Airway epithelial cell response to RSV is mostly impaired in goblet and multiciliated cells in asthma.

BACKGROUND: In patients with asthma, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections can cause disease exacerbation by infecting the epithelial layer of the airways, inducing subsequent immune response. The type I interferon antiviral response of epithelial cells upon RSV infection is found to be reduced in asthma in most-but not all-studies. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms causing the differences in the asthmatic bronchial epithelium in response to viral infection are poorly understood. METHODS: Here, we investigated the transcriptional response to RSV infection of primary bronchial epithelial cells (pBECs) from patients with asthma (n=8) and healthy donors (n=8). The pBECs obtained from bronchial brushes were differentiated in air-liquid interface conditions and infected with RSV. After 3 days, cells were processed for single-cell RNA sequencing. RESULTS: A strong antiviral response to RSV was observed for all cell types, for all samples (p<1e-48). Most (1045) differentially regulated genes following RSV infection were found in cells transitioning to secretory cells. Goblet cells from patients with asthma showed lower expression of genes involved in the interferon response (false discovery rate <0.05), including OASL, ICAM1 and TNFAIP3. In multiciliated cells, an impairment of the signalling pathways involved in the response to RSV in asthma was observed. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight that the response to RSV infection of the bronchial epithelium in asthma and healthy airways was largely similar. However, in asthma, the response of goblet and multiciliated cells is impaired, highlighting the need for studying airway epithelial cells at high resolution in the context of asthma exacerbation.

Aberrant B cell receptor signaling in circulating naïve and IgA+ memory B cells from newly-diagnosed autoantibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: Altered B cell receptor (BCR) signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here we aimed to identify signaling aberrations in autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA patients by performing a comprehensive analysis of the BCR signaling cascade in different B cell subsets. METHODS: We first optimized phosphoflow cytometry for an in-depth analysis of BCR signaling across immunoglobulin isotypes in healthy donors. Subsequently, we compared BCR signaling in circulating B cell subsets from treatment-naïve, newly-diagnosed autoantibody-positive RA and autoantibody-negative RA patients and healthy controls (HCs). RESULTS: We observed subset-specific phosphorylation patterns of the BCR signalosome in circulating B cells from healthy donors. Compared with HCs, autoantibody-positive RA patients displayed enhanced responses to BCR stimulation for multiple signaling proteins, specifically in naïve and IgA+ memory B cells. Whereas in unstimulated healthy donor B cells, the phosphorylation status of individual signaling proteins showed only limited correlation, BCR stimulation enhanced the interconnectivity in phosphorylation within the BCR signalosome. However, this strong interconnectivity within the BCR signalosome in stimulated B cells from HCs was lost in RA, especially in autoantibody-positive RA patients. Finally, we observed strong correlations between SYK and BTK protein expression, and IgA and IgG anti-citrullinated protein antibody concentrations in serum from autoantibody-positive RA patients. CONCLUSION: Collectively, the isotype-specific analysis of multiple key components of the BCR signalosome identified aberrant BCR signaling responses in treatment-naïve autoantibody-positive RA patients, particularly in naïve B cells and IgA+ memory B cells. Our findings support differential involvement of dysregulated BCR signaling in the pathogenesis of autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA.

Increased proportions of circulating PD-1+ CD4+ memory T cells and PD-1+ regulatory T cells associate with good response to prednisone in pulmonary sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment response to corticosteroids in patients with sarcoidosis is highly variable. CD4+ T cells are central in sarcoid pathogenesis and their phenotype in peripheral blood (PB) associates with disease course. We hypothesized that the phenotype of circulating T cells in patients with sarcoidosis may correlate with the response to prednisone treatment. Therefore, we aimed to correlate frequencies and phenotypes of circulating T cells at baseline with the pulmonary function response at 3 and 12 months during prednisone treatment in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. METHODS: We used multi-color flow cytometry to quantify activation marker expression on PB T cell populations in 22 treatment-naïve patients and 21 healthy controls (HCs). Pulmonary function tests at baseline, 3 and 12 months were used to measure treatment effect. RESULTS: Patients with sarcoidosis showed an absolute forced vital capacity (FVC) increase of 14.2% predicted (± 10.6, p < 0.0001) between baseline and 3 months. Good response to prednisone (defined as absolute FVC increase of ≥ 10% predicted) was observed in 12 patients. CD4+ memory T cells and regulatory T cells from patients with sarcoidosis displayed an aberrant phenotype at baseline, compared to HCs. Good responders at 3 months had significantly increased baseline proportions of PD-1+CD4+ memory T cells and PD-1+ regulatory T cells, compared to poor responders and HCs. Moreover, decreased fractions of CD25+ cells and increased fractions of PD-1+ cells within the CD4+ memory T cell population correlated with ≥ 10% FVC increase at 12 months. During treatment, the aberrantly activated phenotype of memory and regulatory T cells reversed. CONCLUSIONS: Increased proportions of circulating PD-1+CD4+ memory T cells and PD-1+ regulatory T cells and decreased proportions of CD25+CD4+ memory T cells associate with good FVC response to prednisone in pulmonary sarcoidosis, representing promising new blood biomarkers for prednisone efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL44805.078.13.

Measuring burden of disease in both asthma and COPD by merging the ACQ and CCQ: less is more?

Symptoms of asthma and COPD often overlap, and both diseases can co-exist in one patient. The asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) and clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) were developed to assess disease burden in respectively asthma or COPD. This study explores the possibility of creating a new questionnaire to assess disease burden in all obstructive lung diseases by integrating and reducing questions of the ACQ and CCQ. Data of patients with asthma, COPD and asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) were collected from a primary and secondary care center. Patients completed ACQ and CCQ on the same day. Linear regression tested correlations. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used for item reduction. The secondary cohort with asthma and COPD patients was used for initial question selection (development cohort). These results were reproduced in the primary care cohort and secondary cohort of patients with ACO. The development cohort comprised 252 patients with asthma and 96 with COPD. Correlation between ACQ and CCQ in asthma was R = 0.82, and in COPD R = 0.83. PCA determined a selection of 9 questions. Reproduction in primary care data (asthma n = 1110, COPD n = 1041, ACO = 355) and secondary care data of ACO patients (n = 53) resulted in similar correlations and PCA-derived selection of questions. In conclusion, PCA determined a selection of nine questions of the ACQ and CCQ: working title 'the Obstructive Lung Disease Questionnaire'. These results suggest that this pragmatic set of questions might be sufficient to assess disease burden in obstructive lung disease in both primary as secondary care.

Aberrant characteristics of peripheral blood innate lymphoid cells in COPD, independent of smoking history.

Background: Distinguishing asthma and COPD can pose challenges in clinical practice. Increased group 1 innate lymphoid cells (ILC1s) have been found in the lungs and peripheral blood of COPD patients, while asthma is associated with elevated levels of ILC2s. However, it is unclear whether the inflammatory characteristics of ILC1s and ILC2s differ between COPD and asthma. This study aims to compare peripheral blood ILC subsets and their expression of inflammatory markers in COPD patients, asthma patients and controls. Methods: The study utilised multi-colour flow cytometry to analyse peripheral blood ILC populations in clinically stable COPD patients (n=38), asthma patients (n=37), and smoking (n=19) and non-smoking (n=16) controls. Results: Proportions of peripheral blood inflammatory CD4+ ILC1s were significantly higher in COPD patients than in asthma. Proportions of CD4- ILC1s were increased in COPD patients compared to asthma patients and smoking controls. Frequencies of CD117- ILC2s were significantly reduced in COPD patients compared with asthma patients. In contrast, the fraction of inflammatory CD45RO+ cells within the CD117- ILC2 population was significantly increased. Principal component analyses showed that combined features of the circulating ILC compartment separated COPD patients from asthma patients and both control groups. Conclusion: Our in-depth characterisation of ILC1 and ILC2 populations in peripheral blood revealed significant differences in their phenotypes between COPD and asthma patients and smoking or non-smoking controls. These findings suggest a role for both ILC subsets in COPD disease pathology, independent of smoking history, and may have implications for patient stratification and therapy development.