Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(suppl_3): S228-S237, 2017 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28575355

RESUMO

BACKGROUND.: Variable adherence to standardized case definitions, clinical procedures, specimen collection techniques, and laboratory methods has complicated the interpretation of previous multicenter pneumonia etiology studies. To circumvent these problems, a program of clinical standardization was embedded in the Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health (PERCH) study. METHODS.: Between March 2011 and August 2013, standardized training on the PERCH case definition, clinical procedures, and collection of laboratory specimens was delivered to 331 clinical staff at 9 study sites in 7 countries (The Gambia, Kenya, Mali, South Africa, Zambia, Thailand, and Bangladesh), through 32 on-site courses and a training website. Staff competency was assessed throughout 24 months of enrollment with multiple-choice question (MCQ) examinations, a video quiz, and checklist evaluations of practical skills. RESULTS.: MCQ evaluation was confined to 158 clinical staff members who enrolled PERCH cases and controls, with scores obtained for >86% of eligible staff at each time-point. Median scores after baseline training were ≥80%, and improved by 10 percentage points with refresher training, with no significant intersite differences. Percentage agreement with the clinical trainer on the presence or absence of clinical signs on video clips was high (≥89%), with interobserver concordance being substantial to high (AC1 statistic, 0.62-0.82) for 5 of 6 signs assessed. Staff attained median scores of >90% in checklist evaluations of practical skills. CONCLUSIONS.: Satisfactory clinical standardization was achieved within and across all PERCH sites, providing reassurance that any etiological or clinical differences observed across the study sites are true differences, and not attributable to differences in application of the clinical case definition, interpretation of clinical signs, or in techniques used for clinical measurements or specimen collection.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/etiologia , Manejo de Espécimes/normas , Bangladesh , Criança , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Projetos de Pesquisa Epidemiológica , Feminino , Gâmbia , Hospitais , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Quênia , Masculino , Mali , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/normas , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , África do Sul , Tailândia , Zâmbia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA