Time between imaging and surgery is not a risk factor for upstaging of clinical stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The timing of preoperative imaging in patients with lung cancer is a debated topic, as there are limited data on cancer progression during the interval between clinical staging by imaging and pathological staging after resection. We quantified disease progression during this interval in patients with early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to better understand if its length impacts upstaging. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database to identify patients who underwent surgery for clinically staged T1N0M0 NSCLC from January 2015 through September 2022. Tumour upstaging between chest computed tomography (CT) and surgery were analysed as a function of time (<30, 30-59, ≥60 days) for different nodule subtypes. We analysed data across 3 timeframes using Pearson's chi-squared and analysis of variance tests. RESULTS: During the study period, 622 patients underwent surgery for clinically staged T1N0M0 NSCLC. CT-to-surgery interval was <30 days in 228 (36.7%), 30-59 days in 242 (38.9%) and ≥60 days in 152 (24.4%) with no differences in patient or nodule characteristics observed between these groups. T-stage increased in 346 patients (55.6%) between CT imaging and surgery. Among these patients, 126 (36.4%) had ground-glass nodules, 147 (42.5%) had part-solid nodules and 73 (21.1%) had solid nodules. CT-to-surgery interval length was not associated with upstaging of any nodule subtype (full-cohort, P = 0.903; ground-glass, P = 0.880; part-solid, P = 0.858; solid, P = 0.959). CONCLUSIONS: This single-centre experience suggests no significant association between tumour upstaging and time from imaging to lung resection in patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC. Further studies are needed to better understand the risk factors for upstaging.

Predictors of prolonged hospital stay after segmentectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Segmentectomy is becoming the standard of care for small, peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. To improve perioperative management in this population, this study aims to identify factors influencing hospital length of stay after segmentectomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent segmentectomy for any indication between January 2018 and May 2023 were identified using a prospectively maintained institutional database. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between clinical features and prolonged (≥3 days) hospital stay. A nomogram was designed to understand better and possibly calculate the individual risk of prolonged hospital stays. RESULTS: In total, 533 cases were included; 337 (63%) were female. Median age was 66 years (interquartile range [IQR], 63-75). The median size of resected lesions was 1.6 cm (IQR, 1.3-2.1 cm). Median hospital stay was 3 days (IQR, 2-4 days). Major adverse events occurred in 31 (5.8%) cases. The 30-day readmission rate was 5.8% (n = 31). There was no 30-day mortality; 90-day mortality was <1%. Patients older than 75 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-3.57, P = .02), those with forced expiratory volume in 1 second <88% predicted (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.38-2.89, P < .001), or positive smoking history (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.15-2.60, P = .01) were more likely to have prolonged hospital stays after segmentectomy. A nomogram accounting for age, sex, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, body mass index, smoking history, and comorbidities was created to predict the probability of prolonged hospital stay with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.66. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients, those with reduced pulmonary function, and current and past smokers have elevated risk for prolonged hospital stays after segmentectomy. Validation of our nomogram could improve perioperative risk stratification in patients who undergo segmentectomy.

Complete anatomic segmentectomy shows improved oncologic outcomes compared to incomplete anatomic segmentectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare oncologic outcomes after segmentectomy with division of segmental bronchus, artery and vein (complete anatomic segmentectomy) versus segmentectomy with division of <3 segmental structures (incomplete anatomic segmentectomy). METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective analysis of patients undergoing segmentectomy from March 2005 to May 2020. Operative reports were audited to classify procedures as complete or incomplete anatomic segmentectomy. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy or pulmonary resection beyond indicated segments were excluded. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier models and compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for death. Cumulative incidence functions for loco-regional recurrence were compared with Gray's test, with death considered a competing event. Cox and Fine-Gray models were used to estimate cause-specific and subdistribution HRs, respectively, for loco-regional recurrence. RESULTS: Of 390 cases, 266 (68.2%) were complete and 124 were incomplete anatomic segmentectomy. Demographics, pulmonary function, tumour size, stage and perioperative outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Surgical margins were negative in all but 1 case. Complete anatomic segmentectomy was associated with improved lymph node dissection (5 vs 2 median nodes sampled; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed reduced incidence of loco-regional recurrence (cause-specific HR = 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.80; subdistribution HR = 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.81), and non-significant improvement in overall survival (HR = 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-1.00) after complete versus incomplete anatomic segmentectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This single-centre experience suggests complete anatomic segmentectomy provides superior loco-regional control and may improve survival relative to incomplete anatomic segmentectomy. We recommend surgeons perform complete anatomic segmentectomy and lymph node dissection whenever possible.

Neumomediastino espontáneo en pacientes COVID-19. Serie de casos / Spontaneous pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 patients. Case series

Resumen El neumomediastino espontáneo es la presencia de aire libre en el mediastino sin el antecedente de alguna causa como trauma de tórax. Es una condición benigna autolimitada que se trata en forma conservadora. El diagnóstico clínico se basa en dos síntomas: dolor torácico y disnea; y en un signo en particular: enfisema subcutáneo. Ha sido reportado en pacientes con influenza A (H1N1) y síndrome respiratorio agudo grave; sin embargo, ha sido raramente observado en pacientes con COVID-19. En este trabajo describimos seis pacientes del sexo masculino con COVID-19, con edades entre 27 y 82 años, que presentaron neumomediastino espontáneo y enfisema subcutáneo; ambos se reabsorbieron totalmente con manejo conservador.

Abstract Spontaneous pneumomediastinum is defined as the presence of free air within the mediastinum without an apparent cause such as chest trauma. It is a benign, self-limiting condition that is conservatively treated. Clinical diagnosis is based on two symptoms: chest pain and dyspnea; and on a particular sign: subcutaneous emphysema. It has been reported in patients with influenza A (H1N1) and severe acute respiratory syndrome; however, it has been rarely observed in COVID-19 patients. In this work, we describe six male patients with COVID-19, aged between 27 and 82 years, who presented with spontaneous pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema; both conditions were completely resorbed with conservative management.