Clinical implication of ZEB-1 and E-cadherin expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

BACKGROUND: While recent research has shown that expression of ZEB-1 in a variety of tumors has a crucial impact on patient survival, there is little information regarding ZEB-1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study investigated the co-expression of ZEB-1 and E-cadherin in HCC by immunohistochemistry and evaluated its association with clinical factors, including patient prognosis. METHODS: A total of 108 patients with primary HCC treated by curative hepatectomy were enrolled. ZEB-1 expression was immunohistochemically categorized as positive if at least 1% cancer cells exhibited nuclear staining. E-cadherin expression was divided into preserved and reduced expression groups and correlations between ZEB-1 and E-cadherin expression and clinical factors were then evaluated. RESULTS: With respect to ZEB-1 expression, 23 patients were classified into the positive group and 85 into the negative group. Reduced E-cadherin expression was seen in 44 patients and preserved expression in the remaining 64 patients. ZEB-1 positivity was significantly associated with reduced expression of E-cadherin (p = 0.027). Moreover, significant associations were found between ZEB-1 expression and venous invasion and TNM stage. ZEB-1 positivity was associated with poorer prognosis (p = 0.025). Reduced E-cadherin expression was significantly associated with intrahepatic metastasis and poorer prognosis (p = 0.047). In particular, patients with both ZEB-1 positivity and reduced E-cadherin expression had a poorer prognosis (p = 0.005). Regardless of E-cadherin status, ZEB-1 was not a significant prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. There was no statistical difference in overall survival when E-cadherin expression was reduced in the ZEB-1 positive group (p = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Positive ZEB-1 expression and loss of E-cadherin expression are correlated with poor prognosis in HCC patients and malignancy of ZEB-1 positive tumors involves EMT.

Prognostic significance of CD68, CD163 and Folate receptor-ß positive macrophages in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cluster of differentiation (CD)68 may be used as a pan-macrophage or M1 marker, whereas CD163 may be used as an M2 marker. Furthermore, folate receptor (FR)ß exhibits an M2-like functional profile. In the present study, CD68 and CD163 were used to evaluate and classify tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). The expression of CD68, CD163 and FRß by TAMs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) Tissues was investigated. Samples from 105 patients with HCC were evaluated using immunohistochemistry. The results revealed that CD68 and CD163 overexpression was associated with a worse prognosis. The number of CD68 positive cells observed was significantly higher in patients with stage IV cancer. Furthermore, an increase in CD68 positive cells was observed in patients with median tumor size ≥3.5 cm and in patients with poorly differentiated HCC. The number of CD163 positive cells was also significantly increased in patients with median tumor size ≥3.5 cm and in those with poorly differentiated HCC. A low CD163/68 ratio was correlated with a worse outcome. The ratio was significantly lower in patients with stage IV cancer, patients with des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin abnormalities, patients with blood vessel infiltration and patients with intrahepatic metastasis. The number of FRß positive cells was not correlated with clinicopathological features. The results of the present study indicate that overexpression of CD68 and CD163 may be associated with a worse patient outcome. The evaluation of CD68 and CD163 positive cells in a cancer microenvironment is controversial. TAMs are not simply cells with single markers or restricted M1 or M2 phenotypes; they are more diverse and heterogeneous. Further studies are required to determine the cross-interaction between diverse TAMs and the tumor microenvironment.

Clinical Implication of the Relationship Between High Mobility Group Box-1 and Tumor Differentiation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: High mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) induces the release of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines as a late-acting mediator of inflammation. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a typical inflammation-related cancer. However, little is known about the relationship between HCC and HMGB1 and its receptor RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products). This study analyzes the clinicopathological relevance of HMGB1 expression level and the effect of HMGB1 expression on the characteristics of HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples from 75 HCC patients including 13 with positive hepatitis B surface antigen and 36 with hepatitis C antibody were studied. The expression of HMGB1 in paired cancer and non-cancerous tissues from patients with HCC was assessed using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blotting. Quantitative RT-PCR data were analyzed in association with the clinicopathological factors of patients with HCC. RESULTS: The expression of HMGB1 mRNA in HCC was high in well-differentiated tumors, but declined as tumors dedifferentiated to moderately and poorly differentiated HCC. The levels of HMGB1 mRNA showed a negative correlation with the presence of portal invasion (p=0.005) and the rise of serum PIVKA-II (p=0.034). There was no clear correlation between HMGB1 expression and proliferation activity of HCC using Ki-67 staining. CONCLUSION: In HCC, HMGB1 expression level correlated inversely with tumor differentiation. The RAGE-HMGB1 interaction may play a greater role in the early stages of HCC tumorigenesis than during cancer development.

Surgical treatment for the excluded bile leakage from Spiegel lobe after right hemihepatectomy: A case report.

INRODUCTION: The treatments of excluded bile duct leakage after hepatectomy are not easy and various strategies have been reported, such as surgery, ethanol or fibrin glue injection, and portal vein embolization. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 72-year-old man with a surgical history of laparoscopic ileocecal resection for diverticular bleeding was diagnosed as having hepatocellular carcinoma. Right hemihepatectomy was performed, and computed tomography examination on postoperative day 9 showed abdominal fluid collection in the right subphrenic space. Percutaneous intra-abdominal fluid drainage was performed and it was diagnosed as bile leakage. After that it was diagnosed as excluded bile leakage from the Spiegel lobe by drip infusion cholangiographic-computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. To improve this clinical condition, we performed the Spiegel lobe excision on postoperative day 48. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged. DISCUSSION: According to the postoperative examination, it appeared that the bile duct from the Spiegel lobe joined to the right main bile duct or the bile duct of the right posterior section. This bile duct anomaly was not detected preoperatively on imaging examination. It is most likely that the bile duct from the Spiegel lobe was cut when the hepatoduodenal ligament in the hepatic hilum was peeled. To prevent excluded bile leakage, the hepatoduodenal ligament should be carefully peeled and ligated instead of using energy devices. CONCLUSION: We consider that surgical treatment for postoperative excluded bile leakage is both a quick and reliable procedure in patients with acceptable liver function and anatomical subject.