Changes in environmental exposures over decades may influence the genetic architecture of severe spermatogenic failure.

STUDY QUESTION: Do the genetic determinants of idiopathic severe spermatogenic failure (SPGF) differ between generations? SUMMARY ANSWER: Our data support that the genetic component of idiopathic SPGF is impacted by dynamic changes in environmental exposures over decades. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The idiopathic form of SPGF has a multifactorial etiology wherein an interaction between genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors leads to the disease onset and progression. At the genetic level, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) allow the analysis of millions of genetic variants across the genome in a hypothesis-free manner, as a valuable tool for identifying susceptibility risk loci. However, little is known about the specific role of non-genetic factors and their influence on the genetic determinants in this type of conditions. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Case-control genetic association analyses were performed including a total of 912 SPGF cases and 1360 unaffected controls. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All participants had European ancestry (Iberian and German). SPGF cases were diagnosed during the last decade either with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia (n = 547) or with idiopathic non-obstructive oligozoospermia (n = 365). Case-control genetic association analyses were performed by logistic regression models considering the generation as a covariate and by in silico functional characterization of the susceptibility genomic regions. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: This analysis revealed 13 novel genetic association signals with SPGF, with eight of them being independent. The observed associations were mostly explained by the interaction between each lead variant and the age-group. Additionally, we established links between these loci and diverse non-genetic factors, such as toxic or dietary habits, respiratory disorders, and autoimmune diseases, which might potentially influence the genetic architecture of idiopathic SPGF. LARGE SCALE DATA: GWAS data are available from the authors upon reasonable request. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Additional independent studies involving large cohorts in ethnically diverse populations are warranted to confirm our findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Overall, this study proposes an innovative strategy to achieve a more precise understanding of conditions such as SPGF by considering the interactions between a variable exposome through different generations and genetic predisposition to complex diseases. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the "Plan Andaluz de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (PAIDI 2020)" (ref. PY20_00212, P20_00583), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation (ref. PID2020-120157RB-I00 funded by MCIN/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033), and the 'Proyectos I+D+i del Programa Operativo FEDER 2020' (ref. B-CTS-584-UGR20). ToxOmics-Centre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health, Genetics, Oncology and Human Toxicology, is also partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Projects: UIDB/00009/2020; UIDP/00009/2020). The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Genetic Basis of Keratoconus: New Perspectives for Clinical Translation.

Purpose: Keratoconus (KC) is a corneal disorder with complex etiology, apparently involving both genetic and environmental factors, characterized by progressive thinning and protrusion of the cornea. We aimed to identify novel genetic regions associated with KC susceptibility, elucidate relevant genes for disease development, and explore the translational implications for therapeutic intervention and risk assessment. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) that integrated previously published data with newly generated genotyping data from an independent European cohort. To evaluate the clinical translation of our results, we performed functional annotation, gene prioritization, polygenic risk score (PRS), and drug repositioning analyses. Results: We identified two novel genetic loci associated with KC, with rs2806689 and rs807037 emerging as lead variants (P = 1.71E-08, odds ratio [OR] = 0.88; P = 1.93E-08, OR = 1.16, respectively). Most importantly, we identified 315 candidate genes influenced by confirmed KC-associated variants. Among these, MINK1 was found to play a pivotal role in KC pathogenesis through the WNT signaling pathway. Moreover, we developed a PRS model that successfully differentiated KC patients from controls (P = 7.61E-16; area under the curve = 0.713). This model has the potential to identify individuals at high risk for developing KC, which could be instrumental in early diagnosis and management. Additionally, our drug repositioning analysis identified acetylcysteine as a potential treatment option for KC, opening up new avenues for therapeutic intervention. Conclusions: Our study provides valuable insights into the genetic and molecular basis of KC, offering new targets for therapy and highlighting the clinical utility of PRS models in predicting disease risk.