RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrent priapism secondary to sickle cell trait in an African-American male has been reported in the literature. A common treatment for these low-flow priapism cases is aspiration and injection of the corpus cavernosum with a sympathomimetic agent. We report a rare complication not described previously in the literature of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock in a 29-year-old male with sickle cell trait undergoing a routine detumescence procedure. CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old African-American male with a history of sickle cell trait and recurrent low-flow/ischemic priapism presented with a painful erection for 8 h. Corporal aspiration and irrigation with phenylephrine was performed. After phenylephrine injection, the patient experienced hypertensive emergency, flash pulmonary edema, STEMI, and subsequent cardiogenic shock. He required intubation, ionotropic support, cardiac catheterization, and admission to the cardiac care unit. History taken from the patient's wife on the following day revealed that he was taking high doses of pseudoephedrine at home to treat symptoms. The patient was subsequently discharged after 3 days with normalization of ejection fraction and negative troponin. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Intracavernosal injection of phenylephrine is a common emergency department treatment utilized in management of priapism, but emergency physicians should be aware of the potential severe systemic complications resulting from this procedure. Providers should take a careful history, including over-the-counter medication use; consider comorbid medical history; standardize phenylephrine mixing instructions with pharmacy; and perform the procedure in a monitored setting with a brief observation after complete detumescence.
Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/complicações , Priapismo/etiologia , Priapismo/fisiopatologia , Pseudoefedrina/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/etiologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/etnologia , Anemia Falciforme/etnologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Humanos , Masculino , Pênis/fisiopatologia , Fenilefrina/administração & dosagem , Fenilefrina/farmacologia , Fenilefrina/uso terapêutico , Priapismo/terapia , Pseudoefedrina/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/fisiopatologia , Vasoconstritores/farmacologia , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US) has been shown to be effective at identifying a pneumothorax (PTX); however, the additional value of adding multiple views has not been studied. Single- and four-view protocols have both been described in the literature. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of single-view versus four-view lung US to detect clinically significant PTX in trauma patients. METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective trial on trauma patients. Adult patients with acute traumatic injury undergoing computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to a single view or four views of each hemithorax prior to any imaging. USs were performed and interpreted by credentialed physicians using a 7.5-Mhz linear array transducer on a portable US machine with digital clips recorded for later review. Attending radiologist interpretation of the chest CT was reviewed for presence or absence of PTX with descriptions of small foci of air or minimal PTX categorized as clinically insignificant. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients were enrolled over a 2-year period. A total of 139 patients received a single view of each chest wall and 121 patients received four views. There were a total of 49 patients that had a PTX (19%), and 29 of these were clinically significant (11%). In diagnosis of any PTX, both single-view and four-view techniques showed poor sensitivity (54.2 and 68%) but high specificity (99 and 98%). For clinically significant PTX, single-view US demonstrated a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.1% to 99.6%) and a specificity of 99.2% (95% CI = 95.5% to 99.9%), with sensitivity of 93.3% (95% CI = 66% to 99.7%) and specificity of 98% (95% CI = 92.1% to 99.7%) for four views. CONCLUSIONS: Single-view and four-view chest wall USs demonstrate comparable sensitivity and specificity for PTX. The additional time to obtain four views should be weighed against the absence of additional diagnostic yield over a single view when using US to identify a clinically significant PTX.