Bridging the age gap in breast cancer: impact of omission of breast cancer surgery in older women with oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer on quality-of-life outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Primary endocrine therapy may be an alternative treatment for less fit women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. This study compared quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes in older women treated with surgery or primary endocrine therapy. METHODS: This was a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of surgery or primary endocrine therapy in women aged over 70 years with operable breast cancer. QoL was assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of cancer QoL questionnaires QLQ-C30, -BR23, and -ELD14, and the EuroQol Five Dimensions 5L score at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for baseline variation in health, fitness, and tumour stage. RESULTS: The study recruited 3416 women (median age 77 (range 69-102) years) from 56 breast units. Of these, 2979 (87.2 per cent) had ER-positive breast cancer; 2354 women had surgery and 500 received primary endocrine therapy (125 were excluded from analysis due to inadequate data or non-standard therapy). Median follow-up was 52 months. The primary endocrine therapy group was older and less fit. Baseline QoL differed between the groups; the mean(s.d.) QLQ-C30 global health status score was 66.2(21.1) in patients who received primary endocrine therapy versus 77.1(17.8) among those who had surgery plus endocrine therapy. In the unmatched analysis, changes in QoL between 6 weeks and baseline were noted in several domains, but by 24 months most scores had returned to baseline levels. In the matched analysis, major surgery (mastectomy or axillary clearance) had a more pronounced adverse impact than primary endocrine therapy in several domains. CONCLUSION: Adverse effects on QoL are seen in the first few months after surgery, but by 24 months these have largely resolved. Women considering surgery should be informed of these effects.

Bridging the age gap in breast cancer: cluster randomized trial of two decision support interventions for older women with operable breast cancer on quality of life, survival, decision quality, and treatment choices.

BACKGROUND: Rates of surgery and adjuvant therapy for breast cancer vary widely between breast units. This may contribute to differences in survival. This cluster RCT evaluated the impact of decision support interventions (DESIs) for older women with breast cancer, to ascertain whether DESIs influenced quality of life, survival, decision quality, and treatment choice. METHODS: A multicentre cluster RCT compared the use of two DESIs against usual care in treatment decision-making in older women (aged at least ≥70 years) with breast cancer. Each DESI comprised an online algorithm, booklet, and brief decision aid to inform choices between surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy versus primary endocrine therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy. The primary outcome was quality of life. Secondary outcomes included decision quality measures, survival, and treatment choice. RESULTS: A total of 46 breast units were randomized (21 intervention, 25 usual care), recruiting 1339 women (670 intervention, 669 usual care). There was no significant difference in global quality of life at 6 months after the baseline assessment on intention-to-treat analysis (difference -0.20, 95 per cent confidence interval (C.I.) -2.69 to 2.29; P = 0.900). In women offered a choice of primary endocrine therapy versus surgery plus endocrine therapy, knowledge about treatments was greater in the intervention arm (94 versus 74 per cent; P = 0.003). Treatment choice was altered, with a primary endocrine therapy rate among women with oestrogen receptor-positive disease of 21.0 per cent in the intervention versus 15.4 per cent in usual-care sites (difference 5.5 (95 per cent C.I. 1.1 to 10.0) per cent; P = 0.029). The chemotherapy rate was 10.3 per cent at intervention versus 14.8 per cent at usual-care sites (difference -4.5 (C.I. -8.0 to 0) per cent; P = 0.013). Survival was similar in both arms. CONCLUSION: The use of DESIs in older women increases knowledge of breast cancer treatment options, facilitates shared decision-making, and alters treatment selection. Trial registration numbers: EudraCT 2015-004220-61 (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/), ISRCTN46099296 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Outcomes for Patients with Lung Cancer Receiving Curative-intent Radiotherapy in the UK.

AIMS: Previous work found that during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, 34% of patients with lung cancer treated with curative-intent radiotherapy in the UK had a change to their centre's usual standard of care treatment (Banfill et al. Clin Oncol 2022;34:19-27). We present the impact of these changes on patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The COVID-RT Lung database was a prospective multicentre UK cohort study including patients with stage I-III lung cancer referred for and/or treated with radical radiotherapy between April and October 2020. Data were collected on patient demographics, radiotherapy and systemic treatments, toxicity, relapse and death. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression were used to assess the impact of having a change to radiotherapy on survival, distant relapse and grade ≥3 acute toxicity. The impact of omitting chemotherapy on survival and relapse was assessed using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Patient and follow-up forms were available for 1280 patients. Seven hundred and sixty-five (59.8%) patients were aged over 70 years and 603 (47.1%) were female. The median follow-up was 213 days (119, 376). Patients with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had a change to their radiotherapy had no significant increase in distant relapse (P = 0.859) or death (P = 0.884); however, they did have increased odds of grade ≥3 acute toxicity (P = 0.0348). Patients with stage III NSCLC who had a change to their radiotherapy had no significant increase in distant relapse (P = 0.216) or death (P = 0.789); however, they did have increased odds of grade ≥3 acute toxicity (P < 0.001). Patients with stage III NSCLC who had their chemotherapy omitted had no significant increase in distant relapse (P = 0.0827) or death (P = 0.0661). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that changes to radiotherapy and chemotherapy made in response to the COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly affect distant relapse or survival. Changes to radiotherapy, namely increased hypofractionation, led to increased odds of grade ≥3 acute toxicity. These results are important, as hypofractionated treatments can help to reduce hospital attendances in the context of potential future emergency situations.

The Use of Palliative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Lung Cancer.

There have been significant advances in the systemic treatment of stage IV lung cancer, which is now recommended first line in patients with adequate fitness. This includes some patients with brain metastases due to the increased understanding of the central nervous system penetration of targeted therapies. The trials evidence base for palliative radiotherapy pre-dated this routine use of systemic therapy in our practice, which means that the sequence and role of palliative radiotherapy are not currently well defined in the first-line treatment setting. However, due to its efficacy in symptom control, radiotherapy remains a core component in the palliative management of lung cancer, particularly in the second-line setting and those unsuited to primary systemic treatment. This overview focuses on the evidence behind palliative radiotherapy to the thorax and brain for non-small cell and small cell lung cancer and the potential for future studies, including the TOURIST Trial Platform, to guide the future direction of these treatments.

Changes in the Management of Patients having Radical Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK.

AIMS: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines on reduced fractionation for patients treated with curative-intent radiotherapy were published, aimed at reducing the number of hospital attendances and potential exposure of vulnerable patients to minimise the risk of COVID-19 infection. We describe the changes that took place in the management of patients with stage I-III lung cancer from April to October 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lung Radiotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic (COVID-RT Lung) is a prospective multicentre UK cohort study. The inclusion criteria were: patients with stage I-III lung cancer referred for and/or treated with radical radiotherapy between 2nd April and 2nd October 2020. Patients who had had a change in their management and those who continued with standard management were included. Data on demographics, COVID-19 diagnosis, diagnostic work-up, radiotherapy and systemic treatment were collected and reported as counts and percentages. Patient characteristics associated with a change in treatment were analysed using multivariable binary logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 1553 patients were included (median age 72 years, 49% female); 93 (12%) had a change to their diagnostic investigation and 528 (34%) had a change to their treatment from their centre's standard of care as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Age ≥70 years, male gender and stage III disease were associated with a change in treatment on multivariable analysis. Patients who had their treatment changed had a median of 15 fractions of radiotherapy compared with a median of 20 fractions in those who did not have their treatment changed. Low rates of COVID-19 infection were seen during or after radiotherapy, with only 21 patients (1.4%) developing the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in changes to patient treatment in line with national recommendations. The main change was an increase in hypofractionation. Further work is ongoing to analyse the impact of these changes on patient outcomes.

Clinical neurological outcome and quality of life among patients with limited small-cell cancer treated with two different doses of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the intergroup phase III trial (PCI99-01, EORTC 22003-08004, RTOG 0212 and IFCT 99-01).

BACKGROUND: We recently published the results of the PCI99 randomised trial comparing the effect of a prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) at 25 or 36 Gy on the incidence of brain metastases (BM) in 720 patients with limited small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). As concerns about neurotoxicity were a major issue surrounding PCI, we report here midterm and long-term repeated evaluation of neurocognitive functions and quality of life (QoL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: At predetermined intervals, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and brain module were used for self-reported patient data, whereas the EORTC-Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Late Effects Normal Tissue-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic scale was used for clinicians' assessment. For each scale, the unfavourable status was analysed with a logistic model including age, grade at baseline, time and PCI dose. RESULTS: Over the 3 years studied, there was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the 17 selected items assessing QoL and neurological and cognitive functions. We observed in both groups a mild deterioration across time of communication deficit, weakness of legs, intellectual deficit and memory (all P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Patients should be informed of these potential adverse effects, as well as the benefit of PCI on survival and BM. PCI with a total dose of 25 Gy remains the standard of care in limited-stage SCLC.

Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Absolute Lymphocyte Count as Prognostic Markers in Patients Treated with Curative-intent Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

AIMS: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) have been proposed as prognostic markers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to examine the association of NLR/ALC before and after curative-intent radiotherapy for NSCLC on disease recurrence and overall survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent radiotherapy for NSCLC across nine sites in the UK from 1 October 2014 to 1 October 2016. A multivariate analysis was carried out to assess the ability of pre-treatment NLR/ALC, post-treatment NLR/ALC and change in NLR/ALC, adjusted for confounding factors using the Cox proportional hazards model, to predict disease recurrence and overall survival within 2 years of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 425 patients were identified with complete blood parameter values. None of the NLR/ALC parameters were independent predictors of disease recurrence. Higher pre-NLR, post-NLR and change in NLR plus lower post-ALC were all independent predictors of worse survival. Receiver operator curve analysis found a pre-NLR > 2.5 (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.79, P < 0.05), a post-NLR > 5.5 (odds ratio 2.36, 95% confidence interval 1.49-3.76, P < 0.001), a change in NLR >3.6 (odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.91, P < 0.001) and a post-ALC < 0.8 (odds ratio 2.86, 95% confidence interval 1.76-4.69, P < 0.001) optimally predicted poor overall survival on both univariate and multivariate analysis when adjusted for confounding factors. Median overall survival for the high-versus low-risk groups were: pre-NLR 770 versus 1009 days (P = 0.34), post-NLR 596 versus 1287 days (P ≤ 0.001), change in NLR 553 versus 1214 days (P ≤ 0.001) and post-ALC 594 versus 1287 days (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: NLR and ALC, surrogate markers for systemic inflammation, have prognostic value in NSCLC patients treated with curative-intent radiotherapy. These simple and readily available parameters may have a future role in risk stratification post-treatment to inform the intensity of surveillance protocols.

Predicting the Risk of Disease Recurrence and Death Following Curative-intent Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The Development and Validation of Two Scoring Systems From a Large Multicentre UK Cohort.

AIMS: There is a paucity of evidence on which to produce recommendations on neither the clinical nor the imaging follow-up of lung cancer patients after curative-intent radiotherapy. In the 2019 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence lung cancer guidelines, further research into risk-stratification models to inform follow-up protocols was recommended. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing curative-intent radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer from 1 October 2014 to 1 October 2016 across nine UK trusts was carried out. Twenty-two demographic, clinical and treatment-related variables were collected and multivariable logistic regression was used to develop and validate two risk-stratification models to determine the risk of disease recurrence and death. RESULTS: In total, 898 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 72 years, 63% (562/898) had a good performance status (0-1) and 43% (388/898), 15% (134/898) and 42% (376/898) were clinical stage I, II and III, respectively. Thirty-six per cent (322/898) suffered disease recurrence and 41% (369/898) died in the first 2 years after radiotherapy. The ASSENT score (age, performance status, smoking status, staging endobronchial ultrasound, N-stage, T-stage) was developed, which stratifies the risk for disease recurrence within 2 years, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the total score of 0.712 (0.671-0.753) and 0.72 (0.65-0.789) in the derivation and validation sets, respectively. The STEPS score (sex, performance status, staging endobronchial ultrasound, T-stage, N-stage) was developed, which stratifies the risk of death within 2 years, with an AUROC for the total score of 0.625 (0.581-0.669) and 0.607 (0.53-0.684) in the derivation and validation sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These validated risk-stratification models could be used to inform follow-up protocols after curative-intent radiotherapy for lung cancer. The modest performance highlights the need for more advanced risk prediction tools.

Reduced Fractionation in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Curative-intent Radiotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Patients treated with curative-intent lung radiotherapy are in the group at highest risk of severe complications and death from COVID-19. There is therefore an urgent need to reduce the risks associated with multiple hospital visits and their anti-cancer treatment. One recommendation is to consider alternative dose-fractionation schedules or radiotherapy techniques. This would also increase radiotherapy service capacity for operable patients with stage I-III lung cancer, who might be unable to have surgery during the pandemic. Here we identify reduced-fractionation for curative-intent radiotherapy regimes in lung cancer, from a literature search carried out between 20/03/2020 and 30/03/2020 as well as published and unpublished audits of hypofractionated regimes from UK centres. Evidence, practical considerations and limitations are discussed for early-stage NSCLC, stage III NSCLC, early-stage and locally advanced SCLC. We recommend discussion of this guidance document with other specialist lung MDT members to disseminate the potential changes to radiotherapy practices that could be made to reduce pressure on other departments such as thoracic surgery. It is also a crucial part of the consent process to ensure that the risks and benefits of undergoing cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and the uncertainties surrounding toxicity from reduced fractionation have been adequately discussed with patients. Furthermore, centres should document all deviations from standard protocols, and we urge all colleagues, where possible, to join national/international data collection initiatives (such as COVID-RT Lung) aimed at recording the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung cancer treatment and outcomes.

Accelerated radical radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer using two common regimens: a single-centre retrospective study of outcome.

AIMS: A variety of radical radiotherapy regimens are in use for non-small cell lung cancer. Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART: 54 Gy in 36 fractions over 12 days) and accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy using 55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks are standard fractionations in our centre. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate survival outcome seen in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All case notes and radiotherapy records of radically treated patients between 1999 and 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. Basic patient demographics, tumours, characteristics, radiotherapy and survival data were collected. RESULTS: In total, 277 patients received radical radiotherapy: 137 and 140 patients received CHART and hypofractionated radiotherapy, respectively. There were differences noted in the demographics between the two treatment schedules: median age 65 years (range 41-83) vs 73 years (range 33-87); histological confirmation rates 90% vs 76%; prior chemotherapy 34% vs 19% for CHART and hypofractionated treatment, respectively. For CHART patients, stages I, II, III and unclassified were 12, 8, 68 and 12% and the staging for the hypofractionated regimen was 54, 11, 34 and 2%, respectively. The median overall survival from the time of diagnosis was 20.4 months with a 40% 2-year survival rate. For the two fractionations the median survival was 16.6 months vs 21.4 months and 34% vs 45% of patients were alive at 2 years in the CHART and hypofractionated groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, stage was the only factor affecting overall survival - no difference was seen according to radiotherapy regimen. CONCLUSION: This single-centre study reflects the outcome of unselected consecutively treated non-small cell lung cancer patients. Adjusting for stage, there was no significant difference in survival seen according to regimen. Encouragingly, CHART outcome shows reproducibility with the original CHART paper. Our hypofractionated outcome is similar to that previously reported, but despite this being the UK's most common regimen, 55 Gy in 20 daily fractions remains unvalidated by phase III trial data.

Escalation and intensification of radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: opportunities for treatment improvement.

In this overview we review and model how radiotherapy tumour control and complication rates vary with dose, fractionation, schedule duration, irradiated volume and use of chemotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and use the modelling to study the effectiveness of different NSCLC dose-escalation approaches being developed in the UK. Data have been collated for pneumonitis, lung fibrosis, early and late oesophagitis, cord and cardiac complications, and local progression-free survival at 30 months. Dependences of the various end points on treatment-related factors are catalogued and analysed using the linear-quadratic incomplete repair model to account for dose and fractionation effects, making linear corrections for differences in schedule duration, and loosely characterising volume effects using parallel- and series-type concepts. Tolerance limits are calculated for the different end points and distilled into ranges of prescribed dose likely to be tolerable when delivered in 2.5 and 4 week radiation and 6 week chemoirradiation schedules using conformal techniques. Worthwhile ( approximately 20%) gains in 30 month local progression-free survival should be achievable at safely deliverable levels of dose escalation. The analysis suggests that longer schedules may be more beneficial than shorter ones, but this finding is governed by the relative rates of tumour and oesophageal accelerated proliferation, which are quite imprecisely known. Consequently escalated 2.5, 4 and 6 week schedules are being developed; each should lead to useful improvements in local control but it is not yet known which schedule will be most effective.

Epirubicin/vinorelbine adjuvant chemotherapy in young women with breast cancer is associated with preservation of menstrual function.

AIMS: To determine whether the epirubicin and vinorelbine regimen in the adjuvant (neoadjuvant) treatment of breast cancer has minimum adverse effects on menstrual function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six premenopausal women with a median age of 32 (25-47) years received epirubicin and vinorelbine. Twenty-eight received only epirubicin and vinorelbine without any other neo/adjuvant chemotherapy agents. Amenorrhoea was defined as absence of periods 6 months after the completion of chemotherapy. The medical records of all patients were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were assessable for effects of epirubicin and vinorelbine on menstruation. All the 26 patients resumed menstruation within 6 months of completing epirubicin and vinorelbine treatment. Epirubicin and vinorelbine was well tolerated. After a median follow-up of 38.5 (11-78) months, six (21%) patients had developed disease relapse and three (11%) had died. The 6.5-year disease-free survival and overall survival probabilities were 77 and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant (neoadjuvant) epirubicin and vinorelbine is an effective and well-tolerated regimen that is associated with the retention of menstrual function.

[Prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with extensive disease caused by small-cell lung cancer responsive to chemotherapy: fewer symptomatic brain metastases and improved survival]. / Profylactische schedelbestraling bij patiënten met uitgebreid kleincellig longcarcinoom dat reageert op chemotherapie: minder symptomatische hersenmetastasen en betere overleving.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) who responded to chemotherapy. DESIGN: Randomised, controlled clinical trial; phase III study (EORTC nr 08993-22993; www.clinicaltrials.gov, nr NCT00016211). METHOD: Patients aged 18-75 years with a functional status according to WHO < or = 2, and with ED-SCLC and any response to chemotherapy, were randomized to observation (standard care) or PCI. The primary endpoint was time to symptomatic brain metastases. If any pre-defined, key symptom suggesting brain metastases presented, a CT or MRI scan of the brain was performed. The size of the study (143 patients per arm) was determined to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44 at 80% power with 2-sided alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: The study accrued 286 patients. PCI decreased the risk of developing symptomatic brain metastases (HR = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.16-0.44; p < 0.001)). The cumulative incidence of developing brain metastases within 1 year was 40% in the control group (95% CI: 32-49) and 15% in the PCI group (95% CI: 8-21). PCI prolonged disease-free (HR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.59-0.96, p = 0.02) and overall survival (HR = 0.68; 95% CI; 0.52-0.88, p = 0.003). The 1-year survival rate was 27% (95% CI: 19-36) for the PCI group versus 13% (95% CI: 8-20) for controls. Acute and late treatment toxicity was acceptable. These side effects did not significantly impact on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: PCI significantly reduced the incidence of symptomatic brain metastases and prolonged both disease-free and overall survival and should be part of standard care in SCLC patients who respond to chemotherapy.

Continuous Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): 7 Years' Experience From Nine UK Centres.

AIM: Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) remains an option to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; NICE, 2011). We have previously published treatment outcomes from 1998-2003 across five UK centres. Here we update the UK CHART experience, reporting outcomes and toxicities for patients treated between 2003 and 2009. MATERIALS AND METHODS: UK CHART centres were invited to participate in a retrospective data analysis of NSCLC patients treated with CHART from 2003 to 2009. Nine (of 14) centres were able to submit their data into a standard database. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated survival and the Log-rank test analysed the significance. RESULTS: In total, 849 patients had CHART treatment, with a median age of 71 years (range 31-91), 534 (63%) were men, 55% had undergone positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and 26% had prior chemotherapy; 839 (99%) patients received all the prescribed treatment. The median overall survival was 22 months with 2 and 3 year survival of 47% and 32%, respectively. Statistically significant differences in survival were noted for stage IA versus IB (33.2 months versus 25 months; P = 0.032) and IIIA versus IIIB (20 months versus 16 months; P = 0.018). Response at 3 months and outcomes were significantly linked; complete response showing survival of 34 months against 19 months, 15 months and 8 months for partial response, stable and progressive disease, respectively (P < 0.001). Age, gender, performance status, prior chemotherapy and PET-CT did not affect the survival outcomes. Treatment was well tolerated with <5% reporting ≥grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSION: In routine practice, CHART results for NSCLC remain encouraging and we have been able to show an improvement in survival compared with the original trial cohort. We have confirmed that CHART remains deliverable with low toxicity rates and we are taking a dose-escalated CHART regimen forward in a randomised phase II study of sequential chemoradiotherapy against other accelerated dose-escalated schedules.

Gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized study of the London Lung Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: This phase III randomized trial compared two chemotherapy regimens, gemcitabine plus carboplatin and mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The regimens were compared with regard to effects on survival, response rates, toxicity, and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had previously untreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC suitable for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Randomly assigned patients were to receive four cycles, each at 3-week intervals, of carboplatin area under the curve of 5 on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (GCa) or mitomycin 6 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 3g/m(2), and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 (MIC). RESULTS: Between February 1999 and August 2001, 422 patients (GCa, n = 212; MIC, n = 210) were randomly assigned in the United Kingdom. The majority of patients received the intended four cycles (GCa, 64%; MIC, 61%). There was a significant survival advantage for GCa compared with MIC (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0. 93; P = .008). Median survival was 10 months with GCa and 7.6 months with MIC (difference, 2.4 months; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.0), and 1-year survival was 40% with GCa and 30% with MIC (difference, 10%; 95% CI, 3% to 18%). Overall response rates were similar (42% for GCa v 41% for MIC; P = .84). More thrombocytopenia occurred with GCa (P = .03), but this was not associated with increased hospital admission or fatality. GCa caused less nausea, vomiting, constipation, and alopecia and was associated with fewer admissions for administration and better quality of life. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced NSCLC, GCa chemotherapy was shown to be a better-tolerated treatment that conferred a survival advantage over MIC.

Functional Image-guided Radiotherapy Planning for Normal Lung Avoidance.

For patients with lung cancer undergoing curative intent radiotherapy, functional lung imaging can be incorporated into treatment planning to modify the dose distribution within non-target volume lung by differentiation of lung regions that are functionally defective or viable. This concept of functional image-guided lung avoidance treatment planning has been investigated with several imaging modalities, primarily single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), but also hyperpolarised gas magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT)-based measures of lung biomechanics. Here, we review the application of each of these modalities, review practical issues of lung avoidance implementation, including image registration and the role of both ventilation and perfusion imaging, and provide guidelines for reporting of future lung avoidance planning studies.

Quality of life, support and smoking in advanced lung cancer patients: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the most common cancer and smoking is the principal cause. Due to poor survival rates, symptom palliation and promotion of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are primary outcomes for lung cancer patients. Given the established relationship between smoking and lung cancer, patients who have smoked may feel stigmatised or guilty after diagnosis, and more pessimistic about their illness and likely outcomes. This may have adverse implications for HRQoL. OBJECTIVES: We explored HRQoL and support experiences among newly diagnosed patients with advanced lung cancer. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted with nine patients and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. RESULTS: Patients described the physical, emotional and social impact of disease on HRQoL. Fear of compromising their immune system and adjusting to new relationship roles had a wide-ranging effect on patients' HRQoL. Patients acknowledged links between lung cancer and smoking but some continued to smoke. They were sensitive to the opinions of medical staff about smoking especially those who continued to smoke or recently quit. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that staff should give clearer advice about the adverse implications of continued smoking. We discuss the potential value of diagnosis as a teachable moment for promoting smoking cessation among patients and family members.

The relevance of the structure of lysine bound to Sepharose for the affinity of rabbit plasminogen;.

The features of the structure of lysine, linked to Sepharose by the alpha-amino group, which are important for affinity chromatography of rabbit plasminogem were studied. Nine lysine and lysine-like conjugates, including epsilon-aminohexanoic acid DL-norleucine, DL-alpha-aminoadipic acid, DL-alpha-epsilon-diaminopimelic acid, cadaverine L-ornithine, L-arginine and D-lysine, were prepared; Using labelled rabbit plasminogen added to plasma, the ability of each conjugate to absorb plasminogen and separate the allomeric forms, type I and type II, during epsilon-aminohexanoic acid gradient elution was compared to Sepharose-L-lysine. Plasminogen had no affinity for Sepharose-epsilon-aminohexanoic acid, and was only weakly attracted by Sepharose-norleucine, Sepharose-cadaverine and others. Sepharose-ornithine held a greater attraction to the protein but the strongest binding was obtained with Sepharose-arginine. The affinity of plasminogen type I was always less than type II for the Sepharose-lysine analogues and the recovery of type II greater than type I from Sepharose-ornithine and Sepharose-arginine. Plasminogen affinity was in the order of Sepharose-arginine greater than Sepharose-lysine greater than Sepharose-ornithine. However, because of the present difficulty in recovering plasminogen from Sepharose-arginine the use of Sepharose-lysine in the affinity chromatography of rabbit plasminogen remains unchallenged. It is concluded that binding of rabbit plasminogen to conjugates of lysine and its analogues is determined by the presence of both a free carboxyl and a free amino group and that the distance between these groups is critical.

The effect of heparin on the affinity chromatography of plasminogen. Demonstration of heparin-plasminogen interaction.

Evidence is presented that heparin binds rabbit plasminogen types I and II under affinity chromatographic conditions using the single stage technique earlier described (Hatton, M.W.C. and Regoeczi, E. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 359, 55-65). Thus, the affinity of types I and II for Sepharose-lysine is markedly increased in the presence of heparin and elution by epsilon-aminohexanoic acid requires a steeper gradient to recover the plasminogen types. Furthermore by adding sufficient epsilon-aminohexanoic acid to non-heparinised plasma to suppress plasminogen affinity, the presence of heparin is shown to encourage binding of plasminogen (type II more so than type I) to the gel. However, the heparin effect is quickly reversed by washing the column with 0.5 M NaCl prior to elution by epsilon-aminohexanoic acid. No evidence of a stable plasminogen-heparin complex has been found from gel filtration studies and any interaction between plasminogen and heparin probably only takes place when heparin is bound to an affinity site. Studies with 35-S-labelled heparin have shown the mucopolysaccharide to bind to the free amino group of Sepharose-lysine and Sepharose-cadaverine and to be displaced by 0.5 M NaCl elution but not by 0.1 M epsilon-aminohexanoic acid. The plasminogen types produced from heparinised plasma are free from heparin and closely resemble preparations from non-heparinised plasma when compared by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Sephadex gel filtration and arginine esterase activity after urokinase activation.