Impact of spinal versus general anaesthesia on perioperative obstructive sleep apnoea severity in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: a post hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations suggest favouring regional over general anaesthesia to reduce impact on postoperative sleep apnoea severity, but there is currently no evidence to support this. We compared the impact of general vs spinal anaesthesia on postoperative sleep apnoea severity and assessed the evolution of sleep apnoea severity up to the third postoperative night. METHODS: This post hoc analysis used pooled data from two previous randomised controlled trials in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under general or spinal anaesthesia (n=96), without performing a preliminary power analysis. All participants underwent respiratory polygraphy before surgery and on the first and third postoperative nights. The primary outcomes were the supine apnoea-hypopnea index on the first postoperative night and the evolution of the supine apnoea-hypopnea index up to the third postoperative night. Secondary outcomes included the oxygen desaturation index on the first and third postoperative nights. RESULTS: In the general and spinal anaesthesia groups, mean (95% confidence interval) values for the supine apnoea-hypopnoea index on the first postoperative night were 20 (16-25) and 21 (16-26) events h-1 (P=0.82), respectively; corresponding values on the third postoperative night were 34 (22-45) and 35 (20-49) events h-1 (P=0.91). The generalised estimating equations model showed a significant time effect. Secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of spinal anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia was not associated with a reduction in postoperative sleep apnoea severity, which was worse on the third postoperative night. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02717780 and NCT02566226.

Effects of Adaptive Servo-Ventilation on Quality of Life: The READ-ASV Registry.

Rationale: Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) effectively treats sleep-disordered breathing, including central sleep apnea (CSA) and coexisting obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Objectives: The prospective, multicenter European READ-ASV (Registry on the Treatment of Central and Complex Sleep-Disordered Breathing with Adaptive Servo-Ventilation) registry investigated the effects of first-time ASV therapy on disease-specific quality of life (QoL).Methods: The registry enrolled adults with CSA with or without OSA who had ASV therapy prescribed between September 2017 and March 2021. The primary endpoint was change in disease-specific QoL (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire [FOSQ]) score between baseline and 12-month follow-up. Sleepiness determined using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was a key secondary outcome. For subgroup analysis, participants were classified as symptomatic (FOSQ score < 17.9 and/or ESS score > 10) or asymptomatic (FOSQ score ⩾ 17.9 and/or ESS score ⩽ 10).Results: A total of 801 individuals (age, 67 ± 12 yr; 14% female; body mass index, 31 ± 5 kg/m2; apnea-hypopnea index, 48 ± 22/h) were enrolled; analyses include those with paired baseline and follow-up data. After 12 ± 3 months on ASV, median (interquartile range) FOSQ score had increased significantly from baseline (+0.8 [-0.2 to 2.2]; P < 0.001; n = 499). This was due to a significantly increased FOSQ score in symptomatic participants (+1.69 [0.38 to 3.05]), with little change in asymptomatic individuals (+0.11 [-0.39 to 0.54]). The median ESS score also improved significantly from baseline during ASV (-2.0 [-5.0 to 0.0]; P < 0.001).Conclusions: ASV treatment of CSA with or without coexisting OSA was associated with improvements in disease-specific QoL and daytime sleepiness, especially in individuals with sleep-disordered breathing symptoms before therapy initiation. These improvements in patient-reported outcomes support the use of ASV in this population.

Sleep disturbances and incident risk of major depressive disorder in a population-based cohort.

Sleep disturbances are well-known symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the prospective risk of MDD in the presence of sleep disturbances in a general population-based cohort is not well known. This study investigated associations between both polysomnography (PSG)-based or subjective sleep features and incident MDD. Participants representative of the general population who had never had MDD completed sleep questionnaires (n = 2000) and/or underwent PSG (n = 717). Over 8 years' follow-up, participants completed psychiatric interviews enabling the diagnosis of MDD. Survival Cox models were used to analyze associations between sleep features and MDD incidence. A higher Epworth Sleepiness Scale and presence of insomnia symptoms were significantly associated with a higher incidence of MDD (hazard ratio [HR] [95 % confidence interval (CI)]: 1.062 [1.022-1.103], p = 0.002 and 1.437 [1.064-1.940], p = 0.018, respectively). Higher density of rapid eye movements in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep was associated with a higher incidence of MDD in men (HR 1.270 [95 % CI 1.064-1.516], p = 0.008). In women, higher delta power spectral density was associated with a lower MDD incidence (HR 0.674 [95 % CI 0.463-0.981], p = 0.039). This study confirmed the associations between subjective and objective sleep features and the incidence of MDD in a large community dwelling cohort.