Esophageal carcinoma advances in treatment results for locally advanced disease: review.

The treatment results of patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinomas have evolved since the publication of the first trial of concurrent mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil with radiotherapy (RT) in 1983. Subsequent studies refined and improved on the concurrent chemotherapy (chemo) with administration of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil infusion (PF). Chemo (PF) before surgery improved overall survival (OS) in those patients in most of the randomized trials and in meta-analyses. Two courses of PF concurrent with irradiation followed by additional two courses of PF were superior to RT alone without surgery for both groups. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery was found to have statistically improved OS as compared with surgery only in randomized trials and meta-analyses. In most of these studies, it was found that those patients with pathologic complete response to the initial treatment(s) did better than those who had no improvement at all. Current treatment outcome for these diseases is disappointing; newer strategies including induction chemo with the optimal combination, proper dosage of each drug, and proper number of courses before concurrent chemoradiotherapy; improvement in RT; and immunotherapy with or without subsequent surgery are exciting and definitely need to be investigated in prospective randomized trial(s).

Brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma: prognosis and treatment.

Thirty-four patients with renal cell carcinoma and brain metastases were reviewed to define important prognostic factors and treatment results. The following covariates were analyzed to determine their influence on survival: disease-free interval, serum calcium, number of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, weight loss, performance score, age, radiation therapy, surgery, and surgery plus radiation. The mean survival for all patients was 7.0 months (range, seven days to 32 months). The patients with a good performance score of 0-2 survived significantly longer (mean survival, 10.2 months) than those with a poor performance score of 3-4 (mean survival, 2.8 months; p = 0.0019). Surgery was associated with significantly improved survival (mean survival, 13.8 months versus mean survival, 4.2 months; p = 0.014). However, all the surgical patients were from the good performance score group, suggesting patient selection. Radiation was associated with an improved mean survival of 8.6 months versus 3.2 months. Performance score is a significant prognostic factor. Furthermore, the data support treatment with radiation therapy for patients with multiple CNS metastases and surgery followed by postoperative radiation therapy for patients with single CNS metastases.

Chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a radiation therapy oncology group study.

The results of radiotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced (stage III or IV) nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) are poor in spite of the initial complete clearance. Twenty-seven patients (26 stage IV) were treated with concurrent standard radiotherapy and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and every 3 weeks for three courses. In 24 (89%) patients, complete response (CR) was achieved. The CR rate was higher for poorly undifferentiated cancer (100%). The major side effects were leukopenia (97%), anemia (54%), nausea and vomiting (81%), stomatitis (92%), and renal impairment (52%). Most of these side effects were either mild or moderate and reversible. All patients finished the radiotherapy dose (greater than 6,450 cGy), 19 (70%) had three courses of cisplatin, and eight had only two courses, six due to drug toxicity. Twenty-six patients with stage IV disease were compared with 78 patients treated with radiotherapy alone by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, and the incidence of distant organ metastasis appear to be better in the combined group. It was concluded that the combination of chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced NPC needs to be evaluated in a phase III randomized trial.

Nonoperative therapy for squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus.

Based on the surgical pathology and survival for patients in previous trials using a neoadjuvant program of chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil [5-FU]-cisplatin) and radiation (3,000 cGy) before surgery for squamous-cell cancer (SCC) of the esophagus, a nonoperative pilot trial was designed to test if survival and recurrence would differ from our historical controls if routine esophagectomy was eliminated. Twenty patients were treated. The protocol called for the delivery of 5-FU infusion (1,000 mg/m2/d X 4 d) days 1 to 4 and 29 to 32 with cisplatin (100 mg/m2) day 1 and 29 sandwiched around external beam radiation (3,000 cGy over 3 weeks). Mitomycin C (10 mg/m2) day 57 was administered with bleomycin infusion (20 U/d X 4 d) days 57 to 60 and 78 to 81. A radiation boost of 2,000 cGy was administered 200 cGy/d days 99 to 103 and 106 to 110. Clinical pulmonary toxicity forced withdrawal of bleomycin and mitomycin C in the last four patients treated; two further courses of 5-FU-cisplatin were administered instead. The median measurement of the 20 esophageal lesions by barium swallow was 7 cm. Four patients underwent salvage surgery to prevent life-threatening aspiration pneumonia. The median survival for the 20 patients is 22 months, with a range from 6 to 39+ months. The six patients clinically without cancer are alive 22+ to 39+ months (median, 35+ months). Three patients died manifesting only local (infield) recurrence; five died manifesting only distant recurrence; and five developed local and distant recurrence. While the toxicity of the four drug regimen as administered was prohibitive, the survival and quality of survival is superior to the regimen previously used, which routinely used surgery after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation.

Progress report of combined chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with esophageal cancer: an intergroup study.

PURPOSE: The present intergroup phase III randomized study compared combined chemotherapy (CT) plus radiotherapy (RT) treatment versus RT only in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two courses of chemotherapy during 50 Gy RT followed by additional two courses of the same CT, versus 64 Gy RT alone were investigated. CT consisted of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 [corrected] and fluorouracil (5FU) 1,000 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 4 every 4 weeks with RT and every 3 weeks post-RT. The main objective of the study was to compare overall survival between the two randomized treatment groups. Patients were stratified by tumor size, histology, and degree of weight loss. RESULTS: Sixty-two assessable patients were randomized to receive RT alone, and 61 to the combined arm. Patients characteristics were as follows: squamous cell cancer, 90% versus 85%; weight loss greater than 10 lb, 61% versus 69%; and tumor size, > or = 5 cm, 82% versus 80% on the RT and CT-RT arms, respectively. Systemic side effects, which consisted of nausea, vomiting, and renal and myelosuppression, occurred more frequently on the combined arm, while local side effects were similar in both groups. With a minimum follow-up time of 5 years for all patients, the median survival duration was 14.1 months and the 5-year survival rate was 27% in the combined treatment group, while the median survival duration was 9.3 months with no patients alive at 5 years in the RT-alone group (P < .0001). Additional patients (69) were treated with the same combined therapy and were analyzed. The results of the last group confirmed all of the results obtained with combined CT-RT in the randomized trial, with a median survival duration of 17.2 months and 3-year survival rate of 30%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that cisplatin and 5FU infusion given during and post-RT of 50 Gy is statistically superior to standard 64-Gy RT alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) consensus guidelines for brachytherapy of esophageal cancer. Clinical Research Committee, American Brachytherapy Society, Philadelphia, PA.

INTRODUCTION: There is wide variation in the indications, treatment regimens, and dosimetry for brachytherapy in the treatment of cancer of the esophagus. No guidelines for optimal therapy currently exist. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Utilizing published reports and clinical experience, representatives of the Clinical Research Committee of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) formulated guidelines for brachytherapy in esophageal cancer. RESULTS: Recommendations were made for brachytherapy in the definitive and palliative treatment of esophageal cancer. (A) Definitive treatment: Good candidates for brachytherapy include patients with unifocal thoracic adeno- or squamous cancers < or = 10 cm in length, with no evidence of intra-abdominal or metastatic disease. Contraindications include tracheal or bronchial involvement, cervical esophagus location, or stenosis that cannot be bypassed. The esophageal brachytherapy applicator should have an external diameter of 6-10 mm. If 5FU-based chemotherapy and 45-50-Gy external beam are used, recommended brachytherapy is either: (i) HDR 10 Gy in two weekly fractions of 5 Gy each; or (ii) LDR 20 Gy in a single course at 0.4-1 Gy/hr. All doses are specified 1 cm from the midsource or mid-dwell position. Brachytherapy should follow external beam radiation therapy and should not be given concurrently with chemotherapy. (B) Palliative treatment: Patients with adeno- or squamous cancers of the thoracic esophagus with distant metastases or unresectable local disease progression/recurrence after definitive radiation treatment should be considered for brachytherapy with palliative intent. After limited dose (30 Gy) EBRT, the recommended brachytherapy is either: (i) HDR 10-14 Gy in one or two fractions; or (ii) LDR 20-25 Gy in a single course at 0.4-1 Gy/hr. The need for external beam radiation in newly diagnosed patients with a life expectancy of less than 3 months is controversial. In these cases, HDR of 15-20 Gy in two to four fractions or LDR of 25-40 Gy at 0.4-1 Gy/hr may be of benefit. CONCLUSION: ABS guidelines for esophageal brachytherapy now exist and will be updated by the ABS in the future, as clinical data using more uniform treatment techniques becomes available.

Dosimetry of rotational photon fields with gravity-oriented eye blocks.

Evolving radiotherapeutic technique is aimed at routine use of an eye protection accessory with uniformity of dose to facial tumors. Rotational 4 MV photon fields with gravity-oriented eye blocks are described in applications to patients and a phantom. A machine-oriented compensator with a slit and beveled edges at eye levels has been applied to increase uniformity of dose over the entire target, including partly blocked regions. Treatment planning parameters are derived from simple geometric relationships. Dose distributions and average tissue-air ratios (TAR) are calculated with a conventional radiotherapeutic treatment planning system, and measured during initial treatments via thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLD) in facial cavities. Machine monitor units of initial treatments (MU1) are calculated from prescribed dose D, TAR, percentage isodose lines, dose rates in air, and compensator transmission; for subsequent treatments, MU1 are modified using averages of unblocked target doses D measured during initial treatment: MU2 = (D/D)MU1. Doses measured on patients' eyelids have been 10 to 15% of prescribed dose. Three dimensional dose distributions were determined using TLD in an anthropomorphic phantom. With beam compensation, eye doses were 15% of unblocked target doses, doses to partly blocked target were 86 to 129% of unblocked target doses, and doses to unblocked target showed 5% mean standard deviations. In vivo and in phantom data were consistent with computer-calculated distributions. For uniformity of target dose, eye-sparing, and simplicity of irradiating tumors surrounding the eyes, the technique investigated compares favorably with conventional techniques.

A phase I/II study to evaluate accelerated fractionation via concomitant boost for squamous, adeno, and large cell carcinoma of the lung: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 84-07.

PURPOSE: A Phase I/II trial was conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group from 1984 to 1989 for 355 evaluable patients with non-small-cell lung cancer to assess tolerance to and efficacy of accelerated fractionation irradiation via concomitant boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS: "Large" fields (primary tumor and locoregional lymph nodes) received 1.8 Gy followed after 4 to 6 hr by 1.8 Gy two to three times weekly to reduced "boost" fields (primary and involved nodes only). The total doses escalated during the study and started with 63 Gy in 5 weeks (45 Gy "large" field and 18 Gy "boost") for 61 patients. After follow-up for ongoing toxicity assessment, the total dose was increased to 70.2 Gy in 5.5 weeks (50.4 Gy "large" field and 19.8 Gy "boost") for the next 180 patients. The last 114 patients received 70.2 Gy in 5 weeks (45 Gy "large" field and 25.2 Gy "boost"). RESULTS: Pretreatment patient characteristics were well balanced between the three treatment arms. Grade 3 acute toxicity was 7% for the 63 Gy arm; it was 14% and 17% for the two 70 Gy arms. Grade 4 or greater acute toxicities (esophagitis and pneumonitis) were 2 to 3% for all three arms. Late toxicities ranged between 5 and 9% (> or = Grade 3) and 0 to 2% (> or = Grade 4), not statistically different among the three arms. There was no difference between the three regimens in median survival (9 months) or 1-year survival (39 to 44%). However, the 2-year survivals ranged from 16% (63 Gy) to 21% ("shortened" 70.2 Gy). Among 176 patients who had the same criteria as Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 84-33 (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging, 1984, Stage III; Karnofsky performance status 70 to 100; < 6% weight loss), the 2-year survival rates ranged from 18 to 22%. CONCLUSION: Concomitant boost accelerated fractionation irradiation regimens for non-small cell lung cancer may offer improved long-term survival without enhanced late toxicity. While acute toxicity is somewhat increased, further refinement of the relationship of "large" to "boost" field doses may improve the therapeutic ratio. Further Phase I/II testing seems justified and necessary, before concomitant boost accelerated fractionation irradiation is tested in Phase III trials for NSCLC.

Phase I/II study of treatment of locally advanced (T3/T4) non-oat cell lung cancer with concomitant boost radiotherapy by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG 83-12): long-term results.

PURPOSE: This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of high dose-per-fraction radiotherapy given to the tumor primary concurrently with conventional fractionated radiotherapy to the electively irradiated regional lymph nodes (concomitant boost). This article reports the late results of toxicity and survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-nine patients with histologically proven clinical Stage T3-T4, N1-3 nonsmall cell lung cancer were prospectively enrolled in this study. Fifty-six were evaluable for late effects. The treatment delivered 2.68 Gy daily to the primary tumor, 5 days a week, to a total dose of 75 Gy in 28 fractions in 5.5 weeks. At the same treatment sessions, the electively irradiated nodal areas received 1.8 Gy daily, 5 days per week, to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. All doses were calculated with heterogeneity corrections for lung density. RESULTS: Presently, one patient remains alive at 7.7 years. Median survival was 10.0 months with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 41%, 25%, 18%, and 4%, respectively. Three patients developed severe late complications, including pulmonary fibrosis and osteonecrosis. The remainder of the patients, however, developed only grade 1 or 2 pulmonary fibrosis and/or pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: We conclude that concomitant boost radiotherapy in the manner reported resulted in acceptable late toxicity. The 2- and 3-year survivals compared favorably with the best-reported results in the literature with either hyperfractionated or chemoradiotherapy treatment. Studies that deliver higher radiotherapy doses to the gross tumor combined with chemotherapy are in order.

A phase I/II study of external beam radiation, brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy in localized cancer of the esophagus (RTOG 92-07): preliminary toxicity report.

PURPOSE: A multi-institutional, prospective study was designed to determine the feasibility and tolerance of external beam irradiation plus concurrent chemotherapy and esophageal brachytherapy (EB) in a potentially curable group of patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Planned treatment was 50 Gy external beam radiation (25 fractions/5 weeks) followed 2 weeks later by EB [either high dose rate (HDR) 5 Gy, weeks 8, 9, and 10, for a total of 15 Gy, or low dose rate (LDR) 20 Gy, week 8]. The protocol was later revised to delete the LDR alternative, owing to poor accrual, and to decrease the HDR dose to 10 Gy (i.e. 5 Gy, weeks 8 and 9). Chemotherapy was given weeks 1, 5, 8, and 11 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg2/m per 24 h, 96-h infusion. The study closed in January 1995 after 56 patients had been entered on the HDR arm. Six patients were declared ineligible owing to tumor extension to the gastroesophageal junction (three patients) or involved celiac lymph nodes (three patients). Of the 50 eligible patients, the planned EB dose was 15 and 10 Gy in 40 and 10 patients, respectively. Forty-six (92%) of the eligible patients had squamous histology, and three (6%) adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: Life-threatening toxicity or treatment-related death occurred in 13 (26%) and 4 (8%) of the 50 eligible patients, respectively. Treatment-related esophageal fistulas occurred in three patients (12% overall, 14% of patients starting EB) at 0.5-6.2 months from the first day of brachytherapy, leading to death in three. The fourth death was secondary to renal toxicity and infection attributed to chemotherapy. No correlation was found between the development of fistula and location of primary tumor, brachytherapy active length or applicator diameter. So far, 5 of the 6 treatment-related fistulas have occurred following 15 Gy EB. The other fistula occurred after only 5 Gy of a planned 15 Gy was delivered. CONCLUSION: Thirty-five patients (70%) were able to complete external beam, EB, and at least two courses of chemotherapy. Estimated survival rate at 12 months is 48%, with an estimated 11-month median survival rate. Survival following external beam radiation plus concurrent chemotherapy and EB does not appear to be significantly different from survival seen following external beam radiation and chemotherapy only. The development of six fistulas in the 35 patients completing EB is of concern. Based on the high incidence of fistulas, we urge extreme caution in employing EB as a boost following concurrent external beam radiation and chemotherapy.

Transmission blocks: clinical and biological rationales.

This paper describes the clinical and biological rationales for the use of transmission blocks. Clinical advantages over the use of full-thickness blocks applied part way through the course of therapy include the use of only one set of fields, blocks, and beam calculations, and less complex chart recording. There is a net saving in time required for the preparation and treatment of the patient. There is also a quality assurance advantage since the impact of a potential error in block positioning is reduced. In terms of biological advantages, it is demonstrated that the linear-quadratic iso-effect model can be applied to predict an improvement of up to 10% in the therapeutic ratio if transmission blocks are used instead of full-thickness blocks.

Initial experience with a practical hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy regimen.

This paper presents early results of a trial of a three-fractions-per-day (TID) regimen that is more convenient to schedule than the Continuous Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) protocol currently being tested in Europe. The treatment schedule used in the CHART regimen has been modified from 36 fractions of 1.5 Gy TID in 12 days to 72 fractions of 1.1 Gy in 24 treatment days, with all fractions delivered during normal working hours. With no weekend treatments, the entire course of radiotherapy is completed in less than 5 weeks. The doses used were determined using the L-Q model, with correction for incomplete repair between fractions and for accelerated repopulation of cancer cells. Comparison with historical controls shows statistically significant improvements both in CR rates for the primary tumor and in acute toxicity, as measured by reduced treatment interruptions. L-Q model calculations predict that, compared to the highest dose achieved in previous studies without exceeding tolerance, we are able to obtain a 12% increase in bioeffect dose to the primary tumor due to accelerating the treatment. An analysis of the potential tumoricidal effectiveness of this new treatment regimen shows that it should be better than several other accelerated fractionation schedules being tested for all values of Tpot. For short Tpot times, the advantage may be as much as one log cell kill, corresponding to a 10-15% potential improvement in local control.

Post-operative thoracic irradiation with or without levamisole in non-small cell lung cancer: results of a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study.

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group conducted a Phase III single blind trial to evaluate the addition of Levamisole to post-operative thoracic irradiation (200 cGy five times weekly to a total of 5000 cGy plus 1000 cGy boost) in patients with resected RTOG Stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer with positive nodes. Between February 1980 and February 1983, 74 patients from 18 RTOG institutions were randomized; accrual to this study was prematurely terminated due to poor accrual and the inferior survival observed in the levamisole-treated patients on another RTOG trial. Sixty-four patients were evaluable; 32 assigned to levamisole and 32 were assigned to placebo. Over 95% of the patients have been followed for a minimum of 4 years or to death. Two patients on placebo and 5 on levamisole experienced Grade 3 pneumonitis or esophagitis; 1 patient on placebo and 2 on levamisole experienced Grade 3 pulmonary fibrosis. Three patients on levamisole experienced other Grade 3 or 4 toxicity: 1 case of intractable nausea and vomiting and 2 with Grade 4 neutropenia (less than 500 per mm3). There were no fatal complications. Median disease-free survival was 13 months in the placebo group and 9 months for the levamisole group. Median time to distant metastases was 18 and 12 months, and median survival was 20 and 13 months, respectively. We concluded that this study failed to demonstrate an advantage for levamisole.

Chemo/radiation with and without surgery in the thoracic esophagus: the Wayne State experience.

Wayne State University was the site of one of the initial experiences with combination chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. This review analyzes all the patients seen with thoracic esophageal carcinoma from 1980 to 1984 inclusive, plus an additional 22 patient pilot study. The great majority of patients seen were treated with combination radiation and chemotherapy, which may have a greater applicability than dose esophagectomy. Eighty-nine patients completed planned preoperative treatment consisting of (5-FU cisplatin and radiation therapy). Of these patients, 39 patients refused or were not offered surgery, and 4 patients are still alive and well several years from treatment initiation. Fifty patients underwent esophagectomy. Twelve of this patients were free of tumor at esophagectomy, and 4 of these are still alive and well several years from treatment. One patient with residual tumor in the esophagectomy specimen alone is still alive. Because of disappointing results and surgical mortality risk, 22 patients were entered on the pilot study, increasing the tumor dose of 5,000 cGy, and increasing chemotherapy to 4 courses. Six patients are still alive in this small series. Since the results of radiation and chemotherapy combination approximates that of best prior trials of radiation therapy alone, a randomized study has been initiated comparing these treatment plans to determine if the combination of radiation and chemotherapy is superior to radiation alone.

Preoperative radiation and chemotherapy for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a RTOG Study.

Forty-one evaluable patients with localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus were treated by a course of radiation therapy (3000 cGy in 3 weeks), 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Cis-platinum (Pt). This was followed by an esophagectomy in medically eligible patients who agreed to the procedure and who had no evidence of extrathoracic tumor. If tumor was found in the specimen, an added 2000 cGy of radiation therapy and additional 5-FU and Pt were given. One-year survival was 44%, 2-year survival 15%, and 3-year survival 8%. All 3-year survivors had tumor-free specimens, but one patient with tumor in the thorax and subdiaphragmatic metastasis survived 2 years.

Phase II study of hyperfractionated radiotherapy and concurrent weekly alternating chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

Despite recent advances in combined modality therapy, long-term survival remains elusive in most patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The present study was designed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy and weekly, alternating-regimen chemotherapy. Twelve patients with limited-stage SCLC and performance status 0-1 were treated with cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2, etoposide 100 mg/m2, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 every other week, and vincristine 1 mg/m2 on day 8, and ifosfamide 1.2 mg/m2 on days 8 and 9 every other week. Hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy, consisting of three daily doses of 1.1 Gy for 20 days to a total dose of 66 Gy, was started on day 1 of chemotherapy. Ten patients (83%) exhibited an objective response (9 CRs and 1 PR) with a median duration of response of 8.6 months. Two complete responders died at 50 and 53 months without evidence of progression and two remain alive and free of SCLC at 73 and 87 months. Median survival was 19.8 months with 2- and 5-year survival rates of 50 and 17%, respectively. Severe toxicity, including grade 3-4 esophagitis (67%) and granulocytopenia (83%), as well as debilitating fatigue and pneumonitis, prompted early termination of the trial. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and concurrent weekly alternating-regimen chemotherapy resulted in promising response and survival rates, but induced excessive toxicity, in patients with limited-stage SCLC.

Recursive partitioning analysis of 1592 patients on four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group studies in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Survival outcome of 1592 analyzable patients on four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) studies in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer were studied utilizing a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). This approach creates a regression tree according to prognostic variables which partitions into homogenous subsets according to survival. Four protocols, RTOG 83-11, 83-21, 84-03 and 84-07 were analyzed. 83-11 and 84-07 were studies utilizing irradiation with alterfractionation; 83-21 and 84-03 were studies evaluating thymocin with irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation with thoracic irradiation respectively. Nine pretreatment variables and one treatment variable were analyzed. Adjustment for radiotherapy effect was made in the accelerated treatment protocol (84-07). Overall, median survival for the entire group was 9.0 months with 17% alive at 2 years. Univariate analysis suggests that KPS, < or = 70 vs. 80-100, pleural effusion, weight loss, < or = 5% vs. 5%, age, 60+ vs. < 60, T stage (T1 and T2 vs. T3 and T4) and N stage (N- vs. N+) were important prognastic factors. Radiation dose, sex, race and histology were not univariate prognastic factors. RPA identified KPS as the most significant covariate (median survival 5.9 mos. < or = 70 vs. 9.9 mos. 80-100). Within KPS 80-100 other splits occurred for N stage, age, weight loss and radiation therapy dose. KPS < or = 70 split at pleural effusion only. The best overall RPA tree has four distinct classes with median survival times ranging from 3.3 to 12.6 months. The RPA classes were validated in an independent non-small cell lung cancer dataset. This analysis may allow more intelligent stratification and study-design for future RTOG trials in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

The influence of gender on survival and tumor recurrence following adjuvant therapy of completely resected stages II and IIIa non-small cell lung cancer.

This study evaluates the influence of gender on survival and tumor recurrence following adjuvant therapy of completely resected stages II and IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a randomized prospective trial of adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stages II and IIIa NSCLC. A laboratory correlative study assessed the prevalence and prognostic significance of p53 and K-ras mutations. Patients were randomized to receive either radiotherapy (RT) alone or four cycles of cisplatin and VP-16 administered concurrently with radiotherapy (CRT). Median survival was 35 months for the 285 men and 41 months for the 203 women enrolled in the study (P = 0.12). The relative risk (RR) of death for men vs women was 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.49). Median survival of the 147 men and 95 women randomized to the RT arm was 39 months each (P = 0.35). Median survival of the 138 men and 108 women randomized to the CRT arm was 30 and 42 months, respectively (P = 0.18). Disease recurrence patterns were similar between the genders. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated improved survival for women with tumors of non-squamous histology (P < 0.01). The distribution of p53 and K-ras mutations was similar between the genders and had no influence on survival. Gender does not influence survival following adjuvant RT or CRT administered to patients with completely resected stages II and IIIa NSCLC. However, women with non-squamous histology have increased survival when compared to men.

Practical aspects of transmission cord blocks in radiotherapy.

We present the advantages of using partial transmission cord blocks throughout treatment, as opposed to adding full-thickness blocks near the end. Such blocks reduce the risk of block omission or mispositioning and require less total time for construction. We also present an argument for the existence of an optimal width for cord blocks used in mediastinal treatments. A figure of merit has been derived which quantifies the tradeoff between narrow blocks, which increase the variation in dose across the block shadow and the risk of positioning errors, and wide blocks, which may unnecessarily shield potential tumor sites. For 60Co, 4- and 10-MV beams, the figure of merit peaks at block widths of 2.0-2.5 cm at the level of the cord. Effective transmission data for cord blocks constructed of cerrobend are given for those three beams. Quality assurance studies show that transmission through cerrobend blocks can be controlled to the required precision.

Accelerated hyperfractionation for bronchogenic cancer: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9205.

RTOG 92-05 was a phase II trial developed to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and acceptance of a three times daily accelerated hyperfractionation radiation therapy schedule delivering 110 cGy, three times daily, to 79.2 Gy uncorrected tumor dose in 72 fractions, in 24 treatment days, in patients with bronchogenic cancer. The radiographically visible tumor received accelerated hyperfractionation and the other radiation volume received standard hyperfractionation. Three times a day, a dose of 110 cGy was delivered, with an interfractional interval of 4 hours; the middle fraction was a gross tumor boost. This schedule allowed treatment to be completed in approximately 4 1/2 weeks in an effort to minimize repopulation, to have a better biologically modeled therapeutic ratio than other schedules that have been completed in cooperative groups, and to use doses within cooperative group experience. In 33 months 35 patients were entered into the study; 15 of the patients had squamous cell carcinomas, 10 had adenocarcinomas, 8 had large-cell undifferentiated carcinomas, and 2 had unspecified non-small-cell cancers. Nineteen patients had AJCC stage IIIB; 13, IIIA; 14, T4; 10, T3; 13, N2; and 7, N3. Twenty-one patients (60%) had greater than 5% weight loss. The Karnofsky performance status was 90 to 100 in 12 patients and 70 to 80 in 23 patients. Treatment was completed in 91% of patients. Acute toxicity >RTOG grade II occurred in three patients: one skin, one lung, and two esophagus (one each III and IV, the only grade IV in the study). Overall late toxicity > or = grade III occurred in six patients: three lung, one thyroid, one esophagus, and one subcutaneous tissue (all grade III). The median survival was 10.5 months, 1-year survival was 42%, and 3-year survival was 18%. The outcome in this group of patients with many adverse prognostic variables compared favorably to prior RTOG radiation-alone studies.