Adjuvant Treatment with 5-Fluorouracil and Oxaliplatin Does Not Influence Cardiac Function, Neurovascular Control, and Physical Capacity in Patients with Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin increases recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with colon adenocarcinoma. It is known that these drugs have been associated with cardio- and neurotoxicity. We investigated the effects of 5-FU ± oxaliplatin on cardiac function, vascular responses, neurovascular control, and physical capacity in patients with colon cancer. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with prior colectomy for stage II-III adenocarcinoma and clinical indication for adjuvant chemotherapy were allocated to receive 5-FU (n = 12) or 5-FU + oxaliplatin (n = 17), according to the oncologist's decision. All the analyses were performed just before and after the end of chemotherapy. Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and speckle tracking, and cardiac autonomic control was assessed by heart rate variability (HRV). Vascular endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was directly recorded by microneurography technique, and muscle blood flow by venous occlusion plethysmography. Physical capacity was evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise test. RESULTS: Chemotherapy (pooled data) did not significantly change left ventricular ejection fraction (58 ± 1 vs. 55 ± 2%, p = .14), longitudinal strain (-18 ± 1 vs. -18 ± 1%, p = .66), and HRV. Likewise, chemotherapy did not significantly change FMD, muscle blood flow, and MSNA (33 ± 2 vs. 32 ± 1 bursts/min, p = .31). Physical capacity was not significantly changed in both groups. Similar findings were observed when the patients were subdivided in 5-FU and 5-FU + oxaliplatin treatment groups. 5-FU and 5-FU + oxaliplatin did not significantly change cardiac function, HRV, vascular responses, MSNA, and physical capacity. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that adjuvant treatment with 5-FU ± oxaliplatin is well tolerated and does not promote changes compatible with long-term cardiotoxicity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin increases recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with colon adenocarcinoma; however, these drugs have been associated with cardio- and neurotoxicity. This study investigated the effects of these drugs on cardiac function, vascular responses, neurovascular control, and physical capacity in patients with colon cancer. It was found that 5-FU and oxaliplatin did not significantly change cardiac function, cardiac autonomic control, vascular endothelial function, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, and physical capacity. This study provides evidence that adjuvant treatment with 5-FU ± oxaliplatin is well tolerated and does not promote changes compatible with long-term cardiotoxicity.

Gastric cancer molecular classification and adjuvant therapy: Is there a different benefit according to the subtype?

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) has been defined in distinct molecular subtypes with different therapeutic implications. However, its clinical significance and prognosis regarding standard chemotherapy (CMT) remains unclear. This study aimed to analyze the impact of perioperative or adjuvant treatment among subtypes of GC. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all stage II/III patients with GC who underwent a curative gastrectomy. Based on immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization techniques, GC was classified into five subtypes: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive, microsatellite instability (MSI), e-cadherin aberrant, p53-aberrant, and p53-normal. RESULTS: Among the 178 CG included, 111 patients received CMT and 67 were treated with surgery alone. Survival analysis showed that p53-aberrant GC treated with CMT had better disease-free survival (DFS) compared with surgery alone (P = .001).There was no significant difference in DFS between patients who received CMT and those with surgery alone for EBV, MSI, E-cadherin, and p53-normal GC. An improvement in overall survival was observed only for E-cadherin (P = .001) and p53-aberrant (P < .001) patients who received CMT. CONCLUSIONS: CMT showed different impact on the survival of CG according to the molecular subtype. No survival benefit was observed for EBV and MSI groups who received CMT. GC with p53-aberrant had a significant benefit in survival with standard therapy.

Venous thromboembolism and cancer: a systematic review.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious and potentially fatal disorder, which is often associated with a significant impact on the quality of life and on the clinical outcome of cancer patients. The pathophysiology of the association between thrombosis and cancer is complex: malignancy is associated with a baseline hypercoagulable state due to many factors including release of inflammatory cytokines, activation of the clotting system, expression of hemostatic proteins on tumor cells, inhibition of natural anticoagulants, and impaired fibrinolysis. Several risk factors, related to the patient, the disease, and the therapeutic interventions, have been identified as contributing to the occurrence of VTE. There is convincing evidence to recommend the use of heparins or fondaparinux for prevention of VTE in selected cancer patients, and, especially in some particular types of malignancies and cancer treatments. Management of VTE in patients with cancer is more challenging and bleeding complications associated with the use of anticoagulants are significantly higher in cancer patients than in those without malignancy. Important issues that need to be considered in all cases are interference with anticancer therapy, inconvenience of treatment, and impact on quality of life.

Phase II trial of romidepsin (NSC-630176) in previously treated colorectal cancer patients with advanced disease: a Southwest Oncology Group study (S0336).

INTRODUCTION: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progress on standard chemotherapy have limited treatment options. New and effective drugs are needed for these patients. Romidepsin is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that can alter chromatin structure and gene transcription leading to multiple changes in cellular protein production. This may result in cell cycle arrest and tumor growth inhibition. Romidepsin has shown anti-proliferative activity in vitro against multiple mouse and human tumor cell lines and in vivo in human tumor xenograft models. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have pathologically verified, measurable, metastatic or locally advanced colorectal cancer that was surgically unresectable. They must have failed either one or two prior chemotherapy regimens, had performance status of 0-1, adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function, and no significant cardiac disease. Patients were treated with romidepsin at a dose of 13 mg/m(2) as a 4-h iv infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The study had a two stage design. The primary objective of the study was to determine the confirmed response probability in this group of patients treated with romidepsin. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were registered to the study, two of whom were ineligible. One eligible patient refused all treatment and was not analyzed. For the 25 remaining patients, performance status was 0 in 16 patients and 1 in nine patients. Ten patients had received one prior chemotherapy regimen and fifteen 2 prior regimens. Out of the 25 eligible and analyzable patients accrued in the first stage of the protocol, no objective responses were observed and the study was permanently closed. Four patients had stable disease as the best response. Twenty-five patients were assessed for toxicity. No grade 4 or greater toxicities were seen. Fourteen of the 25 patients experienced grade 3 toxicities the most common of which were fatigue or anorexia. CONCLUSION: Romidepsin at this dose and schedule is ineffective in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after prior chemotherapy. Future trials might evaluate combinations of romidepsin with chemotherapeutic or other agents.

Rare tumors research in emerging countries.

Rare tumors, when considered as a group, represent a significant burden to society as they may account for up to 25% of the mortality by cancer in nations like the United States. In contrast with the current scenario in highly incident cancer types, little progress has been achieved in the treatment of the most rare cancers. The reasons for this apparent stagnation are mostly intrinsic to logistical difficulties in performing large clinical trials in rare diseases and will be addressed further in this article. Because both cancer incidence and clinical research are booming in emerging nations, we also aim to address the current and future role of these countries in research and the drug development process in rare tumor types.