Complex Transfusion Management in a Sickle Cell Patient With Anti-Fy3 Alloimmunization: A Case Report.

Fy3 is a high-prevalence red blood cell antigen of the Duffy (Fy) blood group system. Anti-Fy3 antibodies are rare and solely arise in individuals with a Duffy null phenotype (Fy(a-b-)), which is a phenotype that mainly occurs in people of African descent. Clinically, anti-Fy3 antibodies can cause both acute and delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions in adults as well as hemolytic disease in fetuses and newborns. Here, we report the case of a 26-year-old male with sickle cell disease (SCD) and a history of anti-E alloantibodies, who was admitted to the hospital with a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and associated low hemoglobin (Hb) level. For the latter he received one unit of antigen-matched and crossmatch-compatible packed red blood cells (pRBCs) without complications. Ten days later the patient was readmitted with a further VOC and associated low Hb level, again requiring a red cell transfusion. However, no crossmatch-compatible pRBCs could be identified. Laboratory testing demonstrated pan-reactivity with additional reference testing demonstrating the presence of anti-E, anti-Fy3 and anti-Jkb alloantibodies. This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges associated with blood transfusion in SCD patients with rare alloimmunization profiles.

Combined Results of Two Cross-Sectional Surveys on the Participation in Clinical Trials and the e-Consent Procedure in the Landscape of Haematology.

Despite the motivation of oncology patients to take part in clinical trials, only a minority of them are enrolled in clinical trials. Implementation of new practical procedures can become a barrier that withholds patients from participating in clinical trials. Treating physicians are crucial in augmenting trial accrual. The drivers that promote physicians to allocate patients for clinical trials need further assessment. We conducted two separate cross-sectional surveys, addressing patients with a haematological disease in one survey and haematologists in another survey. The patient survey was filled out by 420 patients. Significant relationships between the willingness to participate in a trial and trial knowledge (p < 0.001) and between doctor-patient relationship and participation willingness (p = 0.007) were noted. Patients above 60 years were less willing to use an electronic consent procedure vs. patients younger than 60 (p < 0.001). The physician questionnaire was completed by 42 participants of whom most (83%) were active in and (94%) motivated for clinical trials. Apart from the patient benefit and scientific interest, prestige was an equal motivator closely followed by financial remunerations. First goal was not to harm the patient. Our study confirms the high willingness of patients for trial participation and the need to rethink the structure of trial organisation. The e-consent procedure is not the method preferred by most patients above 60 years old.