Variations in Practice and Geographic Disparities Between Dedicated Multidisciplinary Clinics for BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Carriers in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Population screening for the BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women was recently implemented in Israel and is expected to lead to a 10-fold increase in the diagnosis of asymptomatic carriers. Performing the screening follow-up within multidisciplinary dedicated clinics for carriers is recommended for early detection and risk reduction. OBJECTIVES: : To determine the availability, capacity, and practices of dedicated screening clinic for BRCA carriers in Israel. METHODS: A telephone-based survey of all public hospitals in Israel was conducted October 2020 to August 2021 to determine whether they had a dedicated clinic. Dedicated clinics were defined as multidisciplinary screening clinics offering at least breast and gynecological screening and risk reducing services on site. The clinic director or nurse navigator answered a questionnaire about screening practices followed by a semi-structured interview. RESULTS: Of the ten dedicated BRCA clinics found in Israel, nine participated. Approximately 4500 BRCA carriers are currently being followed. No specialized clinics are available in the southern district or in the northernmost half of the northern district of Israel, leading to a disparity between periphery and center. Screening recommendations, although asserted as adhering to international guidelines, vary among clinics including age at initiating of clinical exam, use of adjunct imaging modalities, and follow-up during lactation and after risk reducing surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is a suboptimal distribution of dedicated clinics for BRCA carriers in Israel. Nationally centralized attempt to create guidelines that will unify screening practices is warranted, especially considering the expected increase in demand.

[SCREENING WOMEN AT HIGH RISK FOR BREAST CANCER - BRCA AND BEYOND].

BACKGROUND: Radiologic screening for breast cancer is performed with the goal of diagnosing the disease at an earlier stage, thus reducing morbidity and mortality. Screening recommendations for women at higher than average risk for breast cancer differ from those of women with an average risk, and include yearly breast MRI and mammography starting at a young age. OBJECTIVES: Review the morbidity and mortality, and check whether the goal of early diagnosis was achieved in the participants of the High-Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Ontario Canada. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted of 2,081 women participating in the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre high risk screening program 2011-2018. Demographic, imaging, and if applicable biopsies, diagnosis and treatment data were captured in a prospectively maintained database starting with each participant's enrolment in the program. RESULTS: A total of 32% of the participants were carriers of pathogenic variants in breast cancer related genes (BRCA, NF, CHEK2, TP53 etc.), 8% had a history of therapeutic chest radiotherapy, and the remaining 60% had a calculated elevated lifetime risk based on family history or personal risk factors, without an identifiable pathogenic mutation or previous radiation. During the follow-up period 89 breast cancer cases were diagnosed at the median age of 49 years. Median tumor size at diagnosis was 0.9 cm, correlating with a T1 disease. Nodal disease was found only in 4 cases. Breast cancer incidence was the same in the mutation carriers and chest radiotherapy groups, but 3-fold lower in the third group. Diagnosis of breast cancer was most commonly conducted by MRI imaging, and only 6% of cases were diagnosed based solely on mammography findings. Furthermore, 38 women died during follow-up, 29 of them (76%) were BRCA carriers who died from ovarian carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis at an early stage was achieved in this cohort of women followed in the high risk screening program. Most cases were diagnosed by MRI, thus emphasizing the importance of identifying women at high risk for breast cancer and referring them to the appropriate screening program.

Personalized Screening for Breast Cancer: Rationale, Present Practices, and Future Directions.

Ever since screening for early breast cancer (BC) diagnosis was shown to decrease mortality from the disease, screening programs have been widely implemented throughout the world. Targeted age groups and schedules vary between countries but the majority use a population-based approach, regardless of personal BC risk. The purpose of this review was to describe current population-based screening practices, point out some of the shortcomings of these practices, describe BC risk factors and risk assessment models, and present ongoing clinical trials of personalized risk-adapted BC screening. Three ongoing, large-scale, randomized controlled clinical trials (WISDOM in the US, MyPEBS in Europe, and TBST in Italy) were identified through a search of the MEDLINE and US National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrials.gov) databases. In these trials, women either undergo standard or personalized screening. The trials vary in methods of risk stratification and screening modalities, but all aim to examine whether personalized risk-adapted screening can safely replace the current population-based approach and lead to rates of advanced-stage BC at diagnosis comparable with those of current screening regimens. The results of these trials may change current population-based screening practices.

Screening women at high risk for breast cancer: one program fits all? : Subgroup analysis of a large population high risk breast screening program.

INTRODUCTION: The Ontario High Risk Breast Screening program follows women aged 30-69 at an increased risk of breast cancer, using a yearly mammography and breast MRI. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical outcomes for the enrolled women. METHODS: Observational cohort study following 2081 participants in the high-risk screening program 2011-2017. The participants were divided into three subgroup according to their risk criteria: (a) known carriers of pathogenic variants (PV) in hereditary breast cancer genes. (b) Previous chest radiotherapy. (c) Estimated life time risk (ELR) ≥ 25%, calculated using the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS) tool, with no known mutation or previous radiation. All Breast Cancer (BC) diagnosed during the follow-up time were recorded. RESULTS: 673 women carried PVs in hereditary breast cancer genes, 159 had a history of chest radiotherapy, and 1249 had an ELR ≥ 25%. The total cohort of screening years was 8126. Median age at BC diagnosis was 41 for the first group, 47 for the second group and 51 for the third. BC incidence rate was 18.2 for PV mutation carriers, 17.9 for the chest radiotherapy group and 6.2 for ELR ≥ 25%. Hazard ratio was similar for the first two groups, but significantly lower for the ELR ≥ 25% group. When stratifying by age, the incidence rate in the ELR ≥ 25% increased over time, until it became similar to that of the other subgroups after age 50. CONCLUSION: Our findings question the need to screen women with an elevated lifetime risk using the same screening practices used for women who are PV mutation carriers, or with a history of chest radiation, prior to the age of 50.

Margin assessment before intraoperative radiotherapy during breast conserving surgery-Does the addition of MarginProbe decrease the need for addition of fractionated whole breast radiation?

When performing Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) with Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT), positive resection margin necessitates not only re-lumpectomy-but also the addition of fractionated whole breast radiation. This retrospective study of 106 patients undergoing BCS and IORT aims to evaluate intraoperative margin assessment use in our center, and the contribution of the MarginProbe device (MP) to achieving negative surgical margins. Eleven out of 106 lumpectomy specimens had a total of 17 margins positive for tumor cells. Intraoperative gross pathology identified 6 (43%) involved margins, MarginProbe detected 8 (50%), and their combined use allowed for detection of 12 (70.5%) involved margins. In conclusion, the adjunctive use of intraoperative gross pathology and MarginProbe reduced the number of lumpectomies with positive resection margins by more than 50%, decreasing the need for re-lumpectomy and the addition of whole breast radiation.

A multidisciplinary approach for autologous breast reconstruction: A narrative (re)view for better management.

Breast reconstruction and oncoplastic surgery have become an important part of breast cancer care. The use of autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) has evolved significantly with advances in microsurgery, aiming to reduce donor site complications and improve cosmesis. For years, immediate-ABR was considered a contraindication if postmastectomy irradiation (PMRT) was planned. As a result of de-escalation of axillary surgery the indication of PMRT are increasing along-side with observations that PMRT in the setting of ABR is not contraindicated. Surgical techniques may result in different amount and areas of breast residual glandular tissue and patient selection is important to reduce potential residual disease. Meticulus radiation planning is important to potentially reduce complications without compromising oncologic outcomes. Surgical techniques change constantly in aim to improve aesthetic results but should most importantly maintain priority to the oncological indications. By multidisciplinary team work with a comprehensive understanding of each discipline, we can preserve the accomplishments of breast surgery in the setting of PMRT, without compromising disease control.

Does timing of alloplastic breast reconstruction in older women impact immediate postoperative complications? An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.

BACKGROUND: Alloplastic breast reconstruction is safe in well-selected older women. The impact of timing of surgery on complication rates is unknown. This study aimed to determine the immediate (30-day) postoperative complication rates of older women who underwent immediate (IBR) and delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) with alloplastic techniques. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database was used to identify women ≥70 years old with in situ or invasive breast cancer who underwent either IBR or DBR (2005-2016). Outcomes included 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2,085 older women underwent alloplastic breast reconstruction of which 90% and 10% were IBR and DBR, respectively. Both groups had similar median age, body mass index, and frequency of smoking, diabetes mellitus, and steroid use. Tumors were mainly invasive in the IBR group (83.5%) and in situ in the DBR group (83.3%). IBR had significantly longer operative times (median 154 min vs 98 min, p < 0.0001), but equal length of stay (median 3 days vs 3 days, p = 0.1). The 30-day overall morbidity (medical or surgical complication) rate was significantly higher in the IBR group (7.5% vs 1.0%, p < 0.0004). Women with IBR were significantly more likely to develop infectious complications (6% vs 1%, p = 0.002). Cardiac/transfusion, pulmonary, thromboembolic, renal, and neurological morbidity rates were equal between groups. Thirty-day mortality rates were similar across both groups (IBR: 0.05% vs DBR: 0%, p = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: While overall thirty-day postoperative complication rates in older women who undergo breast reconstruction were low, there were higher rates of infectious complications in the IBR cohort. The risks and benefits of alloplastic breast reconstruction should be discussed with older women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment.

Significant elevation of carcinoembryonic antigen levels in abdominal drains after colorectal surgery may indicate early anastomotic dehiscence.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery is a severe complication leading to major postoperative morbidity and mortality. Leaks typically present on the 5th to 6th postoperative days; however, early anastomotic dehiscence occurs occasionally. This study evaluated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in abdominal drains after colorectal resection to assess its potential as an early marker to predict anastomotic leaks. METHODS: This prospective study included 105 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Fluids from the patients' abdominal drain system were sampled daily for up to 3 days after surgery and evaluated for CEA levels. RESULTS: Early anastomotic dehiscence occurred in 3 patients (2.8%) and was associated with a significant elevation of CEA in drain fluids (above 1,000 ng/mL). However, in patients who developed late leaks (7 patients, 6.7%) no significant elevation of CEA was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Significant elevation of CEA levels in abdominal drains in the early postoperative period may indicate early anastomotic dehiscence.