The Remote Academic Radiologist: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

The importance of developing a robust remote workforce in academic radiology has come to the forefront due to several converging factors. COVID-19, and the abrupt transformation it precipitated in terms of how radiologists worked, has been the biggest impetus for change; concurrent factors such as increasing examination volumes and radiologist burnout have also contributed. How to best advance the most desirable and favorable aspects of remote work while preserving an academic environment that fulfills the tripartite mission is a critical challenge that nearly all academic institutions face today. In this article, we discuss current challenges in academic radiology, including effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, from three perspectives-the radiologist, the learner, and the health system-addressing the following topics: productivity, recruitment, wellness, clinical supervision, mentorship and research, educational engagement, radiologist access, investments in technology, and radiologist value. Throughout, we focus on the opportunities and drawbacks of remote work, to help guide its effective and reliable integration into academic radiology practices.

Utilization of Chest and Abdominopelvic CT for Traumatic Injury From 2011 to 2018: Evaluation Using a National Commercial Database.

BACKGROUND. Increases in the use of CT to evaluate patients presenting with trauma have raised concern about inappropriate imaging. The evolving utilization of CT for trauma evaluation may be impacted by injury severity. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to explore patterns in utilization of chest and abdominopelvic CT among trauma-related emergency department (ED) visits across the United States. METHODS. This retrospective study was conducted with national commercial claims information extracted from the MarketScan Commercial Database. Trauma-related ED encounters were identified from the 2011-2018 MarketScan database files and classified by injury severity score (minor, intermediate, and major injuries) on the basis of International Classification of Diseases codes. ED encounters were also assessed for chest CT, abdominopelvic CT, and single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations. Utilization per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters was determined. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to determine incidence rate ratios (IRRs) as a measure of temporal changes in utilization. RESULTS. From 2011 to 2018, 8,369,092 trauma-related ED encounters were identified (5,685,295 for minor, 2,624,944 for intermediate, and 58,853 for major injuries). Utilization of chest CT per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters increased from 4.9 to 13.5 examinations (adjusted IRR, 1.15 per year; minor injuries, from 2.2 to 7.7 [adjusted IRR, 1.17]; intermediate injuries, from 8.5 to 21.5 [adjusted IRR, 1.16]; major injuries, from 117.8 to 200.1 [adjusted IRR, 1.08]). Utilization of abdominopelvic CT per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters increased from 7.5 to 16.4 (adjusted IRR, 1.12; minor injuries, 4.8 to 12.2 [adjusted IRR, 1.13]; intermediate injuries, 10.6 to 21.7 [adjusted IRR, 1.13]; major injuries, 134.8 to 192.6 [adjusted IRR, 1.07]). Utilization of single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters increased from 3.4 to 8.9 [adjusted IRR, 1.16; minor injuries, 1.1 to 4.6 [adjusted IRR, 1.18]; intermediate injuries, 6.4 to 16.4 [adjusted IRR, 1.16]; major injuries, 99.6 to 179.9 [adjusted IRR, 1.08]). CONCLUSION. National utilization of chest and abdominopelvic CT for trauma-related ED encounters increased among commercially insured patients from 2011 to 2018, particularly for single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations and for minor injuries. CLINICAL IMPACT. Given concerns about increased cost and detection of incidental findings, further investigation is warranted to explore the potential benefit of single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations of patients with minor injuries and to develop strategies for optimizing appropriateness of imaging orders.

Radiologist age and diagnostic errors.

PURPOSE: Previous investigations into the causes of error by radiologists have addressed work schedule, volume, shift length, and sub-specialization. Studies regarding possible associations between radiologist errors and radiologist age and timing of residency training are lacking in the literature, to our knowledge. The aim of our study was to determine if radiologist age and residency graduation date is associated with diagnostic errors. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included 1.9 million preliminary interpretations (out of a total of 5.2 million preliminary and final interpretations) of imaging examinations by 361 radiologists in a US-based national teleradiology practice between 1/1/2019 and 1/1/2020. Quality assurance data regarding the number of radiologist errors was generated through client facility feedback to the teleradiology practice. With input from both the client radiologist and the teleradiologist, the final determination of the presence, absence, and severity of a teleradiologist error was determined by the quality assurance committee of radiologists within the teleradiology company using standardized criteria. Excluded were 3.2 million final examination interpretations and 93,963 (1.8%) of total examinations from facilities reporting less than one discrepancy in examination interpretation in 2019. Logistic regression with covariates radiologist age and residency graduation date was performed for calculation of relative risk of overall error rates and by major imaging modality. Major errors were separated from minor errors as those with a greater likelihood of affecting patient care. Logistic regression with covariates radiologist age, residency graduation date, and log total examinations interpreted was used to calculate odds of making a major error to that of making a minor error. RESULTS: Mean age of the 361 radiologists was 51.1 years, with a mean residency graduation date of 2001. Mean error rate for all examinations was 0.5%. Radiologist age at any residency graduation date was positively associated with major errors (p < 0.05), with a relative risk 1.021 for each 1-year increase in age and relative risk 1.235 for each decade as well as for minor errors (p < 0.05, relative risk 1.007 for each year, relative risk 1.082 for each decade). By major imaging modality, radiologist age at any residency graduation date was positively associated with computed tomography (CT) and X-ray (XR) major and minor error, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) major error, and ultrasound (US) minor error (p < 0.05). Radiologist age was positively associated with odds of making a major vs. minor error (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The mean error rate for all radiologists was low. We observed that increasing age at any residency graduation date was associated with increasing relative risk of major and minor errors as well as increasing odds of a major vs. minor error among providers. Further study is needed to corroborate these results, determine clinical relevance, and highlight strategies to address these findings.

Time ratio disparities among ED patients undergoing head CT.

PURPOSE: To assess if patients who underwent head computed tomography (CT) experienced disparities in the emergency department (ED) and if the indication for head CT affected disparities. METHODS: This study employed a retrospective, IRB-approved cohort design encompassing four hospitals. All ED patients between January 2016 and September 2020 who underwent non-contrast head CTs were included. Furthermore, key time intervals including ED length of stay (LOS), ED assessment time, image acquisition time, and image interpretation time were calculated. Time ratio (TR) was used to compare these time intervals between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 45,177 ED visits comprising 4730 trauma cases, 5475 altered mental status cases, 11,925 cases with head pain, and 23,047 cases with other indications were included. Females had significantly longer ED LOS, ED assessment time, and image acquisition time (TR = 1.012, 1.051, 1.018, respectively, P-value < 0.05). This disparity was more pronounced in female patients with head pain complaints compared to their male counterparts (TR = 1.036, 1.059, and 1.047, respectively, P-value < 0.05). Black patients experienced significantly longer ED LOS, image acquisition time, and image assessment time (TR = 1.226, 1.349, and 1.190, respectively, P-value < 0.05). These disparities persisted regardless of head CT indications. Furthermore, patients with Medicare/Medicaid insurance also faced longer wait times in all the time intervals (TR > 1, P-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Wait times for ED head CT completion were longer for Black patients and Medicaid/Medicare insurance holders. Additionally, females experienced extended wait times, particularly when presented with head pain complaints. Our findings underscore the importance of exploring and addressing the contributing factors to ensure equitable and timely access to imaging services in the ED.

Increasing Utilization of Emergency Department Neuroimaging From 2007 Through 2017.

BACKGROUND. The volume of emergency department (ED) visits and the number of neuroimaging examinations have increased since the start of the century. Little is known about this growth in the commercially insured and Medicare Advantage populations. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate changing ED utilization of neuroimaging from 2007 through 2017 in both commercially insured and Medicare Advantage enrollees. METHODS. Using patient-level claims from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database, which annually includes approximately 12-14 million commercial and Medicare Advantage health plan enrollees, annual ED utilization rates of head CT, head MRI, head CTA, neck CTA, head MRA, neck MRA, and carotid duplex ultrasound (US) were assessed from 2007 through 2017. To account for an aging sample population, utilization rates were adjusted using annual relative proportions of age groups and stratified by patient demographics, payer type, and provider state. RESULTS. Between 2007 and 2017, age-adjusted ED neuroimaging utilization rates per 1000 ED visits increased 72% overall (compound annual growth rate [CAGR], 5%). This overall increase corresponded to an increase of 69% for head CT (CAGR, 5%), 67% for head MRI (CAGR, 5%), 1100% for head CTA (CAGR, 25%), 1300% for neck CTA (CAGR, 27%), 36% for head MRA (CAGR, 3%), and 52% for neck MRA (CAGR, 4%) and to a decrease of 8% for carotid duplex US (CAGR, -1%). The utilization of head CT and CTA of the head and neck per 1000 ED visits increased in enrollees 65 years old or older by 48% (CAGR, 4%) and 1011% (CAGR, 24%). CONCLUSION. Neuroimaging utilization in the ED grew considerably between 2007 and 2017, with growth of head and neck CTA far outpacing the growth of other modalities. Unenhanced head CT remains by far the dominant ED neuroimaging examination. CLINICAL IMPACT. The rapid growth of head and neck CTA observed in the fee-for-service Medicare population is also observed in the commercially insured and Medicare Advantage populations. The appropriateness of this growth should be monitored as the indications for CTA expand.

Disparities in the Use of Emergency Department Advanced Imaging in Medicare Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess potential disparities in the utilization of advanced imaging during emergency department (ED) visits. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study was conducting using 5% Research Identifiable Files. All CT and MRI (together defined as "advanced imaging") examinations associated with ED visits in 2015 were identified for continuously enrolled Medicare beneficiaries. Individuals with medical claims 30 days before the index ED event were excluded, and encounters that occurred in hospitals without advanced imaging capabilities were also excluded. Patient characteristics were identified using Medicare files and hospital characteristics using the American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression was used for the analysis. RESULTS. Of 86,976 qualifying ED encounters, 52,833 (60.74%) ED encounters were for female patients; 29.03% (n = 25,245) occurred at rural hospitals and 15.81% (n = 13,750) at critical access hospitals. Race distribution was 83.13% White, 11.05% Black, and 5.82% Other. Compared with ED patients at urban hospitals, those at rural and critical access hospitals were 6.9% less likely (odds ratio [OR] = 0.931, p = 0.015) and 18.0% less likely (OR = 0.820, p < 0.0001), respectively, to undergo advanced imaging. Compared with White patients, Black patients were 31.6% less likely (OR = 0.684, p < 0.0001) to undergo advanced imaging. Relative to their urban counterparts, both White (OR = 0.941, p = 0.05) and Black (OR = 0.808, p = 0.047) rural ED patients were less likely to undergo advanced imaging. CONCLUSION. Among Medicare beneficiaries receiving care in U.S. EDs, significant disparities exist in advanced imaging utilization. Although imaging appropriateness was not investigated, these findings suggest inequity. Further research is necessary to understand why consistent health benefits do not translate into consistent imaging access among risk-adjusted ED patients.

Decreasing CT Acquisition Time in the Emergency Department through Lean Management Principles.

Background Emergency departments (EDs) rely on advanced imaging such as CT for diagnosis. Owing to increased ED volumes at the authors' institution, CT image acquisition became a significant bottleneck in ED patient throughput. Methods A multidisciplinary team was formed to solve this complex patient flow issue. Lean management principles were leveraged to identify process gaps and institute changes to achieve workflow improvements, remove process wastes, and improve patient throughput in the ED CT scanner. Process metrics such as percentage of CT examinations completed within 120 minutes and monthly median examination turnaround time (TAT) were tracked on a monthly basis. To measure impact, outcome metrics such as time savings from elimination of wasted steps were developed. Interventions Four projects including development of an ideal staffing model, a patient flow worksheet, revision of the CT patient screening form, and examination prioritization efforts were tested. Just-do-it activities such as revision of the CT angiography protocol ordering tool, optimizing scanner utilization, and improving communication and collaboration between the radiology department and ED were also attempted. Results After a phased rollout of changes over 6 months, the percentage of ordered ED CT examinations completed within 120 minutes increased by 10% (61%-71%); however, this improvement was sustained for only 6 weeks. Elimination of process inefficiencies resulted in a monthly median TAT reduction from 90-109 minutes to 82-106 minutes, and approximately 6 weeks (268 hours) of annualized full-time technologist time was saved. Conclusion Lean management tools can be leveraged to solve complex ED CT patient flow issues and reduce TAT. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

Imaging Manifestations of Chest Trauma.

Trauma is the leading cause of death among individuals under 40 years of age, and pulmonary trauma is common in high-impact injuries. Unlike most other organs, the lung is elastic and distensible, with a physiologic capacity to withstand significant changes in contour and volume. The most common types of lung parenchymal injury are contusions, lacerations, and hematomas, each having characteristic imaging appearances. A less common type of lung injury is herniation. Chest radiography is often the first-line imaging modality performed in the assessment of the acutely injured patient, although there are inherent limitations in the use of this modality in trauma. CT images are more accurate for the assessment of the nature and extent of pulmonary injury than the single-view anteroposterior chest radiograph that is typically obtained in the trauma bay. However, the primary limitations of CT concern the need to transport the patient to the CT scanner and a longer processing time. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma has established the most widely used grading scale to describe lung injury, which serves to communicate severity, guide management, and provide useful prognostic factors in a systematic fashion. The authors provide an in-depth exploration of the most common types of pulmonary parenchymal, pleural, and airway injuries. Injury grading, patient management, and potential complications of pulmonary injury are also discussed. ©RSNA, 2021.

Pancreatic Trauma: Imaging Review and Management Update.

Traumatic injuries of the pancreas are uncommon and often difficult to diagnose owing to subtle imaging findings, confounding multiorgan injuries, and nonspecific clinical signs. Nonetheless, early diagnosis and treatment are critical, as delays increase morbidity and mortality. Imaging has a vital role in diagnosis and management. A high index of suspicion, as well as knowledge of the anatomy, mechanism of injury, injury grade, and role of available imaging modalities, is required for prompt accurate diagnosis. CT is the initial imaging modality of choice, although the severity of injury can be underestimated and assessment of the pancreatic duct is limited with this modality. The time from injury to definitive diagnosis and the treatment of potential pancreatic duct injury are the primary factors that determine outcome following pancreatic trauma. Disruption of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) is associated with higher rates of complications, such as abscess, fistula, and pseudoaneurysm, and is the primary cause of pancreatic injury-related mortality. Although CT findings can suggest pancreatic duct disruption according to the depth of parenchymal injury, MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography facilitate direct assessment of the MPD. Management of traumatic pancreatic injury depends on multiple factors, including mechanism of injury, injury grade, presence (or absence) of vascular injury, hemodynamic status of the patient, and associated organ damage. ©RSNA, 2020 See discussion on this article by Patlas.

Radiologist errors by modality, anatomic region, and pathology for 1.6 million exams: what we have learned.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of adding pathology to recent radiologist error characterization schemes of modality and anatomic region and the potential of this data to more specifically inform peer review and peer learning. METHODS: Quality assurance data originating from 349 radiologists in a national teleradiology practice were collected for 2019. Interpretive errors were simply categorized as major or minor. Reporting or communication errors were classified as administrative errors. Interpretive errors were then divided by modality, anatomic region and placed into one of 64 pathologic categories. RESULTS: Out of 1,628,464 studies, the discrepancy rate was 0.5% (8181/1,634,201). The 8181 total errors consisted of 2992 major errors (0.18%) and 5189 minor errors (0.32%). Precisely, 3.1% (257/8181) of total errors were administrative. Of major interpretive errors, 75.5% occurred on CT, with CT abdomen and pelvis accounting for 40.4%. The most common pathologic discrepancy for all exams was in the category of mass, nodule, or adenopathy (1583/8181), the majority of which were minor (1315/1583). The most common pathologic discrepancy for the 2937 major interpretive errors was fracture or dislocation (27%; 793/2937), followed by bleed (10.7%; 315/2937). CONCLUSION: The addition of error-related pathology to peer review is both feasible and practical and provides a more detailed guide to targeted individual and practice-wide peer learning quality improvement efforts. Future research is needed to determine if there are measurable improvements in detection or interpretation of specific pathologies following error feedback and educational interventions.

Increasing emergency department utilization of brain imaging in patients with primary brain cancer.

PURPOSE: To study changing emergency department (ED) brain imaging utilization in patients with primary brain cancers. METHODS: Using 2006-2014 data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), we identified all patients with primary brain cancers visiting EDs and evaluated trends of head CT and brain MRI utilization. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine patient- and hospital-specific factors associated with brain imaging utilization. RESULTS: A weighted cohort of 40,862 ED visits were included (mean age 55; 54% male), increasing from 3932 in 2006 to 5625 in 2014 (+ 43%). A total of 14.4% underwent brain imaging, with 13.2% undergoing CT, 2.3% undergoing MRI, and 1.1% undergoing both modalities. Between 2006 and 2014, there was a 104% increase in the rate of ED brain imaging (from 9.7% in 2006 to 19.8% in 2014). Factors associated with higher utilization of ED brain imaging in adults were non-teaching hospital status and Midwest and Northeast hospital regions (compared with the West). In pediatric patients, higher utilization was associated with older age, higher median household income of patient's ZIP code, and visits in rural, non-teaching hospitals located in the Midwest, South, and Northeast (compared with the West). CONCLUSION: In US patients with primary brain cancer, the number of ED visits increased annually, and the utilization of ED head imaging examinations doubled in a recent 9-year period. A variety of sociodemographic characteristics are associated with a higher likelihood of imaging in both adult and pediatric patients.

The effect of COVID-19 on emergency department imaging: what can we learn?

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department (ED) imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included all ED visits at a four-hospital academic health system in two matched 5-week periods. Demographic information, COVID-19 status, and disposition were reviewed. Type of imaging, acquisition time, and radiology reports were analyzed. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A 43.2% decrease in ED visits and 12% reduction in overall ED imaging occurred during the pandemic period. Mean age was unchanged, but a shift in gender and racial characteristics was observed (p < 0.001). In the pandemic period, COVID-19 ED patients were older (61.8 ± 16.9 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be Black (64.2%; p < 0.001) than non-COVID-19 patients. Imaging per ED encounter increased to 2.4 ± 2.8 exams from 1.7 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001). Radiography increased (57.2% vs. 52.4%) as a fraction of total ED imaging, while computed tomography (23.4% vs. 27.2%) and ultrasound (8.5% vs. 9.6%) decreased (pre-pandemic vs. pandemic). COVID-19 ED patients underwent CT and US at a lower rate (11.5% and 5.4%) than non-COVID-19 patients (25.4% and 9.1%). The proportion of imaging study reports concluding "no disease" or "no acute disease" decreased from 56.7 to 40.6% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant reduction in ED visits, a shift in patient demographics, and a significant decrease in imaging volume. Additional impact included a significant increase in the proportion of positive imaging studies.

Emerging Challenges and Opportunities in the Evolution of Teleradiology.

OBJECTIVE. In recent decades, teleradiology has expanded considerably, and many radiology practices now engage in intraorganizational or extraorganizational teleradiology. In this era of patient primacy, optimizing patient care and care delivery is paramount. This article provides an update on recent changes, current challenges, and future opportunities centered around the ability of teleradiology to improve temporal and geographic imaging access. We review licensing and regulations and discuss teleradiology in providing services to rural areas and assisting with disaster response, including the response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. CONCLUSION. Teleradiology can help increase imaging efficiency and mitigate both geographic and temporal discrepancies in imaging care. Technologic limitations and regulatory hurdles hinder the optimal practice of teleradiology, and future attention to these issues may help ensure broader patient access to high-quality imaging across the United States.

Emergency department visits resulting from electric scooter use in a major southeast metropolitan area.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency, characteristics, and resource use related to the emergency department (ED) encounters resulting from electric scooter use in a major metropolitan area. METHODS: This Institutional Review Board-approved study was conducted at a four-hospital healthcare system. Our clinical data warehouse was retrospectively searched from 5/3/2018 (the date electric scooters were introduced) through 8/15/2019 for various forms of the word "scooter" in triage notes. Demographic variables, arrival mode, length of stay, disposition, and resource utilization, including diagnostic radiology, were extracted. RESULTS: Over the 471-day study window, 293 unique patients presented with e-scooter injuries (0.62 mean ED visits/day). When broken down into 8-h periods, there was a significant increase (p = 0.048) from Friday after 5 PM through Sunday night. Thirty-two percent of patients arrived at the ED during (newly enacted at the time of study) nighttime e-scooter ban hours (9 PM-4 AM). There was a range of one to nine diagnostic radiology examinations per patient, with 100% (293) of patients receiving at least one diagnostic radiology examination. A total of 710 diagnostic radiology examinations were performed on the entire cohort (mean 2.4 per patient): 77.2% (548) were radiographs and 22.1% (157) were computed tomography (CT). CONCLUSION: ED visits resulting from electric scooter injuries are common and increasing. E-scooter injury patients disproportionately present on evenings and weekends, possibly exacerbating already busy periods in the ED. Healthcare resource needs and availability should be considered when developing policy about electric scooter use and distribution, particularly involving emergency care providers in close proximity to e-scooter distribution centers.

The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale 2018 update for computed tomography-based grading of renal trauma: a primer for the emergency radiologist.

The most widely used trauma injury grading system is the Organ Injury Scale (OIS) by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST). The AAST OIS for renal trauma was revised in 2018 to reflect necessary updates based on decades of experience with computed tomography (CT)-based injury diagnosis and, specifically, to better incorporate vascular injuries, which were not comprehensively addressed in the original OIS. In this review article, we describe CT findings of the AAST OIS for the kidney according to the 2018 revision, with an emphasis on real-world application, and highlight important differences from the prior grading scheme. Routine use of this grading system allows for a standardized classification of the range of renal injuries to aid in management, adding value in the imaging care of trauma patients.

Multidetector CT Findings in the Abdomen and Pelvis after Damage Control Surgery for Acute Traumatic Injuries.

After experiencing blunt or penetrating trauma, patients in unstable condition who are more likely to die of uncorrected shock than of incomplete injury repairs undergo emergency limited exploratory laparotomy, which is also known as damage control surgery (DCS). This surgery is part of a series of resuscitation steps, with the goal of stabilizing the patient's condition, with rapid surgical control of hemorrhage followed by supportive measures in the intensive care unit before definitive repair of injuries. These patients often are imaged with multidetector CT within 24-48 hours of the initial surgery. Knowledge of this treatment plan is critical to CT interpretation, because there are anatomic derangements and foreign bodies that would not be present in patients undergoing surgery for other reasons. Patients may have injuries beyond the surgical field that are only identified at imaging, which can alter the care plan. Abnormalities related to the resuscitation period such as the CT hypoperfusion complex and ongoing hemorrhage can be recognized at CT. Familiarity with these imaging and clinical findings is important, because they can be seen not only in trauma patients after DCS but also in other patients in the critical care setting. The interpretation of imaging studies can be helped by an understanding of the diagnostic challenges of grading organ injuries with surgical materials in place and the awareness of potential artifacts on images in these patients. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2019 See discussion on this article by LeBedis .

The state of emergency radiology fellowships in North America and the development of a standardized curriculum.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The number of emergency radiology (ER) training programs in North America is small compared to the projected growth in demand for ER-trained radiologists. To date, there is no consensus-based training curriculum that sets a standard for all ER fellowship training programs. This study seeks to (1) identify the programmatic measures currently used in North American ER fellowship programs and (2) gather the perspectives of existing ER fellowship program directors (PD) and their recommendations for minimum and ideal curricular standards. METHODS: We distributed an 18-question survey to the PDs of every North American ER fellowship program (N = 15). Surveys were completed during the 2016-2017 academic year. We performed a cross-sectional analysis to gain an understanding of existing training curricula, expected areas of competency by the end-of-training, and PD opinions of what a standard ER training curriculum should contain. RESULTS: The data revealed heterogeneity in programmatic structure across the continent, as well as some areas of agreement. PD suggestions for a standard ER training curriculum showed consistency in many areas, including competency and proficiency expectations and clinical exposures, with some variability. These data were used to inform the creation of the first curricular standard for ER fellowship training. CONCLUSION: This study yielded the creation of a standard fellowship training resource for the field of ER. This deliverable serves as a curricular guideline for existing ER fellowships, as well as a model for new ER fellowship programs.

Emergency department imaging superusers.

PURPOSE: To identify and characterize the most frequent users of emergency department (ED) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with at least one ED visit in 2016 across a four-hospital healthcare system were retrospectively identified and their ED imaging utilization characterized. RESULTS: Overall, 126,940 unique patients underwent 187,603 ED visits (mean 1.5 ± 1.7) and a total of 192,142 imaging examinations (mean 1.7 ± 2.7). Fifty-eight percent of patients were imaged (73,672) and underwent a mean 2.6 ± 2.7 exams. When ranked by ED visits, 1.6% (2007) of patients had ≥ 4 ED visits (mean 6.1 ± 5.4). These ED "clinical superusers" accounted for 7.7% (14,409) of total ED visits and underwent 6.8 ± 5.4 imaging examinations, while non-superusers underwent 1.5 ± 2.2 (p < 0.01). When ranked by ED imaging utilization, 12.3% (15,575) of patients underwent ≥ 4 ED imaging examinations and consumed 49.5% (95,053) of all imaging services. A subset of just 1.3% (1608) of ED patients underwent > 10 annual ED examinations (ED "imaging superusers") and accounted for 12.4% (23,787) of all ED imaging services. Only 0.4% (n = 472) of patients were both clinical and imaging superusers. Despite similar ED visits to clinical superusers (6.0 ± 5.6 vs. 6.1 ± 5.4, p = 0.92), imaging superusers underwent significantly more imaging (14.8 ± 4.8 vs. 6.8 ± 5.4 examinations, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Just 12% of ED patients consume 50% of all ED imaging services, and 1.3% consume 12.4%. These ED imaging superusers represent a distinct group from clinical superusers. Prospective identification of this newly described subgroup might permit targeted interventions to control ED imaging volume, restrain costs, and minimize per-patient radiation exposure.

Effect of Shift, Schedule, and Volume on Interpretive Accuracy: A Retrospective Analysis of 2.9 Million Radiologic Examinations.

Purpose To determine whether there is an association between radiologist shift length, schedule, or examination volume and interpretive accuracy. Materials and Methods This study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. A retrospective analysis of all major discrepancies from a 2015 quality assurance database of a teleradiology practice was performed. Board-certified radiologists provided initial preliminary interpretations. Discrepancies were identified during a secondary review by a practicing radiologist or through an internal quality assurance process and were vetted through a consensus radiology quality assurance committee. Unique anonymous radiologist identifiers were used to link the discrepancies to radiologists' shifts and schedules. Data were analyzed by using analysis of variance, t test, or χ2 test. Results A total of 4294 major discrepancies resulted from 2 922 377 examinations (0.15%). There was a significant difference for shift length (P < .0001) and volume (P < .0001) for shifts with versus those without discrepancies. On average, errors occurred a mean (± standard deviation) of 8.97 hours ± 2.28 into the shift (median, 10 hours; interquartile range, 2.0 hours). Significantly more errors occurred late in shifts than early (P < .0001), peaking between 10 and 12 hours. The number of major discrepancies in a single shift ranged from one to four, with a significant difference in the number of discrepancies as a function of study volume (volume for all shifts, 67.60 ± 60.24; volume for shifts with major discrepancies, 118.96 ± 66.89; P < .001). Despite a trend for more discrepancies after more consecutive days worked, the difference was not significant (P = .0893). Conclusion Longer shifts and higher diagnostic examination volumes are associated with increased major interpretive discrepancies. These are more likely to occur later in a shift, peaking after the 10th hour of work. © RSNA, 2017.