KLF2 attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis and inflammation with regulation of AP-1.

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a chronic, fibrosing interstitial pneumonia and devastating disease. Here we investigated the potential roles of Kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) on pulmonary fibrosis and inflammation response. A mouse model of pulmonary fibrosis was established by intratracheal injection of bleomycin (BLM). The mRNA and protein levels of KLF2 were assayed by RT-PCR and Western blotting respectively. The extent of lung fibrosis was determined using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and Masson's trichrome staining, and the hydroxyproline content was quantified. RT-PCR was used to evaluate the mRNA expression of collagen type 1a1 (col1a1), col3a1, α-SMA, TNF-α, IL-1ß and IL-6. The concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IL-6 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung tissue were examined by ELISA. Also, the effects of KLF2 on activator protein-1 (AP-1) were evaluated by measuring the c-Jun and c-Fos protein levels. We found that KLF2 was remarkably downregulated in BLM-treated rats, both in mRNA and protein levels. Additionally, overexpression of KLF2 attenuated the destruction of the alveolar space and pulmonary interstitial collagen hyperplasia, and deposition reduced the expression of col1a1, col3a1, and α-SMA, and blocked the production of TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IL-6 in BALF and lung tissue in vivo. Moreover, adenoviral transduction of KLF2 inhibited TGF-ß1-induced expression of col1a1, col3a1, and α-SMA in vitro. Mechanically, BLM up-regulated c-Jun and c-Fos expression, which was impeded by KLF2 overexpression. Taken together, our data indicate that KLF2 attenuates pulmonary fibrosis and inflammation, possibly through the regulation of AP-1.

Efficacy of oseltamivir compared with zanamivir in COPD patients with seasonal influenza virus infection: a randomized controlled trial.

Influenza viruses exacerbate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with considerable morbidity and mortality. Zanamivir and oseltamivir are effective in treating influenza. However, their efficacy in relieving influenza symptoms in COPD patients remains unknown, with the lack of controlled trials in this subject. Therefore, we conducted this randomized controlled trial to investigate the clinical efficacy of both interventions in this population. Patients were allocated to two groups (80 patients each): oseltamivir (OSELTA) and zanamivir (ZANA) groups. Oseltamivir (75 mg) was orally administered twice daily for 5 days, while zanamivir (10 mg) was inhaled twice daily for 5 days. Clinical parameters including body temperature, influenza symptoms (i.e., sore throat, cough, etc.), and serial blood tests were recorded on days 1, 3, and 7. We analyzed primary (changes in body temperature) and secondary outcomes (changes in non-specific symptoms) using the pre-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses. Differences between groups were assessed using t-test. Oseltamivir and zanamivir significantly reduced body temperature on the 3rd day after treatment; however, the number of patients who reported clinical improvement in influenza-like symptoms was significantly higher in the OSELTA group compared to the ZANA group on days 3 (85 vs 68.8%, P=0.015) and 7 (97.5 vs 83.8%, P=0.003). However, no significant changes in hematological (white blood cells and its subtypes) and inflammatory (C-reactive protein) parameters were noted (P>0.05). Our results suggested that oseltamivir and zanamivir are effective in reducing body temperature, while oseltamivir led to better clinical improvement regarding influenza-like symptoms in patients with COPD.

Efficacy of oseltamivir compared with zanamivir in COPD patients with seasonal influenza virus infection: a randomized controlled trial

Influenza viruses exacerbate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with considerable morbidity and mortality. Zanamivir and oseltamivir are effective in treating influenza. However, their efficacy in relieving influenza symptoms in COPD patients remains unknown, with the lack of controlled trials in this subject. Therefore, we conducted this randomized controlled trial to investigate the clinical efficacy of both interventions in this population. Patients were allocated to two groups (80 patients each): oseltamivir (OSELTA) and zanamivir (ZANA) groups. Oseltamivir (75 mg) was orally administered twice daily for 5 days, while zanamivir (10 mg) was inhaled twice daily for 5 days. Clinical parameters including body temperature, influenza symptoms (i.e., sore throat, cough, etc.), and serial blood tests were recorded on days 1, 3, and 7. We analyzed primary (changes in body temperature) and secondary outcomes (changes in non-specific symptoms) using the pre-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses. Differences between groups were assessed using t-test. Oseltamivir and zanamivir significantly reduced body temperature on the 3rd day after treatment; however, the number of patients who reported clinical improvement in influenza-like symptoms was significantly higher in the OSELTA group compared to the ZANA group on days 3 (85 vs 68.8%, P=0.015) and 7 (97.5 vs 83.8%, P=0.003). However, no significant changes in hematological (white blood cells and its subtypes) and inflammatory (C-reactive protein) parameters were noted (P>0.05). Our results suggested that oseltamivir and zanamivir are effective in reducing body temperature, while oseltamivir led to better clinical improvement regarding influenza-like symptoms in patients with COPD.