Determinants of Late Venous Thromboembolic Events After Acute Isolated Superficial Vein Thrombosis in Daily Practice: 12 Month Results of the INSIGHTS-SVT Study.

OBJECTIVE: Long term incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events in patients with superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) was investigated. METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, patients with acute SVT were treated at the discretion of the responsible physician. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic VTE including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and recurrent or extending SVT. The primary safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding, recorded at periodic clinic visits over a 12 month period. RESULTS: The mean age of 872 patients with 12 month follow up was 60.6 ± 14.5 years, 64.5% were female, 80.1% had chronic venous disease (defined as chronic venous insufficiency and or varicose veins), and 41.9% had a history of VTE. They were receiving fondaparinux in 62.1% (mean duration 34.9 ± 15.7 days), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in 25.0% (mean duration 26.2 ± 23.2 days), any other anticoagulants in 6.2%, and no anticoagulant in 6.7%. At 12 months, 108 patients (14.3%) achieved the primary efficacy outcome. The most common VTE event was recurrent or extending SVT in 11.0%, followed by symptomatic DVT in 2.7%, symptomatic PE in 2.4%, hospitalisation due to VTE in 1.8%, and death in 1.1%. Clinically relevant bleeding events occurred in 2.1% of patients, and major bleedings in 0.3%. By drug, the rate of the primary efficacy outcome was highest in the LMWH group (22.4%) and lowest in the fondaparinux group (10.4%). In a multivariable model, patients with events between three months and 12 months were significantly more likely to have higher BMI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06; p = .002), history of VTE (HR 2.89; p = .002), and severe systemic infections (HR 7.59; p = .006). CONCLUSION: The risk of symptomatic VTE remained elevated over 12 months of follow up. Therefore, anticoagulation beyond 45 days may be considered in patients with risk factors. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02699151.].

Management and Outcomes of Patients with Isolated Superficial Vein Thrombosis under Real Life Conditions (INSIGHTS-SVT).

OBJECTIVE: Management and outcomes of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) are highly variable and not well described. Therefore, the INvestigating SIGnificant Health TrendS in the management of SVT (INSIGHTS-SVT) study collected prospective data under real life conditions. METHODS: Prospective observational study of objectively confirmed acute isolated SVT. The primary outcome was a composite of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and extension or recurrence of SVT at three months. The primary safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 1 150 patients were included (mean age 60.2 ± 14.7 years; 64.9% women; mean BMI 29.4 ± 6.3 kg/m2). SVT was below the knee in 54.5%, above the knee in 26.7%, above and below the knee in 18.8%. At baseline, 93.6% received pharmacological treatment (65.7% fondaparinux, 23.2% heparins, 4.3% direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs], 14.5% analgesics), 77.0% compression treatment, and 1.9% surgery; 6.4% did not receive any anticoagulation. The primary outcome occurred in 5.8%; 4.7% had recurrent or extended SVT, 1.7% DVT, and 0.8% PE. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 1.2% and major bleeding in 0.3%. Complete clinical recovery of SVT was reported in 708 patients (62.4%). Primary outcome adjusted by propensity score and for treatment duration was lower with fondaparinux compared with low molecular weight heparin (4.4% vs. 9.6%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3 - 0.9; p = .017). On multivariable analysis, associated factors for primary outcome included another SVT prior to the present SVT event (HR 2.3), age per year (HR 0.97), duration of drug treatment per week (HR 0.92), and thrombus length (HR 1.03). CONCLUSION: At three month follow up, patients with isolated SVT are at risk of thromboembolic complications (mainly recurrent or extended SVT), despite anticoagulation. In this real life study, about one third had received either heparins, oral anticoagulants, or no anticoagulation.

Varicose vein surgery after acute isolated superficial vein thrombosis in daily practice: INSIGHTS-SVT study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the utilization of surgical interventions in patients diagnosed with superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) and its potential association with the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events. METHODS: INSIGHTS-SVT, a prospective, non-interventional, multicenter study in Germany, investigated the management and outcomes of patients with acute SVT who received conservative and/or invasive treatments at the discretion of the treating physician. RESULTS: Among the 872 patients with 12-month data, 657 had medical therapy only, and 215 patients underwent vascular surgery (70 within 3 months of SVT diagnosis, 136 between months 4 and 12, and nine had an intervention in both periods). The most commonly performed procedures included endovenous thermal ablation, ligation of the saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junction, and vein stripping. The primary outcome of symptomatic VTE was observed in 5.8% of conservatively treated patients and 6.3% of those who underwent surgical intervention. Additionally, the secondary outcome of recurrent or extended SVT was documented in 4.7% of conservatively treated patients and 5.3% of invasively treated patients. Bleeding events occurred in 1.4% of conservatively treated patients and 2.1% of surgically treated patients. These differences were statistically not significant. Furthermore, our analysis indicated a potential protective effect associated with surgical treatments, such as ligation of the saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junction, stripping and endovenous thermal ablation, concerning the endpoint of VTE for patients when applied after 3 months from the index SVT event. CONCLUSIONS: In line with previous research, our study suggests that surgical interventions are not frequently employed in the management of SVT, although they may be warranted in select cases. Nevertheless, additional research is essential to gain a deeper understanding of the indications, criteria, and benefit of surgical interventions in the treatment of SVT.

Anticoagulation Therapy in Cancer Patients with Thrombosis in the Outpatient Sector of Germany (The CERTIFICAT Initiative)-German Practice of Anticoagulation Therapy of Cancer Patients with Thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: This article aims to investigate the reality of anticoagulation treatment for cancer patients with thrombosis in the outpatient sector of Germany. METHODS: For the analysis period 2012 to 2015, anonymized data from 4.1 million statutory insured patients were analyzed. Cancer patients with incident thrombosis and an outpatient prescription of anticoagulant drugs were identified and evaluated for three subsequent quarters with regard to anticoagulant use. RESULTS: A total of 7,313 cancer patients with incident thrombosis (ICD-10: I80*) were evaluated. About, 90% of patients with thromboses were diagnosed and treated in the ambulatory sector. More than 80% of the prescriptions were issued by general practitioners. And 57% of patients were anticoagulated predominantly (>50% of the time) with different low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), 24% predominantly with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and 17% with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Anticoagulants were prescribed for an average of 4.5 months. LMWH had a substantially longer prescription period (90-135 days) than VKA (53 days) or DOAC (47 days). Gastrointestinal bleeding in conjunction with hospitalization was documented in 1.76% of patients with a range of 1.3 to 3% for the different LMWHs. CONCLUSION: The prescription practice documented by this representative and comprehensive evaluation demonstrates an anticoagulation duration in accordance with the guidelines, although the choice of the respective anticoagulant was often not in compliance with the contemporary label or guidelines.

Fondaparinux Pre-, Peri-, and/or Postpartum for the Prophylaxis/Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism (FondaPPP).

We analyzed data for women who received fondaparinux for ≥7 days during pregnancy. The study retrospectively included women who received fondaparinux pre-, peri- and/or postpartum for ≥7 days for prophylaxis/venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment at German specialist centers (2004-2010). Data on pregnancy, VTE risk factors, anticoagulant treatment, pregnancy outcome and adverse events were extracted from medical records. 120 women (mean age 31.5 years) were included. Among 84 women with prior pregnancies, 41.0% had ≥1 abortion. Anticoagulation was indicated for prophylaxis in 92.5% cases, including 82.5% women with an elevated VTE risk (82.8% thrombophilia, 34.2% VTE history). All women received low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as first-line therapy; 3 also unfractionated heparin. Treatment changed to fondaparinux, due to heparin allergy (41.7%) or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (10.0%). Fondaparinux was generally well tolerated. Adverse events included bleeding events (n = 5), abortion (n = 2), premature births (n = 2), stillbirth (n = 1), arrested labors (n = 2), injection site erythema (n = 4) and unspecified drug hypersensitivity (n = 6). No VTE events or increased liver enzymes occurred during treatment. In this retrospective study, fondaparinux was effective and well tolerated. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01004939.

Rationale, design, and methodology of the observational INSIGHTS-SVT study on the current state of care and outcomes of patients with superficial vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: Superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) is a common disease in clinical practice. In terms of pathophysiology and outcomes, the condition is related to venous thromboembolism, bearing a potential for severe thromboembolic complications if it is not treated adequately. A wide range of treatment approaches (including oral and injectable anticoagulants, pain medication, nondrug therapy including compression therapy, and no treatment at all) are applied in clinical practice, but there is sparse information about selection of patients for therapies, current treatment pathways, and drug use as well as outcomes. The INvestigating SIGnificant Health TrendS in the management of Superficial Vein Thrombosis (INSIGHTS-SVT) study aims to close this gap by collecting representative data on the current treatment of SVT. METHODS: The observational prospective study of about 1200 patients is carried out by up to 120 clinical and office-based physicians who regularly treat patients with SVT and are capable of conducting appropriate compression ultrasound diagnostics, such as vascular physicians, phlebologists, internists, vascular surgeons, and general practitioners. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they have ultrasound-confirmed acute, isolated SVT of the lower extremities. Documentation about the characteristics of the patients, diagnostics, comorbidities, and medical and nonmedical treatment is collected at baseline, at 10 ± 3 days or at approximately 45 days (depending on treatment), at approximately 3 months, and at approximately 12 months. Patients are requested to fill in quality of life questionnaires (on pain, Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study on Quality of Life/Symptoms [VEINES-QOL/Sym], EuroQol-5 Dimension 5-Level [EQ-5D-5L]) at baseline and at approximately 3 months. Interventions are not stipulated by the trial protocol. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome is the incidence of venous thromboembolism at 3 months; the primary safety outcome is the combined incidence of major and clinically relevant bleeding events at 3 months. As quality measures, plausibility checks at data entry, queries based on statistical analyses that focus on outliers and distribution of values, monitoring visits, and adjudication procedures will be applied. CONCLUSIONS: This large study is expected to provide a comprehensive picture of patients with SVT under clinical practice conditions in Germany.