Poisson distribution (multi-parameter regression [MPR]) to determine predictors of new-onset AA and mortality in COVID-19 patients, computerized tomography chest scan findings, echocardiographic findings, and International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision codes. The clinical outcomes were compared to a propensity-matched cohort of influenza patients. For influenza, data is reported on baseline demographics, comorbid conditions, and in-hospital events. Generalized linear regression models were built for COVID-19 patients using demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and presenting labs which were significantly different between the groups, and hypoxia in the emergency room. Statistical analysis was performed using R programming language (version 4, ggplot2 package). Multivariable generalized linear regression model showed that, relative to normal sinus rhythm, history of AA (adjusted relative risk [RR]: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.11-1.71; p = 0.003) and newly-detected AA (adjusted RR: 2.02 95% CI: 1.68-2.43; p < 0.001) were independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Age in increments of 10 years, male sex, White race, prior history of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease, presenting leukocytosis, hypermagnesemia, and hypomagnesemia were found to be independent predictors of new-onset AA in the MPR model. The dataset reported is related to the research article entitled "Incidence, Mortality, and Imaging Outcomes of Atrial Arrhythmias in COVID-19" [Jehangir et al. Incidence, Mortality, and Imaging Outcomes of Atrial Arrhythmias in COVID-19, American Journal of Cardiology] [1].

3D-PAST: Risk Assessment Model for Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in COVID-19.

Hypercoagulability is a recognized feature in SARS-CoV-2 infection. There exists a need for a dedicated risk assessment model (RAM) that can risk-stratify hospitalized COVID-19 patients for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and guide anticoagulation. We aimed to build a simple clinical model to predict VTE in COVID-19 patients. This large-cohort, retrospective study included adult patients admitted to four hospitals with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Model training was performed on 3531 patients hospitalized between March and December 2020 and validated on 2508 patients hospitalized between January and September 2021. Diagnosis of VTE was defined as acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). The novel RAM was based on commonly available parameters at hospital admission. LASSO regression and logistic regression were performed, risk scores were assigned to the significant variables, and cutoffs were derived. Seven variables with assigned scores were delineated as: DVT History = 2; High D-Dimer (>500−2000 ng/mL) = 2; Very High D-Dimer (>2000 ng/mL) = 5; PE History = 2; Low Albumin (<3.5 g/dL) = 1; Systolic Blood Pressure <120 mmHg = 1, Tachycardia (heart rate >100 bpm) = 1. The model had a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 53%. This simple, robust clinical tool can help individualize thromboprophylaxis for COVID-19 patients based on their VTE risk category.

Incidence, Mortality, and Imaging Outcomes of Atrial Arrhythmias in COVID-19.

Atrial arrhythmias (AAs) are common in hospitalized patients with COVID-19; however, it remains uncertain if AAs are a poor prognostic factor in SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this retrospective cohort study from 2014 to 2021, we report in-hospital mortality in patients with new-onset AA and history of AA. The incidence of new-onset congestive heart failure (CHF), hospital length of stay and readmission rate, intensive care unit admission, arterial and venous thromboembolism, and imaging outcomes were also analyzed. We further compared the clinical outcomes with a propensity-matched influenza cohort. Generalized linear regression was performed to identify the association of AA with mortality and other outcomes, relative to those without an AA diagnosis. Predictors of new-onset AA were also modeled. A total of 6,927 patients with COVID-19 were included (626 with new-onset AA, 779 with history of AA). We found that history of AA (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.38, confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 1.71, p = 0.003) and new-onset AA (aRR 2.02, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.43, p <0.001) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. The incidence of new-onset CHF was 6.3% in history of AA (odds ratio 1.91, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.79, p <0.001) and 11.3% in new-onset AA (odds ratio 4.01, 95% CI 3.00 to 5.35, p <0.001). New-onset AA was shown to be associated with worse clinical outcomes within the propensity-matched COVID-19 and influenza cohorts. The risk of new-onset AA was higher in patients with COVID-19 than influenza (aRR 2.02, 95% CI 1.76 to 2.32, p <0.0001), but mortality associated with new-onset AA was higher in influenza (aRR 12.58, 95% CI 4.27 to 37.06, p <0.0001) than COVID-19 (aRR 1.86, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.22, p <0.0001). In a subset of the patients with COVID-19 for which echocardiographic data were captured, abnormalities were common, including valvular abnormalities (40.9%), right ventricular dilation (29.6%), and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (16.5%); although there was no evidence of a difference in incidence among the 3 groups. In conclusion, new-onset AAs are associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

SARS-COV-ATE risk assessment model for arterial thromboembolism in COVID-19.

Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at an increased risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic complications conferring an extremely poor prognosis. COVID-19 infection is known to be an independent risk factor for acute ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). We developed a risk assessment model (RAM) to stratify hospitalized COVID-19 patients for arterial thromboembolism (ATE). This multicenter, retrospective study included adult COVID-19 patients admitted between 3/1/2020 and 9/5/2021. Among 3531 patients from the training cohort, 15.5% developed acute in-hospital ATE, including stroke, MI, and other ATE, compared to 13.4% in the validation cohort. The 16-item final score was named SARS-COV-ATE (Sex: male = 1, Age [40-59 = 2, > 60 = 4], Race: non-African American = 1, Smoking = 1 and Systolic blood pressure elevation = 1, Creatinine elevation = 1; Over the range: leukocytes/lactate dehydrogenase/interleukin-6, B-type natriuretic peptide = 1, Vascular disease (cardiovascular/cerebrovascular = 1), Aspartate aminotransferase = 1, Troponin-I [> 0.04 ng/mL = 1, troponin-I > 0.09 ng/mL = 3], Electrolytes derangement [magnesium/potassium = 1]). RAM had a good discrimination (training AUC 0.777, 0.756-0.797; validation AUC 0.766, 0.741-0.790). The validation cohort was stratified as low-risk (score 0-8), intermediate-risk (score 9-13), and high-risk groups (score ≥ 14), with the incidence of ATE 2.4%, 12.8%, and 33.8%, respectively. Our novel prediction model based on 16 standardized, commonly available parameters showed good performance in identifying COVID-19 patients at risk for ATE on admission.

A case report of successful intravascular shockwave lithotripsy and ad hoc directional venous atherectomy of extensive chronic femoral deep venous thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Conventional treatment for chronic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is anticoagulation. However, limited interventional endovascular options exist for patients with non-healing venous ulcers secondary to chronic DVT. CASE SUMMARY: We present a case of 67-year-old man with severely symptomatic post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with persistent high-grade femoral DVT despite prior compressive therapy and chronic oral anticoagulation. It has been successfully treated with intravascular shockwave lithotripsy and ad hoc directional venous atherectomy facilitating subsequent mechanical thrombectomy and venoplasty. The procedure was without complication and resulted in significant clinical improvement. DISCUSSION: We believe our novel endovascular interventional approach represents a unique modality of intervention for patients with chronic DVT and PTS resistant to conventional venoplasty.

Impella-Assisted Intracoronary Lithotripsy of Severely Calcified Left Main Coronary Artery Bifurcation for NSTEMI With Cardiogenic Shock.

High calcification of coronary artery plaque is a frequent cause of suboptimal stent expansion, which can result in stent thrombosis and restenosis. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (S-IVL) represents a new frontier in the treatment of highly calcified coronary lesions. It can be an excellent alternative to intracoronary atherectomy in extremely high-risk lesions. We present a case of a 57-year-old man with known severe coronary artery disease (CAD) who presented with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), cardiogenic shock and was successfully treated with impella-assisted shockwave-intravascular lithotripsy permitting successful percutaneous intervention of a high-risk left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation in-stent restenosis.

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair by interventional cardiologists--a community-based experience.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a relatively recent technology. In comparison to the conventional open surgical treatment for AAA, endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) combines a less-invasive approach with lower morbidity and mortality. There have been few studies regarding the performance of this procedure in a community-based setting. We report our experience of EVAR performed primarily by interventional cardiologists in a community hospital. METHODS: In our community hospital setting, between September 2005 and November 2007, we included all patients who underwent EVAR by interventional cardiologists, with available on-site vascular surgical support. Clinical and serial computed angiographic imaging outcomes were followed by a retrospective chart review. Data collection tools included demographic and clinical characteristics, anatomical aneurysm features, length of stay, peri- and postprocedural complications, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 71 consecutive patients had EVAR attempted. The endovascular stent placement was successful in 67 (93%) patients. Thirty-day mortality in this study was 1 of 71 (1.4%). All four procedural failures and the single periprocedural mortality occurred in women. Mean follow-up was 12 months. There were a total of six mortalities and among these four were women (P ≤ 0.001); however, multivariate analysis revealed loss of significant difference in mortality (P = 0.16). Major complications following EVAR were noted in 10 of 71 (14%) patients. CONCLUSION: EVAR can be successfully performed by experienced interventional cardiologists with vascular surgical support in a community-based setting. In our experience, there is acceptable rate of complications and mortality in a carefully selected patient population.

A Single Coronary Artery Anomaly: Right Coronary Artery as a Branch From the Left Anterior Descending Artery.

An anomalous origin of the right coronary artery (RCA) from the left anterior descending artery (LAD), also known as a single coronary artery, is an extremely rare finding in clinical practice. It is usually a benign anomaly; however, symptoms are highly dependent on the course that the anomalous RCA takes after branching off of the LAD. We present a case of a patient who had decompensated heart failure and was detected to have a single coronary artery. The patient was treated with guideline-directed medical therapy with notable improvement in clinical status in the following days. Enhanced awareness of congenital cardiac anomalies may help guide management.

Moxifloxacin-induced QT prolongation and torsades: an uncommon effect of a common drug.

Torsade de pointes (TdP) or "twisting of the points" represents polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in the setting of prolonged QT interval and is characterized by QRS complexes that change in morphology and amplitude. We report a rare case of TdP, associated with QT interval prolongation, caused by intravenous moxifloxacin given for pneumonia in a 71-year-old African American man. Electrocardiogram initially revealed QT interval prolongation that led to torsades de pointes. These changes reverted to normal when moxifloxacin was held. Although the risk for quinolone-associated TdP seems to be low, caution is still warranted when given someone with high risk of QT prolongation.

Impact of internal mammary artery conduit on long-term outcomes after percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft.

BACKGROUND: The influence of an internal mammary artery (IMA) graft on long-term outcomes after percutaneous saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention is currently unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: To examine the impact of IMA on outcomes in patients undergoing SVG interventions, we analyzed 2119 patients from the Duke Cardiovascular Disease Database (1986-2003) with prior coronary artery bypass surgery undergoing cardiac catheterization who had at least 1 SVG graft. Patients were categorized into 4 groups: group I, SVG intervention and patent IMA; group II, no SVG intervention and patent IMA; group III, SVG intervention without patent IMA; and group IV, no SVG intervention without patent IMA. At a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 2.1 to 8.8 years), adjusted survival rates in groups I, II, III, and IV were 72.8%, 72.3%, 64.5%, and 58.9%, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling showed similar survival for groups I and II (P=0.63) and for groups III and IV (P=0.33). The presence of IMA graft was related to lower long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.82), whereas SVG intervention was not associated with long-term mortality (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.10). In contrast, the adjusted event-free rates for nonfatal myocardial infarction were lower in the SVG intervention groups (groups I and III) than in the non-SVG intervention groups (groups II and IV) (HR for SVG intervention versus no SVG intervention, 3.19; 95% CI, 2.18 to 4.66), with the presence of patent IMA conferring no significant benefit on this outcome (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.08). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing SVG interventions, survival, but not nonfatal myocardial infarction, is favorably influenced by the presence of patent IMA. In contrast, SVG intervention had no measurable survival benefit but was associated with an increased risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction.

Documented traditional cardiovascular risk factors and mortality in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Although documented traditional cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and dyslipidemia) increase the risk of developing coronary artery disease, their influence on the treatments and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has not been fully elucidated. METHODS: Using data from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative, we sought to characterize the effect that the absence of documented traditional risk factors has on inhospital treatments and outcomes in a population of patients with NSTEMI treated in routine practice. We compared clinical characteristics and inhospital outcomes according to the presence and number of risk factors in 74,220 patients with NSTEMI (defined as creatine kinase-MB and/or troponin I/T values above the local upper limit of normal) treated in 476 US hospitals from January 2001 through March 2004. RESULTS: The 7755 (10.5%) patients with no documented traditional risk factors on admission were less likely to receive short-term guideline-recommended therapies and revascularization procedures. Despite a higher prevalence of normal left ventricular function and insignificant angiographic coronary artery disease, these patients had a slightly higher risk of adjusted inhospital mortality (odds ratio 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.29) compared with patients with any combination of risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without documented traditional cardiovascular risk factors represent 10.5% of the non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction population. Because the absence of documented traditional risk factors does not yield a favorable prognosis, further study is needed to delineate the effects of the interplay between novel and documented traditional risk factors and treatment differences on the outcomes of these patients.

Impact of on-site cardiac catheterization on resource utilization and fatal and non-fatal outcomes after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) strongly depend on the availability of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities. Although the management found at hospitals without on-site catheterization does not lead to increased mortality, little it known about its impact on resource utilization and non-fatal outcomes. METHODS: We identified all patients (n = 35,289) admitted with a first AMI in the province of Quebec between January 1, 1996 and March 31, 1999 using population-based administrative databases. Medical resource utilization and non-fatal and fatal outcomes were compared among patients admitted to hospitals with and without on-site cardiac catheterization facilities. RESULTS: Cardiac catheterization and PCI were more frequently performed among patients admitted to hospitals with catheterization facilities. However, non-invasive procedures were not used more frequently at hospitals without catheterization facilities. To the contrary, echocardiography [odds ratio (OR), 2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.93-2.16] and multi-gated acquisition imaging (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17-1.32) were used more frequently at hospitals with catheterization, and exercise treadmill testing (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.91-1.15) and Sestamibi/Thallium imaging (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98) were used similarly at hospitals with and without catheterization. Use of anti-ischemic medications and frequency of emergency room and physician visits, were similar at both types of institutions. Readmission rates for AMI-related cardiac complications and mortality were also similar [adjusted hazard ratio, recurrent AMI: 1.02, 95% CI, 0.89-1.16; congestive heart failure: 1.02; 95% CI, 0.90-1.15; unstable angina: 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.02; mortality: 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05)]. CONCLUSION: Although on-site availability of cardiac catheterization facilities is associated with greater use of invasive cardiac procedures, non-availability of catheterization did not translate into a higher use of non-invasive tests or have an impact on the fatal and non-fatal outcomes available for study in our administrative database.

Relation of early saphenous vein graft failure to outcomes following coronary artery bypass surgery.

Up to 20% of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) fail within 2 years of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The long-term effects of early SVG failure on major clinical events remain undefined in contemporary patient populations. We sought to examine the relation between early SVG failure and long-term outcomes after CABG. Using the Duke Cardiovascular Databank, we examined baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics and clinical outcomes among patients who underwent catheterization 1 to 18 months after their first CABG from 1986 to 2004. Patients were classified on the basis of their worst SVG stenosis as having no (<25%), noncritical (25% to 74%), critical (75% to 99%), or occlusive (100%) SVG disease. Our primary outcome measure was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization after catheterization. Of 1,243 patients included in the analysis, 27.9% had no, 11.9% had noncritical, 20.8% had critical, and 39.3% had occlusive SVG disease. At 10 years, the corresponding adjusted composite event rates were 41.2%, 56.2%, 81.2%, and 67.1%, respectively (p <0.0001). Most events occurred immediately after catheterization in patients with critical and occlusive SVG disease and were primarily repeat revascularization. On multivariate analysis, critical, nonocclusive SVG disease was the strongest predictor of the composite outcome (hazard ratio 2.36, 95% confidence interval 2.00 to 2.79, p <0.0001). In conclusion, in contemporary clinical practice, early SVG failure is associated with worse long-term outcomes after CABG.

Platelet inhibitor therapy for patients with cardiovascular disease: looking toward the future.

Understanding platelet function and the role of platelets in the response to vascular injury has led to the development of novel platelet-inhibiting therapies that have been proven effective in the treatment of acute and chronic vascular disease. Antiplatelet therapies are cornerstone treatments for patients with acute coronary syndromes and have been essential in reducing the acute and subacute ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention. Furthermore, an increased understanding of the pathobiology behind the platelet's role in atherothrombosis has offered up many new avenues of research and many new targets for therapeutic drug development. This review briefly summarizes the state of available anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatments in cardiovascular disease management and provides a perspective on the key issues in developing new antiplatelet strategies in the future.