Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 38(12): 1483-90, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24813369

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic inequalities in obesity are well established in high-income countries. There is a lack of evidence of the types of intervention that are effective in reducing these inequalities among adults. OBJECTIVES: To systematically review studies of the effectiveness of individual, community and societal interventions in reducing socio-economic inequalities in obesity among adults. METHODS: Nine electronic databases were searched from start date to October 2012 along with website and grey literature searches. The review examined the best available international evidence (both experimental and observational) of interventions at an individual, community and societal level that might reduce inequalities in obesity among adults (aged 18 years or over) in any setting and country. Studies were included if they reported a body fatness-related outcome and if they included a measure of socio-economic status. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted using established mechanisms and narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: The 'best available' international evidence was provided by 20 studies. At the individual level, there was evidence of the effectiveness of primary care delivered tailored weight loss programmes among deprived groups. Community based behavioural weight loss interventions and community diet clubs (including workplace ones) also had some evidence of effectiveness-at least in the short term. Societal level evaluations were few, low quality and inconclusive. Further, there was little evidence of long term effectiveness, and few studies of men or outside the USA. However, there was no evidence to suggest that interventions increase inequalities. CONCLUSIONS: The best available international evidence suggests that some individual and community-based interventions may be effective in reducing socio-economic inequalities in obesity among adults in the short term. Further research is required particularly of more complex, multi-faceted and societal-level interventions.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Saúde Pública , Classe Social , Redução de Peso , Programas de Redução de Peso/organização & administração , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Países Desenvolvidos , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Promoção da Saúde/normas , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Áreas de Pobreza , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Programas de Redução de Peso/normas
2.
Obes Rev ; 18(2): 227-246, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27899007

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Ready-to-eat meals sold by food outlets that are accessible to the general public are an important target for public health intervention. We conducted a systematic review to assess the impact of such interventions. METHODS: Studies of any design and duration that included any consumer-level or food-outlet-level before-and-after data were included. RESULTS: Thirty studies describing 34 interventions were categorized by type and coded against the Nuffield intervention ladder: restrict choice = trans fat law (n = 1), changing pre-packed children's meal content (n = 1) and food outlet award schemes (n = 2); guide choice = price increases for unhealthier choices (n = 1), incentive (contingent reward) (n = 1) and price decreases for healthier choices (n = 2); enable choice = signposting (highlighting healthier/unhealthier options) (n = 10) and telemarketing (offering support for the provision of healthier options to businesses via telephone) (n = 2); and provide information = calorie labelling law (n = 12), voluntary nutrient labelling (n = 1) and personalized receipts (n = 1). Most interventions were aimed at adults in US fast food chains and assessed customer-level outcomes. More 'intrusive' interventions that restricted or guided choice generally showed a positive impact on food-outlet-level and customer-level outcomes. However, interventions that simply provided information or enabled choice had a negligible impact. CONCLUSION: Interventions to promote healthier ready-to-eat meals sold by food outlets should restrict choice or guide choice through incentives/disincentives. Public health policies and practice that simply involve providing information are unlikely to be effective.


Assuntos
Dieta Saudável , Fast Foods , Promoção da Saúde , Comportamento de Escolha , Análise Custo-Benefício , Preferências Alimentares , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados não Aleatórios como Assunto , Saúde Pública , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Restaurantes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA