Oral Medicine Experience and Attitudes Toward Oral Cancer: An Evaluation of Dentists Working in Primary Health Care.

This analytical, cross-sectional, observational study aimed to evaluate the perception of dentists working at the public system of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil, regarding academic training to treat oral lesions, adoption of preventive measures for oral cancer, and attitude toward the need to perform oral biopsies. The sample consisted of questionnaires filled out by 192 dentists (153 women and 39 men) working in primary health care who participated in training activities on oral cancer diagnosis in July 2016. To enroll in the training activities, the professionals completed an online questionnaire to evaluate their perceptions regarding oral cancer issues. With respect to preventive measures, 96.88% of dentists reported performing full mouth examination, 87.50% reported providing tobacco cessation counseling, and 51.04% reported giving advice on excessive alcohol consumption. In addition, 72.40% and 44.79% of dentists considered, respectively, clinical training and theory instruction in oral medicine to be insufficient during undergraduate school. Only 8.33% reported performing biopsies in daily clinical routine, and almost 90% reported referring the patient to a specialist from the public system or universities. Lack of experience was the main reason not to perform a biopsy. The dentists in our sample recognize the importance of preventive measures for oral cancer, but few of them perform biopsies regularly. Therefore, there is a need for continuing education actions including practical training.

Innovations in the national household random sampling in Brazilian National Health Survey: results from Starfield and Shi's adult primary care assessment tool (PCAT).

BACKGROUND: Several middle and upper income countries carry out household surveys that seek to trace the profile of access and use of health services. Probably one of the most ambitious examples is Brazil, with its National Health Survey (PNS-2019). We evaluated PNS-2019, presenting in an unprecedented way, one of its innovations, which refer to Starfield and Shi's adult Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT). METHODS: Based on a cross-sectional study, we evaluated Module H of the PNS-2019, which interviewed a probabilistic sample of about 10,000 adults in 2019 in all 27 Brazilian states. According to the PCAT methodology, an average score equal to or above 6.6 indicates a greater orientation and quality of the evaluated primary care services. RESULTS: Brazilian overall PCAT score [5, 9] reveals the need to improve primary health care services across the country. There were no statistically significant differences in the scores by sex (men and women, 5.9), and race (whites 5.9 [5.7; 6.0] and brown / black 5.9 [5.8; 6.0]). On the other hand, there was a difference in terms of age. The elderly evaluated the services in a more positive way (score = 6.1 [6.0; 6.2]), when compared to those aged 40-59 years (5.9 [5.7; 6.0]) and 18 to 39 years (5.6 [5.5; 5.8]). First results of PNS-2019 show that the population that most needs primary care services in SUS is the one with the best perception and the most positive evaluation of the actions and procedures offered in health facilities. DISCUSSION: During 2019, Brazil undertook important structural reforms in PHC based on a new financing model with the aim of inducing an improvement in efficiency and strengthening its attributes. It is essential that countries with universal health coverage (UHC) guarantee access to their population and, especially, the most vulnerable, seek better efficiency of these services and regularly assess PHC based on the population's perception, through an independent methodology that monitor the quality of services and the strength of PHC, generating value for public resources applied to health services.

RESUMO: INTRODUçãO: Vários países de renda média e alta realizam pesquisas domiciliares que procuram traçar o perfil de acesso e uso dos serviços de saúde. Provavelmente um dos exemplos mais ambiciosos é o Brasil, com sua PNS. Avaliamos esse inquérito e apresentamos, de forma inédita uma de suas inovações, que se refere ao uso do instrumento Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT). MéTODOS: Com base em um estudo transversal, avaliamos o Módulo H da PNS-2019, que entrevistou uma amostra probabilística de cerca de 10.000 adultos em 2019 em todos os 27 estados brasileiros. De acordo com a metodologia do PCAT, um escore médio igual ou acima de 6,6 indica uma maior orientação e qualidade dos serviços de atenção primária avaliados. RESULTADOS: O escore médio geral do PCAT no Brasil foi de 5,9, revelando a necessidade de melhoria dos serviços de atenção primária à saúde em todo o país. Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significantes nos escores por sexo (homens e mulheres, 5,9) e raça (brancos 5,9 [5,7; 6,0] e pardos / pretos 5,9 [5,8; 6,0]). Por outro lado, houve diferença em termos de idade. Os idosos avaliaram os serviços de forma mais positiva (escore = 6,1 [6,0; 6,2]), quando comparados aos de 40­59 anos (5,9 [5,7; 6,0]) e 18 a 39 anos (5,6 [5,5; 5,8]). Os primeiros resultados da PNS-2019 mostram que a população que mais necessita dos serviços de atenção básica no SUS é aquela que tem melhor percepção e avaliação mais positiva das ações e procedimentos oferecidos nas unidades de saúde. DISCUSSãO: Durante o ano de 2019, o Brasil fez reformas estruturais importantes na APS a partir de um novo modelo de financiamento, com o objetivo de induzir uma melhoria da eficiência e fortalecer seus atributos. É fundamental que países com sistemas de saúde de cobertura universal, garantam acesso a sua população e, em especial, aos mais vulneráveis; busquem melhor eficiência desses serviços e avaliem regularmente a APS a partir da percepção da população, por meio de uma metodologia independente que monitore a qualidade dos serviços e a força da APS, gerando valor aos recursos públicos aplicados nos serviços de saúde.

Reasons for encounter in primary health care in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Primary health care (PHC) delivery in Brazil has improved in the last decades. However, it remains unknown whether the Family Health Strategy teams are meeting the health needs of the population. OBJECTIVES: To describe the reasons for encounter (RFEs) in PHC in Brazil and to examine variations in RFEs according to sex, age and geographic region. METHODS: This descriptive study is part of a national cross-sectional study conducted in 2016. The sample was stratified by the number of PHC physicians per geographic region. Physicians who had been working for at least 1 year in the same PHC unit were included. For every participating physician, 12 patients aged ≥18 years who had attended at least two encounters were included. Patients were asked about their RFEs, which were classified according to the International Classification of Primary Care. RESULTS: In 6160 encounters, a total of 8046 RFEs were coded. Seven reasons accounted for 50% of all RFEs. There was a high frequency of codes related to test results, medication renewal and preventive medicine. RFEs did not vary significantly by sex or geographic region, but they did by age group (P < 0.001). The rates of prescriptions, requests for investigations and referrals to specialized care were 71.1%, 42.8%, and 21.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This novel study opened the 'black box' of RFEs in PHC in Brazil. These findings can contribute to redefining the scope of PHC services and reorienting work practices in order to improve the quality of PHC in Brazil.

[Recommendations to strengthen primary health care in BrazilRecomendaciones para el fortalecimiento de la atención primaria de salud en Brasil]. / Recomendações para o fortalecimento da atenção primária à saúde no Brasil.

OBJECTIVE: To formulate strategic recommendations to strengthen primary health care (PHC) in Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS) based on expert consultation. METHOD: The present qualitative study, developed from March to August, 2018, included administration of an open questionnaire followed by consensus building among 20 participants representing the five Brazilian regions, selected using the criterion of recognized professional expertise in the field of PHC. Participants answered an online questionnaire created by the authors. The findings were systematized as recommendations, which were submitted for priority ranking by the expert group using a one-round Delphi technique. The final recommendations were discussed in a face-to-face workshop. RESULTS: Of 20 experts, 18 answered the open questionnaire, generating 84 themes for analysis, which were systematized into 44 proposals. Evaluation of these proposals resulted in 20 recommendations, emphasizing expansion of the Family Health Strategy (FHS); enhanced access to PHC; training of professionals for multidisciplinary work in the PHC setting; allocation of technologies to ensure PHC resolvability; improvement of regulation/coordination of services to strengthen a foundational role of PHC in the SUS; human resources, provision of professionals, and support/stimulus for teams; production and dissemination of knowledge; transparency in PHC initiatives; and mediating role of PHC in the healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the FHS as the best model to ensure a strong PHC in the SUS, combined with policies that prioritize essential PHC attributes, especially through innovation in care, management, and communication technologies.

OBJETIVO: Formular recomendaciones estratégicas para fortalecer la atención primaria de salud (APS) en el Sistema Único de Salud (SUS) en Brasil a partir de una consulta a expertos. MÉTODO: Este estudio cualitativo, realizado entre marzo y agosto del 2018, consistió en emplear un cuestionario abierto y lograr consenso entre 20 participantes representativos de las cinco macrorregiones brasileñas, seleccionados por su reconocida experiencia profesional en la APS. Los participantes respondieron 20 preguntas abiertas en un cuestionario en línea elaborado por los investigadores. Los hallazgos se sistematizaron en forma de recomendaciones, sometidas por el grupo de expertos a una evaluación de prioridades con la metodología Delfos en una sola ronda. Las recomendaciones finales se debatieron en un taller presencial. RESULTADOS: Dieciocho de los 20 especialistas respondieron al cuestionario abierto, que produjo 84 temas sistematizados en 44 propuestas. Después de la evaluación, se formularon 20 recomendaciones, en las cuales se acentuaron la expansión de la estrategia de salud de la familia; la ampliación del acceso a la APS; la formación de profesionales para el trabajo multidisciplinario en la APS; la asignación de tecnologías para garantizar la resolutividad en la APS; el perfeccionamiento de la regulación y la coordinación de servicios para fortalecer la APS como elemento estructurante del SUS; la estructura y el financiamiento; los recursos humanos, la dotación de profesionales, el apoyo y el estímulo a los equipos; la producción y divulgación del conocimiento; la transparencia en las actividades de APS; y la función mediadora de la APS en el sistema de atención de salud. CONCLUSIONES: Los hallazgos refuerzan la estrategia de salud de la familia como el mejor modelo para garantizar una APS fuerte en el SUS, vinculada a políticas que prioricen los atributos esenciales de la APS, sobre todo por medio de innovación en materia de tecnologías asistenciales, de gestión y de comunicación.

Development and Assessment of a Mobile Nutritional Counseling Tool for Primary Care Physicians.

Background:Hypertension remains widely undetected, undertreated, and poorly controlled. Appropriate dietary changes can prevent and treat hypertension effectively. Primary care physicians (PCPs) have the opportunity to counsel patients about their diets and are able to facilitate long-term adherence to changes. However, they encounter several barriers to delivery of evidence-based counseling in daily medical practice. m-Health can make important contributions.Objective:To describe the development and assessment of a Brazilian mobile app for nutritional management of hypertension supported by evidence-based.Materials and Methods:App development used a user-centered approach that seeks to solve problems in a collective and collaborative way. The app was developed in Apache Cordova® (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) for iOS and Android mobile phone platforms. Beta testing was performed with a sample of Brazilian PCPs (n = 62), who were asked to use the app in routine practice and evaluate it.Results:The process involved researchers, government, PCPs, nutritionists, and designers. Dieta Dash® (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul-UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil) app was divided into following sections: meal evaluation, Healthy meals, Healthy choices, and a database of Healthy recipes. The mean perceived usefulness and ease-of-use scores were 23.3 and 32.3 out of 42, respectively.Conclusions:It is a great source of up-to-date and summary guidelines, usable, acceptable, and positively impact clinical care. PCPs have identified improvements that could make the user experience better. The Dieta Dash app can be incorporated into Brazilian primary care practice.

Telemedicine in the driver's seat: new role for primary care access in Brazil and Canada: The Besrour Papers: a series on the state of family medicine in Canada and Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To contrast how Brazil's and Canada's different jurisdictional and judicial realities have led to different types of telemedicine and how further scale and improvement can be achieved. COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE: A subgroup of the Besrour Centre of the College of Family Physicians of Canada and Canadian telemedicine experts developed connections with colleagues in Porto Alegre, Brazil, and collaborated to undertake a between-country comparison of their respective telemedicine programs. METHODS: Following a literature review, the authors collectively reflected on their experiences in an attempt to explore the past and current state of telemedicine in Canada and Brazil. REPORT: Both Brazil and Canada share expansive geographies, creating substantial barriers to health for rural patients. Telemedicine is an important part of a universal health system. Both countries have achieved telemedicine programs that have scaled up across large regions and are showing important effects on health care costs and outcomes. However, each system is unique in design and implementation and faces unique challenges for further scale and improvement. Addressing regional differences, the normalization of telemedicine, and potential alignment of telemedicine and artificial intelligence technologies for health care are seen as promising approaches to scaling up and improving telemedicine in both countries.

Following the legacy of professors Barbara Starfield and Leiyu Shi in Brazil as health policy: the National Health Survey (PNS), led by the Brazilian National Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) and the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT).

We present to the scientific community the pioneering of Brazilian National Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE, the Brazilian Census Bureau) in partnership with the Ministry of Health, the largest fieldwork ever conducted in a single country in the world, using the PCAT in a national household sample survey, visiting more than 100,000 households and 40% of the country's municipalities. In Brazil, PCAT is being consolidated as an instrument to support public policy for the evaluation of primary health care. We believe that it represents a virtuous example of dialogue between scientific community and health management, following the legacy of Professors Barbara Starfield and Leiyu Shi.

[Universal health coverage and the More Doctors physician recruitment program (Programa Mais Médicos) in BrazilCobertura universal de salud y el programa Más Médicos (Programa Máis Médicos) en Brasil]. / Cobertura universal em saúde e o Programa Mais Médicos no Brasil.

Universal health coverage can be understood as a goal encompassing a series of structural measures that allow health care systems to enhance access to health care. Primary health care (PHC) should be seen as an essential component of this process, in charge of re-organizing services according to the health needs of the population. A Brazilian physician recruitment program, Programa Mais Médicos (More Doctors), has introduced a set of measures that strengthen PHC. Based on a conceptual review of universal health coverage and on an analysis of the More Doctor Program from the perspective of the results obtained in terms of strengthening PHC in the public Unified Health System (SUS), the aim of the present article was to discuss the potential contribution of the More Physicians Program to the progress towards universal coverage in the SUS. It is concluded that the More Doctors Programs is a driver of universal coverage in the public health care system in Brazil.

La cobertura universal de salud puede entenderse como una meta que abarca una serie de medidas estructurales que permiten a los sistemas de atención médica mejorar el acceso a la atención médica. La atención primaria de salud (APS) debe ser vista como un componente esencial de este proceso, responsable de la reorganización de los servicios, tomando en cuenta las necesidades de salud de la población. El programa Más Médicos, ha introducido en Brasil un conjunto de medidas que fortalecen la APS. Con base en una revisión conceptual de la cobertura universal de salud y de un análisis del programa Más Médicos desde la perspectiva de los resultados obtenidos en términos de fortalecimiento de la APS en el Sistema Único de Salud público (SUS), el objetivo del presente artículo fue analizar la contribución potencial del programa Más Médicos al progreso hacia la cobertura universal en el SUS. Se concluye que el programa Más Médicos es un motor de cobertura universal en el sistema de salud pública en Brasil.

[Primary health care performance in Brazil and association with the More Doctors physician recruitment programCalidad de la atención primaria de salud en Brasil y relación con el Programa Más Médicos]. / Qualidade da atenção primária à saúde no Brasil e associação com o Programa Mais Médicos.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of primary health care (PHC) in Brazil and its association with the More Doctors Program (Programa Mais Médicos, PMM). METHOD: This nationwide cross-sectional study used the Primary Care Assessment Tool validated for Brazilian Portuguese (PCATool-Brasil) to determine the achievement of PHC according to user experience associated with three physician categories: Brazilian physicians participating in the PMM, Cuban physicians participating in the PMM, and Brazilian physicians not linked to the PMM. The following PHC scores were calculated: overall PCA score, accessibility (first contact), and longitudinality. The association between PHC scores, physician category, and other user and physician characteristics was investigated using multilevel analysis. RESULTS: The overall PCA score for Brazil was 6.78, and the longitudinality score was 7.43. There was no difference in these scores among the three physician categories. The overall accessibility score was 4.24. A small but significant difference (P < 0.001) in accessibility score was detected among physician categories: 4.43 for Cuban physicians participating in the PMM (CI: 4.32-4.54), 4.08 for Brazilian physicians participating in the PMM(CI: 3.98-4.18), and 4.20 for Brazilian physicians not linked to the PMM (CI: 4.09-4.32). Age, socioeconomic level, presence of chronic diseases, and home visits by physicians positively influenced the overall PCA score on multilevel analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The type of physician did not influence the primary care orientation (overall score) of the healthcare system in Brazil. PMM was associated with higher accessibility sores in more socioeconomically vulnerable areas. Multilevel analysis showed that PCH may be strengthened by the reinforcement of essential physician roles (such as home visits) and by improving access for socioeconomically vulnerable, younger populations or those without chronic diseases.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la calidad de la atención primaria de salud (APS) en Brasil y su relación con el Programa Más Médicos (PMM). MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal de alcance nacional em el que se utilizó la herramienta PCATool-Brasil para evaluar la calidad de la APS a partir de la experiencia de los usuarios vinculados a tres categorías de médicos: médicos brasileños del PMM, médicos cubanos del PMM y médicos brasileños no vinculados al PMM. Se calcularon los siguientes puntajes: Puntaje general de APS, Puntaje de acceso y Puntaje de longitudinalidad. Se investigaron mediante análisis multinivel la asociación entre el Puntaje general obtenido, la categoría del médico y otras características de los usuarios y los profesionales. RESULTADOS: El Puntaje general de APS para Brasil fue 6,78, y el Puntaje de longitudinalidad, 7,43. No hubo diferencia entre estos puntajes para las tres categorías de médicos. El Puntaje de acceso para Brasil fue de 4,24 y mostró una diferencia pequeña, pero significativa (p <0,001) entre las categorías de médicos: médicos cubanos del PMM 4,43 (IC: 4,32-4,54), médicos brasileños del PMM 4,08 (IC: 3,98-4,18) y médicos brasileños no vinculados al PMM 4,20 (IC: 4,09-4,32). En el análisis multinivel, la edad, el estrato socioeconómico, la presencia de enfermedades crónicas y el hecho de que el médico realizara visitas domiciliarias influyeron positivamente em el Puntaje general. CONCLUSIONES: El tipo de médico no influyó en el grado de orientación a los atributos de la APS (Puntaje general) en Brasil. El PMM se asoció com mayores Puntajes de acceso en las regiones de mayor vulnerabilidad socioeconómica. Con el análisis multinivel se identificó que el fortalecimiento de la APS también puede ser alcanzado reforzando los roles fundamentales de los médicos que trabajan en la APS (como las visitas domiciliarias) y mejorando el acceso de las poblaciones de mayor vulnerabilidad socioeconómica y de las personas más jóvenes o sin enfermedades crónicas.

Pediatric Dentistry in Primary Healthcare: Creation, Development, and Evaluation of a Distance Education Course.

BACKGROUND: Oral health in childhood is a major problem for global public health. In Brazil, the prevalence of childhood tooth decay varies from 12% to 46%. Dental care treatment in Brazil is almost the exclusive responsibility of primary healthcare (PHC). Therefore, it is essential these professionals are prepared to conduct restorative, endodontic, and exodontic treatments and preventive care in children. INTRODUCTION: Children make up a large proportion of the population in territories requiring advanced dental care provided by PHC in Brazil. To care for these patients, it is necessary to have both manual dexterity and technical knowledge of pediatric dentistry. Accordingly, this study aimed to develop a distance course on pediatric dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pretest questionnaire consisting of 15 questions was used to assess initial dental knowledge of participants. After completion of a five-module course, participants retook the same initial dental knowledge questionnaire (post-test). Descriptive statistic and paired t test, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson and Spearman correlation were used, and a significance level of 5% was set. RESULTS: The majority of participants completing the five-module course were women who earned specialty degrees beyond undergraduate studies and currently worked in PHC (>5 years). Participant performance on the dental knowledge questionnaire after completion of the five-module course improved pre- to post-test. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that completion of a distance course on pediatric dentistry can be an effective tool for improving knowledge of pediatric dentistry in PHC professionals.

Teledentistry: A Tool to Promote Continuing Education Actions on Oral Medicine for Primary Healthcare Professionals.

BACKGROUND: Difficulties in diagnosis of oral mucosal lesions are a significant cause of delayed oral cancer diagnosis, and this difficulty may be due to gaps in knowledge. This study evaluated the diagnostic skills of primary healthcare professionals regarding oral cancer and presented them with an e-learning course. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven primary healthcare professionals (32 dentists and 15 nondentists) enrolled in a 24-h course on oral medicine delivered through an e-learning platform. A test, based on 33 clinical images of oral lesions, was used to evaluate the diagnostic skills of participants. The participants were requested to classify each lesion as benign, potentially malignant, or malignant as well as to inform their clinical impression. Three specialists also took the test as the gold standard. RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants completed the test. Nondentists and dentists showed a comparable sensitivity of 68.8 ± 11.1 and 63.7 ± 15.8, respectively. Specialists performed somewhat better; however, the difference was not statistically significant (81.0% ± 4.1%, p = 0.16). Dentists and specialists (70.0% ± 16.6% and 95.5% ± 3.1%, respectively) showed higher specificity than nondentists (39.3 ± 20.6, p < 0.01). Nondentists had a higher number of unanswered questions (p < 0.01) for classification and clinical impression (50.0% ±45.1% and 72.0% ± 25.0%, respectively) than dentists (5.7% ±11.9% and 19.8% ± 20%, respectively). Both dentists and nondentists had low attendance in the course (44.57% ± 37.38% and 26.53% ± 26.53%, respectively, p = 0.26). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the diagnostic skills of public health workers belonging to different professional categories. CONCLUSION: Both dentists and nondentists have a fairly good capacity for discriminating the nature of oral lesions. Early squamous cell carcinoma is the most challenging situation and remains an issue to be addressed.

[Psychometric validation in Spanish of the Brazilian short version of the Primary Care Assessment Tools-users questionnaire for the evaluation of the orientation of health systems towards primary care]. / Validación psicométrica en español de la versión corta brasileña del cuestionario Primary Care Assessment Tools: usuarios para la evaluación de la orientación de los sistemas de salud hacia la atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Brazilian short version of the PCAT for adult patients in Spanish. DESIGN: Analysis of secondary data from studies made to validate the extended version of the PCAT questionnaire. LOCATION: City of Córdoba, Argentina. Primary health care. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 46% of parents, whose children were enrolled in secondary education in three institutes in the city of Cordoba, and the remaining 54% were adult users of the National University of Cordoba Health Insurance. MAIN MEASURES: Pearson's correlation coefficient comparing the extended and short versions. Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis, composite reliability, average variance extracted, and Cronbach's alpha values, in order to assess the construct validity and the reliability of the short version. RESULTS: The values of Pearson's correlation coefficient between this short version and the long version were high .818 (P<.001), implying a very good criterion validity. The indicators of good global adjustment to the confirmatory factor analysis were good. The value of composite reliability was good (.802), but under the variance media extracted: .3306, since 3 variables had weak factorials loads. The Cronbach's alpha was acceptable (.85). CONCLUSIONS: The short version of the PCAT-users developed in Brazil showed an acceptable psychometric performance in Spanish as a quick assessment tool, in a comparative study with the extended version.

Primary health care quality and hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the public health system in Porto Alegre, Brazil.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relation of hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) with the quality of public primary care health services in Porto Alegre, Brazil. METHODS: Cohort study constructed by probabilistic record linkage performed from August 2006 to December 2011 in a population ≥18 years of age that attended public primary care health services. The Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool-Brazil) was used for evaluation of primary care services. RESULTS: Of 1200 subjects followed, 84 were hospitalized for primary care sensitive conditions. The main causes of ACSC hospital admissions were cardiovascular (40.5%) and respiratory (16.2%) diseases. The PCATool average score was 5.3, a level considerably below that considered to represent quality care. After adjustment through Cox proportional hazard modelling for covariates, >60 years of age [hazard ratio (HR): 1.13; P = 0.001), lesser education (HR: 0.66; P = 0.02), ethnicity other than white (HR: 1.77; P = 0.01) and physical inactivity (HR: 1.65; P = 0.04) predicted hospitalization, but higher quality of primary health care did not. CONCLUSION: Better quality of health care services, in a setting of overwhelmingly low quality services not adapted to the care of chronic conditions, did not influence the rate of avoidable hospitalizations, while social and demographic characteristics, especially non-white ethnicity and lesser schooling, indicate that social inequities play a predominant role in health outcomes.

Telemedicine-supported transition of stable coronary artery disease patients from tertiary to primary health care facilities: protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Many Brazilian patients with complex diseases who are treated in tertiary referral clinics have been stable for long periods. The main needs of these patients involve monitoring of risk factors and review of drug prescriptions, which could be satisfactorily done in primary care facilities. The goal of this protocol is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of telemedicine services to support the transition of patients with stable chronic coronary artery disease from the tertiary to the primary level of care. METHODS/DESIGN: We designed a randomized non-inferiority protocol that will include 280 patients with stable coronary artery disease (for at least 12 months). Patients will be selected from the Ischemic Heart Disease Clinic in a tertiary care hospital in southern Brazil. Enrolled participants will be randomized into one of two groups: 12 months of follow-up at the same clinic; or 12 months of follow-up at a primary care facility with clinical support from a telemedicine platform including a toll-free line for physicians (intervention group). In the intervention group, decisions to refer patients to tertiary care during follow-up will be made jointly by primary physicians and medical teleconsultants. The groups will be compared in terms of the primary outcome-maintenance of baseline functional class 1 or 2 after 12 months. Secondary outcomes include control of risk factors and instability of the disease. DISCUSSION: We intend to determine the effectiveness of using telemedicine to qualify the transition of patients with chronic coronary disease from the tertiary to the primary level of care. This should facilitate the access of patients to the healthcare system, since care will be provided closer to their homes, and provide more opportunities for treatment of severe cases at tertiary care hospitals that are often overcrowded. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT02489565 - trial registration date May 13, 2015.

Telehealth in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: Bridging the Gaps.

INTRODUCTION: In 1988, Brazil adopted a universal healthcare model in which access is mediated by the primary care level. However, difficulties have emerged in the coordination of care between the primary and specialized levels. Telehealth was thus proposed as a means to overcome this challenge. This article describes initiatives developed by a large Brazilian program, TelessaúdeRS/UFRGS, in the fields of teleconsultation, telediagnosis, tele-education, and information technology development to support the public healthcare system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TelessaúdeRS/UFRGS was established in 2010 to develop a telehealth platform and a support system for primary care teams with a special focus on optimizing the flow between primary and specialized levels of care. To define priorities, TelessaúdeRS analyzes the health needs of the Brazilian population and the most common inquiries it receives from primary care health professionals. This information is then combined with the best available scientific evidence for development of services. RESULTS: Since 2010, over 50,000 clinical consultations have been provided. More than 15,000 healthcare professionals have benefited from teleconsultations and from telediagnosis and tele-education activities. All services were provided using information technology solutions developed by the Telessaúde team, including smartphone apps and a Web-based National Telehealth Platform. CONCLUSIONS: The case of TelessaúdeRS/UFRGS shows that even in the presence of structural limitations, telemedicine is potentially useful to improve the quality of care and streamline the flow between different levels of care.

Formative second opinion: qualifying health professionals for the unified health system through the Brazilian Telehealth Program.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization's World Health Assembly WHA58.28/2005 Resolution recommends the adoption of e-health by health systems of State Members. The Brazilian Telehealth Program integrates the national policy of education for health that combines many strategies with complementary foci, including technical-level workers, undergraduate students of the 14 health professions, residency, postgraduate courses, support, and continuing health education at work. The Brazilian Unified Health System has approximately 1.5 million workers. The objectives of this work areas are as follows: to define a new concept, the so-called "formative second opinion" (FSO); to describe the methodology for its construction; and to show its structure as well as the number of FSOs already available, classified according to the field of knowledge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Brazilian Telehealth Program was created in 2007 and has already offered around 41,000 teleconsultations. Based on their relevance and pertinence, 710 questions asked through teleconsulting by health professionals were selected. The questions were handled so that each question should not contain any specific information about patients, preserving professional confidentiality. For each question, a bibliographic review was performed and used to build a structured and standardized answer, based on the best available scientific and clinical evidence. RESULTS: This question-and-answer combination, originated thru teleconsulting, created by the Brazilian Telehealth Program, was termed the FSO and has been made available, with open access for all health professionals, at the Web site of the Program. Among the total number of 710 FSOs, diagnosis and treatment support corresponded to 238 questions (33.5%), followed by primary healthcare (90 questions) and then by subjects concerning oral health (68 questions) and nursery (39 questions). The structure and design of the FSO are also shown. CONCLUSIONS: The FSO helps professionals and health workers to use the already produced best evidence and scientific knowledge to solve their daily practice questions, improving, qualifying, and increasing the resolution of primary healthcare by the Unified Health System in Brazil. Oral health is frequently asked about by professionals, matching the high prevalence of oral disease in primary healthcare.

Community health workers programme in Luanda, Angola: an evaluation of the implementation process.

BACKGROUND: The Community Health Workers (CHWs) Programme was launched in Luanda, Angola, in 2007 as an initiative of the provincial government. The aim of this study was to assess its implementation process. METHODS: This is a case study with documental analysis, CHWs reports data, individual interviews and focus groups. RESULTS: Until June 2009, the programme had placed in the community 2,548 trained CHWs, providing potential coverage for 261,357 families. Analysis of qualitative data suggested an association of CHWs with improvements in maternal and child access to health care, as well as an increase in the demand for health services, generating further need to improve service capacity. Nevertheless, critical points for programme sustainability were identified. CONCLUSIONS: For continuity and scaling up, the programme needs medium- and long-term technical, political and financial support. The results of this study may be useful in strengthening and reformulating the planning of the CHWs programme in Luanda and in Angola. Moreover, the lessons learned with this experience can also provide insight for the development of CHWs programmes in other parts of the world. By means of cooperation, Brazil has supported the implementation of this CHWs programme and can potentially contribute to its improvement.